Restaurant in Glasgow's West End sold to the Scotsman Group
Ownership of the Ruthven Lane eatery will be transferred from the Metropolitan Pub Company (MPC) to the Scotsman Group, owned by Glasgow businessman Stefan King, at the end of August.
In a statement confirming the sale, the MPC stated that the decision to sell a property 'is never an easy one'.
It is understood that the company is working with staff at the Hanoi Bike Shop and has 'opportunities' for them to remain within the MPC.
READ NEXT: Much-loved Glasgow bar to close temporarily - here's why
A spokesperson for Metropolitan Pub Company said: 'We have made the decision to sell the Hanoi Bike Shop, which will transfer from our ownership to the Scotsman Group at the end of August.
'Making the decision to sell a property is never an easy one; however, following a recent review, we have found the Hanoi no longer fits with our future portfolio.
'We want to thank the Hanoi's customers for their support over the years.'
The MPC also operates Stravaigin and the Ubiquitous Chip, both in the city's West End.
The Ubiquitous Chip is currently closed whilst it undergoes a multi-million pound restoration to rejuvenate it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 hours ago
- Reuters
South Korea, Vietnam leaders to pledge deeper ties amid trade challenges
SEOUL, Aug 11 (Reuters) - South Korea and Vietnam will pledge deeper economic and strategic cooperation when their leaders hold a summit on Monday as the former Cold War-era foes seek to leverage their business ties to navigate a challenging global trading environment. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung hosts Vietnamese leader Lam To as his first state guest since taking office on June 4 and will discuss promoting trade and investment in the Southeast Asian country, Lee's office said. Lam, who is the Vietnamese Communist Party general secretary, leads a delegation of industry, trade, foreign and technology ministers and senior party and parliament members on the four-day state visit. The countries plan to sign at least 10 memoranda of understanding at the summit meeting, pledging cooperation in nuclear and renewable energy, monetary and financial policies, and science and technology, Lee's office said. The rare visit by the Vietnamese leader is expected to contribute to a favourable condition for South Korean businesses to invest in major infrastructure and nuclear energy projects planned in Vietnam, it said. A number of major South Korean companies including Samsung Electronics have used Vietnam as an export hub, benefiting for years from lower labour costs, generous tax incentives and Hanoi's numerous free trade pacts with dozens of countries. But the trade policy of U.S. President Donald Trump, who imposed sweeping new tariffs on the Asian countries in recent weeks, has increased uncertainty over future business commitments, with Vietnamese official data showing a slowdown in new investment. South Korean companies have been cited as potential investors in Vietnam's planned nuclear energy, LNG power plants and high-speed rail projects. Trump has imposed a tariff rate of 15% for South Korean goods and 20% for imports from Vietnam.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
The Bank of England has left Britain open to speculative attack
On Thursday, the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) lowered the UK's main benchmark interest rate from 4.25pc to 4pc. This headline borrowing cost has now been cut five times since last August, falling incrementally from its post-Covid peak of 5.25pc. Had I been one of the nine MPC members, I'd have voted to hold the Bank's interest rate where it was. This cut was a significant error, further damaging the UK's policymaking credibility. I fear it will come back to bite us. Yes, the decision was close – the committee was split five-to-four. With the economy stalled, political and media pressure to try boosting growth via cheaper borrowing was intense. Kudos to MPC members who held firm. But this rate cut was so off-beam, so difficult to justify, that the strong impression has been created, again, that the MPC as a whole, far from being a highly-expert body collectively committed to keeping inflation as close to the 2pc target as possible, is dominated by careerist operatives ultimately serving their political masters. After the Covid pandemic, the MPC made countless errors throughout 2021, waiting far too long to raise rates, oblivious to looming price pressures. Inflation subsequently hit a 30-year high, before Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with related energy-price fall-out then pushing prices even higher. UK inflation, again, is high and is rising. The consumer price index (CPI) increased 3.6pc during the year to June, up from 3.4pc the previous month. Headline CPI inflation has been consistently way above 2pc since last October – and shows no sign of falling soon. The National Institute for Economic and Social Research reckons inflation will rise even more over the coming months, remaining well above 2pc throughout 2026 – driven by food, utility and transport prices. Even the Bank of England just upped its forecast, saying CPI growth will hit 4pc this autumn. Yet the MPC cut rates regardless. So why can't I find a single compelling reason in the minutes of the MPC's latest deliberations why the majority of members think price pressure will ease anytime soon, let alone fast enough to justify dropping rates, when headline inflation, on the Bank's own figures, it's about to be double the official target. Wage growth remains elevated at 5pc-plus, which will keep driving inflation. Trade tensions and other global supply chain issues pose further upside risks. Stand-offs in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine remain highly unpredictable. We could yet endure spikes in the price of oil, gas, grain and/or fertiliser, the soaring costs of which saw inflation peak at over 11pc in the autumn of 2022. Yes, the UK economy is slowing – but the traditional view that MPC rate cuts energize household spending via lower mortgage rates is outdated. Depleted home-ownership among young adults means just a third of households have a mortgage these days – and around 90pc of those are on fixed rates. Any immediate consumption boost will be marginal. Anyway, the MPC's job is to focus on inflation. There is no 'dual mandate' to target both prices and output, as at the US Federal Reserve. That's because the pound, unlike the dollar, isn't the world's reserve currency. Since mid-June, in fact, as data showing GDP contractions in both April and May has emerged, sterling has dropped around 1.5pc against the dollar and 2.5pc against the euro. Thursday's rate cut could soon weaken the pound more, pushing up inflation via higher import prices – an ongoing danger in the UK, now a heavy net-importer of both energy and food. Following the MPC's announcement last week, the Labour party put a graph on social media showing incremental rises in the Bank of England's policy rate during 2022 and into 2023 'under the Tories', compared to five rate cuts 'with Labour' since the party took office in July 2024. 