logo
Starmer accused of ‘stuffing' House of Lords with allies before axing hereditary peers

Starmer accused of ‘stuffing' House of Lords with allies before axing hereditary peers

Telegraph02-03-2025
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of 'stuffing' the House of Lords with his allies at the same time as attempting to abolish hereditary peers.
The Prime Minister has appointed the most life peers to his party's benches in his first 200 days than any other leader in the last 30 years, apart from David Cameron.
Sir Keir has created 37 Labour life peers in that time, compared to 35 by Sir Tony Blair, 10 by Boris Johnson and 13 by Baroness May.
The Prime Minister made more party peerages in his first 200 days than Baroness May, Mr Johnson and Rishi Sunak in their first 200 days combined.
It comes ahead of the Hereditary Peers Bill, which will abolish all the remaining hereditary peers from the Upper Chamber, returning to the House of Lords for scrutiny on Monday.
The legislation will see 45 Tories booted out of the House of Lords, along with 33 crossbenchers and just four Labour peers.
Meanwhile, Sir Keir has appointed several ex-union officials and long-standing allies from his time at Camden council to the Upper Chamber, as well as ex-MPs.
Critics have claimed that ridding the Upper Chamber of so many Conservatives while adding several Labour peers shows Sir Keir's move is 'nothing to do with reform'.
Lord Strathclyde, a Conservative hereditary peer and former Lords leader, said: 'It is a simple partisan act to remove his opponents while stuffing the place with his friends. That's what it's all about.'
He added: 'It is the same old Labour nonsense on class war. 'Get the old hereditary peers out whom we don't like and replace them with our chums that we do.''
Lord Mancroft, fellow Conservative hereditary peer, said: 'It's staggering. It's not a route to democracy. It's constitutional abuse.
'We've spent hundreds of years slowly and carefully and painfully constructing our constitution, and these politicians just want to break it.'
A Labour source called criticisms over Sir Keir's appointments 'desperate stuff from those yet to reconcile themselves with the fact that Labour is completing the job we started 25 years ago of removing hereditary peers from the Lords'.
They added that even without the hereditary peers on their benches, the Tories would remain the largest party in the Upper Chamber.
Among those who have been put into the House of Lords by Sir Keir since taking office, including Brendan Barber, Mary Bousted and Kay Carberry, former trade union bosses.
Mike Katz, a former Camden councillor from the Prime Minister's time in politics in the borough, has also been appointed.
They join Sue Gray, Sir Keir's former chief of staff, and Thangam Debbonaire, ex-shadow minister, in the House of Lords.
Ms Debbonaire, the former shadow culture secretary, lost her seat in Bristol West to the Green Party in 2024.
Individuals are nominated to the House of Lords for their contribution to society and public and political service.
All appointments are vetted by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
Over 100 amendments have been tabled to the five-clause Hereditary Peers Bill, which is scheduled for four days of debate in the House of Lords but is expected to take longer than expected.
Critics of the Bill have been accused of delaying tactics to try and scupper Labour's plans to immediately rid the House of Lords of all its hereditary peers, but the Tories have denied the claims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer urged to drop 'toxic' NIMBY term by Labour MPs
Keir Starmer urged to drop 'toxic' NIMBY term by Labour MPs

Daily Mirror

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Keir Starmer urged to drop 'toxic' NIMBY term by Labour MPs

