Without Elon Musk, DOGE likely to fizzle out, says ex-staffer
Without billionaire
Elon Musk
in the
Trump administration
, his cost-cutting
Department of Government Efficiency
project is likely to sputter out, a former
DOGE
staffer said in his first interview since leaving the team.
Tesla CEO Musk announced on Wednesday evening that he was ending his time as a special government employee but vowed that DOGE would continue without him. Administration media representatives also said in statements to Reuters that DOGE would continue its work.
DOGE has overseen
job cuts
at nearly every federal agency as part of U.S. President
Donald Trump
's attempts to shake up the federal bureaucracy.
However, software engineer Sahil Lavingia, who spent almost two months working for the group of pro-Musk technologists, said he expects DOGE to quickly "fizzle out."
"It'll just die a whimper," Lavingia, who was fired from DOGE earlier this month, told Reuters. "So much of the appeal and allure was Elon." He said he expected DOGE staffers to "just stop showing up to work. It's like kids joining a startup that will go out of business in four months."
Live Events
That would cap a remarkable undoing for DOGE, which Musk initially vowed would cut $2 trillion in federal spending. Instead, DOGE estimates its efforts have saved around $175 billion so far and the group's tallies have been riddled with errors.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
The White House praised DOGE but did not comment on Lavingia.
"DOGE is integral to the federal government's operations, and its mission, as established by the President's executive order, will continue under the direction of agency and department heads in the Trump administration," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said.
Musk did not respond to a request for comment.
Lavingia, the 32-year-old founder and CEO of creator platform Gumroad, said he was recruited by DOGE through a personal contact and joined the team in March.
While he said he was proud of certain achievements at the Department of Veterans Affairs, including modernizing the agency's internal artificial-intelligence chatbot, he said he was often at a loss about what work he was expected to do.
"I got dropped into the VA with an HP laptop. What are we supposed to do? What is the road map?" Lavingia said he asked, to no avail. "I felt like I was being pranked."
Veterans Affairs press secretary Pete Kasperowicz said in a statement to Reuters: "VA looks forward to continuing to work with its DOGE liaisons to help the department improve its performance, customer service, and convenience to Veterans."
Lavingia said Steve Davis, the president of Musk's tunneling enterprise the Boring Company, ran day-to-day operations while Turkish-born venture capitalist Baris Akis helped with DOGE recruitment and DOGE logistics.
Davis and Akis did not respond to requests for comment sent via the White House.
When instructions did come through, they were usually communicated through phone calls or small chats on the encrypted Signal messaging app that would typically auto-delete in one day, Lavingia said.
Lavingia said instructions included moving faster to increase mass layoffs at the VA, the federal government's second-largest agency.
The only time he met Musk, Lavingia said, was at an all-hands meeting in March with what he estimated was between 40 and 60 fellow DOGE staffers.
Lavingia said he asked to open-source, or make freely available, some of his computer code, which Musk approved.
He then asked if they could livestream DOGE meetings to increase transparency.
"Elon said: 'That's a great idea. We'll do it next week.' He then caught himself and said: 'Maybe we pre-record it because of security risks.'"
Lavingia said he never heard back.
In early May, after he spoke to media outlet Fast Company about working at DOGE, Lavingia said his computer access was revoked in what amounted to a firing. He said Musk and team leaders never explicitly told him he should not talk to journalists.
