Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group
Since April, junior high schools across Japan started to use new textbooks. The changes to the way World War II is described have sparked concern and unease among the Children and Textbooks Japan Network 21, a non-governmental organization formed in 1998 that has long been focusing on issues surrounding textbook approval and the presentation of war history in Japan.
'We reviewed junior high school history textbooks published by Tokyo Shoseki, Kyoiku Shuppan, Teikoku-Shoin, Yamakawa Shuppansha, Nihon Bunkyo Shuppan, and Manabisha. Among them, only Manabisha's version explicitly writes that 'Japan started the war,' while most textbooks used descriptions like 'the war began,'' Yoko Kojiya, secretary-general of the organization, told the Global Times on Tuesday via email, noting this expression makes it difficult for students to understand and contemplate why Japan started the war and how it proceeded with colonial rule.
Kojiya pointed out particularly that the descriptions in textbooks about Japan's invasion of China are not sufficiently detailed. Also, the content about why Japan went to war with the US and the UK in 1941 is problematic because it is described as 'Japan had to go to war due to being isolated by the ABCD [America, Britain, China and Dutch] encirclement.'
Kojiya said to better teach history and allow Japanese students to grasp war history more fully and impartially, it's vital to enable discussions on why Japan started the wars and how Japanese people should prevent such conflicts from happening in the future. 'Therefore, it is necessary to provide a large amount of historical material to help understand the nature of war.'
Kojiya also highlighted the changes concerning the 'Nanjing Massacre' and 'comfort women,' slamming Japanese government's textbook screening policy as political interference in educational content.
'The term 'Nanjing Massacre' is used in fewer textbooks nowadays, with many referring to it as the 'Nanjing Incident' instead. And the number of people massacred is accompanied by caveats such as 'there are various opinions' or that the number 'is being researched,'' Kojiya said.
The Nanjing Massacre is one of the darkest chapters of World War II. The atrocities began on December 13, 1937, when Japanese troops captured the then-Chinese capital Nanjing, unleashing six weeks of devastation that claimed the lives of an estimated 300,000 civilians and unarmed soldiers, according to Xinhua.
Regarding 'comfort women,' Kojiya said that the removal of the term 'accompanying the military' in the textbooks aims to hide the fact that these women were forced into sexual servitude by the Japanese military.
'The National History Textbook published by ReiwaShoseki even writes 'There is no evidence of Japanese troops forcibly taking away women.' I consider it a serious problem that this passed the government screening without any objections,' Kojiya said.
The 'comfort women' system was a military sexual slavery regime enforced by the Japanese government and its military during World War II. It resulted in at least 400,000 innocent women worldwide being forced into sexual slavery. Nearly half of them were Chinese, according to Xinhua.
According to Xinhua, in 2021, the Japanese government decided through a cabinet meeting to deem expressions such as 'comfort women accompanying the military' as 'inappropriate textbook terminology.' Japan's education authority subsequently requested modifications to related teaching materials, including those already distributed.
Kojiya told the Global Times that it is a serious problem that the descriptions in Japanese history textbooks can be greatly influenced by the policies of the government at any given time.
'The current textbook screening in Japan is not focusing on pointing out academic errors, but rather on whether the descriptions align with government inclinations,' said Kojiya.
This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. On May 31, the organization held a seminar in Tokyo to discuss the proper role of Japanese history education eight decades after the war.
According to the seminar material Kojiya sent to the Global Times, during the seminar, Hisao Ishiyama, former chairman of the History Educationalist Conference of Japan, said that since 2014, forces that glorify war and distort history started to utilize the deteriorated textbook system and government power to launch a government-wide effort to distort the entire population's understanding of history.
In response to this challenge, Kojiya told the Global Times that she is especially worried about the rise of conservative forces, such as the 'Tsukurukai,' which attack reflection on the war and the pacifism of the constitution, advocate for a constitutional amendment, and push forward policies aimed at expanding military capabilities to build Japan into a country that can wage war.
