logo
As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations

As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations

Chicago Tribune2 days ago

Ed Wolf doesn't quite recall the moments between being knocked off his bike and losing a chunk of his face in November 2023.
But he remembers the phone call he made to his wife: 'I said, 'You have to come get me. I've been attacked by a pit bull,'' Wolf said. 'And she goes, 'Are you kidding?''
A day and 50 stitches later Wolf, 68, went to the police station to report the bite and found himself navigating a morass of different systems as he tried to draw official attention to the dog's owner.
An officer at the Morgan Park District (22nd) police station helped Wolf get started on a bite report, which kickstarts an investigation at Chicago Animal Care and Control.
The city department received some 6,435 bite reports between January 2020 and April 30 of this year, according to a Tribune review of data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
For that same period, data shows that CACC has issued about 1,516 citations, for 'unrestrained violations,' to animal owners. The violations cover dogs found to be off-leash in public areas, but not every violation issued pertains to a bite.
All of the investigations save a single one were marked closed, leaving residents and city officials alike to complain that the path to hold owners to account after dog attacks is opaque at best and useless at worst.
Wolf's was one of them. An animal control investigator spoke with Wolf about the attack, but stated in the report that Wolf didn't know the owner or how to reach him. Someone was trying to locate better information on the dog's owner, according to the investigation report.
The Beverly resident said he tried to follow up with Animal Control but never heard back. A copy of the investigation associated with Wolf's bite report showed the inquiry was marked completed, with no listed resolution.
'I would have liked for there to be some consequences to this,' he said.
In the 19th Ward, where Wolf lives, canine attacks have been a problem since a woman jogging in the Dan Ryan Woods was mauled to death by a trio of vicious dogs in 2003. More recently, city data shows that bites are up in that ward and citywide since 2020.The agency received 1,267 bite reports in 2023 and just over 1,300 reports in 2024, according to Chicago Animal Care and Control data. But the number of unrestrained citations it issued dropped by more than half over the same period — from 390 to 177.
A CACC representative said in a statement that the department was reviewing Wolf's case and one other closed case listed in a request for comment. The department acknowledged it can be frustrating for the public to deal with multiple agencies in the reporting process, but said it largely relies on the Chicago Police Department for accurate information to push cases forward.
CPD representatives didn't respond to multiple requests for comment.Animal Care has been without a permanent leader for more than two years, since then-Mayor Lori Lightfoot appointed Susan Capello as acting director in January 2023.
CACC has cut back on its hours for members of the public to bring in animals and is sounding the alarm on a flood of pet surrenders that is testing the capacity of its space and its staff. On Thursday, it reported on social media that 75 animals entered its shelter over a single day.
As for why more than three-quarters of the animal bites reported to the agency are closed without a clear resolution, Animal Care and Control Operations Manager Angela Rayburn said investigators contend with missing or inaccurate information in bite reports.
'We have no other way to find the person other than what we're seeing in the official police (report),' she said.
Even with the correct information, Rayburn acknowledged, investigators will mark probes closed if they are unable to reach a bite victim or a dog owner. They can reopen investigations if someone calls them back, she added, but said callbacks after the first 24 hours are rare.
'We would probably have over 100 open bite (reports) if we're waiting on people to call us back,' she said. 'We don't want to wait months just to leave it open for someone that's probably never going to call.'
A department spokesperson said CACC officials and CPD were working to update a 2019 police order governing how officers handle animal-related incidents. That order directs officers to determine whether biting animals belong to anyone, and fill out bite reports for city and county animal control officials, among other obligations. If an officer can identify an owner, the order requires him or her to cite the owner for any alleged violations of city code.
CACC investigators will also work with animal owners to 'address concerns rather than defaulting to citations' when appropriate, according to the statement. 'That said, our ability to issue citations or take enforcement action depends on verifiable information, including victim/witness cooperation and confirmed ownership.'
People who have tried to make reports complain of a confusing and frustrating process involving multiple agencies. That can include CPD, Animal Control and potentially Cook County Animal Care and Control, which handles rabies investigations.
Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, has resorted to getting personally involved on behalf of his constituents who need help getting bites reported and investigated.
'There seems to be a lot of confusion,' O'Shea said. 'But when I'm on the scene or I'm on the phone, or I'm getting an email from someone who was just viciously attacked, and there's a whole lot of 'Oh, that's not us' on the other end, that's a problem.'
One of those constituents was Kevin Conroy. Conroy, 37, wasn't even sure where he was supposed to report the attack that left his dog Liam with a half-dozen puncture wounds and a $1,300 vet bill while the pair was out for a run on the Major Taylor Trail last fall.
Conroy first called 311, he said, and was then told he needed to go to the police station. He ended up calling the Cook County Forest Preserve to report the bite, which cares for the property on which he and his dog were attacked, and filed a bite report through the Police Department.
'That was the last I heard of that,' he said.
A Cook County Forest Preserve spokesperson, reached for comment, said Forest Preserve police documented the attack but didn't get any more information after the initial phone call with Conroy. According to the investigative file associated with Conroy's bite report, an Animal Control investigator conducted a phone interview but wrote that no owner information was available.
The file does not list an outcome.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court's emergency docket is a familiar station for Trump administration appeals
Court's emergency docket is a familiar station for Trump administration appeals

