Greece signs deal to buy 16 anti-ship missiles from France
Greece signed a deal Monday to purchase anti-ship missiles from France as it seeks to bolster its defenses in a procurement program aimed mainly at addressing tensions with neighboring Turkey.
Greece's Defense Minister Nikos Dendias signed the agreement for the 16 Exocet missiles with his French counterpart Sébastien Lecornu, who was on a one-day visit to Athens. The two did not disclose the cost of the deal.
It is the latest in a series of purchases of military equipment from France, with Greece having already bought two dozen Rafale warplanes and three Belharra-class frigates. Dendias said discussions are progressing for the addition of a fourth frigate, adding that France is also providing Greece with NH-90 military helicopters.
Athens has said it will spend 25 billion euros ($27 billion) over the next decade to adapt its military to evolving high-tech warfare technologies.
Although NATO allies, Greece and Turkey have long-standing disputes over boundaries in the Aegean Sea and eastern Mediterranean that have brought them close to war several times in recent decades.
'Greece does not threaten, but is threatened,' Dendias said in joint statements to the press with Lecornu. The two ministers did not take questions.
Speaking in Parliament earlier this month, Dendias said Greece plans to shift from traditional defense systems to a high-tech, networked strategy centered on mobile, Artificial Intelligence-powered missile systems, drone technologies, and advanced command units — reducing reliance on conventional fleets.
Greece's modernization drive — launched after years of defense cuts during the 2010–2018 financial crisis — already includes all branches of the armed forces and focuses on cooperation with France, Israel, and the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Euan McColm: Why John Swinney's critics in the SNP should bite their tongues and get behind him
John Swinney speaks to journalists following First Minister's Questions at the Scottish Parliament. Picture: JeffHistory should provide nationalists with a warning that division threatens their slight recovery and their long-term goal of independence Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... After a period of chaos in the SNP, the election of John Swinney as leader was supposed to bring calm to a party heading for electoral humiliation. With his bank-managerly demeanour, he was the opposite of his predecessor, under whom the nationalists had grown increasingly divided. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It did not take long, however, for the Swinney project to begin falling apart and, after a poor election result, calls for his resignation grew so loud that he could not credibly ignore them. I write, of course, not about current events but about the end of Swinney's first spell in charge of the SNP which ended, after four years, in 2004, paving the way for the return to the leadership of Alex Salmond. History has a habit of repeating itself. Today, little more than a year after succeeding Humza Yousaf as leader of the SNP, Swinney finds himself in what must be uncomfortably familiar territory. Defeat for the SNP in the recent Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election has triggered a crisis in his leadership. There have been calls – both anonymous and public – for his resignation. The sense that he is losing his grip on the SNP grows stronger by the day. Just as he did in 2004, Swinney has decided to fight on. Responding to reports that a group of colleagues had met to discuss a leadership challenge during the SNP's annual conference in October, the First Minister said he did not think that would be a good idea. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Swinney told BBC Radio Scotland that he had returned to the SNP leadership in order to help his party 'recover' from what he described as 'a very, very difficult situation in the spring of 2024' and that he remained focused on the job in hand. He was not, he added, worried 'in the slightest' about the briefing against him. If you say so, First Minister. Swinney's characterisation of the state of his party when he took over last year is correct. Former FM Humza Yousaf's decision to end the power-sharing agreement between the SNP and the Greens had blown up in his face, leaving him without the parliamentary support needed to get things done, and the nationalists had descended into the sort of in-fighting that had, for many decades, kept them on the fringes of our politics. Given the circumstances, Swinney's flaws became his advantages. The SNP – and, indeed, the country – very much required a period of calm after years of stormy political weather. Steady old John was just the captain his party needed. However, Scottish nationalists are not, by nature, patient. Swinney may have been elected to be a safe pair of hands but, already, he's under pressure to be more radical, with a number of critics inside the SNP demanding he push harder for a second independence referendum. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In response to these briefings, Swinney declared that, after returning stability to his party, he planned to 'open up a conversation about independence'. For some of Swinney's critics – one thinks, for example, of former health secretary Alex Neil, whose contempt for the First Minister dates back decades – this will never be good enough. Scotland will never gain its 'freedom' through conversations. Rather, the break-up of the Union will require something more radical than a cosy chat. It is perfectly understandable that those SNP members now agitating for Swinney to either change course or quit, want to see a new strategy for independence. Having been told, for years, that defeat in the 2014 vote was a bump in the road on the way to nationhood, they believe they have been badly let down in recent years. I'm not at all sure, however, what Swinney could be doing differently to advance the cause of independence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former FM Nicola Sturgeon spent nine years telling SNP members that 'Indyref2' was on the horizon. A rush and a push, lads and lassies, and the land that they stood on would be theirs. But reality – in the shape of continuing minority support for independence and the Scottish Government's lack of power to call a referendum – got in the way of Sturgeon's plans. The authority to stage another vote remains with the UK Government. Recent polls suggest support for independence is rising and that, if there were another referendum tomorrow, the Union would come to an end. