Multicultural families in South Korea show signs of deeper integration, but disparities remain
On Thursday (July 31), the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family released the 2024 National Survey on Multicultural Families, conducted on a sample of 16,014 households nationwide.
Under Korean law, a multicultural family refers to a family comprising an immigrant by marriage and a person who has acquired Korean citizenship by birth, acknowledgement or naturalisation, as outlined in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Nationality Act.
A sharp rise in higher education enrollment was recorded among multicultural children.
The rate of those entering college or university jumped from 40.5 percent in 2021 to 61.9 percent last year, a dramatic increase of over 21 percentage points.
The education gap between multicultural youth and their peers has narrowed from 31 percentage points in 2021 to just 13 points in 2024.
'These statistics suggest that children from multicultural families are now transitioning from being recipients of aid to active participants in society,' said Choi Sung-ji, director of youth and family policy at the Ministry. 'We must now focus on unlocking their full potential.'
Household income has also improved. About 65.8 percent of multicultural households reported a monthly income of over 3 million won (US$2,200), up from 50.8 percent in 2021.
It was the first time this income bracket became the most common, marking a shift in economic standing, the survey showed.
Longer-term settlement is also becoming the norm. More than half, or 52 percent, of respondents said they have lived in Korea for over 15 years, up 12.7 percentage points from three years ago, while those residing in the country for 20 years or more accounted for 28.3 percent.
Employment rates for foreign-born spouses and naturalized citizens also increased, reaching 62.7 percent.
However, 39 percent remained in low-wage manual labor, an increase from 2021, highlighting continued occupational stratification.
Experiences of discrimination have declined modestly but persist.
In 2024, 13 percent of respondents had experienced discrimination, down from 16.3 percent in 2021.
However, most said they chose to "put up with it" rather than respond, reflecting a lack of redress or support mechanisms.
Some 71.6 percent of youth and young adults (aged 13 to 24) hoped to attend a four-year university or go on to higher education, a 10-point rise from three years ago.
Reports of school bullying dropped slightly to 1.9 percent from 2.3 percent three years prior, while discrimination reports edged up to 4.7 percent, rebounding from a drop during the pandemic.
Cultural differences and marital conflicts between spouses slightly declined compared to the last survey, and more parents reported having fewer difficulties raising children.
Among those with children aged 5 and under, 27.3 percent said they had no significant parenting challenges.
For children aged 6 to 24, that figure rose from 11.9 percent in 2021 to 21.8 percent in 2024.
The most common challenges cited were access to emergency child care for younger children and financial burdens related to raising older children.
As multicultural families move toward long-term settlement, the government said it will pivot its focus from short-term adaptation to long-term support tailored to each family's needs.
This includes educational programs, bilingual learning, psychological counseling and job training, to be available at around 240 family centers nationwide.
'Multicultural families should no longer be viewed merely as vulnerable groups,' said Choi.
'The change in perception that they are part of Korea's future in enriching our society with various strengths and potential is needed."
The government also plans to scale up programs that help multicultural youth with an emphasis on career development, emotional well-being and social inclusion.
The survey respondents included different types of multicultural households.
Of the total, 72.8 percent were families with married immigrants who are foreign nationals or naturalised citizens married to Koreans; 16.5 percent were families with other types of naturalized citizens; and 10.6 percent were households without a married immigrant or naturalized parent, but with children of multicultural backgrounds.
The survey, conducted every three years, assesses the status of multicultural families in areas such as education, income, parenting, employment and social experience. - The Korea Herald/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Belgium's airdrop ignites global aerial aid movement for Gaza
ON August 4, 2025, as part of a coordinated humanitarian mission, the Belgian Air Force dropped 15 tonnes of food and medical aid over Gaza, followed by another 16 tonnes the next day. It was the first European nation to boldly participate in this form of direct aerial aid to the besieged Palestinian enclave — without waiting for Israel's green light or America's diplomatic blessing. This airdrop shattered the illusion that nothing could move into Gaza without Israel or US approval. What followed was just as remarkable. Inspired by Belgium's courage, a number of countries quickly followed. France began its own airdrops, delivering over 40 tonnes of aid. Germany, Spain, and Italy joined with commitments and logistical coordination. Jordan, acting as a central hub, helped facilitate these missions, while the UAE and Egypt also pledged and executed deliveries. The United Kingdom announced its intent to begin airdrops, and Saudi Arabia is reportedly preparing its entry into the mission. In total, over a dozen nations are now either actively participating or making logistical arrangements to deliver aid from the skies to a population pushed to the brink of starvation. What makes this different from earlier "statements of concern" is that these actions are material, not symbolic. They directly bypass the decades-long stranglehold that Israel and the US have exerted over humanitarian corridors to Gaza. Belgium's decision didn't come with a negotiated corridor, but with a moral one: the belief that starving people do not need permission slips for mercy. In terms of international relations, this moment could signal the slow dismantling of US-Israeli impunity. For decades, Israel has maintained that any uncoordinated delivery into Gaza is a violation of its sovereignty. The US has echoed that position while shielding Israel from global accountability. But now, as countries like Belgium, France, and Spain take matters into their own hands, that consensus is breaking down. Even in the US, there is growing frustration. The American public is beginning to question why their tax dollars fund weapons but not food. And the same Congress that routinely rubber-stamps military aid to Israel is now watching European nations act with moral clarity. The more countries join this momentum, the harder it becomes for Israel to justify the continued strangulation of 2.3 million civilians. And the harder it becomes for the United States to maintain its credibility as a defender of international law while standing by a partner accused of war crimes. What if the Muslim world now followed suit — not just with speeches and resolutions, but with economic action? If the 57 Muslim-majority countries were to impose a complete embargo on imports from and exports to Israel and the United States until the siege is lifted and a ceasefire implemented, the financial impact would be staggering. Based on conservative trade data from 2024, Muslim countries import approximately US$290 billion worth of goods and services annually from the United States and