'I just wanted to vote': Cleona Rosie the Riveter honored for voting 81 years in a row
The first time Lorraine Koons ever voted in a presidential election was in 1944, when she voted for then President Franklin D. Roosevelt's fourth term.
"I wasn't old enough for the primary that year," she said. "You had to be 21 to vote then in those years, and so I was only 21 in time for the general election."
Since then, Koons has voted 81 years in a row, saying that she "never ever" thought about skipping an election and not submitting a ballot.
"I think voting to me is an important part of life," she said. "You're helping your government in a small way."
That why members of the Lebanon County Lebanon County Bureau of Elections and Voter Registration, along with county and state election officials, came out to Lebanon Valley Home May 9 to acknowledge the 102-year-old Koons' dedication to fulfilling her civic obligation.
"I think it's wonderful," she said. "They really surprised me. I didn't expect all this."
Koons recently wrote the elections office a letter saying that she had recently moved, and a certificate and a commemorative plate she received in 1997 honoring her induction into the Pennsylvania Voter Hall of Fame had gone missing. The Voter Hall of Fame acknowledges commonwealth residents who have voted in every November election for at least 50 consecutive years.
"She wanted to know if there was any way to get a copy of at least the certificate because she would like to pass that along someday," Elections Director Sean Drasher said.
In the process of helping Koons, the elections office staff realized that she had continued her voting record for almost 82 years. The event Friday was supposed to be a small affair, but Drasher said that once state and county officials found out they wanted to join in as well.
"People like Lorraine remind us that we still have a civic obligation to get out there and vote," he said. "And to do it with such a cheery smile, she's a great ambassador."
Koons, who spent all but the last three years living in Cleona, graduated from Lebanon High School in 1940 and began working at the Cleona Paper Box Factory. Last year she spoke with the Lebanon Daily News about her time as a "Rosie the Riveter," helping to repair U.S. aircraft at the Middletown Air Depot during World War II.
"I worked in the fuselage department," she said. "That department put in new gas tanks and we worked on the oxygen systems and the oil systems. We repaired any damage that was made from enemy fire."
In December 2024, Koons received the Rosie the Riveter Congressional Medal of Honor for her service.
Lorraine Koons: Cleona Rosie the Riveter's proudest moments: working the air depot and lifetime of voting
But as proud as she is about her time as a Rosie, Koons is also grateful for her chance to vote in every election. Voting became important to her at a young age, through her aunt who was very politically minded.
"When I was just little, I had an aunt that was very active in local politics," she said. "She took me along with her to all the conventions, rallies and speeches. ... I couldn't wait till I was 21. I just wanted to vote."
To celebrate her voting record May 9, the election office staff got Koons a cake, baseball hat, a card and an elections blanket. State Rep. Russ Diamond presented Koons with a House of Representatives proclamation, and state Rep. Chris Gebhard, along with County Commissioners Michael Kuhn and Jo Ellen Litz, also expressed their congratulations.
Koons said that it's a privilege to go out and vote, especially during the primary.
"So many people think, 'Oh I'm not going to vote in the primary,' and that's the important one," she said. "That's when you pick the people that are going to run."
The Pennsylvania 2025 municipal primary is scheduled for May 20.
Matthew Toth is a reporter for the Lebanon Daily News. Reach him at mtoth@ldnews.com or on X at @DAMattToth.
This article originally appeared on Lebanon Daily News: Cleona Rosie the Riveter recognized for 81-year voting record
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
2 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group
Beijing, China, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — A Japanese civil group said in an exclusive interview with the Global Times on Tuesday that Japanese junior high school history textbooks contain inaccurate descriptions regarding the causes of World War II. The group warned that Japan's current lack of responsibility in addressing historical issues could make it difficult for Japanese young people to understand the true history of the war and to critically examine the essence of contemporary social issues. Since April, junior high schools across Japan started to use new textbooks. The changes to the way World War II is described have sparked concern and unease among the Children and Textbooks Japan Network 21, a non-governmental organization formed in 1998 that has long been focusing on issues surrounding textbook approval and the presentation of war history in Japan. 'We reviewed junior high school history textbooks published by Tokyo Shoseki, Kyoiku Shuppan, Teikoku-Shoin, Yamakawa Shuppansha, Nihon Bunkyo Shuppan, and Manabisha. Among them, only Manabisha's version explicitly writes that 'Japan started the war,' while most textbooks used descriptions like 'the war began,'' Yoko Kojiya, secretary-general of the organization, told the Global Times on Tuesday via email, noting this expression makes it difficult for students to understand and contemplate why Japan started the war and how it proceeded with colonial rule. Kojiya pointed out particularly that the descriptions in textbooks about Japan's invasion of China are not sufficiently detailed. Also, the content about why Japan went to war with the US and the UK in 1941 is problematic because it is described as 'Japan had to go to war due to being isolated by the ABCD [America, Britain, China and Dutch] encirclement.' Kojiya said to better teach history and allow Japanese students to grasp war history more fully and impartially, it's vital to enable discussions on why Japan started the wars and how Japanese people should prevent such conflicts from happening in the future. 