As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations
But he remembers the phone call he made to his wife: 'I said, 'You have to come get me. I've been attacked by a pit bull,'' Wolf said. 'And she goes, 'Are you kidding?''
A day and 50 stitches later Wolf, 68, went to the police station to report the bite and found himself navigating a morass of different systems as he tried to draw official attention to the dog's owner.
An officer at the Morgan Park District (22nd) police station helped Wolf get started on a bite report, which kickstarts an investigation at Chicago Animal Care and Control.
The city department received some 6,435 bite reports between January 2020 and April 30 of this year, according to a Tribune review of data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
For that same period, data shows that CACC has issued about 1,516 citations, for 'unrestrained violations,' to animal owners. The violations cover dogs found to be off-leash in public areas, but not every violation issued pertains to a bite.
All of the investigations save a single one were marked closed, leaving residents and city officials alike to complain that the path to hold owners to account after dog attacks is opaque at best and useless at worst.
Wolf's was one of them. An animal control investigator spoke with Wolf about the attack, but stated in the report that Wolf didn't know the owner or how to reach him. Someone was trying to locate better information on the dog's owner, according to the investigation report.
The Beverly resident said he tried to follow up with Animal Control but never heard back. A copy of the investigation associated with Wolf's bite report showed the inquiry was marked completed, with no listed resolution.
'I would have liked for there to be some consequences to this,' he said.
In the 19th Ward, where Wolf lives, canine attacks have been a problem since a woman jogging in the Dan Ryan Woods was mauled to death by a trio of vicious dogs in 2003. More recently, city data shows that bites are up in that ward and citywide since 2020.The agency received 1,267 bite reports in 2023 and just over 1,300 reports in 2024, according to Chicago Animal Care and Control data. But the number of unrestrained citations it issued dropped by more than half over the same period — from 390 to 177.
A CACC representative said in a statement that the department was reviewing Wolf's case and one other closed case listed in a request for comment. The department acknowledged it can be frustrating for the public to deal with multiple agencies in the reporting process, but said it largely relies on the Chicago Police Department for accurate information to push cases forward.
CPD representatives didn't respond to multiple requests for comment.Animal Care has been without a permanent leader for more than two years, since then-Mayor Lori Lightfoot appointed Susan Capello as acting director in January 2023.
CACC has cut back on its hours for members of the public to bring in animals and is sounding the alarm on a flood of pet surrenders that is testing the capacity of its space and its staff. On Thursday, it reported on social media that 75 animals entered its shelter over a single day.
As for why more than three-quarters of the animal bites reported to the agency are closed without a clear resolution, Animal Care and Control Operations Manager Angela Rayburn said investigators contend with missing or inaccurate information in bite reports.
'We have no other way to find the person other than what we're seeing in the official police (report),' she said.
Even with the correct information, Rayburn acknowledged, investigators will mark probes closed if they are unable to reach a bite victim or a dog owner. They can reopen investigations if someone calls them back, she added, but said callbacks after the first 24 hours are rare.
'We would probably have over 100 open bite (reports) if we're waiting on people to call us back,' she said. 'We don't want to wait months just to leave it open for someone that's probably never going to call.'
A department spokesperson said CACC officials and CPD were working to update a 2019 police order governing how officers handle animal-related incidents. That order directs officers to determine whether biting animals belong to anyone, and fill out bite reports for city and county animal control officials, among other obligations. If an officer can identify an owner, the order requires him or her to cite the owner for any alleged violations of city code.
CACC investigators will also work with animal owners to 'address concerns rather than defaulting to citations' when appropriate, according to the statement. 'That said, our ability to issue citations or take enforcement action depends on verifiable information, including victim/witness cooperation and confirmed ownership.'
People who have tried to make reports complain of a confusing and frustrating process involving multiple agencies. That can include CPD, Animal Control and potentially Cook County Animal Care and Control, which handles rabies investigations.
Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, has resorted to getting personally involved on behalf of his constituents who need help getting bites reported and investigated.
'There seems to be a lot of confusion,' O'Shea said. 'But when I'm on the scene or I'm on the phone, or I'm getting an email from someone who was just viciously attacked, and there's a whole lot of 'Oh, that's not us' on the other end, that's a problem.'
One of those constituents was Kevin Conroy. Conroy, 37, wasn't even sure where he was supposed to report the attack that left his dog Liam with a half-dozen puncture wounds and a $1,300 vet bill while the pair was out for a run on the Major Taylor Trail last fall.
Conroy first called 311, he said, and was then told he needed to go to the police station. He ended up calling the Cook County Forest Preserve to report the bite, which cares for the property on which he and his dog were attacked, and filed a bite report through the Police Department.
