logo
3 men found guilty in daytime Toronto shooting that left 12-year-old dead

3 men found guilty in daytime Toronto shooting that left 12-year-old dead

CBC2 days ago

Toronto · Breaking Dante Sebastian Andreatta, 12, was shopping with his mother when he was hit by a stray bullet during a brazen afternoon shooting on Nov. 7, 2020. (GoFundMe.com)
Three men have been found guilty of first-degree murder and attempted murder in connection to a fatal shooting in North York in 2020 that left a 12-year-old boy dead and three others injured.
More to come.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet the 11 candidates vying to succeed George Darouze in Osgoode
Meet the 11 candidates vying to succeed George Darouze in Osgoode

CBC

time39 minutes ago

  • CBC

Meet the 11 candidates vying to succeed George Darouze in Osgoode

Social Sharing Better roads. More police. Giving rural wards like Osgoode a stronger voice at city council. These are some of the goals of the 11 people vying to be Ottawa's next Ward 20 councillor. The seat became vacant after George Darouze was elected as Carleton's MPP. Residents will vote on his replacement on June 16 from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m, or in advance on June 6. To help electors understand who the candidates are and what they stand for, we asked all 11 to complete a questionnaire, and most of them responded. You can learn more about the candidates and what they had to say by reading their questionnaire responses below. You can also skip directly to the candidate you want to hear from by following these links: The election comes over a year before the city's next general election on Oct. 26, 2026. For more information about where and how to vote, visit the city's election page. Candidates CBC Ottawa sent a detailed questionnaire to Osgoode candidates and all but one responded. Candidates were also asked to submit photos of themselves. Where candidates have websites or campaign pages on social media, those links can be accessed by clicking on the candidate's name. Road maintenance, plus policing and emergency presence are among Boone's top priorities for the ward. here. Gulati cites the creation a local business association as one of his top priorities, and also wants to make the Tewin development a "win-win situation" for residents and developers. Read his questionnaire answers in full here. Dalton Holloway Holloway says it's important that Osgoode has the right infrastructure. He also wants to make sure the rural voice is "amplified." here. Colette Lacroix-Velthuis Ensuring the city executes on the area's core services, community safety, and emergency services "that we deserve" are among Lacroix-Velthuis's priorities. here. Dan O'Brien O'Brien says he wants improved road conditions in the ward — and more police to discourage speeding and other illegal activity. here. Isabelle Skalski Priorities for Skalski start with roads: better maintenance, addressing a lack of paved shoulders and expanding key routes. here. Doug Thompson Thompson also counts a lack of sufficient policing as a concern, and he's also advocating for road upgrades. here. Gregory Vail Vail is intent on joining forces with Ottawa's four other rural councillors to strength their collective voice, and working closely with community groups. here. Jennifer van Koughnett "My platform is what I like to call the Ts; traffic: trails, and transparency," van Koughnett writes. Arnold Vaughan Peter Westaway Westaway is intensely focused on rethinking Ottawa's Greenbelt, and believes the ward should concern itself more with what is going on in the city as a whole.

Scotiabank holds customer responsible for almost $20K in credit card fraud
Scotiabank holds customer responsible for almost $20K in credit card fraud

