Japan executes ‘Twitter killer' who murdered nine
Takahiro Shiraishi, 34, was hanged for killing his young victims, all but one of whom were women, after contacting them on the social media platform now called X.
He had targeted users who posted about taking their own life, telling them he could help them in their plans, or even die alongside them.
Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki said Shiraishi's crimes, carried out in 2017, included 'robbery, rape, murder... destruction of a corpse and abandonment of a corpse.'
'Nine victims were beaten and strangled, killed, robbed, and then mutilated with parts of their bodies concealed in boxes, and parts discarded in a garbage dump,' Suzuki told reporters in Tokyo.
Shiraishi acted to satisfy 'his own sexual and financial desires' and the murders 'caused great shock and anxiety to society', Suzuki said.
'After much careful consideration, I ordered the execution.'
Japan and the United States are the only two G7 countries to still use capital punishment, and there is strong support for the practice among the Japanese public, surveys show.
There was one execution in 2022, three in 2021, three in 2019 and 15 in 2018, the justice ministry told AFP.
Cat litter
Shiraishi was sentenced to death in 2020 for the murders of his nine victims, aged between 15 and 26.
After luring them to his small home near the capital, he stashed parts of their bodies around the apartment in coolers and toolboxes sprinkled with cat litter in a bid to hide the evidence.
His lawyers had argued Shiraishi should receive a prison sentence rather than be executed because his victims had expressed suicidal thoughts and so had consented to die.
But a judge dismissed that argument, calling Shiraishi's crimes 'cunning and cruel', reports said at the time.
'The dignity of the victims was trampled upon,' the judge had said, adding that Shiraishi had preyed upon people who were 'mentally fragile.'
The grisly murders were discovered in autumn 2017 by police investigating the disappearance of a 23-year-old woman who had reportedly tweeted about wanting to kill herself.
Her brother gained access to her Twitter account and eventually led police to Shiraishi's residence, where investigators found dismembered body parts.
Death row prisoners
Executions are always done by hanging in Japan, where around 100 death row prisoners are waiting for their sentences to be carried out.
Nearly half are seeking a retrial, Suzuki said Friday.
Japanese law stipulates that executions must be carried out within six months of a verdict after appeals are exhausted.
In reality, however, most inmates are left on tenterhooks in solitary confinement for years, and sometimes decades.
There is widespread criticism of the system and the government's lack of transparency over the practice.
In 2022, Tomohiro Kato was hanged for an attack that killed seven people in 2008, when he rammed a rented two-ton truck into a crowd in Tokyo and went on a stabbing spree.
The high-profile executions of the guru Shoko Asahara and 12 former members of the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult took place in 2018.
Aum Shinrikyo orchestrated the 1995 sarin gas attacks on Tokyo's subway system, killing 14 people and sickening thousands more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
34 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Menendez brothers to be evaluated by parole board for release after 30 years in prison
The Menendez brothers are set to make their cases for parole starting Thursday, marking the closest they've been to winning freedom from prison since their convictions almost 30 years ago for murdering their parents. Erik and Lyle Menendez were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison for fatally shooting their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989. They were 18 and 21 at the time. While defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance. The brothers became eligible for parole after a Los Angeles judge in May reduced their sentences from life in prison without the possibility of parole to 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole under California law because they were under the ages of 26 when they committed their crimes. A panel or two or three parole hearing officers from a board of commissioners appointed by the governor will evaluate the brothers individually. Erik Menendez will have his hearing Thursday morning, followed by Lyle Menendez on Friday, over videoconference from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego. The board will assess whether the brothers pose an 'unreasonable risk of danger to society' if released, considering factors like criminal history, motivation for the crime and signs of remorse, behavior while in prison and plans for the future, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Even if the board grants their parole, it could still be months before the brothers walk free — if at all. If the board grants each brother's parole, the chief legal counsel has 120 days to review the case. Then Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has 30 days to affirm or deny the parole. Only then, if Newsom affirms the parole, would the Menendez brothers be able to leave prison. Newsom had previously ordered the state parole board to conduct a risk assessment of the brothers in response to a clemency request. At the time, he emphasized that the key question was whether the brothers posed an 'unreasonable risk to public safety.' He noted at a May news conference that he has both approved and rejected decisions by the parole board before and that he was the 'ultimate arbiter.' The brothers' lawyer, Mark Geragos, sought release last month for Erik Menendez after he was hospitalized for a 'serious medical condition.' He has since returned to prison. The case has captured the attention of true crime enthusiasts for decades and spawned documentaries, television specials and dramatizations. The Netflix drama 'Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story' and the documentary 'The Menendez Brothers,' both released in 2024, have been credited for bringing new attention to the brothers. In the last year, weigh-in from celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and a greater recognition of the brothers as victims of sexual abuse has helped amass a legion of supporters who have called for their release. Some have flown to Los Angeles over the past few months, holding rallies and attending court hearings as the brothers' attorneys pushed for their resentencing. The previous LA County district attorney, George Gascón, first opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences. Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for fellow people in prison, his office said in a petition. The judge's decision to ultimately resentence the brothers followed months of pushback from current prosecutors, who argued the brothers hadn't taken adequate responsibility for their crimes. The Menendez brothers still have a pending habeas corpus petition filed in May 2023 seeking a review of their convictions based on new evidence supporting their claims of sexual abuse by their father. Last month, a different judge ordered Los Angeles prosecutors to explain why their case shouldn't be reexamined. The state corrections department has selected one media representative to view the proceedings virtually and share notes with the rest of the press at set intervals.