'That was the last I heard of that,' he said.
A Cook County Forest Preserve spokesperson, reached for comment, said Forest Preserve police documented the attack but didn't get any more information after the initial phone call with Conroy. According to the investigative file associated with Conroy's bite report, an Animal Control investigator conducted a phone interview but wrote that no owner information was available.
The file does not list an outcome.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Maxwell prison transfer raises witness tampering concerns, House Dems say
Ghislaine Maxwell's controversial prison transfer following her interview with a Justice Department official raises "substantial concern" the administration may be trying to tamper with a witness, some House Judiciary Democrats argued in a recent letter. The big picture: The move of the convicted sex trafficker, who was serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida, to a minimum-security facility in Texas was slammed by the family of Virginia Giuffre and other Jeffrey Epstein accusers, arguing it "smacks of a cover up." Maxwell, who is pushing to have her conviction appealed, has been the subject of ire and speculation amid backlash toward the Trump administration's handling of Epstein evidence. She met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, who interviewed her for two days. Driving the news: Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee, led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), are now demanding answers on Maxwell's transfer, as well as "all documents and information" related to Blanche's interview. "These actions raise substantial concerns that the Administration may now be attempting to tamper with a crucial witness, conceal President Trump's relationship with convicted sex offenders, and coax Ms. Maxwell into providing false or misleading testimony" to protect Trump, they argued in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Bureau of Prisons Director William K. Marshall III. The lawmakers further argued the transfer "appears to violate" DOJ and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policies, citing the "public safety factor" classification given to sex offenders, which they note would restrict such inmates from minimum-security federal prison camps with "access to the community." While the group noted obtaining a waiver is possible, they argue Maxwell "short-circuited the entire review process and jumped the queue." Catch up quick: Trump told reporters earlier this month that he didn't know about Maxwell's transfer. Trump hasn't ruled out a pardon for Maxwell, who was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison on sex trafficking and other charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has also issued a subpoena to Maxwell for a since-delayed deposition originally set for this month. Zoom out: Earlier this month, Democracy Defenders Fund, founded by Obama administration alumnus Norm Eisen, submitted a series of Freedom of Information Act requests seeking records of communications between DOJ and BOP leadership related to Maxwell's transfer. What we're watching: The Democratic lawmakers requested a slew of documents, including a list of all administration officials aware of Maxwell's transfer and interview transcripts, by August 26. "There can be no question that your actions have served to send a clear message to Ms. Maxwell in the lead up to any testimony before Congress and the American public: this Administration can punish or reward her as it sees fit for its own purposes," the letter read. It is "imperative," they added, for the administration to "come clean."
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
Big Brother is watching you — but this homeowner made him back down
Last month, Charlie Wolf attended a meeting of the Greers Ferry, Ark., city council to complain about a license-plate camera that he said was violating the Fourth Amendment by regularly taking pictures of his driveway and front yard. Greers Ferry Police Chief Kallen Lacy acknowledged Wolf's 'distress' but rejected his legal analysis, saying 'over 5,000 cities' across the country use such cameras, 'so there is no constitutional violation there.' Despite Lacy's assurance, the widespread acceptance of automated license-plate readers as a crime-fighting tool only magnifies the privacy concerns they raise. They enable routine surveillance of a sort that would have troubled the Fourth Amendment's framers. 'Unlike red-light cameras or speed cameras that are triggered by specific violations,' the Institute for Justice notes, ALPRs 'photograph every vehicle that drives by and can use artificial intelligence to create a profile with identifying information that then gets stored in a massive database. 'Once that happens, officials can search the database for any vehicle they wish, all without a warrant.' Worse, 'departments around the country are automatically sharing data with each other, making it simple for police anywhere to track drivers' movements. 'All of this arbitrary discretion threatens people's privacy, security and freedom of movement by creating an atmosphere where everyone knows they are being watched and tracked whenever they hit the road.' Wolf's experience crystallizes these concerns. As he noted at the city council meeting, the camera that was installed across the street from his house on May 13 was photographing 'our yard, curtilage and vehicles' whenever a car passed by. 