CBC

time42 minutes ago

  • CBC

Scotiabank holds customer responsible for almost $20K in credit card fraud

Social Sharing Jordon Judge's cellphone rang as he sat in his local Vancouver coffee shop last October — caller ID said the person was from Scotiabank. He had no idea it was actually a fraudster who had manipulated the call display, a practice known as phone call "spoofing." The fraudster said he was calling to flag two suspicious charges that were coming through on Judge's Scotiabank Visa card. Judge said he hadn't approved those charges and the caller said they would be blocked. But two days later, Judge spotted two large charges on his credit card statement, totalling almost $20,000. "Those were not my charges," he told Go Public. "So it was definitely astonishment." Got a story you want investigated? Contact Erica and the Go Public team at gopublic@ It was the beginning of a long and frustrating process, during which Scotiabank continued to insist he was liable for the fraudulent charges. Credit card fraud is a growing problem. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre doesn't track how much money people lose to it, but says that over the past three years, an increasing portion of identity fraud cases have involved compromised credit cards. WATCH | On the hook for $20K: Bank blames customer for $20K in credit card fraud | Go Public 5 hours ago Duration 2:09 The Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments says complaints related to fraud are the number one issue it deals with, and only e-transfers have more fraud complaints than credit cards. Under federal law, a person's maximum liability for unauthorized credit card transactions is generally capped at $50 unless the bank can prove the customer was grossly negligent in protecting their card. A cybersecurity expert says increasing fraud and the rise in complex technology means financial institutions should be conducting thorough investigations and providing clear evidence when holding customers liable. "All that the bank has done is accuse [Judge] of either negligence or malice," said Claudiu Popa, who has 35 years' experience in cybersecurity and wrote The Canadian Cyberfraud Handbook. "The bank has to prove that the customer is the one who perpetrated this quite significant and sophisticated fraud." Scotiabank declined an interview request, did not answer any written questions and instead sent a brief statement, reminding customers to safeguard their personal information. What happened The fraudster who called Judge asked for his birth date and mother's maiden name, which Judge shared. But then the fraudster asked him to share a "one-time passcode" — a type of two-step verification — that was texted to his phone. Judge says he refused to do that, because the message also told him not to share the code with anyone, and said that no one from Scotiabank would ever ask for it. The fraudster claimed that he stopped the charges from going through and hung up. But two days later, Judge discovered a charge for $17,900 to Anglia Ruskin University in the U.K. on his statement, and a second for $1,800, supposedly paid to someone by the name of Paula S. Taylor. "I wasn't worried at the time because I knew those weren't my charges," said Judge. "I thought I couldn't be held accountable for it." No transparency Judge filed a request for compensation with Scotiabank, which sent him a letter a few weeks later, saying the bank had "examined all relevant documentation" and concluded that he was responsible for the charges. The letter did not outline what evidence had been reviewed and did not explain why the bank concluded he should be on the hook for almost $20,000 — plus the growing interest. "When people sign up for credit cards, they're under the assumption that if they get scammed, they're not liable for the purchases made on their credit card," said Judge. "Apparently that's not the case." He appealed, and a second letter — from Scotiabank's Escalated Customer Concerns Office (ECCO) — also found Judge responsible, stating that a one-time passcode was used for the university charge, calling it "a feature that has a proven track record in mitigating fraudulent and nefarious activities". The ECCO letter said that because the code was sent to Judge's phone, it "indicates" that the code was disclosed. Judge appealed that decision, but Scotiabank's Customer Complaints Appeals Office also claimed in a letter that evidence "suggests" Judge revealed a one-time passcode. "Evidence that may 'suggest' something isn't evidence of a fact," said Geoff White, executive director of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre. "One would like to see more in terms of actual evidence demonstrating that the customer was negligent — rather than simply an assertion." White also said the onus shouldn't be on individuals to prove they are innocent of a crime. "The onus is in fact on institutions to take care of their systems," said White. "Make sure that their processes are secure." Popa, the cybersecurity expert, took a look at Scotiabank's correspondence and says the financial institution didn't provide evidence of "the most basic investigation," which would include reviewing a log of activities that would be time-stamped — such as showing when an individual received the one-time passcode and when it was entered into a web interface. "This was never provided," said Popa. "Nor was there an indication that this kind of log was inspected." Contrary to Scotia's insistence that a one-time passcode is a proven fraud deterrent, Popa says a code sent via email or SMS is vulnerable to "a number of different types of compromises" and is less safe than using an authenticator app. Cellphones can be hacked using malware or spyware and SIM cards can be hijacked — allowing fraudsters to intercept text messages. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre also told Go Public that it recommends people use an authenticator app when possible. "Unlike SMS/text messages or email messages, authenticator apps generate time-sensitive passcodes that are not vulnerable to SIM swapping or potential text message and email interception," wrote CAFC spokesperson Jeff Horncastle. The Quebec-based advocacy group Option consommateurs has been calling on the federal government to strengthen protections for banking customers in cases of fraud. In a proposal to MPs earlier this year, the organization said the Bank Act should require transparency when a bank investigates, and clarify that the burden of proving the customer was highly negligent rests on the bank. Judge gets his money back Go Public contacted Anglia Ruskin University to ask about the charge on Judge's credit card. A representative said Scotiabank never contacted the university — another disappointment to Popa. "Why would you not contact an organization that you know exists?" asked Popa. "They have a duty to investigate and to protect their customers." After Go Public made several inquiries with the university, it said it conducted an investigation and reimbursed Judge. A spokesperson said it could not elaborate on its findings, such as whether the money was used to pay for someone's tuition. Go Public also asked Scotiabank several times what evidence it had to hold its customer responsible for the fraudulent charges. Although the bank did not reply, it recently credited Judge's bank account — covering the outstanding $1,800 paid to "Paula S. Taylor" and the interest that had accrued on both charges. Judge says no one from Scotiabank contacted him to explain the about-face. "I do think it's ridiculous that it took the media to get involved until they decided they would even act as if they cared," said Judge. Previously, Scotiabank had offered Judge $200 as a "goodwill gesture," but said he would have to acknowledge his claim was resolved and drop any further action. Judge declined. Although he has been fully compensated, Judge had to push for almost eight months, and is still left without any answers about why Scotiabank insisted for so long that he was responsible for the fraud. "My biggest concern is that there are people in his situation … who may not have the ability to pressure their financial institution to be more transparent or to recognize the fact that they might not be guilty," said Popa, the cybersecurity expert. "People are out there who are simply being silently victimized."