'Therefore, it is necessary to provide a large amount of historical material to help understand the nature of war.' Kojiya also highlighted the changes concerning the 'Nanjing Massacre' and 'comfort women,' slamming Japanese government's textbook screening policy as political interference in educational content. 'The term 'Nanjing Massacre' is used in fewer textbooks nowadays, with many referring to it as the 'Nanjing Incident' instead. And the number of people massacred is accompanied by caveats such as 'there are various opinions' or that the number 'is being researched,'' Kojiya said. The Nanjing Massacre is one of the darkest chapters of World War II. The atrocities began on December 13, 1937, when Japanese troops captured the then-Chinese capital Nanjing, unleashing six weeks of devastation that claimed the lives of an estimated 300,000 civilians and unarmed soldiers, according to Xinhua. Regarding 'comfort women,' Kojiya said that the removal of the term 'accompanying the military' in the textbooks aims to hide the fact that these women were forced into sexual servitude by the Japanese military. 'The National History Textbook published by ReiwaShoseki even writes 'There is no evidence of Japanese troops forcibly taking away women.' I consider it a serious problem that this passed the government screening without any objections,' Kojiya said. The 'comfort women' system was a military sexual slavery regime enforced by the Japanese government and its military during World War II. It resulted in at least 400,000 innocent women worldwide being forced into sexual slavery. Nearly half of them were Chinese, according to Xinhua. According to Xinhua, in 2021, the Japanese government decided through a cabinet meeting to deem expressions such as 'comfort women accompanying the military' as 'inappropriate textbook terminology.' Japan's education authority subsequently requested modifications to related teaching materials, including those already distributed. Kojiya told the Global Times that it is a serious problem that the descriptions in Japanese history textbooks can be greatly influenced by the policies of the government at any given time. 'The current textbook screening in Japan is not focusing on pointing out academic errors, but rather on whether the descriptions align with government inclinations,' said Kojiya. This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. On May 31, the organization held a seminar in Tokyo to discuss the proper role of Japanese history education eight decades after the war. According to the seminar material Kojiya sent to the Global Times, during the seminar, Hisao Ishiyama, former chairman of the History Educationalist Conference of Japan, said that since 2014, forces that glorify war and distort history started to utilize the deteriorated textbook system and government power to launch a government-wide effort to distort the entire population's understanding of history. In response to this challenge, Kojiya told the Global Times that she is especially worried about the rise of conservative forces, such as the 'Tsukurukai,' which attack reflection on the war and the pacifism of the constitution, advocate for a constitutional amendment, and push forward policies aimed at expanding military capabilities to build Japan into a country that can wage war. 'Thus, it is crucial to squarely face the historical facts of aggression on the basis of the reflection that led to the creation of the Japanese Constitution, and to gather the strength of people who wish to stop policies that will make Japan a 'war state',' Kojiya said. This story first appeared in Global Times: Company: Global TimesContact Person: Anna Li Email: [email protected] Website: City: Beijing Disclaimer: This press release may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies (including product offerings, regulatory plans and business plans) and may change without notice. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Obama called out by progressives for not doing enough to counter Trump
Some liberals reportedly want former President Obama to do more amid President Donald Trump's second term, accusing the former president of sacrificing his "megaphone." "There are many grandmas and Rachel Maddow viewers who have been more vocal in this moment than Barack Obama has," co-founder of the Progressive Change Institute, Adam Green, told the Atlantic. Obama campaigned alongside former President Biden before he dropped out of the race and also stumped for former Vice President Kamala Harris when she became the nominee. The former president spoke out against Trump in April at an event in New York, but has largely remained out of the spotlight since Trump won. "It is heartbreaking," Green said, "to see him sacrificing that megaphone when nobody else quite has it." Democratic Strategists Question Influence Of Obama-era Campaign Operatives In Party's Future Obama accused the Trump administration of trying to destroy the post-World War II international order at the April event before suggesting sacrifice might be necessary to fight back against Trump. Read On The Fox News App "It has been easy during most of our lifetimes to say you are a progressive, or say you are for social justice, or say you are for free speech, and not have to pay a price for it… And now we're in one of those moments when… it's not enough just to say you're for something. You may actually have to do something and possibly sacrifice a little bit," Obama said. "Should Obama get out and do more? Yes, please," Democratic media consultant Tracy Sefl told the Atlantic. "Help us," she said. "We're sinking over here." The Obama Foundation did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. 