North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds
Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power.
It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period.
While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said.
The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively.
This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis.
The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person.
Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023.
Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes.
Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review.
It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire.
Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit.
'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens.
'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right.
'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders.
'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.'
Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment.
'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm.
'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Exact date millions of pensioners will qualify for Winter Fuel Payment
In a huge U-turn, it was confirmed that pensioners will now receive the Winter Fuel Payment this year if they earn below £35,000 a year - we explain the full eligibility below The exact date millions of pensioners will qualify for Winter Fuel Payments later this year has been revealed. It comes after a major change to the eligibility criteria was announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves this week. Since last year, Winter Fuel Payments have only been paid to those in receipt of means-tested benefits, such as Pension Credit or Universal Credit. These payments used to be available universally to everyone over state pension age, regardless of their income or benefit entitlement. The decision to narrow the scope of Winter Fuel Payments was met with fierce criticism from MPs and charities, who warned the decision would leave many older people in poverty. But in a huge U-turn yesterday, it was confirmed that pensioners will now receive the Winter Fuel Payment this year if they earn below £35,000 a year. Labour says approximately nine million pensioners will receive Winter Fuel Payments in England and Wales this year as a result of these changes. There are different systems in Northern Ireland and Scotland. Winter Fuel Payments are worth £200 for eligible households, or £300 for eligible households with someone aged over 80. Your eligibility will be based on your age by the end of the qualifying week. The qualifying week changes every year, but for winter 2025/26, the Government has confirmed it will be September 15 to September 21, 2025. Rachel Reeves said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' If you earn above £35,000 a year, you will still get the payment - but then you will have to pay it back. HMRC will clawback the payment via PAYE, or through self-assessment return. You can choose to opt out of receiving the payment if your earnings are above £35,000, with details to be confirmed. The income eligibility is based per person - but the Winter Fuel Payment will still be issued per household. For example, if you have two people living together and one earns £30,000 a year and the other earns £40,000, one person would keep their share of the Winter Fuel Payment but the other would pay it back. Winter Fuel Payments are paid automatically, with most people normally receiving the cash into their bank accounts from November. Winter Fuel Payments are tax-free payment and do not affect any benefits you may receive.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Cops for the chop? Forces may have reduce number of officers as Rachel Reeves rejects Yvette Cooper's pleas for more cash in Spending Review
The Home Office may have to cut the overall number of police officers after Rachel Reeves ignored pleas for more cash for fighting crime. The Chancellor is said to have 'imposed' a funding settlement on Home Secretary Yvette Cooper yesterday ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review, after reaching an impasse in negotiations. It came after she demanded more money for police forces, who have themselves warned that they will be hindered unless more money is forthcoming. However Ms Reeves be believed to be planning to prioritise the NHS, education, nuclear energy and boosting defence when she unveil the multi-year financial plans tomorrow. She today signed off £14.2billion for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant – more than 40 years after it was proposed - with the plant eventually powering 6million homes. A source told the Guardian that cuts to overall police numbers remain 'a possibility'. Earlier this month, in a letter to the Prime Minister, Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan Police, warned that cuts to police budgets will have 'far-reaching consequences'. But a Whitehall source told the Times: 'Rachel imposed the settlement on Yvette in the end. Yvette pushed very hard but was told that there simply isn't the money for it.' The Chancellor is due to lay out departmental allocations running up to 2029 - the likely timetable for the next general election - on Wednesday. But the generous fiscal envelope set at the Budget last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economic slowdown, calls for more defence cash, and Labour revolts on benefits. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' On Sunday Technology Secretary Peter Kyle declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. He used a round of interviews today to say that 'every part of our society is struggling' and police were competing with various other sectors who have Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. Sizewell C was first proposed in 1982 and, after years of paralysis, was given the green light by the Tories in 2022. Ms Reeves will also confirm a £2.5billion investment in nuclear fusion research, while government sources said ministers would press ahead with proposals for 'mini' nuclear plants around the country. The Treasury said the funding would help create 10,000 new jobs. The last time Britain completed a new nuclear plant was in 1987, which was Sizewell B. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction but not expected to open until 2031.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is Sizewell C nuclear plant and why is it controversial?
Plans to open a new major nuclear plant have been given a major funding boost after Rachel Reeves announced £14.2 billion worth of investment for Sizewell C. Located on the Sussex coastline, the power station is set to cost about £20bn but is expected to generate electricity for six million homes. Energy secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Despite this, there is strong opposition to the plans from environmentalists and those that believe the plans are too expensive, and investment would be better off elsewhere. So what do we know about the Sizewell C nuclear plant? What is Sizewell C and where is it? Plans have been underway for years for a new two-reactor nuclear power station to be built on the east Sussex coastline with hopes that it could generate 3.2 gigawatts of electricity. French energy company EDF have claimed that the plant will power the equivalent of six million homes, and is planned to be operational in the 2030s. This means is could potentially generate electricity for 60 years. At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. Located close to the town of Leiston, it will sit next to Sizewell B that has been operating since 1995, and the decommissioned Sizewell A site. How much is the plant likely to cost? Sizewell C is expected to cost about £20bn. However, reports in January circulated that the costs were likely to double, with people close to talks over the energy scheme estimating the rise to £40bn. The government said it did not recognise the figure, while Sizewell C's managing directors said it is 'not accurate'. EDF previously rejected the figure, but did accept its nuclear plant being built at Hinkley Point, in Somerset, would cost more than that figure. The government confirmed a total of £3.6bn worth of investment had been put into the project so far. When was it proposed? The need for the UK to increase its nuclear power capacity has been a discussion in government since 2008, with the coalition government between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats identifying Sizewell as a suitable site in 2010. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. Three other public consultations were held with 10,000 Sussex residents, with the final one finishing in September 2019. Planning permission was granted to EDF by the government in July 2022, with the site also receiving its nuclear licence granted in May 2024. Will Sizewell C improve our energy prices? In announcing the plans, Ed Miliband argued it would boost Britain's energy security by reducing reliance on buying power from overseas. The project will be funded via household electricity bills, adding about £1 a month to the cost of power over the plant's 60-year lifespan. But it is hoped that the overall impact of the plant will be lower bills as a result of a cheaper energy supply. The investment comes amid concerns that the dash towards clean power could reduce our energy security and leave Britain vulnerable. Why are the plans controversial? There has been strong opposition against Sizewell C since it was announced by environmentalists who have argued the plans are 'too slow', and that it will impact the natural wildlife of the area. Campaign groups Stop Sizewell C and Together Against Sizewell C both fear the plant could have negative effects and have demonstrated against the plans on several occasions. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds have similarly protested against the impact on the local wildlife on the Sussex coast. Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?
