logo
After rosogolla, Odias and Bengalis fight over Mamata's Jagannath Dham

After rosogolla, Odias and Bengalis fight over Mamata's Jagannath Dham

The Print11-05-2025

Bengalis, it seems, have a peculiar fondness for replicas. During Durga Pujas, Buckingham Palaces, Golden Temples and the Pyramids pop up all over the state – pandals built with bamboo and tarpaulin to house the goddess in the festive season.
Why did Banerjee tread this path? If a temple was her big trip, why a Puri Jagannath lookalike and not something in the tradition of Bengal's own terracotta temples that dot Bishnupur in Bankura district? Alternatively, it could have opted for something original.
In the season of Conclave, what if a church suddenly decided to call itself Vatican — not just a tribute, but a claim to spiritual status? That's what the Mamata Banerjee government effectively did, as far as Odias are concerned, when it named the new Jagannath temple in Digha after Jagannath Dham in Puri, Odisha. For the Odias, this 'appropriation' was the last straw and has put them eyeball to eyeball with the Bengalis like never before.
But those are temporary structures, dismantled once the pujas end. The Jagannath Temple in Digha is permanent, a silent testimony to the Bengalis' copycat gene.
Or, at least, Mamata Banerjee's.
Also read: How a temple inauguration has set off an Odisha-Bengal slugfest & a holy power tussle in Puri
The copycat impulse
A few months after becoming the chief minister in 2011, Banerjee was on her way home via Newtown, parts of which today resemble Gurgaon from 50 years ago, when she suddenly halted her vehicle, got off, and stood to survey 480 acres of green dotted with waterbodies.
On the spot, she declared it a park — and the next thing we know, in 2013, she was inaugurating Eco Park, a brand-new destination in Kolkata a la Victoria Memorial, or the historic Botanical Gardens with the centuries-old Banyan Tree.
That wasn't the end of it. Past the tree-lined boundary came up the Pyramids of Giza, an Eiffel Tower, a Taj Mahal, a Colosseum, and even a towering Christ the Redeemer – all of them exact replicas of the originals in miniature form.
For those who thought it was all faux, Banerjee's acolytes had a pat rejoinder: masterstroke. They would argue that many could afford to fly across the world and see the original in all their glory. But for millions of people in Bengal who could not, the Eco Park replicas offered a taste of global marvels, without leaving the state.
Two years later, London's 315-foot-tall Big Ben sprung up in Kolkata's Lake Town, in a miniature 90-foot avatar, put up there by one of Banerjee's MLAs, clearly taking a leaf out of the boss's book. Today, Big Bens, short and tall, have sprung up all over the place. Clearly the copycat gene is infectious.
This infection knows no border and exists in Bangladesh as well. Back in 2009, journalists from Kolkata who had gone to cover the general election saw a 'Taj Mahal' on the outskirts of Dhaka. The Shah Jahan in this case? A Bangladeshi filmmaker named Ahsanullah Moni, who built the 'Taj Mahal' as a tourist destination and for his movies' song and dance sequences.
Sweet wars
The miniature Taj Mahal never caused any bad blood between India and Bangladesh. But Digha's Jagannath 'Dham' has. There is a lot more bitterness between Odias and Bengalis now than when the battle over the origin of the sweet rosogolla began a few years ago.
In 2017, Bengal, which fought for ownership, got the GI tag, but it was for the Banglar Rasogolla and, two years later, Odisha got the GI for the Odisha rasagola. Since then, peace has held between the two states.
Will the Digha Dham face-off send the respective states to the GI registration office once more? Quarreling over a sweet dish one one thing. But a pow-wow over the name of Lord Jagannath's abode deserves delicate and diplomatic handling.
Imitation may be the best form of flattery but clearly there are exceptions to that rule.
Monideepa Banerjie is a senior journalist based in Kolkata. She tweets @Monideepa62. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abhishek Banerjee vs Rahul Gandhi: Who's Ready To Lead The Opposition Forward?
Abhishek Banerjee vs Rahul Gandhi: Who's Ready To Lead The Opposition Forward?