'Greater Reckoning': Obama's Spot In The Democratic Sun Fading After Harris Loss The former Democratic president also weighed in on the back-and-forth between Harvard and the Trump administration in a post to social media in April, praising his alma mater for standing up against the president. Eric Schultz, an adviser to Obama, told the Atlantic that the former president is careful about the issues he weighs in on. "We try to preserve his voice so that when he does speak, it has impact," Schultz said. "There is a dilution factor that we're very aware of." Obama's former Attorney General Eric Holder told The Atlantic that the former president was out there opposing Trump, but said Democrats needed to be careful not to "regularize" him. "Should he do more? Everybody can have their opinions," Holder said. "The one thing that always kind of pisses me off is when people say he's not out there, or that he's not doing things, that he's just retired, and we never hear from him. If you f------ look, folks, you would see that he's out there." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Jon Favreau, a former Obama speechwriter and co-host of "Pod Save America," told the outlet that the Democratic Party needed new stardom but added that if Trump attempted to run for a third term, he would beg the former president to be the party's standard-bearer again. "The party needs new rising stars, and they need the room to figure out how to meet this moment, just like Obama figured out how to meet the moment 20 years ago," he said. "Unless, of course, Trump tries to run for a third term, in which case I'll be begging Obama to come out of retirement."Original article source: Obama called out by progressives for not doing enough to counter Trump
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tulsi Gabbard warns of nuclear threat in social media video
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard issued a stark warning about the threat of nuclear war in a video posted to her personal account on X, marking a sharp contrast with past comments made by President Donald Trump on the same topic. Gabbard, who recently visited Hiroshima, Japan, reflected on the devastation and "haunting sadness" caused by the atomic bomb dropped during World War II in a post on Tuesday. In the video, she warned that political elite and warmongers are fomenting fear and tension, pushing us closer to "the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before." The three-minute video shows Gabbard visiting several landmarks in Hiroshima. The video also describes in detail what a nuclear event could mean for the United States -- including a simulation of a nuclear attack on San Francisco, California, which appears to destroy the Golden Gate Bridge. MORE: Hegseth, Gabbard lead US delegation to major security summit in Singapore Gabbard's remarks were similar to previous remarks she's made on the campaign trail, however, the video was posted days after she traveled to the Shangri-La Dialogue, a major Asian conference held in Singapore, earlier this month. "This isn't some made-up science fiction story. This is the reality of what's at stake, what we are facing now, because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers," Gabbard said in the video. "Perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to," she added. Gabbard called on people to "speak up and demand an end to this madness." "We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust," Gabbard said. Gabbard's position is in sharp contrast to Trump's previous remarks on the use of nuclear weapons during WWII. In 2016, while campaigning in San Diego, California, Trump criticized then-President Barack Obama for visiting Hiroshima, calling him "pathetic." He added that he didn't care that Obama visited, "just as long as he doesn't apologize" for dropping the bomb: "Who cares." More recently, on Jan. 20, 2024, in Manchester, New Hampshire, Trump brought up Hiroshima again, this time to make a point about presidential immunity: "Hiroshima, not exactly a nice act, but it did end the second World War, probably. Right?" Earlier this year, Trump focused his nuclear war rhetoric mostly on Russia and China, saying in March that "it would be great if everybody would get rid of their nuclear weapons." Alexa Henning, Gabbard's deputy chief of staff, told ABC News that Gabbard and the president align on their plans for peace and prevention of war. "Acknowledging the past is critical to inform the future. President Trump has repeatedly stated in the past that he recognizes the immeasurable suffering, and annihilation can be caused by nuclear war, which is why he has been unequivocal that we all need to do everything possible to work towards peace," Henning said in a statement. "DNI Gabbard supports President Trump's clearly stated objectives of bringing about lasting peace and stability and preventing war." MORE: As Trump escalates immigration fight, Democrats face high-stakes test: ANALYSIS Gabbard's Tuesday remarks also echoed rhetoric from her time as a Democratic presidential candidate, when she warned about neoconservatives, neoliberals and Trump himself. In 2019, Gabbard said Trump "tore up the Iran nuclear agreement, and has taken action since, step by step, to further push us closer and closer to the brink of nuclear war, to the brink of war with Iran, that would be far more devastating than the war in Iraq, and leading us to the point where every single day that there is no nuclear deal with Iran, Iran is closer to developing a nuclear weapon." But when she endorsed Trump's 2024 presidential campaign as an independent last August, Gabbard shifted her focus to President Joe Biden. Speaking at the National Guard Association conference, she said the Biden-Harris "administration has us facing multiple wars on multiple fronts and regions around the world, and closer to the brink of nuclear war than we ever have been before." Gabbard's initial bid for president in 2020 was sparked by a mistaken ballistic missile alert that sent people in Hawaii into panic, thinking they were under attack. That moment inspired the former Hawaii congresswoman to center much of her campaign on ending wars and seeking peace. Although she has now aligned herself with the Republican Party and the Trump administration, this moment suggests Gabbard is still staking out an independent position on America's global posture -- one deeply rooted in her long-standing skepticism of the Washington establishment. Tulsi Gabbard warns of nuclear threat in social media video originally appeared on