'We're being photographed and entered into a database without consent or violation of any law,' Wolf said. The camera captured images of Wolf and his wife whenever they left their home or returned to it. The camera also documented the comings and goings of the Wolfs' visitors, including their friends, children and grandchildren. Depending on the vagaries of traffic, it might record trips to the mailbox, kids playing in the yard or anything else happening in front of the house. Local officials initially were unfazed by the Wolfs' complaints, insisting that the camera, one of five installed in the tiny town under a contract with the ALPR company Flock Safety, would stay where it was. But they reconsidered after receiving a letter from Institute for Justice attorney Joshua Windham, who explained why the couple's objections deserved more respect than they had received. In 2018, Windham noted, the Supreme Court held that the FBI violated the Fourth Amendment when it collected cellphone location data without a warrant supported by probable cause. That ruling, he explained, was based on the principle that the Fourth Amendment 'must preserve at least as much privacy as Americans would have enjoyed when it was adopted.' Back then, Windham observed, 'police lacked the means to create a historical record of people's physical movements' because 'they simply did not have the manpower or the technology to do so.' He noted that a federal judge in Iowa and two state supreme courts have recognized that 'the placement of a surveillance camera in front of a home,' like tracking someone's movements via cellphone data, 'may violate a reasonable privacy expectation.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The morning after Windham sent that letter, Greers Ferry officials posted a defense of ALPRs that read like a Flock press release. But by the end of the month, they had agreed to remove the camera that was spying on the Wolfs. That small victory for privacy was followed a week later by another encouraging development: Scarsdale, NY, terminated its ALPR contract with Flock Safety after more than 400 residents signed a petition expressing concern about 'the broad and lasting implications of deploying such a surveillance system.' The official rationale for the town's decision was lack of funding. But the criticism provoked by the project suggests Americans are beginning to recognize the perils of surrendering their privacy in the name of public safety. Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Va. senators demand answers into death of Resendiz
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WAVY) — Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine are demanding answers from the U.S. Navy regarding the death of Seaman Angelina Resendiz, found dead June 9 in Norfolk after being reported missing for more than 10 days. The senators seek a briefing 'from relevant Navy and installation leadership' by Aug. 14. A Navy official told 10 On Your Side they have received the letter and are going through the process of responding to the senators. 'Not like Angie at all': Search continues for missing sailor from Naval Station Norfolk Resendiz, a culinary specialist who had been assigned to the destroyer James E. Williams at Naval Station Norfolk, was initially reported missing May 29 and had last been seen in her barracks around 10 a.m., according to the Navy. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service confirmed June 10 the body found in a wooded area in Norfolk near the Broad Creek neighborhood was that of Resendiz. NCIS: Body confirmed as missing Norfolk Naval Station sailor; Navy sailor in confinement The senators, in the letter, ask the Navy for a briefing and more information about the period of Resendiz's disappearance and death, along with the Navy's adherence to policies and procedures. They also have concerns with how public accounts of . 'We write to inquire about the Navy's handling of the tragic death of Seaman Angelina P. Resendiz,' the senators said in a statement attributed to both of them. 'While we acknowledge the Navy's engagement with congressional offices to date, ongoing questions and concerns related to the period of her disappearance, the circumstances leading to her death, and the Navy's policies and procedures throughout, demand answers. Navy memo sheds light on timeline of Angelina Resendiz' disappearance Info-Memo_public-CSSN-Resendiz-Final-1_0d20a1Download 'As the Navy continues its investigation, it is critical that you provide Congress with significantly greater detail about the circumstances of Seaman Resendiz's disappearance and death, including a more fulsome accounting of the Navy's engagement with Seaman Resendiz's loved ones and fellow sailors who had raised concerns about her well-being.' The communication between the Navy and Resendiz's mother was something Kaine brought up specifically. 'Her mother claims that she was told that her daughter had been located, when that in fact was not the case,' Senator Kaine said. It's similar to what Resendiz's mother has been asking for, as Esmeralda Castle has demanded transparency and accountability from the Navy. Mother of Naval Station Norfolk sailor killed seeks Navy accountability Among the issues: A public timeline and accountability from the Navy and NCIS Disclosure of non-disclosure agreements service members were required to sign involving the case Collaboration on a civilian family guide Access to documents under the Freedom of Information Act for the Resendiz family, among others. Warner and Kaine call for clarity on the Navy's actions when it first learned of Resendiz's absence, and its leaders' following 'a range of protocols and procedures.' They are asking for details on the investigative steps taken, by the Navy and NCIS, 'as well as the interactions with local and Virginia State Police.' 'We reiterate our concern over the public accounts from the family about the grief and anger caused by the condition of Seaman Resendiz's remains upon arrival in Texas,' the senators wrote. 'We have serious questions as to what policies and procedures govern dignified transfer of remains after an investigation, and whether those were followed in this instance.' Warner said that 'if there were protocol mistakes, if there are procedural mistakes that need to be improved, we can learn from this tragedy.' The full text of the letter can be read below: 73025lettertonavyonseamanangelinaresendizDownload Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