In recent months Keir Startmer has vowed to take on 'the NIMBYs' to get spades in the ground of major infastructure projects and deliver on promise to build 1.5million new homes Keir Starmer should drop the "toxic" term NIMBY for those who rally against developments in their own area, a group of Labour MPs have suggested. ‌ In recent months the PM has vowed to take on "the NIMBYs" - an acronym which stands for 'not in my back yard' - to get spades in the ground of major infrastructure projects. But Jenny Riddell-Carpenter, the Labour MP who chairs the Labour Rural Research Group, told The Mirror"many people rightly despise the term". ‌ "The term NIMBY isn't just toxic, it's politically pointless. We win nothing by labelling people 'anti development' or 'anti growth'," she added. It comes after The Mirror's Kevin Maguire wrote: 'Labour must find engaging story for the UK - or face election wipeout'. ‌ The group of 26 Labour backbenchers Labour Rural Research Group - set up to champion rural issues - have published their first report today on the attitudes of their countryside constituents. Their survey of 1,412 people found 56% "firmly do not see themselves as NIMBYs". Over 60% also agreed developments in their areas should go ahead "as long as it is delivered thoughtfully, and with consideration for local needs and identity". The report says: "The rhetoric in today's political world and media, which tends to focus on dividing lines, often pits rural against urban, and NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yard) against YIMBYs (Yes In My Back Yard). YIMBYs are often presented (in the media at least) as proud urban voters, whilst NIMBYs are seen as people living in rural or semi-rural communities." ‌ It also found almost three quarters believe rural communities have been overlooked over the past 15 years. And three in five feel their communities are in decline. The MPs' report said: "We must ensure that rural communities, left behind by successive Conservative governments, are front and centre of the Labour government's mission for inclusive growth and opportunity." Ms Riddell-Carpenter, who overturned ex-Tory Deputy PM Therese Coffey's massive majority in the Suffolk Coastal constituency last year, added: "Our report shows – in black and white – rural voters do not see themselves as NIMBYs, in fact many people rightly despise the term." ‌ She added: "They are rightly proud of, and ambitious for, their local area - they want to see new jobs, more affordable homes, and better opportunities for young people. We need to make sure that growth and development in rural areas matches this strong local identity, and that we put forward proposals that local people can be proud of in their back yard." A Labour source told The Mirror: 'Labour was elected to deliver change. We are proud of our ambition to create a fairer Britain. Working families don't feel that sense of fairness yet. People work hard and deserve a secure place to call home for them and their loved ones. 'Through our Plan for Change, Labour will unashamedly deliver on that promise. We'll build 1.5 million new homes during this Parliament, and create the infrastructure that gets them to work more quickly and seen by a doctor more swiftly.'

John Hipkin obituary
John Hipkin obituary

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

John Hipkin obituary

My father, John Hipkin, who has died aged 90, was a teacher, councillor and former mayor of Cambridge. He brought intelligence, compassion and moral clarity to his four decades serving in local government, first as a Labour county councillor for Romsey ward in 1977; later, as a founding member of the SDP, he became a Lib Dem city councillor for Castle ward in 1992. He then served as an independent until his retirement from local politics in 2021. He was chair of the planning committee for a period and was mayor in 2005-06. Choosing 'peace' as the focus of his year, he was touched to be invited to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan to mark the 60th anniversary of the atomic bombings of those cities. John was also a co-founder of the Western Buddhist Order in 1967, and a founder, in 1960, and director for the Advisory Centre for Education, a service that gives advice to parents, carers, governors, local authorities and others on education law. He also did research at King's College Cambridge for the Public Schools Commission (1965-68), looking at the possibilities of integrating public schools into the maintained system of education. Born in Derby, John experienced adversity in his early life. His mother, Bunty (Elsie) Holloway, was forced to place John into the care of Dr Barnardo's when he was five; his two younger siblings, Anthony and Naomi, were adopted separately. His father, Jack Hipkin, a mounted police officer, was married, and during the second world war the relationship ended. After being placed with foster carers, education offered John a way forward. He passed the 11-plus, attended two grammar schools, first in Diss, Norfolk, and then in Surbiton, near Kingston upon Thames. He went to the London School of Economics, graduating with a first-class degree in history and economics. John became an English teacher and was determined to give back to the system that changed the direction of his life. In his first post at Senacre school in Maidstone, Kent, he developed his own English curriculum and wrote and produced a play, The Massacre of Peterloo (1968), which enlisted everyone in a collaborative production, with each student committed to a role. He later became head of English at Meridian school in Royston, Hertfordshire, and retired in 1995. He was reunited with his mother and his sister, who had changed her name from Naomi to Margaret, and his brother, Anthony, who died in 2014. Bunty had three other children, Hugh, David and Pamela. Rediscovering his siblings and their families was a healing experience. He is survived by his second wife, Marie-Louise (nee Holland), whom he married in 2004, and by his children Charlotte, Thomas, Joseph, Daniel and David, from his first marriage, to Bronwyn Dewey, which ended in divorce; me, from his relationship with Sylvie Chastagnol; and Imogen, from his marriage to Marie-Louise.