'Thus, it is crucial to squarely face the historical facts of aggression on the basis of the reflection that led to the creation of the Japanese Constitution, and to gather the strength of people who wish to stop policies that will make Japan a 'war state',' Kojiya said.
This story first appeared in Global Times:
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202506/1335854.shtml.
Company: Global TimesContact Person: Anna Li
Email: [email protected] Website: https://globaltimes.cn
City: Beijing
Disclaimer: This press release may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies (including product offerings, regulatory plans and business plans) and may change without notice. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
A tech bailout? Trump admin in talks about taking 10% stake in chipmaker Intel
An Intel deal would be one of the largest government interventions in private industry since the U.S. auto industry's bailout under President Obama. WASHINGTON ― The Trump administration is in talks for the federal government to take a 10% equity stake in the troubled chipmaker company Intel, White House officials confirmed. The discussions, which come as Intel has struggled to open manufacturing centers planned in the United States, would be one of the largest government interventions in the private industry since the bailout of the U.S. auto industry under former President Barack Obama. "It's a creative idea that has never been done before to ensure that we're both reassuring these critical supply chains while also gaining something of it for the American taxpayer," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at an Aug. 19 press briefing when asked about the government potentially acquiring stake in Intel. Leavitt said U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutick is "ironing out the details." Any deal between the U.S. and Intel would likely require approval from the company's board of directors. During an interview earlier in the day on CNBC's "Squawk Box," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the federal government would take an equity stake in Intel in exchange for billions in federal grants awarded to the company by the Biden administration. "The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilize the company for chip production here in the U.S.," Bessent said. Former President Joe Biden's Chips and Science Act, signed into law in 2022, included $39 billion in subsidies to boost U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the incentives as giveaways. Bloomerg News, which first reported on the discussions, said a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth around $10.5 billion ‒ an amount that would nearly match the $10.9 billion in federal grants Intel has received for commercial and military production. The greatest beneficiary of the Biden law was Intel, which announced several projects with help from the incentives including a sprawling semiconductor facility outside Columbus, Ohio, that the company hoped would become "the largest semiconductor manufacturing site on the planet." The Ohio project has been marred by delays, however. Intel's first Ohio plant was originally set to open in 2025, but financial challenges forced the company to delay that opening to 2030 or 2031. Lutnick told CNBC that the U.S. wants a return on any "investment" in Intel. "We should get an equity stake for our money," the Commerce secretary said in a separate interview with the network. "Instead of just giving grants away." The Intel arrangment wouldn't be the first time Trump has secured U.S. stake of private companies during his second term. As part of a merger between Japanese-based Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel that Trump approved in June, Nippon granted his administration a "golden share" in the company. Contributing: Max Filby, Columbus Dispatch; Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
American Military News
35 minutes ago
- American Military News
US quietly deployed missiles near China, sparking Chinese response
The United States is considering the potential deployment of additional missile launchers to the Philippines following the initial quiet deployment of missile launchers last year amid rising tension with China. The deployment of missiles near China has resulted in China issuing major warnings. According to The Associated Press, the U.S. military deployed the Typhon, a land-based missile system capable of firing the Tomahawk Land Attack Missile and the Standard Missile-6, to the Philippines for joint military exercises last April. The outlet noted that an anti-ship missile launcher was also deployed to the Philippines by the U.S. military earlier this year. The Associated Press reported that the ambassador of the Republic of the Philippines to the United States confirmed on Thursday that the United States is considering the deployment of additional missile launchers to the Philippines amid increased tension in the South China Sea. However, the ambassador acknowledged that a final decision regarding the deployment of additional missiles has not been made. Addressing military deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region during a press conference in Manila in March, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said, 'The United States has been fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with the Philippines since World War II. Our partnership not only continues today, but we are doubling down on that partnership, and our ironclad alliance has never been stronger.' READ MORE: China, Russia hold major joint military exercise In response to the U.S. military's deployment of missile launchers in the Philippines, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense has warned the Philippines that the missile systems could lead to 'self-inflicted destruction' and cause instability in the Indo-Pacific region. According to Defense News, a Chinese national security document, titled 'China's National Security in the New Era,' warned of 'intensifying geopolitics' and a 'Cold War mentality' due to the increase of 'intermediate-range missile systems' in the region. The Chinese document warned that the deployment of foreign missiles in the Philippines could result in 'aggravated regional tensions,' as the two countries are already involved in a maritime dispute over territory in the South China Sea. The Chinese document stated, 'Unresolved territorial and maritime rights disputes have become more difficult and complicated … with the intervention of foreign forces.' Additionally, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defense previously warned, 'Wherever US weapons are deployed, the risk of war and conflicts will rise, and the local people will suffer undeserved suffering from war.'
