Drexel University parking restrictions prompt food truck closures
The Brief
Food trucks serving the Drexel University campus said overnight parking enforcement is going to put them out of business.
Vendors tell FOX 29 Drexel University Public Safety officers told them enforcement of current parking laws will begin on Friday.
At least one popular food truck is permanently closing as a result.
PHILADELPHIA - Food truck vendors at Drexel University are bracing for overnight parking restrictions beginning April 4.
It's leading to the permanent closure of a popular food truck "Pete's Little Lunch Box" after 17 years in business, as other vendors reconsider doing business on Drexel's campus.
What they're saying
"I'm working here seven years, it's no problem," said Eun Hee Han, owner of Kami Food Truck. "I'm very… I don't have an idea right now, but maybe first week we try."
Kami serves authentic Korean food on 33rd Street near Market Street and employs eight part-timers and a manager who are all students at Drexel.
"Parking gets taken up very fast. There's not really a standard place for food trucks to be parked so it's usually just street parking, and if there's no street parking available they can't sell down here. It's kind of forcing her out of business because she's not going to be able to park down here anymore," said manager Kaylee Rodriguez of Kami Food Truck. "A lot of the student body depend on her for food especially international students. So, a lot of Korean students from UPenn's campus and Drexel campus comes here."
Niki Gianakaris, Drexel University Vice President of Strategic Communication, provided this statement to FOX 29:
"Food trucks have long been a part of the fabric of University City with many located around Drexel University's campus at any given time. The University supports this vending tradition as a food option for its community. However, Drexel and the City of Philadelphia also must ensure the safety of pedestrians and patrons of food trucks.
As part of the City's regular enforcement and Drexel's ongoing efforts to ensure pedestrian and traffic safety around campus, Drexel Police are reminding vendors of street vending rules established by the City. These rules require vendors to adhere to health and maintenance codes, restrict hours of operation to between 7 a.m. to midnight and address parking and other safety regulations, such as preventing vehicles from being left unattended overnight on a sidewalk or on public property.
Drexel looks forward to working with vendors so that they can continue to operate their businesses while also ensuring the safety of the community."
Philadelphia Democratic Councilmember Jamie Gauthier who represents University City said the city does have a law in place banning overnight parking, but explains it's selectively enforced.
"Drexel is choosing to enforce the law in this way and I think they should listen to their food truck community as a vital part of our small business community and they should also listen to their students. We should have a city that is welcoming to food trucks because food trucks help enhance Philadelphia's economy and offerings," said Councilmember Gauthier. "I was somewhat dismayed that they were telling the student community this was because of something that I did. I would never be a part of any movement to push food trucks off of the campus and in fact I would hope that Drexel would reverse course on this but if they don't, I'm going to be exploring legislative options to make sure we continue to welcome food trucks to West Philadelphia."
Drexel student Claire Toomey created an online petition to raise awareness and support for the food trucks.
"You see all these food trucks and all these diverse food options and they're run by people living the American Dream. All these food trucks here are immigrant run, immigrant owned and it's just a shame these businesses are dealing with struggles," said Toomey. "To the food truck vendors we love you, you guys feed us everyday."
FOX 29 reached out to the City's Department of Licenses and Inspections seeking information on the potential penalties of overnight parking enforcement.
An L&I spokesperson responded via email and said "Drexel University is performing the enforcement, so they would be the appropriate contact."
We reached out to Drexel University about potential penalties for vendors who don't comply with overnight parking restrictions, but did not get a response.