News18

time4 hours ago

  • News18

Abhishek Banerjee vs Rahul Gandhi: Who's Ready To Lead The Opposition Forward?

Last Updated: In a few months, Bihar and Bengal elections could decide who inherits the opposition's crown Two scions, two of the most powerful leaders of their party, and two inheritors—but that's just about where the similarity ends between Abhishek Banerjee and Rahul Gandhi. Banerjee has taken charge of the party's affairs again, especially when it comes to projecting the national perspective of the Trinamool Congress. After his Pahalgam delegation speech, Banerjee has not only carefully cultivated his image of the general secretary of the TMC but also made people sit up and take note. Superseding Sudip Bandyopadhyay and Yusuf Pathan, Banerjee was chosen to ensure that he comes across as someone who pushes the nationalism narrative. His speech on foreign land, where he said he would continue his fight with the BJP back home but abroad he was the representative of his country, showed his unwavering support to the cause at a challenging juncture. Back home, Banerjee did not waste time and took the lead to ask five questions of the government, including where the Pahalgam terrorists were and why they had not been nabbed yet. The party is set to make this a big issue in Parliament. To be fair, Congress too has raised the issue earlier. Rahul Gandhi too had asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the government whether they had grovelled before Donald Trump to reach a ceasefire with Pakistan—as the US President claimed. However, as Indians tackle yet another grief in the aftermath of the Air India crash, Gandhi is off on a break. Suddenly, the voice questioning the government on Pahalgam seems to have become more muted. Also, Gandhi has the image of someone who shifts from issue to issue and has been branded as a 'Shoot and Scoot' neta. What also sets the two leaders apart is their approach to elections. Banerjee's aggression, him running the media narrative for the TMC and taking charge clearly show that he has begun work for the Bengal polls of 2026. Gandhi, meanwhile, has visited Bihar twice, but the party is still waiting for clarity on seat-sharing talks. Bihar also has a large number of Agniveers, and given that several youth in the state belong to defence families, the Pahalgam issue can resonate in election season. Not just this, an indecisive Nitish Kumar and a government in limbo are narratives that the Congress can push already. But, for this, the LOP has to be around. Sadly, politics doesn't allow the luxury of time. Banerjee is ensuring that no time is wasted and has begun to crack the whip. While he will always be overshadowed by his aunt Mamata Banerjee, he clearly wants to shed the 'bhaipo' tag. In the case of Rahul Gandhi, many feel that his surname overshadows him and camouflages his faults and misses. In a few months, Bihar and Bengal could decide who will be the inheritor of the Gen X of the Opposition. First Published: June 17, 2025, 14:50 IST

Calcutta HC halts West Bengal's new OBC list notification until July 31
Calcutta HC halts West Bengal's new OBC list notification until July 31

