Budget 2025 Robs Researchers To Pay For Regulation
This years budget allows us to update our analysis showing how far short of the 0.6% of GDP target we fall. We advocate for alternative budgets that initially restore core public research investment to inflation-adjusted 2019 levels and then proceed …
NZAS Co-Presidents Lucy Stewart and Troy Baisden have made initial comments on the Budget released by the coalition government this week, highlighting the 're-prioritisation' of frontline research funds to pay for the government's science reforms. Pre-Budget commentary has emphasised that Aotearoa New Zealand's research and science system has been under-funded by successive governments for decades and that meaningful new funding is needed if we want to achieve the same level of science and innovation as other small advanced economies [1]. The need for funding from government was also a key theme of the first Science System Advisory Group report released in January 2025 [2].
Prof Troy Baisden laments, 'Following last year's nothing-burger budget for science, this year edges toward a black hole budget for the research system. Many areas of research may now be heading across a threshold where there's no escape and they can no longer rebuild what is being lost.'
Dr Lucy Stewart comments, 'The Government signalled that there was unlikely to be new spending for research and science in this Budget. They have also, in the past six months, demonstrated a willingness to take funding away from areas of research that they do not see as priorities. This was most clearly illustrated by the changes to the Marsden Fund in December 2024, which removed social sciences and humanities from the eligible areas of research. In recent weeks they have also announced that the Endeavour Fund will not award new funding in 2026 and will only offer extensions to current projects which are considered to be 'value for money' and to align with the government's priorities.
At the same time, they have committed to significant reforms to the science system including the establishment of three – or perhaps four – new Public Research Organisations, two created by merging existing Crown Research Institutes, as well as the establishment of a new regulator for genetic technologies. These reforms will cost money. In this Budget, we learn that they propose to pay for them by cutting yet more money from our core research funds – primarily the Health Research Fund, which has $17 million less budgeted in the 2025/2026 financial year, as well as the Catalyst Research fund, which loses $12 million. The Strategic Science Investment Fund is also hit by significant 'reprioritisation' of funds forecast across the next three years, and cuts of approximately $5 million are proposed for the Marsden Fund in 2026/2027 and 2027/2028 as well. The Marsden Fund has effectively not received any new funding for nearly a decade, so it is already very hard-hit by inflation.
As I said last year, I expect to see more job losses across the sector before the end of the year. Many researchers depend entirely on contestable funding to support their jobs and less contestable funding available means fewer researchers will be employed.
I do note that there are small but relatively meaningful increases budgeted for funds supporting the development of mātauranga Māori researchers and organisations, PhD students working on applied science, and early and mid career researcher fellowships. This is good to see. However, at the same time the research system that these researchers are part of is being torn down around them. Small increases cannot make up for that.'
Prof Troy Baisden adds: 'Today's budget continues to double down on a pattern spanning four decades, in which New Zealand's governments have been world leaders in choosing not to invest in the future. We appear determined to fall behind peer nations with our investment in research, science, innovation and technology. This is increasingly true for universities, which continue to see the increasing support they saw across the decade to 2020 reversed.
There's almost no good news, with significant areas now having gone many years without any adjustment for the pulse of inflation. Areas we depend on such as GeoNet, which helps us understand earthquakes and tsunamis as they affect us, are seeing budget cuts of around 13%. The significant research programmes supported through the Ministry of Primary Industries are not immune, with reductions of $25 million across areas such as sustainable land management and greenhouse gas emissions reductions. We're seeing not just funding cuts in the future, but also 'efficiencies' where underspending has occurred relative to signalled allocations. Relatively small new initiatives in space science, touted as an important new area while Judith Collins was Minister, appear to be petering out to nothing.
The Table of Estimates produced with Budget 2025 also allows us to look back, from an estimate for the year just ended to finalised funding in previous years. Funding for the entire tertiary education sector has flatlined then declined, following the period when Government helped stabilise the sector during the pandemic's impacts. Up until 2019 the sector was growing consistently. Although the current budget is consistent with the pre-2019 trend in dollar terms, it doesn't account for the recent pulse of inflation. Institutional budgets are undergoing increasing stress and provide little solace to top research teams who miss out or are now deemed ineligible for contestable research funding such as the Marsden fund. A very disappointing case is the significant cuts to the Health Research Fund, slowing the front of a pipeline into an innovation ecosystem where New Zealand has global companies.
When last year's budget emerged with cuts to science, we noted that our hope for this year sat with Sir Peter Gluckman's Science System and University Advisory Groups (SSAG and UAG) to make a case for future funding. The first SSAG report made a very strong case, in part noting that we should focus more on the foundation that core public research investment provides. When carried out with sufficient quality, core public research investment of about 0.6% of GDP ensures that additional investments by government and business have strong payoffs. These payoffs across the economy have been tallied as an average of $11 for every dollar invested in Europe, or $5–20 for every dollar invested in Australia. The government is calling for that further investment, but we continue to undermine the foundation that's needed for these payoffs to be reliable.
