Trump tariffs stay in place for now after court reprieve
US President Donald Trump.
Image: AFP
US President Donald Trump celebrated a temporary reprieve for his aggressive tariff strategy on Thursday, with an appeals court preserving his sweeping import duties on China and other trading partners -- for now.
The short-term relief will allow the appeals process to proceed after the US Court of International Trade barred most of the tariffs announced since Trump took office, ruling on Wednesday that he had overstepped his authority.
Welcoming the latest twist in legal skirmishes over his trade policies, Trump lashed out at the Manhattan-based trade court, calling it "horrible" and saying its blockade should be "quickly and decisively" reversed for good.
Asian shares fell on Friday, reversing a rally across world markets the previous day, as the judicial wrangling around Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs fanned uncertainty.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said after Thursday's appeals court ruling that trade talks with China were "a bit stalled" and Trump might need to speak to President Xi Jinping in order to iron out tariffs between the world's two biggest economies.
"I think that given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity, that this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other," Bessent told Fox News after the ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, known as an administrative stay.
Washington and Beijing agreed this month to pause reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, a surprise de-escalation in their bitter trade war following talks between top officials in Geneva.
Asked about Bessent's comments at a regular news conference on Friday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said Beijing had "stated its position on the tariffs issue many times" in an apparent reference to the Asian manufacturing giant's fury at the levies.
Trump has moved to reconfigure US trade ties with the world since returning to the presidency in January, using levies to force foreign governments to the negotiating table.
However, the stop-start tariff rollout on both allies and adversaries has roiled markets and snarled supply chains.
The White House had been given 10 days to halt affected tariffs before Thursday's decision from the appeals court.
The Trump administration called the block "blatantly wrong," expressing confidence that the decision would be overturned on appeal.
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the judges "brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump."
Leavitt said the Supreme Court "must put an end" to the tariff challenge, while stressing that Trump had other legal means to impose levies.
A separate ruling by a federal district judge in the US capital found some Trump levies unlawful as well, giving the administration 14 days to appeal.
'Hiccups'
Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told Fox Business that "hiccups" sparked by the decisions of "activist judges" would not affect talks with trading partners, adding that three deals were close to finalization.
Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro told reporters after the appellate stay that the administration had earlier received "plenty of phone calls from countries" who said they would continue to "negotiate in good faith," without identifying those nations.
Trump's import levies are aimed partly at punishing economies that sell more to the United States than they buy.
The president has argued that trade deficits and the threat posed by drug smuggling constituted a "national emergency" that justified the widespread tariffs -- a notion the Court of International Trade ruled against.
Trump unveiled sweeping duties on nearly all trading partners in April at a baseline 10 percent, plus steeper levies on dozens of economies including China and the European Union that have since been paused.
The US trade court's ruling quashed those blanket duties, along with others that Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately using emergency powers.
However, it left intact 25 percent duties on imported autos, steel and aluminum.
Beijing -- which was hit by additional 145 percent tariffs before they were temporarily reduced to make space for negotiations -- reacted to the trade court decision by saying Washington should scrap the levies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
41 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Understanding market shocks: A Guide for the resilient South African investor
Another day, another headline, and another market jolt. Lately, this has become a regular feature of global financial markets, with South African investors caught in the crosswinds. From global trade tensions to local political uncertainty, markets can swing sharply in response to shifting narratives and breaking developments. Beneath the surface of these market moves are what economists call 'shocks'; unexpected events that trigger wide-reaching effects across economies and portfolios. So, understanding the different types — namely event, cyclical, and structural — is essential for navigating volatility and building a portfolio that can withstand uncertainty. Event Shocks: Fast, loud, and disruptive Event shocks are sudden surprises that jolt the economic system, forcing a rapid repricing of risk before the full impact is clear. These include tariffs, wars, pandemics, assassinations and natural disasters. US President Donald Trump's tariff announcements are a classic example, disrupting supply chains, fuelling inflation concerns and shaking investor confidence overnight. When such shocks escalate, they can weaken company margins, hurt earnings and tip markets into a broader downturn. While event shocks are unpredictable, investors can build resilience through diversification, holding cash or owning defensive assets like government bonds, gold, or consumer staples such as companies that sell essentials like food and healthcare products that stay in demand regardless of economic conditions. It's also important not to overreact to short-term market noise unless it points to a deeper shift with lasting consequences. We've seen how quickly markets can rebound once some uncertainty or trade tensions ease. However, that sharp recovery doesn't mean the uncertainty is gone, it just means it's changed shape. Cyclical Shocks: The market's natural downturn Cyclical shocks are part of the market's natural rhythm. They emerge during phases of economic slowdown, often marked by things like shrinking growth, tighter lending conditions or a spike in borrowing costs. While they tend to build up gradually, their effects can hit hard.

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Investment in ESG is irresponsible
By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment, says the writer. It is saddening to note that the Coronation Fund Managers Stewardship Activities Report (Business Report, May 29) uncritically embraces the false globalist ideology of ESG (environmental, social, governance). Proudly, the Coronation Fund Managers declare that they 'assess and advocate for improvements in their climate change strategies.' Clearly, despite Coronation's research capacity, they have wittingly or unwittingly allowed themselves to be shepherded by the controlled sirens of pliant science and the mass media in believing that human activity can influence climate change. Uncorrupted science and history have proved that warming periods occurred in millennia before fossil fuels were being widely used as they are today. Uncorrupted science has also shown that temperature changes occur as a result of the inconsistency of the Earth's elliptical path around the sun and the slight variations that occur in the Earth's tilt. So, ignoring true science and history is inexcusable. But what is worse is the agenda of the climate change globalists. It requires investing in the hugely expensive green deal – lithium-powered vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. It ignores the vast environmental damage the extraction of lithium causes and the unreliability of wind turbines, with their terrible toll on bird life. By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment. Of course, if they studied the science and history of carbon dioxide, they would note that although it comprises less than one percent of the atmosphere, it is vitally important for plant and vegetation growth. The section of the Stewardship Report that reveals double standards is Coronation's focus on the potential oil and gas bonanza off the Namibian coast. Despite their green commitment, the temptation of lucrative investment in fossil fuel exploitation is enticing. Although the Stewardship Report does not address the social aspect of ESG, it is important to note that it relates to DEI – diversity, equity, and inclusion. One wonders how that aligns with Coronation's commitment to 'responsible investment,' especially when it is evident that the principle of merit is overlooked in the implementation of DEI policy. Given the Trump Administration's recognition of the globalists' green deal for the scam it is, in keeping with their commitment to responsible investment, Coronation's Fund Managers ought to be ditching ESG and focusing on the massive fossil fuel exploitation that is about to take off in the US. Investment in ESG is irresponsible. DR Duncan Du Bois Durban

TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump pulls Musk ally's NASA nomination, will announce replacement
The White House on Saturday withdrew its nominee for NASA administrator, Jared Isaacman, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. President Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. 'I will soon announce a new nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America First in space.' Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead NASA, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission,' Isaacman said in a post on X. 'That was on full display during my hearing, where leaders on both sides of the aisle made clear they're willing to fight for the world's most accomplished space agency. 'I am incredibly grateful to President Trump, the Senate and all those who supported me.' His removal comes days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the department of government efficiency created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Semafor reported the news earlier.