"My DOGE days were over," Lavingia wrote in a blog about his experience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
15 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Stumps Old Allies: POTUS Looks To Bridge The 'Gulf' As Ties With Musk, Putin & India Suffer
Last Updated: Under Trump, 'closest allies' are often defined less by diplomatic traditions and more by ideological alignment, economic benefits, and willingness to serve US strategic interests In the ever-evolving landscape of global politics, US President Donald Trump's alliances have been as fluid as the tides. Once seen as a key player with powerful figures like Elon Musk and Vladimir Putin, a closer look reveals a narrative of shifting relationships, with some former allies drifting away while new partnerships, such as with Qatar, emerge. This dynamic highlights Trump's transactional approach to diplomacy, prioritising national interests and economic benefits over traditional ideological alignments. Musk The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, initially marked by camaraderie and shared populist appeals, has shown signs of strain. While Musk served in an advisory capacity in Trump's administration through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), recent reports suggest a cooling of their political bond. Musk's departure from his government cost-cutting initiative, coupled with his public criticisms of certain Trump administration policies—such as the 'massive spending bill"—indicate a growing divergence. Though Trump has publicly stated that Musk is 'not really leaving" and will remain an adviser, the billionaire's focus appears to be shifting back to his business empire, particularly as Tesla navigates challenging market conditions. The initial alignment, perhaps fuelled by a mutual disruptive ethos, has given way to a more pragmatic distance. While still emphasising his ability to broker a peace deal and threatening further sanctions, this rhetoric marks a departure from the largely deferential tone of his earlier interactions. The ongoing war has forced a recalibration of Trump's public stance, even as his underlying 'America First" philosophy continues to shape his approach to international conflicts. Netanyahu The relationship between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, once famously close and ideologically aligned, has experienced significant strain and, in some key areas, a noticeable deterioration. While both leaders shared a strong conservative and nationalist bent, and Trump's administration delivered several major policy wins for Israel (e.g., moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, recognising Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, and brokering the Abraham Accords), a transactional approach and personal grievances have led to friction. A significant and deeply personal rift for Trump came in 2020 when Netanyahu publicly congratulated Joe Biden on his election victory. Trump, who continues to dispute the election results, viewed this as a profound betrayal, reportedly stating, 'The first person that congratulated [Biden] was Bibi Netanyahu, the man that I did more for than any other person I dealt with. He has made a terrible mistake." Since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza, Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Netanyahu's handling of the conflict. While initially supportive, Trump has reportedly grown 'fed up" with Netanyahu's resistance to American directives and the prolonged nature of the war. Trump appears to desire a quick, decisive win that he can claim as his own, which clashes with Netanyahu's stated goal of completely dismantling Hamas and his government's maximalist war aims. Trump has pushed for humanitarian access and de-escalation in Gaza, backing new aid delivery systems. Netanyahu, on the other hand, has remained primarily committed to a hardline military campaign, often downplaying humanitarian concerns and the need for immediate ceasefires, which creates a divergence from Trump's desire for a swift resolution. A clear symbol of the fraying relationship was Trump's recent Middle East tour, which included visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE but conspicuously omitted Israel, despite Israeli lobbying. This is a stark contrast to his past visits and underscores a shift in priorities. India While the India-US relationship has generally strengthened over the past two decades, characterised by growing strategic convergence, Donald Trump's 'America First" approach and transactional diplomacy have introduced points of friction, particularly concerning trade. Trump has consistently criticised India for its high tariffs on American goods, even famously calling India the 'tariff king" and a 'big abuser" in global trade. This rhetoric is a direct consequence of his focus on trade deficits and what he perceives as unfair trade practices. Trump has advocated for and, in some cases, imposed 'reciprocal tariffs," meaning the US would charge the same tariff rates on imports from other countries as those nations impose on US exports. This has led to specific tariffs on Indian goods, even if temporarily paused for negotiations. The Trump administration is also likely to continue pushing India to reduce trade barriers and tariffs in various sectors, including agriculture, automobiles, and alcoholic beverages. Also, Trump's repeated public statements about mediating the 'ceasefire" between India and Pakistan this month have been a significant source of diplomatic friction. Indian officials have consistently maintained that this was a bilateral issue and rejected any third-party intervention. These claims have been seen in India as an attempt to undermine its diplomatic position. Trump's stricter immigration policies, including threats of higher tariffs on BRICS nations and increased deportations, can impact the Indian diaspora in the US and create friction in people-to-people ties. Europe and NATO Trump's relationship with Europe has been marked by significant tension and a clear divergence from decades of established transatlantic cooperation. His 'America First" policy directly challenges the bedrock principles of the post-World War II international order, leading to a palpable sense of unease and, at times, open frustration among European leaders. Trump has consistently and vociferously criticised European NATO members for not