US$23 billion from Israel. In return, they export around $190 billion to the U.S. and $15 billion to Israel. This results in a total bilateral trade volume of approximately $480 billion with the United States and $38 billion with Israel. If even a partial embargo were enacted — on petroleum, consumer goods, technology, or financial services—the ripple effect could hit supply chains, energy markets, and corporate interests in both countries. Oil exports alone could be used as leverage against US support for continued Israeli aggression. Trade redirection toward pro-Palestinian allies, or toward neutral trading blocs, could shift global economic balances. The Muslim world can also reward those who stand up for justice. Belgium, for example, could be granted Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status among OIC member states. Similar preferential treatment could be extended to France, Germany, and any country that dares to take humanitarian action where superpowers have failed. A reward-based system would reshape international diplomacy — where moral courage earns access and political cowardice invites isolation. What's especially powerful — and painful — is that this initiative has come not from the Islamic world but from Christian-majority European nations. While Muslim governments have delivered strong words, they have stopped short of concrete action. Belgium did not. Neither did Spain or France. Their aid drops have reached Palestinian children before many Muslim leaders even held emergency summits. Yet it's not too late. Imagine a unified Muslim airlift: planes from Turkiye, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Qatar, and Egypt dropping food and medicine directly into Gaza, without seeking Israeli clearance. Imagine a simultaneous suspension of trade with the United States and Israel. The political impact would be seismic. It would demonstrate that the Muslim world is not merely a collection of markets and oil wells but a bloc capable of coordinated, morally driven global action. Belgium has done what much of the world failed to do — show up. Not with drone strikes or naval blockades, but with parachutes and provisions. Not with threats, but with compassion. In defying silence and cowardice, Belgium has reminded the world what moral clarity looks like. It has reopened the sky—not just above Gaza, but above all of us.
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse
JERUSALEM: Benjamin Netanyahu will convene his security cabinet this week to decide on Israel's next steps in Gaza following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas, with one senior Israeli source suggesting more force could be an option. Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave. The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a US-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel. After Netanyahu met Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official said that "an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel" of a need to shift from a truce to a comprehensive deal that would "release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarise the Gaza Strip" — Israel's key conditions for ending the war. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday that the envoy's visit was seen in Israel as "very significant." But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force: "An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat." Israel's Channel 12 on Monday cited an official from his office as saying that Netanyahu was inclining towards expanding the offensive and seizing the entire Palestinian enclave. "STRATEGIC CLARITY" What a "military defeat" might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure the fighter group. Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago. The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials. While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said. Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas fighters. A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on the report but said that the military has plans in store. "We have different ways to fight the terror organisation, and that's what the army does," Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani said. On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which included a call on Hamas to hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority. Hamas has repeatedly said it won't lay down arms. But it has told mediators it was willing to quit governance in Gaza for a non-partisan ruling body, according to three Hamas officials. It insists that the post-war Gaza arrangement must be agreed upon among the Palestinians themselves and not dictated by foreign powers. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar suggested on Monday that the gaps were still too wide to bridge. "We would like to have all our hostages back. We would like to see the end of this war. We always prefer to get there by diplomatic means, if possible. But of course, the big question is, what will be the conditions for the end of the war?" he told journalists in Jerusalem.
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Anwar: Malaysia defended Bumiputera policy in US trade talks, resisted pressure on key policies
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 5 — Malaysia was among the few countries that stood firm on protecting key national policies during trade negotiations with the United States (US), Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim told Parliament today. Anwar said Malaysia rejected several US demands, including challenges to the country's pro-Bumiputera policy, an affirmative action programme that benefits the majority ethnic Malays and other indigenous communities. 'We still managed to secure a 19 per cent tariff rate. Most importantly, we defended the Bumiputera policy, which the US considers discriminatory and contrary to international trade principles. 'But we stood firm, Malaysia must uphold this policy, and in the end, it was accepted,' he said during ministerial question time in the Dewan Rakyat. Anwar said that while Malaysia maintained its position on non-negotiable issues, it took a pragmatic stance on others, particularly those involving trade mechanisms such as import and export regulations. 'I didn't want to risk tariff rates of 25 per cent or even 40 per cent. Malaysia is a trading nation, and the US is one of our major trade partners. 'It's easy to score symbolic victories at home, but the country could suffer, and hundreds of thousands of people would feel the impact. As Prime Minister, I have to protect the people's interests,' he said. He added that the government was willing to make concessions where possible, not only with the US, but also with other trading partners, including China. Meanwhile, touching on the Malaysia Aviation Group's (MAG) purchase of Boeing aircraft, the Prime Minister said it was MAG's decision and that Boeing was not the only aircraft model being acquired by the airline. 'We are also buying from Airbus, and I had brought up the fact that Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and AirAsia will be purchasing larger aircraft from Airbus during my discussion with French President Emmanuel Macron,' he said. He added that both Boeing and Airbus have set up their manufacturing facilities here in Malaysia, and highlighted that the purchase agreement with Boeing includes a condition that Boeing must set up some of its aircraft manufacturing operations in Malaysia. 'We need to buy a number of aircraft because we have had to cancel too many flight routes. This is a matter of supply and demand,' he said. — Bernama