Boston Globe

time9 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Court's emergency docket is a familiar station for Trump administration appeals

The court is not being asked to render a final decision but rather to set the rules of the road while the case makes its way through the courts. The justices have issued orders in 11 cases so far, and the Trump administration has won more than it has lost. Among the administration's victories was an order allowing it to enforce the Republican president's ban on transgender military service members. Among its losses was a prohibition on using an 18th-century wartime law called the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans alleged to be gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The most recent emergency filing arrived May 27. Advertisement The Trump administration's latest appeal asks the high court to halt an order by US District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston. The White House violated his earlier order, Murphy found, with a deportation flight bound for the African nation carrying people from other countries who had been convicted of crimes in the U.S. Those immigrants must get a real chance to raise any fears that being sent there could put them in danger, Murphy wrote. Trump's top Supreme Court lawyer, Solicitor General D. John Sauer, asked for an immediate high court order that would allow the third-country deportations to resume. Advertisement Murphy has stalled efforts to carry out deportations of migrants who can't be returned to their home countries, Sauer wrote. Finding countries willing to take them is 'a delicate diplomatic endeavor,' and the court requirements are a major setback, he said. Lawyers for the deported men have until Wednesday to respond. The Department of Government Efficiency, overseen by billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk until his departure on Friday, is resisting a lawsuit calling for it to publicly disclose information about its operations. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington argues in a lawsuit that DOGE, which has been central to Trump's push to remake the government, is a federal agency and must be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW claims that DOGE 'wields shockingly broad power' with no transparency about its actions. The administration says DOGE is just a presidential advisory body that is exempt from FOIA disclosures. US District Judge Christopher Cooper had found that its role is likely more than just advisory, especially in helping to shutter the US Agency for International Development and cut billions of dollars in government contracts. The administration appealed Cooper's orders requiring documents be turned over and acting Administrator Amy Gleason to answer questions under oath. Last week, Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to temporarily pause the orders pending additional word from the Supreme Court. Social Security has personal data on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, bank details, salary information, and medical and mental health records for disability recipients, according to court documents. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to Social Security's systems as part of its mission to target waste in the federal government. Advertisement But US District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland restricted the team's access to Social Security under federal privacy laws, saying DOGE's efforts at the agency amounted to a 'fishing expedition' based on 'little more than suspicion' of fraud. The judge is disrupting DOGE's work and interfering with decisions that belong to the executive branch, not courts, Sauer wrote in asking the high court to block Hollander's order in the suit filed by labor unions and retirees. The justices could act anytime. Several judges quickly blocked an executive order Trump signed on his first day in office that would deny citizenship to children who are born to people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The administration appealed three court orders that prohibited the changes from taking effect anywhere in the country. Earlier in May, the justices took the rare step of hearing arguments in an emergency appeal. It's unclear how the case will come out, but the court seemed intent on keeping the changes on hold while looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. One possibility advanced by some justices was to find a different legal mechanism, perhaps a class action, to accomplish essentially the same thing as the nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's citizenship order. Nationwide injunctions have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts to remake the government and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. The court could act anytime, but almost certainly no later than early summer.