The Source
The information in this story is from Drexel University officials, food trucks and community members.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dems Say They're Blocked From Info on Verge of Crypto Market Structure Bill Hearings
On the eve of a U.S. House of Representatives hearing to scrutinize a bill to establish rules for the crypto markets, Democrats said they've been stymied from seeking technical information about its effects from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, according to staffers. Regulatory agencies such as the SEC routinely give technical analysis to lawmakers, answering questions about the potential effects of legislative efforts such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act that would establish regulatory guardrails for digital assets. Democratic staff on the House Financial Services Committee submitted questions to the SEC about the bill and in a briefing were denied basic answers that were previously given to Republicans, according to the Democratic aides who asked not to be named. The agency also didn't offer its subject-matter experts for the discussion, they said. On Tuesday, the panel's ranking Democrat, Representative Maxine Waters of California, prepared a letter to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins to demand "comprehensive technical and impact analysis" of the crypto market structure bill. She included several pages of questions in a draft reviewed by CoinDesk, contending that "fulsome answers to the questions raised above are necessary for the American people, through their representatives in Congress, to determine whether this legislative proposal addresses the unique risks related to crypto, and would foster the needed environment for responsible innovation to take root." The SEC "provides technical assistance to any Member of Congress who seeks it, including on these crypto-related bills," a spokesperson told CoinDesk when asked about the complaints. One of the staffers said that the SEC Crypto Task Force's Landon Zinda, who moved to the agency from crypto advocacy group Coin Center in February, was meant to brief them but was unable to answer basic questions. The House committee is set to hold the Clarity Act hearing on Wednesday after having recently introduced the long-negotiated legislation, a successor of the last sessions' Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21). The House Agriculture Committee, which also has jurisdiction over the regulation of digital assets, is running its own hearing at the same time. This bill represents the central policy goal of the crypto industry, which contends that it needs clear U.S. regulations to encourage investors who've waited on the sidelines and to keep crypto innovators from moving overseas. The Democratic staffers say that members have concerns about the traditional securities firms finding loopholes in this major legislation that will allow them to skirt existing securities regulations. But congressional Democrats haven't acted as a block when it comes to this and a related stablecoin bill also making its way through the legislative process. While some leaders, including Waters, have opposed advancing crypto legislation, other Democrats have joined with Republicans to move bills forward in both the House and Senate. Updates with a response from the SEC and further information from sources.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dem governor ripped as 'total disgrace' after vetoing bill limiting Chinese land ownership near military bases
Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who is up for reelection this year, garnered backlash Tuesday after vetoing a bill aimed at preventing China from buying up land next to strategic assets, such as military bases. Arizona state Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp said the "politically motivated veto" was "utterly insane," blaming Hobbs for being "an obstructionist against safeguarding our citizens from threats." However, Hobbs said the bill, S.B. 1109, was "ineffective at counter-espionage" and did not "directly protect" American military assets in the state. Texas Pushes Back Against Foreign Land Grab With 'Strongest Bill In The Nation' Against China, Iran, Russia Chinese investment in land near military bases has become an increasing concern for national security hawks. Shamp, in her efforts to get the now-vetoed bill passed, cited recent Chinese attempts to lease buildings alongside Arizona's Luke Air Force Base, where the military trains fighter pilots. "Governor Hobbs's veto of SB 1109 hangs an 'Open for the CCP' sign on Arizona's front door, allowing Communist China to buy up American land near critical assets like Luke Air Force Base, Palo Verde nuclear power plant, and Taiwan Semiconductor's growing fabrication footprint," said Michael Lucci, the CEO and founder of State Armor Action, a conservative group with a mission to develop and enact state-level solutions to global security threats. Read On The Fox News App "Allowing Communist China to buy up land near our critical assets is a national security risk, plain and simple, and Governor Hobbs is substantively and completely wrong when she says that SB 1109 'is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets,'" Lucci added. Lucci pointed to Ukraine's recent drone attacks that destroyed significant numbers of Russian military aircraft, noting that "proximity produces peril in asymmetric warfare." After Ukraine's Surprise Drone Assault On Russia, New Attention Drawn To Sensitive Sites Stateside S.B. 