North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds
Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power.
It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period.
While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said.
The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively.
This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis.
The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person.
Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023.
Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes.
Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review.
It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire.
Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit.
'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens.
'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right.
'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders.
'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.'
Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment.
'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm.
'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
33 minutes ago
- Metro
Free travel for over-60s costs taxpayers £100,000,000 more than fare dodgers
Freebie travel benefits for pensioners are costing the taxpayer three times as much as London Underground fare dodgers do. More than 1.5million Londoners aged 60 and over can travel for free on London's buses, Tubes, trains and trams. But the schemes – the 60+ Oyster Card and the Freedom Pass – cost nearly £500million a year to fund, well over the £400million lost to fare-jumping nationwide, the Office of Rail and Road found. Transport for London (TfL) is predicted to spend £135million on the 60+ Oyster Card this year, up from £60million in 2016. As Britain faces an ageing population, the cost is expected to increase to £185million a year by 2027, according to an analysis by The Telegraph. The Freedom Pass for people over 66 costs London boroughs another £350million a year and will rise to £498million by the end of the decade. Almost one in 20 Tube passengers dodge fares, costing TfL £130million a year. The 60+ Oyster Card is available for Londoners aged between 60 and 65, among the highest earners in the capital, at £42,000 a year, double that of people in their 20s. TfL says 60% of 60+ Oyster Card holders are still working, with two in 10 using it to commute. The card, introduced by then-Mayor of London Boris Johnson in 2012, is funded by tax bills and daily driving fees like the congestion charge. Speaking to Metro, Liz Emerson, chief executive of the research charity International Foundation said: 'This is a disservice to younger colleagues who are paying more for their travel than those who still work and are over 60. 'It impacts their essential spending power and helps instead those who are older and wealthy. 'This is unfair for younger colleagues who already struggle with housing costs, wages and the cost-of-living crisis. More Trending 'The least the Mayor can do is align free London travel with the state pension age. A TfL spokesperson told Metro: 'Both the Mayor and TfL are committed to making public transport in London as accessible, convenient, and affordable as possible. View More » 'We regularly review our range of concessions to ensure that they continue to benefit Londoners, while also remaining affordable for TfL to operate.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Samurai sword killer 'screamed in delight' after nearly decapitating schoolboy MORE: British couple feared to have been on Air India flight named and pictured MORE: Three teenage girls admit killing 75-year-old man in the street Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Rachel Reeves promises so much - but we're worried how it will be paid for'
Rachel Reeves' Spending Review promised big boosts for the NHS, defence, and housing - but many of you are worried about how it will all be funded If you're wondering where all the money's going to come from to pay for the Chancellor's Spending Review then you're not alone. Rachel Reeves finally delivered her long-anticipated plan to renew Britain – and while there were some big promises, it left many of you asking how it's going to be funded. Standing at the despatch box in the House of Commons, the Chancellor pitched her plan as a blueprint for 'Britain's renewal' and took a swipe at years of 'destructive' Tory austerity. She announced that departmental budgets will rise by 2.3% each year in real terms, with hefty sums heading to the NHS, defence, and housing. In parliament, Ms Reeves batted away claims she would raise taxes and said her spending plans were paid for by decisions made at the Autumn Budget. She repeated her pledge not to raise taxes on working people. But a think tank says tax rises are likely in the autumn. The Resolution Foundation reported the big rise in public spending has been largely paid for by £39.7 billion in tax increases (set for 2028-29) announced in last Autumn's Budget, along with £3.6 billion in benefit cuts (also in 2028-29) revealed in the Spring Statement – which works out to about £1,550 for every family in Britain. "But the combination of a weaker economic outlook, an unfunded spending commitment on winter fuel payments, and just £9.9 billion of headroom against the chancellor's fiscal rules, mean further tax rises are likely to be needed this autumn," it says. We asked Did Rachel Reeves get her Spending Review right? Just 908 of you felt she did, while a whopping 1,982 said she didn't. Many of you responded to our original story, here's just a slice of what some of you had to say: Martinsopinion posted: "I don't know about you, but I don't want to pay more council tax for less services. I wonder what other ways they will find to tax us? Maybe spending money on poorly connected urban sprawl to maybe help a few, when the country needs a new city full of six-storey buildings. The policies are so misguided." Hfchbffch said: "What happened to the 22 billion black hole? Looks like it's gone bigger. Where is all the cash coming from? I don't see any country given money to the UK for all the problems it has got. It looks like the UK working people will foot another bill." 72Momma added: "Where is all the money coming from? Have they actually got rid of the 'black hole' or are they just remortgaging the country? To be able to spend over £102bn ... who is she borrowing