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This, says one senior Swinney ally, is something for which the First Minister deserves some credit. I have some sympathy for that view. Do those now agitating for Swinney to go really think that their party – and their cause – would be in ruder health had Humza Yousaf remained in post? With the next Holyrood election just 11 months away, the last thing the SNP needs is another destabilising leadership contest. Polls may show increased support for independence but Swinney knows – because the focus group data he reads tells him so – that the constitution does not top the list of voters' priorities. Swinney is every bit as fanatical about independence as those now whispering about a leadership challenge – many years ago, one of the SNP leader's aides told me he 'would live in a cave to be free' – but the First Minister's zealotry is tempered by a degree of common sense. He knows and accepts that the time is not right for another referendum. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Swinney also knows that the slight recovery his party has made under his leadership is still fragile. The SNP is – as was perpetually the case for decades before the party unified under Alex Salmond in 2004 – divided and fractious. Any Scottish nationalist who thinks it's now time exacerbate that division is a fool.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
EU country pays up to €25 to repair your clothes and abstain from fast-fashion
This county's scheme to push it's consumers away from 'fast-fashion' brands like Shein and Temu offers shoppers up to €25 per repair for old clothes and shoes and advocates for "virtuous" purchasing France's scheme to encourage the public to repair their existing clothes and shoes instead of purchasing new items could make you some extra cash, as you save from not throwing old ones away. Launched in October 2023, France's bonus scheme was put in action, offering a discount of €6 (£5) and €25 (£21) per repair after their Junior Ecology minister, Bérangère Couillard, protested the 700,000 tonnes of clothing that's dumped in France's landfill's each year in 2023. Promising to contribute €154m (£131m) to the scheme across the first five years, the French government aims to improve in sustainability and influencing their consumers away from 'fast-fashion' brands such as Shein and create new jobs by supporting the repair industry. Couillard had suggested for "all sewing workshops and shoemakers to join the system" that rebates €7 for a new heel for old shoes and €10-€25 for new lining to be added to a jacket, skirt or other garment, reported the BBC at the time. Couillard also said that the government's commitment dealing with the overwhelming rise of 'fast fashion' is "external" as it wishes for the French public to opt for more "virtuous" purchases and to repair them rather than contributing to the dark side of consumer-landfill. A group asked to set up said scheme, named Refashion, claims 3.3. billion items - including clothing, homeware textiles and footwear - were added to France 's market in 2024. And whilst the impressive goal is a step forward in the right direction for sustainability and climate change, some But not everyone is happy about the approach. Right-wing French MP, Eric Pauget, highlighted that the government was already stuck in debt of €3trillion (£2.5trillion) and that they should "stop throwing the French public's money out of the window". Working for the Haute Couture and Fashion Federation, Pascal Morand shared his worry for the potential effect the new scheme would have on luxury brands. Speaking to Le Monde newspaper, he said: "A silk organza shouldn't be judged as less durable than a polyester one based purely on its physical resistance". Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! An addition to the sustainability motion is an enforced labelling system that insists items are detailed with their environmental impact. This new rule came into action on 1 January 2024 and is still in effect. France's rules now mean that manufacturers list the amount of water needed to make and item of clothing, as well as the chemicals involved, the level of microplastic emissions risk and whether the product has any recycled materials in them. Whilst the country is one Europe's largest fashion exporter, with an average of 35.7 billion euros of export revenue according to Fashion United and Institut Francais de la Mode, from November 2018, it has seen a noticeable decline in recent years. Fashion United reports that in 2020 French consumers dipped below the European average, spending around €430 on clothing. France now plans to band 'fast-fashion' giants Shein and Temu in its continued efforts of sustainability.
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Tactic people smugglers use to get young male migrants past French cops onto dinghies to UK revealed
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PEOPLE smugglers are using women and children as human shields in a diversion tactic to get past French police - before mostly men make it onto a dinghy. Families with young babies and kids were put at the front of the queue of migrants entering the vast beach from the sand dunes in Gravelines, near Calais, yesterday with young men trailing behind. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 People-smugglers are using women and children as a diversion tactic to get young male migrants past French police Credit: Getty The diversionary tactics meant the 40 police officers, armed and waiting with pepper spray and tear gas, remained calm and did not use force against the group straight away to avoid injuring the children. Instead, officers kettled the group and successfully marched them off back into the sand dunes. But, when the time was right and the police thought they had taken the group off the beach, a group of mostly men suddenly sprinted off into the sand dunes before making a break for it back onto the beach. Most of the migrants with children did not return to the beach. It comes after senior Labour minister Darren Jones was slammed after suggesting on BBC's Question Time that the majority of migrants entering by small boats that he had seen were women and children. A dramatic cat and mouse game followed yesterday with tear gas being fired over Gravelines beach in an attempt to keep migrants away from the sea. But they failed to stop a nearby dinghy from picking up the migrants and it left for British shores with mostly men on board. It comes after official figures showed that more than 919 people crossed the Channel in small boats on Friday on 14 dinghies - averaging around 66 people per boat. It has taken the provisional annual total to 16,183, which is 42 per cent higher than the same point last year and 79 per cent up on the same date in 2023. The highest daily number so far this year was 1,195 on May 31.