1109, which can still pass if the Arizona legislature overrides Hobbs' veto, would have prohibited the People's Republic of China from having a 30%, or more, stake in Arizona property. Hobbs, in her defense of the veto, added that in addition to being ineffective at countering Chinese espionage efforts, the bill lacked "clear implementation criteria," which opened the door for "arbitrary enforcement." However, the bill went through a bipartisan amendment process in an effort to assuage those concerns that the legislation might lead to discrimination in land sales, according to local outlet the AZ Mirror. The initial version of the bill banned certain people and entities deemed to be national security threats from buying up land in Arizona, but following subsequent amendments the bill only sought to ban Chinese government-linked entities and its subsidiaries. In addition to Arizona, other states have proposed or passed legislation aimed at curtailing Chinese land grabs in the United States. Congress has also taken steps in an effort to effectuate change through national policy. As of March 17, according to the China-focused nonprofit Committee of 100, 27 states are currently considering 84 bills aimed at restricting foreign property ownership in some way, while Congress is currently considering seven separate bills addressing the issue. So far, the committee indicated, 22 states have passed bills restricting foreign property ownership, 17 of which were passed into law in article source: Dem governor ripped as 'total disgrace' after vetoing bill limiting Chinese land ownership near military bases
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
California acts to eliminate ‘harmful' ultraprocessed foods in schools, beating MAHA to the punch
Move over, MAHA. California has just overtaken President Donald Trump's 'Make America Healthy Again' Commission in the quest to identify which ultraprocessed foods are the most harmful for human health. Numerous studies have linked an additional serving a day of ultraprocessed foods, or UPFs, to a greater risk of developing or dying from dozens of adverse health outcomes, including cancer, heart disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes and various mental health conditions. Which of the thousands of ultraprocessed foods on grocery shelves could be most responsible for such ill health? To date, answers are elusive. Research is in its infancy. Expert advocates and food manufacturers disagree on harms and definitions, while lobbyists battle behind the scenes. California, however, intends to offer a solution in just over a year. On Tuesday, a bipartisan coalition of the California State Assembly voted to pass AB 1264, which lays out a plan to remove 'particularly harmful' ultraprocessed foods from the state's school meals. The bill's passage is expected to be finalized Tuesday night. The legislation requires that the first step, defining which ultraprocessed foods are most detrimental to human health, be completed by July 1, 2026. Once passed by the California Senate and signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, AB 1264 would be the first such legislation in the nation, said Jesse Gabriel, the Democratic California assemblymember who introduced the bill. 'Our understanding is that this would actually be the first statutory definition in the world, not just in the United States,' said Gabriel, who represents California's 46th Assembly District. Focusing on school lunches will have a significant impact on children's health, he said. 'The busiest restaurant in California is our school cafeterias,' Gabriel said. 'We'll serve over a billion school breakfasts, lunches and dinners in 2025 alone. If you want to improve the nutritional health of young people, starting with school lunches is a really powerful way to do it.' The MAHA Commission, led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is also trying to address children's nutrition. In mid-May, the commission released a Trump-mandated report recommending federal agencies reassess the impact of ultraprocessed foods (as well as vaccines, lifestyle, pollutants and the overprescribing of drugs) on the 'childhood chronic disease crisis.' The document was quickly criticized for errors and citing studies that don't exist, as first reported by NOTUS, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news site. The administration discounted the errors as 'formatting issues,' but some experts who previously spoke with CNN said the mistakes suggest the report was likely created using artificial intelligence. Regardless, the MAHA Commission is expected to identify more specific actions on ultraprocessed foods and its additional concerns by August 12. By then, AB 1264 should be close to a signature if all goes well, Gabriel said. 'We hope to have this bill on the Governor's desk for a signature in late August or early September,' Gabriel said. 'We are really targeting the worst of the worst UPFs, where there is really strong science and research and data. If federal regulators were doing their job as intended, there wouldn't be a need for states to do this.' In response, the Consumer Brands Association, a national advocacy group that represents food and beverage manufacturers, told CNN the new California bill would create an unnecessary duplicate regulatory framework. 'AB1264's attempt to classify certain proven-safe ingredients as unhealthy is so broad that it could limit access to certain nutrient-dense foods, such as fruits, salads and soups, cause consumer confusion, and lead to higher prices for Californians,' said John Hewitt, CBA's senior vice president of state affairs, in an email. In response, Gabriel told CNN that suggesting AB 1264 would ban healthy foods or drive up prices is 'ridiculous.' 