Benjamin Netanyahu will not listen to Keir Starmer, says Anas Sarwar
Benjamin Netanyahu will not listen to Keir Starmer, says Anas Sarwar

The National

time20 minutes ago

  • The National

Benjamin Netanyahu will not listen to Keir Starmer, says Anas Sarwar

The Scottish Labour leader was speaking at an Unspun event held by The Herald at the Edinburgh Fringe when he was asked if he believed the UK Prime Minister had 'done enough' to stop Israel's bombardment on Gaza. Although Sarwar failed to answer if he believed Starmer had done enough, he did say the Prime Minister had caused 'a lot of upset' following an interview on LBC in the wake of the October 7 attacks by Hamas, where he said Israel had the 'right to defend herself' by withholding power and water from Palestinian civilians. Sawar said that he believes cutting off food and water is a clear breach of international law and that Netanyahu is 'clearly in breach' of international law and agrees with the International Court of Justice that Israel is carrying out genocide in Gaza. READ MORE: BBC dismisses complaint after host calls Israel spokesperson 'propagandist' He added that Netanyahu is not a 'fair actor for peace' and is motivated more by 'staying in power and staying out of jail' rather than in the best interests of his people and the Middle East. When pressed if he thought that Starmer was doing enough to stop Netanyahu, Sarwar said he didn't believe the Israeli prime minister would listen to his UK counterpart. 'One is, I think there are probably more people that think they have influence to stop Benjamin Netanyahu, or even the UK has more influence in stopping Benjamin Netanyahu than we do,' Sarwar said. 'I don't think he [Netanyahu] will listen to the Prime Minister of the UK.' When asked if he thinks Starmer has no influence over the Israeli Prime Minister, Sarwar said, he believes the Labour leader has influence over the US president Donald Trump, who ultimately is the only person who could stop Netanyahu. 'I think Trump is ultimately the only one who can exert influence over Benjamin Netanyahu,' Sarwar said. When asked if he thought Starmer had enough influence on Trump, Sarwar didn't answer and said: 'Let's be honest, the globe has utterly failed the people of Palestine.' 'The world has failed. 'We often talk about the international community as if somehow there is a group of people out there that can automatically do something or resolve something. The international community, if any such thing exists, has clearly failed and that means we have a population that's been collectively punished. 'People are being literally starved to death and also it is looking like the peace process is further away than it has ever been.' Sarwar went on to say that although he believes the UK Government have made the right steps recently in saying that it would recognise the state of Palestine, Labour have to be doing 'much more to hold the Israeli government to account'. He also called on the Labour Government to do more to provide evidence that there is no 'hint' of components supplied by the UK that are being used by Israeli forces in Gaza. 'I think every single form of pressure that can be put on Benjamin Netanyahu has to be applied if we are to see a peaceful resolution. 'Palestinian statehood is welcomed. I want the state of Palestine to be recognised. 'My one frustration with the debate about Palestinian statehood. Palestinian statehood is not going to stop the war in itself. 'The most urgent pressing thing we need right now is for the war to stop. 'Bombs to stop dropping, bullets to stop firing, people to get the food and supplies, medicine they need, and a pathway to that piece of freedom.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store