meeting their defence spending commitments (2% of GDP). He has threatened to withdraw US troops from Europe or even pull the United States out of NATO altogether if allies didn't increase their contributions, questioning the very mutual defence clause (Article 5) of the alliance. Beyond spending, Trump's overall disdain for multilateral institutions and his sometimes admiring tone towards Vladimir Putin have caused deep concern in Europe, particularly among Eastern European states bordering Russia. His approach has been seen as weakening the collective security framework that has protected Europe for decades. Trump has viewed the European Union as a protectionist entity that unfairly took advantage of the US. He imposed tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from the EU, citing national security concerns, which was met with retaliatory tariffs from the EU on American goods. He has also threatened significant tariffs on European automobiles, a major concern for Germany's powerful auto industry. Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change was met with widespread condemnation and disappointment across Europe, where climate action is a high priority. European leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the accord and intensified their own climate policies. The US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, despite European efforts to salvage it, also created a major rift. European nations largely viewed the deal as crucial for preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and saw the US withdrawal as destabilising. Trump's administration actively undermined the World Trade Organization (WTO) by blocking appointments to its appellate body, effectively paralysing its dispute settlement mechanism. Members of Trump's administration have sometimes publicly weighed in on European elections and policies, breaking diplomatic norms and further irritating European governments. Trump openly supported Brexit and even suggested other countries should leave the EU. Finding new friends, particularly in Middle East As certain old alliances have waned or become more nuanced, Trump has actively sought and cultivated new partnerships, often driven by economic opportunities and strategic interests. Qatar stands out as a prime example of such an emerging alliance. During a recent Middle East tour, Trump underscored a significant pivot in US strategy, prioritising economic deals and investments with wealthy Gulf states. Pentagon also announced on May 21 that it had officially accepted the luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, a gift announced ahead of Trump's visit to the Middle East. From May 13 to 16, Trump undertook his first major international trip of his second term, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. He was joined by a Republican delegation and several business chief executives, including senior adviser Elon Musk. The four-day tour primarily focused on securing business deals and investments in the United States, which Trump claimed could reach as high as $4 trillion, as well as lifting sanctions on the transitional government of Syria. Trump met with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, the first time that the leaders had met since a meeting was convened between Bill Clinton and Hafez al-Assad in Geneva in 2000, and urged him to join the Abraham Accords. The United States announced over US$243 billion in deals with Qatar, including a US$1 billion defence agreement with Raytheon for Qatari counter-drone capabilities, a US$2 billion contract with General Atomics for MQ-9B unmanned aerial vehicles, and US$38 billion for Al Udeid Air Base. Trump later attended a state dinner at Lusail Palace, where he appealed to Qatar to improve Iran–United States relations. When Trump arrived in Abu Dhabi on May 15, he became the second serving US president to visit the country. He toured the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque with Khaled bin Mohamed Al Nahyan. The United Arab Emirates awarded Trump the Order of Zayed, the country's highest civil decoration. During the visit, the United States Department of Commerce announced a deal with the Emirates and Emirati artificial intelligence firm G42 to establish the largest data centre for artificial intelligence outside of the United States in Abu Dhabi. This burgeoning relationship with Gulf nations highlights several key aspects of Trump's foreign policy. It demonstrates his clear preference for 'the art of the deal" over traditional diplomatic engagements. The focus on massive economic commitments, job creation in the US, and strategic investments aligns perfectly with his 'America First" agenda. It signals a recalibration of US policy in the Middle East, moving away from an exclusive focus on long-standing security alliances towards a more transactional approach that seeks immediate and tangible benefits. Qatar, in particular, seems to have skillfully leveraged its position as a regional mediator and financial powerhouse, aligning its interests with Trump's transactional diplomacy to secure strategic partnerships and enhance its global standing. The deepening ties with Qatar reflect a foreign policy where economic incentives and pragmatic gains are increasingly at the forefront of US engagement. Trump has emphasised large economic agreements and investments with wealthy Gulf states, viewing them as key partners for trade and stability in the region. The Abraham Accords, brokered during his first term, also highlight this transactional approach to regional diplomacy. top videos View all Under the Trump administration, 'closest allies" are often defined less by long-standing diplomatic traditions and more by shared ideological alignment, economic benefits, and a willingness to align with US strategic interests on a transactional basis. (With agency inputs) About the Author News Desk The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk More Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump elon musk Middle East pakistan Vladimir Putin Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: May 31, 2025, 08:30 IST News world Trump Stumps Old Allies: POTUS Looks To Bridge The 'Gulf' As Ties With Musk, Putin & India Suffer
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Global universities step in as US cracks down on foreign students