This year's budget allows us to update our analysis showing how far short of the 0.6% of GDP target we fall. We advocate for alternative budgets that initially restore core public research investment to inflation-adjusted 2019 levels and then proceed to the 0.6% target over 5 years.'
2 https://www.mbie.govt.nz/assets/science-system-advisory-group-report.pdf
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
One Day's Notice Shows Rushed Approach To Gutting New Zealand's Science Funding
Revelations that the Marsden Fund was given just one day's notice of further funding cuts demonstrates the Government's cavalier approach to dismantling New Zealand's science sector, the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi said today. The $15 million cut to the Marsden Fund is in addition to the cuts that were already announced in Budget 2025. "It is outrageous that the Royal Society only learned of the $15 million funding cut the day before the Institute for Advanced Technology was announced and was told to keep quiet about it," said PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons. "This is no way to make policy that will affect New Zealand's scientific capability for decades to come. The Government should be engaging meaningfully with our science sector workforce on their reforms, not giving them a day's notice and swearing them to secrecy." "The Marsden Fund supports fundamental research - the kind of science that leads to breakthrough discoveries and innovations. "The Government keeps talking about wanting research that can be commercialised, but they don't seem to understand that you can't have applied research without the fundamental research that underpins it." PSA represents public sector science workers including in Public Research Organisations and Callaghan Innovation. "Our members feel demoralised and uncertain about the future. Many are considering leaving New Zealand for countries that value scientific research. We're haemorrhaging talent and institutional knowledge," Fitzsimons said. "The Government needs to step back from these rushed reforms and engage meaningfully with the sector and its workforce. The final report of Sir Peter Gluckman's review has been sitting with the Science Minister since April but still hasn't been released. "We call on the Government to pause these damaging cuts, release the Gluckman review, and have a meaningful conversation with scientists, researchers and their representatives. Our researchers and the New Zealand public deserve better than policy-making by stealth and ambush." Note The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand's largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Marsden Fund says it was given only a day's notice of further funding cuts
Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti said public good science was still being supported, and the government would have more options to reinvest in the future. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi A decades-old fund dedicated to blue-skies research says it was given a day's notice of further funding cuts and told to keep quiet about it until the government made it public. The Marsden Fund, which backs fundamental research - science for the sake of knowledge - is among three contestable funds to lose millions to help set up the new Institute for Advanced Technology . Scientists said slashing funding for such research could have significant unintended consequences for innovation and warned the Prime Minister as such in a letter earlier this month. The cuts come amid a long-awaited review into the sector - final recommendations were delivered to the Science Minister three months ago, but are yet to be made public - and after the government announced the biggest overhaul of the science system in decades , to "ensure a system that generates maximum value for the economy". The reforms so far have seen the dissolution of science commercialisation arm, Callaghan Innovation, and merger of the six Crown Research Institutes into three mega science entities or Public Research Organisations (PROs) plus a fourth dedicated to advanced technology. Callaghan Innovation was dissolved in the government's overhaul of the science sector. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) said of the $231 million earmarked for the Institute for Advanced Technology over the next four years, more than half - $150.4m - was to be reallocated from within the science, innovation, and technology portfolio. MBIE's general manager of technology and innovation Dean Ford said it represented a shift in priorities towards emerging technologies that could be commercialised. "The majority of this funding will continue to go into science - but into new areas of research that have significant potential, where New Zealand is developing greater capability." Science Minister Shane Reti said organisations affected by the reallocated funding for the Institute for Advanced Technology, were advised ahead of the public announcement on 18 July. From July 2028, the Endeavour Fund, which provided funding for university researchers, will have its funding cut by $13.5m, and the Health and Research Council will lose $11.5m. While the Marsden Fund will have its funding slashed by a one-off $15m. Just over $24m has been found in the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation's operations across 2027-29, $18m from the New to R&D Grant for three years from 2025, and $3m is being reprioritised from 'contract management' over the next three years from July 2026. MBIE said $37.5m has also been found from within the Strategic Science Investment Fund from contracts which are coming to an end over the next three years, and $21.6m has been reprioritised from unallocated National Science Challenge funding. The remaining $80m will support the parts of Callaghan Innovation that are being retained. The changes are in addition to the $212m repurposed from research and innovation funds in Budget 2025 to support the overhaul of the science system. In a statement the Royal Society, which administered the Marsden Fund, said it learned of the $15m funding cut the day before the Institute for Advanced Technology was announced. "The Royal Society Te Apārangi received a letter from the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) on the afternoon of Friday 18 July 2025, confirming a phonecall the previous evening. "The letter advised that the Marsden Fund will be reduced by a further $15 million in the 2028/29 year, in addition to the reductions already announced in the Government's 2025 Budget in May. "Separately, MBIE requested that this information be treated in strict confidence until the government publicly released it." A briefing to the Science Minister regarding the funding for the Institute was made public on MBIE's