from?" Joeyd: "Margaret Thatcher's Reagonomics caused the global economic crash. She sold off Britain to foreign countries for a pittance, wrecked mining, shipbuilding and steel towns across Britain, sold off council housing and put all our money into banking. When the banks collapsed, the country collapsed with them. The Conservative Government introduced 14 years of failed austerity making the rich even richer, and the poorest even poorer. Someone has to reverse decades of neglect, we'll have to wait and see if they carry through with the infrastructure plans she's promising." Seccmjfl01: "It might not be perfect but at least she's trying and making an effort. Things take time and she needed some stability. Good luck to her." Wolveslegends: "The Chancellor promises so much with no money to pay for it. Come the Autumn she will gain the funds from guess where from? All of us will donate to her cause if we like it or not including the disabled and those too old to work. Welcome to New Labour." Reeves is pledging an extra £29 billion a year for the NHS – a real-terms boost of around 3% annually. And on housing, she laid out a massive £39 billion package to build hundreds of thousands of affordable homes over the next decade. It's being called the 'biggest cash injection' in 50 years and is part of the drive to get 1.5 million new homes built by 2029. Following details of the winter fuel U-turn earlier this week, Reeves confirmed plans to restore the payments to millions of pensioners. OAPs with an income of £35,000 or below in England and Wales will receive the benefit this winter. It is a major uplift from the current £11,500 cut-off point announced last summer. In an "age of insecurity" the Chancellor said defence spending will rise to 2.6% of GDP by 2027. She said the figure includes spending on intelligence agencies. 'We will make Britain a defence industrial superpower," Ms Reeves vowed. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. This includes a major expansion of free school meals to 500,000 more pupils. Some £15.6billion will also be handed to mayors for major transport projects across the country. This will go towards plans to improve trams, trains and buses in the North and the Midlands. Other announcements include ending the "costly" use of hotels to house asylum seekers, £3 cap on single bus tickets, and over £14billion worth of investment will go towards building the Sizewell C nuclear power plant on the Suffolk coast. Keir Starmer told the Cabinet that the Spending Review: "Marks the end of the first phase of this Government, as we move to a new phase that delivers on the promise of change for working people all around the country and invests in Britain's renewal." However, Tory Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride slammed the announcement, as he fumed: "This spending review is not worth the paper it is written on.' He goes on to claim Ms Reeves has "completely lost control" and warns of tax rises to come in the autumn."
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Huge row as Tories demand watchdog probes Reform over data grab
The Tories have called on the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to look into a 'cyber-security disaster waiting to happen' affecting Reform-controlled councils Nigel Farage's Reform must be probed over a "cyber-security disaster waiting to happen", the Tories have demanded. The Conservatives have called on the information watchdog to launch an investigation into their right-wing rivals, who have asked for a mountain of data from councils it controls. This includes information on whistleblowers and the names and addresses of people who receive meals on wheels. The Tories also accuse Mr Farage's underlings of risking the amount of cash foster carers receive becoming public. In a letter to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake lashed out at "unauthorised data transfers". He warned taxpayers could be landed with massive bills if Reform is fined for breaking the law. It comes after Mr Farage's party said it would use a "unit of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors" to trawl council finances to find waste. Mr Hollinrake wrote: "I believe that the scale of such unauthorised data transfers across local government is a cyber-security disaster waiting to happen. READ MORE: Rachel Reeves pumps cash into NHS with 4million more tests and procedures to cut waits "There is a strong public interest in the Information Commissioner taking pro-active steps to investigate and, if necessary, issue enforcement notices against the public authorities and Reform UK Ltd. "I also suspect that council staff would welcome the support of the Information Commissioner, given the clear threats to sack them if they sound the alarm on breaches of the law. It is also not in the financial interests of local taxpayers for their council to be exposed to the liability of fines for breaching the law." The Tories went on to claim there is a "lack of legal basis" for Reform's data requests. Reform has launched its own Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) modelled on the chaotic department Elon Musk headed in the US. In a letter to Kent County Council signed by Mr Farage, Reform's head of Doge Zia Yusuf and its new council leader Linden Kemkaran, the party said its team of analysts was "bound by data protection obligations and professional standards". It also warned: "Should you resist this request, we are ready to pass a council motion to compel the same and will consider any obstruction to be gross misconduct. We trust this will not be required." Reform won control of 10 councils in the May elections, which also include County Durham, Derbyshire, Doncaster, Lancashire, Lincolnshire, North Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire, and West Northamptonshire. The party also won the inaugural regional mayoral contests in Greater Lincolnshire, and Hull and East Yorkshire, and has minority control of several councils. Reform's head of Doge Mr Yusuf claimed the Conservatives "were desperate to cover up the corruption and waste of their now deposed local government regimes". He added: "It will not work. "Just as they plundered hundreds of millions from the British taxpayers during Covid, they have done the same at councils. Reform councillors were voted in to expose it, and with the help of Reform's Doge team, they will do just that."