DHS Collecting DNA as Part of Larger 'Massive Surveillance' Effort: Lawsuit
DHS Collecting DNA as Part of Larger 'Massive Surveillance' Effort: Lawsuit

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

DHS Collecting DNA as Part of Larger 'Massive Surveillance' Effort: Lawsuit

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleges a failure to respond to numerous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking details on how the agency collects, stores and uses the DNA of noncitizens taken into custody as part of a larger "mass surveillance" effort on behalf of the Trump administration, plaintiffs claim. Newsweek reached out to DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), for comment. Why It Matters The lawsuit comes amid a widespread illegal immigration crackdown by the administration that has extended beyond arrests and deportations to stripping humanitarian parole protections from over 500,000 immigrants and preventing student visa holders from attending some American colleges. What To Know The lawsuit was filed June 2 by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, the Amica Center for Immigrants Rights, and Americans for Immigrant Justice. They allege that DHS has not been transparent about its rapidly expanding program of genetic data collection from migrants, including children. The FOIA suit expresses mounting concerns about both the scale and oversight of these DNA practices. "It is a mistake to think of DHS's DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement,'" Emily Tucker, executive director at the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law, said in a statement. "Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority.' "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence and target anyone they perceive as the enemy." The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief due to the multiple federal agencies purportedly failing to respond to FOIA requests in a timely fashion, combined with a failure to disclose requested documents within the time prescribed by FOIA. A police employee tests Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on a saliva sample for criminal analysis. A police employee tests Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on a saliva sample for criminal analysis. Getty Images The case stems back to August 2024, when a FOIA request was made to ICE—under the purview of DHS—regarding its practices and procedures pertaining to DNA collection of noncitizens. Back-and-forth email exchanges between the groups and ICE, with a lack of information allegedly provided by the government, concluded last October with ICE failing to respond and make a required initial "determination" within 20 business days of its receipt. Between October and January, similar exchanges occurred between the groups and CBP—which is alleged to have not provided a response after more than 30 working days. A report published on May 21, Raiding the Genome: How the United States Government Is Abusing Its Immigration Powers to Amass DNA for Future Policing, shed light on the dramatic increase of DNA profiles collected from migrants and shared with federal law enforcement. More than 1.5 million migrant DNA profiles have been added to the FBI's Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) since 2020, representing a 5,000 percent in three years. That genetic data is then made searchable by law enforcement across the country, with samples kept indefinitely. That report also claims that DHS "misleads and intimidates people to collect their DNA," and primarily collects DNA from people of color. Stevie Glaberson, director of research & advocacy at the Georgetown University Law Center and co-author of the genome report, told Newsweek on Monday that the Trump administration claims to prioritize transparency but continues to collect DNA "in relative obscurity." "Little remains known about where and how ICE is collecting DNA, even as we have seen numerous examples of the agency grabbing people off the street with masks on and without identifying insignia, and detaining and even deporting US citizens and individuals with a right to remain in the country," Glaberson said. "We filed this suit in the hopes of chipping away at the obscurity in which the administration is carrying out some of its most dangerous programs. "The country deserves to know the details of DHS's DNA collection program." A 2021 report published by the California Law Review cites a disproportionate impact of DNA collection on immigrant and minority communities, sparking significant privacy concerns with little public scrutiny or official explanation. The report followed a 2019 rule change under the Trump administration that removed earlier exemptions for collecting DNA from some noncitizens. It also required regular DNA swabbing in federal immigration detention, including among asylum seekers at legal U.S. ports of entry. What People Are Saying Daniel Melo, Immigration Impact Lab Attorney, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, in a statement: "As immigration enforcement agencies continue to deploy sophisticated tools to target, surveil, and arbitrarily detain non-citizens, the community most impacted by these policy choices has a right to know how, when, and why genetic material is being taken, stored, and used against non-citizens—potentially indefinitely—simply because they were not born in the United States." Hilton Beckham, assistant commissioner of public affairs at CBP, said in a statement to Wired: "In order to secure our borders, CBP is devoting every resource available to identify who is entering our country. We are not letting human smugglers, child sex traffickers, and other criminals enter American communities... CBP collects DNA samples for submission to the FBI's Combined DNA Index System ... from persons in CBP custody who are arrested on federal criminal charges, and from aliens detained under CBP's authority who are subject to fingerprinting and not otherwise exempt from the collection requirement." What Happens Next The suit claims that the government agencies failed to respond within a timely manner; failed to conduct an adequate search based on the information provided for the FOIA requests; and were "wrongly withholding agency records by failing to produce nonexempt records." The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling DHS to release records related to protocols for DNA collection, storage, access controls and data sharing.