Arab News
13 hours ago
- Arab News
Myanmar's torture must not be ignored
The latest report from UN investigators on Myanmar is one of the most harrowing yet. It documents the systematic use of torture by the junta's security forces in prisons and interrogation centers across the country. What is especially horrifying is that children are among the victims. Some are targeted with electric shocks and sexual violence. Others are arrested as proxies for their parents, brutalized to extract information or as a warning to entire communities. This is not just another story of a repressive regime. These are gross violations of international law and, in some cases, they amount to crimes against humanity. Torture of detainees has long been a feature of authoritarian rule, but what is happening in Myanmar is now widespread, coordinated and openly documented. It is meant to terrorize the population into submission at a time when the junta is losing control of much of the country to armed resistance. The first key questions that arise from this report are simple: what exactly does it reveal and why does it matter? Investigators gathered testimonies from survivors and defectors, detailing practices including electric shocks to the genitals, burning with heated metal rods, the pulling out of fingernails and prolonged beatings. Victims described being forced to kneel for hours on sharp objects or having plastic bags tied over their heads until they nearly suffocated. The accounts also show that women and girls are subjected to sexual assault in detention as a method of humiliation and coercion. Children are perhaps the most shocking victims. Some were detained in place of missing parents who were wanted for their political activity. Others were swept up in mass arrests after protests. The psychological scars inflicted on these young people will endure long after Myanmar's conflict ends. The UN investigators concluded that this torture is not the result of rogue soldiers acting on their own initiative. Rather, it is a deliberate policy, orchestrated at the highest levels of the junta's security apparatus. It is systematic, organized and designed to suppress dissent through fear. That makes it more than just a human rights violation. It is a crime under international law. It is meant to terrorize the population into submission at a time when the junta is losing control of much of the country. Dr. Azeem Ibrahim The next, more difficult, question is: what can be done about it? Myanmar's generals have faced international condemnation before, most notably after the campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Rohingya Muslims in 2017. That episode drove hundreds of thousands of Rohingya into Bangladesh, where they remain in refugee camps today. And yet, despite widespread recognition of the atrocity, not a single senior general has been held accountable. The International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court have ongoing cases, but justice moves slowly while the victims continue to suffer. This impunity has emboldened the junta. They know the global community has limited tools and even less political will to enforce accountability. Statements of concern are issued and sanctions are applied piecemeal, but no concerted international strategy has ever emerged to hold Myanmar's military leaders to account. What should happen now is clear. First, governments must use the UN report as a basis for renewed action at the Security Council and the Human Rights Council. Even if China or Russia block binding resolutions, the evidence should be referred directly to international courts and prosecutors. There is already a case at The Hague brought by Gambia on behalf of the Rohingya. This new evidence should be added to strengthen charges of crimes against humanity. Second, sanctions must be targeted not only at senior military figures but also at the networks of companies and cronies who fund the junta's repression. Arms sales, aviation fuel and access to foreign currency are all lifelines that allow the generals to maintain their grip. Cutting these off is essential. Third, regional actors, especially Association of Southeast Asian Nations members, must break their silence. For too long, the region's states have treated Myanmar's crisis as an internal affair. But the torture of children and widespread atrocities cannot be brushed aside as domestic politics. It undermines the entire region's credibility and stability. Neighboring countries must push harder for humanitarian access and begin exploring options for accountability. Finally, civil society and diaspora groups must be empowered to document, advocate and sustain pressure. The voices of survivors should be amplified, not silenced. International media and human rights organizations need to ensure that these stories do not fade into obscurity. The stakes are far greater than Myanmar's domestic politics. When the world tolerates torture of children