Time of India

time6 hours ago

  • Time of India

Calcutta HC halts West Bengal's new OBC list notification until July 31

A division bench of the Calcutta High Court , on Tuesday has given an interim stay on issuance of the notification for fresh Other Backward Class (OBC) list by West Bengal government in connection with 140 fresh new sub-classification of OBC. The stay order will be valid until July 31. The division bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Rajasekhar Mantha heard the matter today. The interim order was passed by High Court's Division Bench following a petition, seeking intervention of the High Court. Lawyer Bikram Bandopadhyay, who was one of the petitioner, said, 'The survey was done in haste within one month without following SC directives. We requested the Calcutta High Court to quickly do the hearing as the survey did not follow the Supreme Court guidelines. After two-day long hearing, the court has granted interim stay on notification.' 'Sub-classification related notification has been stayed. The stay order will be still July 31. We had asked to prepone the hearing. Justice Raja Sekhar Mantha questioned about new sub-classification,' the advocate added. Live Events A fresh survey was started by the state government on OBC classification . On March 18, the state government had informed the apex court to complete the process of the fresh survey within the next three months. In May 2024, the Calcutta High Court had rejected all OBC certificates issued in West Bengal since 2010. The fresh OBC list reportedly included 140 sub-sections of OBC, with 80 minority and 60 non-Muslims, as pointed out by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in the assembly. The stay order will be valid until July 31. Meanwhile, BJP leadership in Bengal has welcomed the court's order. Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari welcoming the verdict, 'This is a victory of the judiciary against an arrogant state government. The Mamata Banerjee-led TMC government's blatant appeasement politics, as evident from the disproportionate inclusion of almost 90% new Muslim Classes in the OBC list, has been directly affront to the principles of equality and fairness.' Union MoS for Education and BJP State President Sukanta Majumdar said, 'The verdict shows Mamata Banerjee is anti-court and anti Consti. It is like giving reservation in the name of religion is being done. Under the name of OBC-A and B. There is an attempt to give 97% reservation to the Muslims from backdoor.' "Gratitude to Calcutta High Court for striking down Mamata Banerjee's attempt to stuff the OBC list with 76 Muslim groups—nearly 90% of new entries. This wasn't social justice. It was blatant, communal appeasement—a cynical move to hijack reservations for vote-bank politics,' Majumdar said in his X Handle. 'We are not above court. Let us see the verdict. OBC related survey has been done following court order. It is a false campaign.,' Trinamool leader Arup Chakraborty said. Admission stalemate With the High Court stay, uncertainty related to the entire admission procedure for colleges looms large. Ahead of the HC order, State Education Minister Bratya Basu said, 'If there is any order comes, we will take emergency actions. Our work will be done and we will act accordingly.'

In Major Setback For TMC Govt, Calcutta High Court Halts New OBC List; BJP Hails Ruling
In Major Setback For TMC Govt, Calcutta High Court Halts New OBC List; BJP Hails Ruling

News18

time7 hours ago

  • News18

In Major Setback For TMC Govt, Calcutta High Court Halts New OBC List; BJP Hails Ruling

Last Updated: The court clarified that the original list of 66 OBC communities recognised before 2010 will remain unaffected by the ruling. The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday issued an interim stay on the West Bengal government's OBC list notification, putting a hold on all actions and processes based on the new list of Other Backward Classes (OBC) communities. The court was hearing a series of petitions challenging the state government's executive order that added 140 subgroups—80 of which are Muslim—to the newly announced OBC list. The division bench of Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Rajasekhar Mantha imposed the stay, which affects various key areas, including college and university admissions, government job recruitments, and social welfare benefits. The court also stayed the implementation of the newly introduced 100-point roster for jobs, which had been designed based on the updated OBC list. However, the court clarified that the original list of 66 OBC communities recognised before 2010 will remain unaffected by the ruling. The previous list, which was largely invalidated by the High Court on May 22, 2024, had 113 subgroups, comprising 77 Muslim and 36 non-Muslim communities. The Bengal Assembly passed the new notification last week in response to the court's earlier decision, which struck down the categorisation of OBC-A and OBC-B groups introduced after 2011. Several petitions challenging the new state executive order were submitted to the High Court, with the issue still being under consideration by the Supreme Court. The petitioners urged the court to stay the order, describing it as a 'blatant violation" of the High Court division bench's ruling issued on May 22. The court order, being viewed as a major setback for the ruling Trinamool, was largely hailed by the BJP today, with Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari calling it a 'landmark verdict." 'I extend my heartfelt gratitude to the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta for the landmark decision to stay the inclusion of 76 Muslim classes in the new OBC list prepared by the Mamata Banerjee Government. This is a resounding victory of the Judiciary against an arrogant State Government that has repeatedly flouted constitutional norms for its narrow political gains," he said in an X post. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta for the landmark decision to stay the inclusion of 76 Muslim classes in the new OBC list prepared by the Mamata Banerjee Government. This is a resounding victory of the Judiciary against an arrogant State…— Suvendu Adhikari (@SuvenduWB) June 17, 2025 Adhikari added that the Mamata Banerjee-led TMC government's approach, reflected in the inclusion of nearly 90 per cent of new Muslim groups in the OBC list, represents a 'direct affront to the principles of equality and fairness."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store