Amidst policy shifts in the US targeting academic institutions, universities worldwide are actively attracting international students with incentives like tuition waivers and research grants. This comes as the US faces criticism for policies impacting international student enrolment, leading students to explore alternatives in Europe and Asia-Pacific, potentially affecting the US's reputation and economy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Also Read: Federal judge extends order blocking Trump administration ban on foreign students at Harvard Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Universities around the world are stepping in to attract international students affected by US President Donald Trump's recent policies targeting academic institutions. These policies include cutting research funding, tightening visa rules—especially for Chinese students—and increasing taxes on elite Osaka University is offering tuition waivers, travel support, and research grants to students and scholars looking to transfer from US institutions. Kyoto University and Tokyo University are also considering similar initiatives. Hong Kong has instructed its universities to actively attract top talent from the US China's Xi'an Jiaotong University has issued an appeal to students from Harvard, offering fast-tracked admissions and full move follows actions by the Trump administration that critics say undermine US higher education. Last week, Harvard's ability to enrol international students was temporarily revoked, although a federal judge later blocked the Ishii, dean of Osaka University's graduate school of medicine, told Reuters, 'This is a loss for all of humanity.'Japan has set a target to increase its foreign student population from 337,000 to 400,000 over the next Turner, CEO of Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), which ranks universities globally, said to Reuters institutions in Europe and Asia-Pacific are seeing more interest from students who are rethinking plans to study in the US Countries like Germany, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and mainland China are gaining visibility as crackdown on Chinese students has drawn particular attention. On Wednesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would 'aggressively' restrict Chinese student over 275,000 Chinese students study in the US, contributing significantly to both the revenue of educational institutions and the talent pool of tech companies. According to the US Department of Commerce, international students—more than half from India and China—added over $50 billion to the US economy in policy shift comes during the international application season. Many students are planning to arrive in the US by August to begin their studies. But some are now a 24-year-old Chinese student from Chengdu, had intended to complete her master's degree in the US but is now exploring options in the UK. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.'The impact isn't limited to Chinese students. Tom Moon, deputy head at Oxbridge Applications, said students from Britain and the EU are now more cautious about applying to US universities In contrast, British universities are seeing more interest from students currently in the US, according to Universities UK, though it is too early to confirm enrolment Rickets, an 18-year-old Canadian student at Harvard, said her financial aid package may not be matched by other universities if she is forced to transfer. 'Around the time I was applying to schools, the only university across the Atlantic I considered was Oxford... However, I realised that I would not be able to afford the international tuition and there was no sufficient scholarship or financial aid available,' she Harvard's enrolment rights are revoked, she plans to apply to the University of reported that traffic to its 'Study in America' guide dropped 17.6% in the past year. Interest from India fell by more than 50%.'Measurable impacts on enrolment typically emerge within six to 18 months. Reputational effects, however, often linger far longer, particularly where visa uncertainty and shifting work rights play into perceptions of risk versus return,' Turner Thompson, a 20-year-old American student at Harvard, lives with eight international scholars. He said, 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study.'(With inputs from Reuters)
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
'Thug Life wont release in Karnataka without Kamal Haasans apology,' says KFCC President
Chennai (Tamil Nadu) [India], May 31 (ANI): Actor Kamal Haasan's upcoming film, Thug Life, is facing trouble in Karnataka after the actor's recent remark on the Kannada language sparked anger among local groups, including the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC), which has banned the film's release until the actor issues a public apology. While speaking to ANI, KFCC president M. Narasimhalu said that people in Karnataka are upset with Haasan for his comment that "Kannada is born out of Tamil," which he reportedly made during a promotional event in Chennai. Narasimhalu added that if the actor does not "apologise" before the movie's slated release, it will not be allowed to screen in Karnataka. "People of Karnataka are angry with Kamal Haasan. We have also sent a message to the South Film Chamber. The distributors have decided that if he does not apologise before the release of his film on the 5th, it will not be allowed to release here..." he said. The controversy has led to several protests in Karnataka by the Karnataka Rakshana Vedike and other Kannada organisations. In response to the growing backlash, Hassan stood by his statement, saying he believes in law and democracy. Terming India a "democratic country," the actor stated that he wouldn't "apologise" to anyone for his actions if he is "not wrong." Pro-Kannada organisations have demanded a public apology from him for allegedly hurting the sentiments of Kannada people. Speaking to media personnel outside the DMK party headquarters in Chennai on Friday, Haasan said, "It is a democracy. I believe in law and justice. My love for Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Kerala is genuine. Nobody will doubt it except for those who have an agenda. I've been threatened earlier too, and if I am wrong, I would apologise; if I'm not, I won't." Thug Life is directed by Mani Ratnam and stars Kamal Haasan, Trisha Krishnan, and Silambarasan TR in the lead roles. (ANI)