Homeland Security faces lawsuit over ‘massive surveillance dragnet' collecting immigrant DNA — including from children
Homeland Security faces lawsuit over ‘massive surveillance dragnet' collecting immigrant DNA — including from children

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Homeland Security faces lawsuit over ‘massive surveillance dragnet' collecting immigrant DNA — including from children

Immigration authorities are collecting DNA from immigrants — including children — and feeding that information into a massive criminal database. Most of those immigrants are not accused of committing any crime, but federal law enforcement agencies can now access their detailed DNA profiles as part of a 'massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone,' according to a lawsuit demanding information from Donald Trump's administration. Monday's lawsuit from the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology calls on the Department of Homeland Security to answer how, exactly, the agency 'collects, stores and uses' those DNA samples. Georgetown Law and two other immigration groups filed a Freedom of Information Act request for information last year. Nine months later, without any response, the groups are now suing the agency for answers. DHS is 'quickly becoming the primary contributor of DNA profiles to the nation's criminal policing DNA database,' according to Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy for Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy & Technology. The Combined DNA Index System, or CODIS, is administered by the FBI. The network is used by local, state and federal enforcement agencies to match DNA from crime scenes to identify suspects. Last year, Georgetown's center discovered that border agents are collecting DNA from virtually anyone in their custody, no matter how long they have been detained. That information is fed into CODIS, where it lives indefinitely, 'simply because they were not born in the United States,' according to Daniel Melo, an attorney with Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, which joined Georgetown's lawsuit. Homeland Security has added more than 1.5 million DNA profiles to the database since 2020, marking a 5,000 percent increase in submissions between 2000 and 2024, the report found. That figure includes more than 133,000 children, according to data reviewed by Wired. Nearly 230 children are under the age of 13 and more than 30,000 were between 14 and 17 years old. 'The government's DNA collection program represents a massive expansion of genetic surveillance and an unjustified invasion of privacy,' report author and Center on Privacy & Technology Justice Fellow Emerald Tse said at the time. 'The program reinforces harmful narratives about immigrants and intensifies existing policing practices that target immigrant communities and communities of color, making us all less safe,' Tse added. 'Americans deserve visibility on the details of this program, and the department's lack of transparency is unacceptable,' Glaberson said Monday. The lawsuit joins a wave of litigation against Trump's expanding 'mass deportation operation,' which is deploying officers across all federal law enforcement agencies to ramp up arrests and rapidly remove people from the country. Emily Tucker, executive director at Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy & Technology, said it's a 'mistake' to consider DNA collection part of 'immigration enforcement.' The president is instead relying on broad immigration authorities to justify Trump's expansion of federal law enforcement, according to Tucker. 'This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone,' Tucker added. 'They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.' Last week, reports emerged that the administration has deepened the federal government's ties to Palantir, a tech firm allegedly building wide-ranging data tools to collect and surveil information for millions of Americans. Palantir — co-founded by Silicon Valley investor, Republican donor, and JD Vance mentor Peter Thiel — is reportedly working inside Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, among other agencies. The administration has reportedly spent more than $113 million with Palantir through new and existing contracts, while the company is slated to begin work on a new $795 million deal with the Defense Department. The Independent has requested comment from Homeland Security.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store