and systematic abuse by a military regime, it signals to other authoritarian leaders that they can act with impunity. It corrodes the entire international system that is meant to protect basic human dignity. The people of Myanmar have shown remarkable courage in resisting the junta's brutality. Despite massacres, airstrikes and torture, the opposition movement has not been extinguished. That resilience deserves more than sympathy. It demands action. The UN's new report has given us the evidence. The question is whether the international community has the resolve to act. Failure to respond will not just betray Myanmar's children, it will erode the credibility of international law everywhere. As we watch this tragedy unfold, we should remember that silence is complicity. The torture chambers of Myanmar are not hidden. They are open for the world to see. The only question is whether the world will choose to look away. • Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is the director of special initiatives at the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, DC. X: @AzeemIbrahim
Arab News
19 hours ago
- Arab News
Philippine regulator resists online gambling ban amid pressure to criminalize industry
MANILA: The Philippine gaming regulator on Monday opposed a proposed ban on online gambling, despite mounting nationwide calls to criminalize it over soaring numbers of addiction, debt and mental health cases. The online gambling sector in the Philippines has been growing exponentially, with gross revenues jumping from $140 million in 2022 to $2.4 billion in 2024, according to Senate Committee on Games and Amusement data. The committee held a hearing last week, highlighting the human cost of the industry, with its members demanding to outlaw it, saying the country was facing a full-blown public health and social crisis. Sen. Erwin Tulfo, who led the hearing on online gambling, warned that 'as long as online gambling exists, we are breeding the next generation of addicts, debtors, and broken families.' He called for a ban and to 'prosecute not only the operators, but also the enablers — in the government and in the private sector — who profit from this misery.' The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. — a government-owned and -controlled corporation, which is both an operator and regulator, and was present during the hearing — sent Arab News a statement saying it 'is not in favor of a total ban and instead advocates for stricter regulation.' The corporation said illegal operators were the real problem. 'Unfortunately, many of these unregulated online operators are based overseas who target Filipinos, most of whom do not realize that the sites they are playing on are not licensed by PAGCOR. This is where problems arise, especially regarding age restrictions.' But a survey cited by senators indicates that age was not the main issue. It indicated that 66 percent of Filipinos aged 18 to 40, and 57 percent of those aged 41 to 55 were engaged in online gambling. Nearly a third bet multiple times a week, some wagering up to $53 per session. Majority Leader Joel Villanueva warned that online gambling was a 'growing national crisis' in the Philippines. 'People are not just risking their hard-earned money. They are putting their futures, families, and lives on the line. The lure of instant wealth has already led many down a path of addiction, debt, and despair,' he said. 'Online gambling is not just a matter of financial loss. It is strongly associated with serious mental and physical health issues, broken relationships, family conflict, increased cases of domestic violence and suicide, crime against persons and property, and ultimately, the erosion of opportunities and dignity in the lives of many Filipinos.' Bridges of Hope, a prominent addiction treatment and rehabilitation organization in the Philippines, reports that currently seven out of 10 of its clients are now treated for online gambling addiction. The support group Recovering Gamblers of the Philippines says that the proportion of online gamblers among its members has increased from 60 to 90 percent in just the past two years. Dr. Tony Leachon, a physician and commentator on public health, said that online gambling addiction has turned into a 'silent epidemic that corrodes mental health, destabilizes families, and fractures communities.' He warned that PAGCOR's 'dual role as regulator and operator creates a conflict of interest that undermines protective measures' in the Philippines, where financial vulnerability is widespread. Leachon told Arab News: 'Addiction drives people to borrow from loan sharks, sell possessions, or neglect basic needs like food and education. This is not merely a behavioral issue. 'It is a public health crisis that demands systemic intervention, just as we would respond to substance abuse or infectious disease.' 'Without decisive action, we risk institutionalizing addiction as a cultural norm,' he added.
