Telangana's seed law may encounter Centre's roadblock
Hyderabad: Telangana's efforts to formulate its own seed legislation may face delays as the Centre recently advised the Haryana govt to hold off creating its own Seed Act.
Haryana's seed law, which was passed in the assembly this year, aims to impose strict penalties on companies supplying spurious or low-quality seeds, but the Centre indicated that it would soon introduce amendments to the
Central Seed Act
of 1966.
Haryana's law includes provisions for imprisonment of up to two years and fines of up to 3 lakh for such companies.
In response to numerous complaints from farmers' associations regarding issues with spurious seeds, the Haryana govt had decided to bring in its own regulations. Under the 1966 Seed Act, however, the penalties for companies or individuals involved in producing or selling counterfeit, adulterated, or substandard seeds were minimal, with a maximum fine of only 500 for the first offence.
A top Telangana govt official noted, "Under the Central (Seed) Act, companies bear no liability or punishment, and despite supplying fake seeds, states were prohibited from enacting their own laws." The Centre's argument was that while agriculture was a state subject, the Seed Act covers multiple states and involves all states; therefore, only the Centre could amend or create laws related to seeds.
Sources privy to the developments stated, "We must explore alternative solutions to address these problems and will consider other means." Incidentally, Telangana had encountered a similar situation in 2017 when it attempted to formulate its own Seed Act, but the Centre urged the state to wait for forthcoming amendments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mumbai: No relief for six defaulter flat buyers in Chembur project
MUMBAI : In a recent order, MahaRERA granted no relief to six flat purchasers, stating that since they defaulted on payments, they were not entitled to the relief they sought under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. Of the six flat purchasers, five sought a refund of certain amounts they paid as they wished to withdraw from the residential project in Chembur , and one wanted to continue but sought more time to pay. Godrej Developers terminated their bookings by seeking to forfeit the booking amounts. The allottees challenged the forfeiture and sought a refund under Section 18 of the RERA Act on the grounds of wanting to withdraw from the project. One of the buyers who filed the complaint before MahaRERA said he wanted to withdraw from the project and sought orders to direct the builder to refund the amount, as due to the Covid pandemic at the time, he was unable to invest huge sums in the project. All complainants said they suffered financial and personal loss during the Covid-19 pandemic, the effects of which they are facing even today. Advocate Pulkit Agarwal, representing four complainants, argued that they wished to withdraw since the builder served them termination letters, "stating that the entire amount that the complainant paid stands forfeited and the complainants were ordered to return all the documents regarding their units". For Godrej, advocate Abhijeet Mangade argued that the reliefs claimed by individual complainants were not based on any violation or non-compliance of RERA Act by the developer, but the buyers failed to pay on time. MahaRERA chairperson, Manoj Saunik, in his order, said since the allottees defaulted on their obligations by failing to make remaining payments on time as per the agreement, "the authority finds that the six complainants are not entitled to reliefs under Section 18". MahaRERA upheld the termination notice sent by the builder to the buyer with whom an agreement was made, but directed a refund of money strictly according to the terms of the agreement to the buyer in 60 days. MahaRERA said it was pertinent to note that under Section 19(6), the allottee is under obligation to make timely payments in the manner prescribed in the agreement. One of the functions of the authority is to ensure compliance with the obligations cast upon the allottees. The Chembur project got part occupancy certificates in March 2022 and Dec 2023.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
LG VK Saxena permits cutting of 27 trees to make way for flyover in northeast Delhi
New Delhi: Delhi Lt Governor VK Saxena on Wednesday permitted cutting or transplanting 27 trees in a 2.16-hectare area coming in way of a flyover project in Nand Nagri in the city's northeast. The construction of a 1.5-kilometre flyover between Mandoli prison and the Gagan Cinema intersection has been underway since 2023. "In a major decision that would help clear the last hurdle in the way of infrastructure development in Northeast Delhi, LG VK Saxena has granted approval for the exemption of a 2.16-hectare area for transplantation/cutting of 27 trees for a flyover project at the Nand Nagri-Gagan cinema junction," a statement from the Public Works Department said. The flyover was supposed to be completed last year, but the project hit a roadblock because of trees in the way, PWD said. The agency said the tree cutting permission was granted under Section 29 of the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act (DPTA), 1994, and after consultation with the Department of Forest and Wildlife. According to forest officials, PWD had submitted a formal request to it seeking permission to transplant trees for the construction of the project. The PWD said the proposal has already been cleared by the environment department, the chief secretary, the environment minister, and Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. "This flyover project will address the long-pending issue of traffic jams and commuting in the area," it added. Section 29 of the DPTA Act 1994 states, "Government may, if it considers it necessary to do so in the public interest, by notification, exempt any area or any species of trees from all or any of the provisions of this Act." With an outlay of Rs 241 crore, the project involves the construction of an elevated corridor, footpaths, drainage systems, and rainwater harvesting facilities. Almost 85 per cent of the work has been completed.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Karnataka High Court warns against weaponisation of law
BENGALURU: Courts must remain vigilant against the weaponisation of criminal law in civil disputes as the law, when misused, ceases to be a shield and becomes a sword, the Karnataka High Court said while quashing a case under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court was hearing a petition filed by realtor Vilas Bhormalji Oswal from Solapur, Maharashtra, questioning the proceedings pending before a special court brought about by his business partner under provisions of the IPC and SC/ST Act. 'The complainant, to wreak vengeance or arm-twist the petitioner over a financial dispute, has made use of the criminal justice system. The complaint is a blade of vengeance, cloaked in the garb of law. A criminal trial, if permitted to proceed, would amount to an egregious abuse of legal machinery,' said Justice M Nagaprasanna. The court said apart from the delay of 118 days in lodging the complaint before the Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement, which sat on it for over three years, no casteist remark was made. A financial dispute between two partners is projected to become a crime, court said. The complainant Somashekara, Oswal and two others were partners in a real estate firm, Green Land Infra, in the city. The dispute surfaced because the petitioner did not sign several documents, resulting in various developments being stalled. The petitioner allegedly threatened the complainant with dire consequences if he did not receive his invested money back from the firm and hurled abuses on December 23, 2020.