Hospital alleges its floors aren't flat, files $100M lawsuit against builder
Hospital alleges its floors aren't flat, files $100M lawsuit against builder

CBC

time44 minutes ago

  • CBC

Hospital alleges its floors aren't flat, files $100M lawsuit against builder

Humber River Health is suing the consortium contracted to build and maintain its Toronto hospital for $100 million, alleging that negligent design and construction is creating health and safety problems for patients and staff. The lawsuit, filed in early April, alleges that a "sizable portion" of the hospital's floors are not level or flat and that some of the flooring itself is deteriorating. "Floor levelness is a critical operational and safety issue," reads Humber River Health's claim, filed in Ontario Superior Court. "Non-level floors make it difficult for staff to move equipment, supplies, food, and patients on wheeled transportation devices. Often, wheeled carts have to be placed behind rubber stoppers to prevent the carts from sliding out of position." The statement of claim goes on to say that the floor conditions "have led, and will continue to lead, to health and safety issues" for patients and staff. It also says that durability problems with the floors are having a major operational impact as "critical rooms" and areas of the hospital have been unavailable because of maintenance. Touted as North America's first fully digital hospital, construction on Humber River Hospital began in 2011 and it opened in October 2015. The facility was built through a public-private partnership with Plenary Health Care Partnerships. The Ontario government contracted Plenary to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the hospital for 30 years. WATCH | Why this hospital is suing the consortium that built it: Toronto hospital sues builder for $100M claiming uneven floors create safety issues 19 minutes ago Duration 2:15 In a statement, Humber River Health spokesperson Joe Gorman said the hospital is "implementing all necessary measures to ensure the best experience for our patients, staff and community" while it works to resolve these problems. Plenary Health Care Partnerships hasn't filed a statement of defence yet. Due to contractual obligations, the consortium told CBC Toronto it couldn't comment. Not the first lawsuit The floor lawsuit is the latest in a series of claims filed in the last couple of years concerning alleged issues with the design and construction of the northwest Toronto hospital. Since 2023, four other lawsuits totalling at least $10.4 million have been filed by Plenary Health Care Partnerships against the contractor and various subcontractors hired to design and build the hospital. The claims are looking for compensation for property damage from flooding caused by valve and breaker leaks and for design flaws with its domestic water system, which affected hot and cold water in patient rooms within the first year the hospital opened, according to the court filings. The leaks included one above the ceiling of the hospital's cancer care unit. The contractor and subcontractors have filed statements of defence in some of those lawsuits. They deny the allegations and any liability claimed by the consortium. Two of the lawsuits concerning leaks and issues with the water system have spawned third-party claims from the subcontractors being sued claiming another third-party subcontractor should be held liable in their place if the courts determine damages are warranted, which they deny. CBC Toronto contacted Ontario's Ministry of Health for comment on whether it is concerned about these alleged construction and design issues with a public hospital that is just 10 years old and on the impact the problems are having on hospital operations and patient care.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store