website on 6 August . The society said the $15m reallocation "effectively doubles the reductions already announced in this year's budget, amounting to a cut of about 29 percent over the 3 years from 2026/27 to 2028/29". President of the Fund professor Jane Harding said the cuts to fundamental research were likely to have "significant unintended consequences" and "will undermine the long-term potential of the new Institute". "The Society is very concerned that cuts to funding for the fundamental research supported by the Marsden Fund will undermine the long-term potential of the new Institute and other parts of the sector that apply early stage research, by significantly reducing the pipeline of knowledge at the new-discovery end of the process. "This may have important unintended consequences for New Zealand in the long term." The cuts follow a government directive last year, that saw the Marsden Fund abandon support for social science and humanities research and direct at least half of its investments to research with economic potential. A spokesperson for the Health and Research Council said it's too early to know how the loss of $11.5m per year from July 2028 - a 10 percent reduction to its investment fund - and the almost $600,000 cut to its operational budget from next July, will impact the council's work. The Association of Scientists said it's "extremely concerned" by the reprioritisation of funds and says the cuts on top of Budget 2025 mean "our major research funds are in extremely bad shape". Co-president Lucy Stewart said the reduced contract management funding likely meant there would be jobs lost at funders such as the Royal Society and MBIE. Reti said "the government has made it clear on several occasions that we want publicly funded research to focus on solving real world problems that can be commercialised". He said public good science was continuing to be supported, and the government would have more options to reinvest in the future, "with the economic gains that can be made through commercialising research and advanced technologies". Meanwhile, the final report of Sir Peter Gluckman's review of the science system is yet to be made public following its delivery to the Science Minister at the end of April. The long-awaited report was the second part of the Science System Advisory Group's review of the sector, and would include recommendations on the system's funding. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
The govt's capacity for opacity
The Beehive is urgently in need of some metaphorical window cleaning. The literal window cleaners have no doubt already been sacked by the government to save a few thousand dollars. But the cry for the metaphorical ones is stronger — every week another layer of political grime seems to affix itself to any surface which may once have let light through and allowed those outside to see what might be happening within. It is upsetting to see — or, perhaps not see — how much this government is doing behind closed doors. Far too much is being done secretively and, when details are finally liberated to the public, efforts are made to ensure that that is done in the most inconvenient way at the worst possible time — as happened with the release of documents around its approval of a third medical school at the University of Waikato. There is nothing new, of course, in ministers and officials playing these games and tinkering with the public and the media, but there appears to be a degree more cynicism in recent behaviour. Unfortunately, the previous government can hardly be held up to the current administration as a shining example of how to be transparent. Despite Labour making Chris Hipkins the minister responsible for open government, the amount of obfuscation and spin which it generated has not faded from memory. Anyone who voted for the current government in the hope of greater transparency and a breather from such tactics must be very disenchanted with the efforts of the coalition partners to date. Concerning details have now come to light of how the government deliberately hid what it was up to regarding the provocative changes to pay equity, which saved the coalition's bacon by freeing up billions of dollars to make this year's Budget figures appear more sanguine. Thirty-three active claims were immediately cancelled by the Bill, which was passed under urgency in May. RNZ and Newsroom have been delving into the government's management and manipulation of pay equity changes to ensure the public remained in the dark until it was too late for them to be able to make any difference. Documents released under the Official Information Act show the assiduous stage management included even Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who attended one of the ministerial meetings at which instructions were issued to withhold the proactive release of their diaries. Photo: RNZ An email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden said officials should remove digital access to Cabinet papers on the topic, with hard copies instead hand-delivered to ministers. The whole strategy was given a name, Project 10. There were recommendations that nothing be said publicly until the Bill had been introduced to the House — the reason being there could be a raft of new claims if the public knew beforehand. However, as Newsroom points out, that is fallacious, given the existing pending claims were cancelled anyway by the new legislation. Despite warnings that the furtive approach potentially breached people's human rights, the government carried on regardless. Sometimes there are valid reasons for keeping matters confidential. But more often, secrecy is a way of keeping knowledge and power close to the chests of one group to deliberately disadvantage others. Hiding matters can also suggest lack of confidence in one's decision-making abilities and the desire to avoid scrutiny of such. The documents reveal a government more concerned with meeting its mantra of economic prudence than it is with looking after the public. This is all very disappointing, from a government which continues to disappoint and blame others for its own lack of progress. At least we now know the kind of thinking which has gone on behind those murky Beehive windows and can keep on the government's case for greater transparency — transparency which New Zealanders have a right to. Use some judgement We support the vigilant policing of mobility parks to ensure people with disabilities can stop as close as possible to their destinations. However, the $750 fine a Dunedin City Council parking officer handed to injured 78-year-old Swava Pociecha for her husband's momentary stop to pick her up outside Moana Pool after a physiotherapy session seems unfair. The council clearly needs to hold some lessons on using discretion.
