Merck to invest $1 billion in new Delaware plant to boost US manufacturing
US drugmaker Merck said on Tuesday it is investing $1 billion in a new Delaware plant to expand domestic production as it prepares to deal with President Donald Trump's tariffs.
The new facility will produce biologic drugs and Keytruda, becoming Merck's first in-house U.S. site to make the blockbuster cancer treatment, the company said.
Merck said last week its biggest tariff exposure is through Keytruda and it has enough U.S. inventory for this year. It estimated $200 million in additional costs for the levies implemented to date.
The company expects labs at the new facility to be fully operational by 2028 and produce experimental drugs by 2030.
The new plant would create at least 500 full-time jobs and about 4,000 construction vacancies, the company said.
Merck opened a $1 billion facility at its North Carolina site last month to boost U.S. production.
The Trump administration has been putting pressure on U.S. drugmakers to move their medicine production to the country and announced probes into drug imports that set the stage for levies in the sector.
U.S. drugmakers, including Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson, have recently announced additional investments to boost domestic production amid the tariff threat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Copper slips on uncertainty over trade talks, demand
LONDON: Copper prices lost ground on Tuesday as many investors shunned the market due to uncertainty about US-China trade talks and how the ongoing trade war between the world's two largest economies will hit economic growth and metals demand. Benchmark three-month copper on the London Metal Exchange was down 0.3% at $9,767 per metric ton in official open-outcry trading, having recovered by 20% since hitting its lowest since November 2023 in April. 'We have a lot of market complacency right now. Volatility seems to be drifting lower across markets even though we have yet to see any breakthrough on trade talks with China,' said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank in Copenhagen. Top US and Chinese officials will resume trade talks for a second day in London on Tuesday, hoping to secure a breakthrough over export controls for rare earths and other goods. More copper inventories departed from LME-registered warehouses as traders took advantage of higher US prices due to expectations that US President Donald Trump will impose tariffs on the metal, following duties levied on aluminium and steel. LME copper stocks eroded by another 2,000 tons to 120,400, data showed on Tuesday, having tumbled by half over the past three months. US Comex copper futures dropped 0.7% to $4.89 a lb, bringing the premium of Comex over the LME to $1,016 a ton. 'The appetite is failing somewhat, especially in the New York market, because the tariff announcement will be a binary event and some fireworks can probably not be avoided once you get that news out.' Traders are awaiting the outcome of an investigation Trump ordered in February on potential import tariffs on copper. In China, zinc on the Shanghai Futures Exchange softened for a third trading day, losing 1.3% to 21,845 yuan a ton, the lowest since late April. 'China's domestic demand has shown signs of weakening recently, and buyers have been procuring to meet their immediate needs at lower prices,' Shanghai-based commodity market research house SHMET said. Among other LME metals, aluminium eased 0.1% to $2,476 a metric ton, nickel ceded 0.9% to $15,280, zinc was little changed at $2,649, lead fell 0.2% to $1,982, while tin edged up 0.1% to $32,730.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
China's angry rebuttal to Trump's tariff Tsunami
My reading of China has always been of a country that is sagacious, forgiving and accommodating—an entity flowing naturally through history, shaped by the burden and blessing of over 5,000 years of civilizational legacy. China has long carried the unique distinction of never being an occupying force in the historical sense, never driven by the imperial ambition to rule the world. Despite holding immense power at different junctures in history, China refrained from conquest. Its Great Wall was built not as a launchpad for outward domination, but as a safeguard for inward integration. This tradition of strategic restraint and internal focus has morphed into the philosophical foundation of President Xi Jinping's economic and diplomatic agenda in the 21st century. China's foreign policy, even amid rising global tensions, has maintained its emphasis on win-win cooperation, mutual growth, and infrastructural diplomacy. It does not promote regime change, nor does it meddle in the internal politics of other nations. China's strength lies in its ability to uplift weaker economies through massive infrastructure projects, energy support, port development, and institutional capacity-building. These efforts are not intended to dominate but to elevate. That is the spirit of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), offering struggling nations an alternative model of growth without conditionalities that mirror neo-colonialism. In contrast, the Trump administration's aggressive 'America First' policy has been marked by an unrelenting tariff war, often in violation of international norms, bilateral treaties, and the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO). These tariffs were not just protectionist; they were unilateral assaults on the interconnected architecture of the global economy. By weaponizing tariffs, Trump sought to coerce trading partners and reconfigure supply chains through brute economic power. However, in doing so, the administration not only antagonized allies and adversaries alike but also disrupted global trade balances, supply chains, and investor confidence. The global economy is an ecosystem. If one part of it is harmed, the ripple effects are felt across continents. In this context, the Trump tariffs didn't just target China—they undermined the very structure of global trade and collaboration. The United States, which once championed free trade, suddenly became its greatest disruptor. This led to global uncertainty, inflation in various sectors, and rising consumer prices within the United States itself. In response to this unprecedented tariff regime, China issued its strongest economic and diplomatic rebuttal to date. Breaking from its traditional quiet diplomacy, Beijing made it unequivocally clear that it would not succumb to unilateral economic bullying. For the first time, Chinese officials accused the United States of distorting international trade norms and harming global economic recovery. China argued that the United States had, in fact, been the largest beneficiary of globalization. With a massive 25% share in world trade, the US economic dominance was built on the very trade practices it was now dismantling. China emphasized that it did not initiate the trade war but would not hesitate to defend its