'Speaks for itself' was the headline. It certainly does – illustrating a woeful lack of judgement regarding economic policymaking. The Bank of England is supposed to be independent – and at a time when the UK's monetary policy regime is under extreme scrutiny, with financial markets already furrowing their collective brow as to why the central bank of a nation with easily the highest inflation in the G7 is cutting rates, it is deeply damaging for the Government to then claim credit for the Bank's rate cuts. On top of that, a major reason inflation remains high is the Government's own policies. Labour's higher employer national insurance contributions and above-inflation minimum wage increases have sent business costs soaring – which are being largely passed on to consumers. Far from borrowing costs coming down under Labour, as the party claims on social media, the interest rates that really count – those dictated by financial markets – have been moving entirely in the opposite direction. The UK's 30-year gilt yield was 5.32pc on Tuesday, prior to the MPC's announcement. At the time of writing, it is 5.43pc – significantly higher, despite the Bank's cut. Since last July, Government borrowing costs have gone through the roof, even though the Bank's 'policy' rate has been moved entirely in the opposite direction – a sign of growing financial instability. So the MPC's unjustified rate cut, far from lowering economy-wide borrowing costs, has pushed them up further, as financial markets sense panic amongst policymakers and dismiss official claims inflation will soon be subdued. Over the coming months, as Labour's fiscal management falls to pieces, with spending and borrowing spinning even further out of control, yields will almost certainly rise even more. And as these market rates and the Bank's policy rate continue to move against each other, the gap between them getting wider, that signals trouble, making our sovereign debt and currency more vulnerable to speculative attack.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: We can fight inflation - here's how
Stand by for another surge in inflation. It will happen here and we have a poor record on it compared with the rest of the developed world. But this is a global thing, not just a British one, and we have to arm ourselves against it. We had a glimpse of our own future last week. The Bank of England expects inflation to rise through the autumn and it looks as though it will hit 4 per cent in October, double its target. Indeed inflation will probably stay above target right through next year and beyond. So what does the Bank do? It cuts interest rates. True, there were four sensible members of the Monetary Policy Committee who voted against the cut and it looks like there will be no further cuts this year. I still expect the next movement to be up, not down, though so far I have been ahead of the market on that. It's not all the fault of the Bank. Much of the blame lies with the Government. Whatever you think about the rises in living wage and National Insurance contributions the fact is they have increased costs, particularly for supermarkets and the hospitality industry. Food prices are 4.5 per cent up on the year, and look like rising further through the autumn. The combination of the Government's net zero and other environmental policies adds 16 per cent to a typical household's electricity bill. That's from a House of Lords study this year. Governments may want to follow these policies but they need to be honest about their impact on inflation and hence on living standards. The UK has become an outlier on inflation, but we seem likely to be joined by the US, which matters vastly more for the world. There's the whole business about Donald Trump's attacks on the chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, and who he might appoint to succeed him. We can assume that, whoever it is, the US will have looser monetary policies next year. More immediately there is the effect of tariffs, which put up prices not just in America but everywhere. We don't know by how much, because the tariffs are only just coming in, but we do know that anything that gums up global trade raises costs. We all pay for that in higher inflation. So what's to be done? Here there's a glimmer of hope. It's competition. Politicians don't really care about price rises; they say they do, but they don't. Central banks everywhere have underestimated the danger of the resurgence of inflation, and now are, with the possible exception of the European Central Bank, too weak to take the steps needed to crush it. But the private sector can and must help. An example. You may have noticed a story last week that Lidl has replaced Aldi as Britain's cheapest supermarket. We're supposed to be good at retailing, Napoleon's jibe that we were 'a nation of shopkeepers' and all that. But it has taken two German-owned groups to revolutionise our food distribution. Go into Tesco and the signs have a little tick and say Aldi Price Match. They don't say Sainsbury's price match, though that's number two behind it in sales. It's foreign competition that is taming our shopping bills. There's the challenge: to use our power as consumers to squeeze down inflation. If a restaurant imposes an extra charge on a meal, or pads its prices, go elsewhere. If an energy supplier ups the electricity bill, find another. The same goes for other services. If your bank cuts the interest rate on savings, move your cash elsewhere. And so on. It's an attitude to apply to taxation, too. If, as I expect, the Chancellor raises fuel duty and other taxes in the autumn, you follow the incentives. If that means driving (or drinking) less, so be it. We have already seen a response to higher taxation in capital gains tax revenues since the last Government cut the tax-free limits. Many people decided not to take the hit, held on to their assets instead and revenues fell by 18 per cent in the 2023-24 tax year. Ultimately it is not in our power to control inflation. If Government policies push it up and the Bank of England fails to curb it, then it's ordinary people who are hammered. But we can fight back and must do so in the months ahead.