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Anti‑corruption protests hit European nation as calls for new elections grow
Anti-corruption protests rocked the Serbian capital of Belgrade as student-led demonstrators clashed with supporters of President Aleksandar Vucic and his political party, demanding new elections. Violent clashes between anti-government protesters and Serbian security forces have intensified over the last week, with protesters setting fire to an office building belonging to the ruling party in Novi Sad. "You will see the full determination of the Serbian state. We will use everything at our disposal to restore law, peace and order," President Vucic said in an address to the nation Saturday night. Tens of thousands of college students have been marching and protesting since December, demanding justice and accountability after the deaths of 16 people in the collapse of a railway station in the Serbian town of Novi Sad. The canopy at the railway station collapsed Nov. 1 after renovations led by two Chinese companies. The government is accused of not implementing student demands, including the release of all documentation related to the reconstruction of the train station. In his speech, Vucic said that justice must be served for all those responsible for the 16 victims of the Novi Sad rail station collapse. Critics have called out the heavy-handed response used against protesters. Alan Berset, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, said in a post on X that he was concerned with the rising violence. "I call for calm and respect of the right to peaceful assembly. Serbian authorities must uphold Council of Europe standards. The rule of law and respect for human rights must prevail," Berset said. Serbia's foreign minister, Marko Djuric, responded to the criticism in a statement to Fox News Digital. "We respect and protect peaceful protest—it is part of our democratic fabric. But when demonstrations turn into physical attacks and attempts to destabilize the country, the government has both the right and the duty to respond." "This is by far the biggest threat Vucic has faced in the last 13 years, and it is very unlikely that Vucic will weather the storm without elections," Helena Ivanov, senior fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital. "The country is not functioning, and the situation is dangerously escalating. The only way out of the problem is to hold free and fair elections as soon as possible. "Everything else will further destabilize the situation, which could have devastating consequences," Ivanov added. The government is accused of not fulfilling one of the original student demands, including the release of all documentation related to the reconstruction of the train station. What originally started as spontaneous protests voicing dissatisfaction with the government's failed response to the railway catastrophe transformed into a movement opposing widespread corruption and the erosion of the rule of law under Vucic. One of the largest protests in Serbia's history took place on March 15, with nearly 350,000 people gathered in Slavija Square in central Belgrade. Serbia's then-Prime Minister Milos Vucevic announced his resignation in January amid the nationwide protests, making him the most senior government member to step down. "Serbian students put forward several demands, the first and most important being the release of documentation regarding the reconstruction of the Novi Sad train station, where the collapse of the canopy killed 16 people. To this day, no one has been held accountable," Filip Ubović, a student from the University of Belgrade and protest participant on the ground in Belgrade, told Fox News Digital. Ubovic said the protests were originally aimed at influencing the institutions responsible for upholding the rule of law, and not directly against the ruling party. As the government failed to hold any officials accountable for the tragedy or release any information on the canopy collapse, the protesters realized that it was time to demand elections.