'On the contrary, the bill would phase out foods with dangerous chemical additives linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and other serious diseases from our schools,' Gabriel said via email. 'That's why AB 1264 has received broad bipartisan support.' If passed, AB 1264 will go in effect on January 1, 2026. Then the clock starts ticking. By July 1, a mere six months later, experts from the University of California and the state's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment must establish a subcategory of 'particularly harmful' ultraprocessed foods. Because research on UPFs is exploding, the bill requires that definition to be updated every two years. Experts deciding how to identify an ultraprocessed food as 'particularly harmful' should use the following criteria, according to the bill: • Are any of the ingredients linked by established science to cancer, obesity, metabolic or cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, or developmental or reproductive harm? • Does the food contain additives that have been banned, restricted or required to carry a warning by other local, state, federal or international jurisdictions? (The European Union has banned various UPF additives over health concerns.) • Has the food been modified to include high levels of sugar, salt or fat? (That's a key way manufacturers design ultraprocessed foods to meet the 'bliss point' human taste buds yearn for.) • Can any ingredient contribute to food addiction by being hyperpalatable, or extremely difficult to resist? (The Bert Lahr potato chip commercial from the 1960s said it all: 'Betcha can't eat just one.') Foods may also be considered ultraprocessed, the bill says, if they contain additives such as emulsifiers, stabilizers and thickeners, flavor enhancers and non-nutritive sweeteners that aren't on the US Food and Drug Administration's radar. (Manufacturers are constantly inventing new ways to make food delicious, and not all of those are reported to the FDA.) Once the 'harmful' ultraprocessed food definition is established, the bill moves on to implementation. Beginning on February 1, 2027, vendors selling food to California schools will be required to submit an annual report listing any UPFs that fall under the new definition. Because school districts often create menus up to three years in advance, the bill gives school nutritionists a bit of breathing room — using the information provided by vendors, they must begin phasing out all particularly harmful ultraprocessed foods by January 1, 2028. The bill's momentum then slows. Six years after the bill goes into effect, by January 1, 2032, vendors may no longer offer harmful ultraprocessed foods to school district nutritionists to be included in their menus. Three years later, by January 1, 2035, school districts will no longer be able to provide children any meals containing particularly harmful UPFs. (That restriction, however, does not apply to school fundraising events.) 'While the timeline may appear long, we think that change is going to happen right away. We're already seeing schools take action, and this bill is going to help put pedal to the metal on getting schools to make that shift way ahead of 2032,' said Bernadette Del Chiaro, the senior vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, or EWG, a health advocacy organization based in Washington, DC, that cosponsored AB 1264. 'I can tell you that farmers are really excited about it — nothing would please them more than to be able to deliver food directly to California's kids and schools,' Del Chiaro said. 'And we have strong bipartisan support — a left and right grassroots movement of people saying, 'Let's correct this. Let's get our schools to be healthy.' So there's all of these really great win-win-win elements to this bill.' Success stories already exist. One school district in Santa Clara County, California, is now feeding over 8,000 students with grass-fed beef, organic milk, and antibiotic-free chicken and pork from local farmers and ranchers. However, what the Morgan Hill United School District did to remove added sugars was truly startling, said Nora LaTorre, CEO of Eat Real, a national nonprofit that provides K-12 schools around the country with free tools to transform their menus. 'Morgan Hill removed 34 pounds of sugar per student per year by removing foods with hidden added sugar, such as sauces, dressings and condiments,' said LaTorre, who gave the school district an Eat Real certification in 2024. 'Now the children are served items with less than 6 grams of added sugar.' Replacing ultraprocessed foods with real food is not only possible, but easy, said LaTorre, who has testified in support of AB 1264. One example: a makeover of a school-purchased high-sugar yogurt cup with 13 grams of added sugar and flavors. 'The children are now served parfaits out of plain Greek yogurt, which can be purchased through USDA commodities,' she said. 'The parfaits are topped with fresh fruit or house-made fruit compote with zero added sugar. 'It really doesn't take that long to make a significant change in children's school nutrition,' LaTorre said. 'Eat Real is on track to reach 1 million kids in schools across some 20 states. Our average time from initial assessment of a school to certification is about 23 months.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