interests. It pledged to open up its economy further, reduce tariffs, and increase imports—not out of compulsion, but to demonstrate its commitment to global cooperation. This stands in sharp contrast to the inward-looking, protectionist tendencies of the Trump administration. China's response was calm but resolute. It promised to uphold the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits. It reaffirmed its belief in genuine multilateralism, rejecting all forms of unilateralism and economic coercion. China stood firmly in support of the international system with the United Nations at its core and the multilateral trading system with the WTO at its foundation. China's declaration also emphasized that the vast majority of nations still believed in fairness, justice, and the rule of international law. These countries, it argued, would eventually stand on the right side of history—not because of allegiance to any one superpower, but because equity must triumph over hegemony. Trump, meanwhile, sought to justify the economic fallout from his tariff blitzkrieg by promising future investments totaling $7 trillion. However, even he admitted that the US stock market had lost nearly $6 trillion in value within days. While the theoretical future investment may or may not materialize over four to five years, the immediate damage was undeniable. The American consumer bore the brunt of the tariffs, with increased prices on everything from electronics to household goods. What Trump failed to recognize—or perhaps chose to ignore—is that tariffs on imports function as a hidden tax on American citizens. When tariffs are levied on goods from China or any other country, US importers pass those costs onto retailers, who in turn pass them onto consumers. So, while the US Treasury may gain in the short term from tariff revenues, it is ultimately the American people who pay the price. This disconnect between political rhetoric and economic reality triggered public backlash. Demonstrations erupted across the United States, not just from ideological opponents of Trump but from ordinary citizens suffering from inflation and job insecurity. The symbols associated with Trump's protectionist agenda—banners, flags, and campaign props—became the targets of public outrage, a visible expression of disillusionment with failed promises and mounting hardship. The damage was not just economic; it was reputational. America's standing as a leader of the free world, a promoter of open markets and democratic values, was called into question. The aggressive imposition of tariffs on allies and adversaries alike sent a message that America was retreating from the world stage, abandoning its commitments, and undermining its credibility. What is the via media in this escalating trade conflict? The answer lies in dialogue, cooperation, and mutual respect. Instead of unilaterally imposing tariffs, the United States must return to the table and engage its partners through negotiation, evidence-based studies, and inclusive policy-making. Any trade policy that causes disproportionate harm to a segment of the global population—be it American or foreign—is inherently flawed. Tariffs should be the last resort, not the first weapon of choice. They must be evaluated based on who truly benefits and who bears the cost. If the people of both nations stand to gain, then policy adjustments may be justified. But if tariffs disproportionately hurt consumers, strain diplomatic ties, and fracture global supply chains, then they are not only counterproductive but dangerous. The world today demands cooperation over confrontation. It requires strategic empathy rather than economic nationalism. China's model of infrastructure-led diplomacy and economic integration may not be perfect, but it offers an alternative vision to brute-force protectionism. A world driven by consultation and shared prosperity is far more stable than one governed by unilateral decrees and economic coercion. The battle between tariff wars and trade cooperation is not just a contest of policies—it is a contest of visions. The world must choose between retreating into silos or building bridges across continents. In this defining moment, China's calm and strategic response to Trump's aggressive tariffs may well mark a turning point in the global order. It is a call for equity—not hegemony. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Wall St muted as investors track progress of US-China trade talks
NEW YORK: Wall Street's main indexes were subdued in volatile trading on Tuesday as investors awaited a breakthrough in the ongoing US-China trade talks aimed at defusing a tariff dispute that has roiled global markets this year. Investors hoped for improved ties after relief from a preliminary deal struck last month was overshadowed by Washington's allegations that Beijing was blocking exports of rare earth minerals critical to the aerospace, semiconductor and defense sectors. 'Markets are taking a more upbeat tone on hints that we are starting to see some signs of progress,' said Laura Cooper, head of macro credit and investment strategist at Nuveen. 'This is just going to underpin more choppy price action because there's a lack of clarity on what an actual deal could be.' At 11:39 a.m. ET the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 6.91 points, or 0.02%, to 42,768.67, the S&P 500 gained 5.96 points, or 0.10%, to 6,011.84 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 8.49 points, or 0.04%, to 19,582.75. Seven of the 11 major S&P 500 sub-sectors rose, led by a 1.9% gain in energy, tracking strength in oil prices. Communication services stocks added 0.8%. US equities rallied sharply in May, with the S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq marking their best monthly gains since November 2023, helped by upbeat earnings reports and a softening in President Donald Trump's harsh trade stance. The S&P 500 is about 2% below all-time highs touched in February, while the Nasdaq is about 2.6% away from the record peaks it reached in December. Investors are awaiting US consumer prices data on Wednesday for clues on the Federal Reserve's rate trajectory. The World Bank slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by 0.4 percentage point to 2.3%, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies. Most megacap and growth stocks were mixed. Tesla shares advanced 3.6%. Insmed shares jumped 27% after the drugmaker said its experimental drug significantly reduced blood pressure in the lungs and improved exercise capacity in patients in a mid-stage study. Jif peanut butter maker J.M. Smucker's shares were set for their worst day on record after it forecast annual profit below estimates. The company's shares were last down 12.3%. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 1.91-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and by a 1.47-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and two new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 59 new highs and 35 new lows.
