logo
A tiny rainforest country is growing into a petrostate. A US oil company could reap the biggest rewards

A tiny rainforest country is growing into a petrostate. A US oil company could reap the biggest rewards

CNN29-03-2025

Guyana's destiny changed in 2015. US fossil fuel giant Exxon discovered nearly 11 billion barrels of oil in the deep water off the coast of this tiny, rainforested country.
It was one of the most spectacular oil discoveries of recent decades. By 2019, Exxon and its partners, US oil company Hess and China-headquartered CNOOC, had started producing the fossil fuel. They now pump around 650,000 barrels of oil a day, with plans to more than double this to 1.3 million by 2027.
Guyana now has the world's highest expected oil production growth through 2035.
This country — sandwiched between Brazil, Venezuela and Suriname — has been hailed as a climate champion for the lush, well-preserved forests that carpet nearly 90% of its land. It is on the path to becoming a petrostate at the same time as the impacts of the fossil fuel-driven climate crisis escalate.
While the government says environmental protection and an oil industry can go hand-in-hand, and low-income countries must be allowed to exploit their own resources, critics say it's a dangerous path in a warming world, and the benefits may ultimately skew toward Exxon — not Guyana.
Since Exxon's transformative discovery, Guyana's government has tightly embraced oil as a route to prosperity. In December 2019, then-President David Granger said in a speech, 'petroleum resources will be utilized to provide the good life for all … Every Guyanese will benefit.'
It's a narrative that has continued under current President Mohamed Irfaan Ali, who says new oil wealth will allow Guyana to develop better infrastructure, healthcare and climate adaptation.
Oil's economic impact has already been enormous. The country of around 820,000 people is now the world's fastest expanding economy. Its GDP grew more than 33% in 2023 and more than 40% in 2024.
Critics, however, accuse the country of squandering its climate leadership by throwing its lot in with fossil fuels, especially given Guyana's huge vulnerability to climate change. Sea level rise could claim its capital Georgetown by 2030, according to one assessment.
'You have a government that is reckless about what is going to happen to Guyana,' said Melinda Janki, an international lawyer in Guyana who is handling several lawsuits against Exxon. It's pursuing 'a supposed course of development that is actually backward and destructive,' she told CNN.
And while plenty of Guyanese people welcome the new oil industry, some say Guyana's startling economic statistics do not reflect a real-world prosperity for ordinary people, many of whom are struggling with the higher prices accompanying the oil boom. Inflation rose 6.6% in 2023, with prices of some foods shooting up much more rapidly.
'Since the oil extraction began in Guyana, we have noticed that our cost of living has gone sky high,' said Wintress White, of Red Thread, a non-profit that focuses on improving living conditions for Guyanese women. 'The money is not trickling down to the masses,' she told CNN.
CNN contacted President Ali, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Finance for comment but received no response.
Guyana, a former Dutch then British colony which gained independence in 1966, is one of only a handful of countries that is a 'carbon sink,' meaning it stores more planet-heating pollution than it produces. This is due to its vast rainforest; trees remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow.
The country has protected its biodiversity where others have destroyed theirs, President Ali said in a BBC interview last year. In 2009, the country signed an agreement with Norway, which promised Guyana more than $250 million to preserve its 18.5 million hectares, or nearly 46 million acres, of forests.
Ali insists the country can balance climate leadership and fossil fuel exploitation. The new oil wealth will allow Guayana to develop, including building climate adaptations such as sea walls, he has said. He has also pointed to the continued failures of wealthy countries, already grown rich on their own fossil fuels, to help poorer countries with climate finance.
But there are concerns Guyana could fall victim to the 'resource curse,' in which vast, new wealth can actually make life worse for those who live there.
'That foreign money and that sudden rush of opportunities, combined with very limited manpower and government capacities, does often result in a lot of corruption,' said Michael Ross, a political science professor at UCLA.
Ross pointed to Guyana's neighbor Venezuela, where a large oil windfall led to a dramatic decline in government accountability and an increase in authoritarianism. The oil has also upped tensions between the two countries, with Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro laying claim to the oil-rich Essequibo region of Guyana.
Newly wealthy countries also find themselves suddenly interacting with foreign companies 'whose own infrastructure and access to information just dwarfs anything that's happening in the country,' Ross said.
Critics say this power imbalance is clear in the 2016 contract Guyana signed with Exxon. Under the agreement, Exxon keeps 75% of everything it makes from its oil operations in Guyana, with the remaining 25% shared equally between the company and the government, which also takes a 2% royalty.
'It was a bad deal,' Ali said in the BBC interview, but he has rejected the idea of unilaterally changing the agreement, which was signed by the previous government. He says the next contract with Exxon will be on different terms.
An Exxon spokesperson said the contract is 'globally competitive for countries at a similar stage of exploration' and said Guyana is averaging $1 billion a year in 'oil profits.'
Exxon has also faced a number of lawsuits over its potential environmental impact, many filed by Melinda Janki, a Guyanese international lawyer, who drafted the country's Environmental Protection Act back in the 1990s.
A big victory for Guyana's people and environment came in 2023, when the court ruled Exxon should have unlimited liability for the costs of any oil spill. Exxon has since appealed the ruling and has posted a $2 billion guarantee while it awaits the appeal outcome.
Exxon said this commitment supplements 'its robust balance sheets … and the insurance policies they already had in place.' Janki says this isn't enough. Offshore oil spills can be extremely expensive to deal with, the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill cost nearly $70 billion to clean up.
The push and pull between those who say oil offers Guyana a brighter future and those who fear the industry's impact will continue.
Exxon said it's had a positive impact on the country, including employing more than 6,200 people, investing more than $2 billion with local Guyanese businesses since 2015 and spending more than $43 million on community projects.
But Red Thread's Wintress White says people are struggling with sky-high rents and food prices that have doubled or tripled in some cases.
'The reality here is that the oil is not a blessing, it's a curse and it's only polluting our environment,' she said.
Janki believes Guyana can move swiftly to renewables. It is a country of sunshine, wind and rivers for small-scale hydropower she said.
She fears the country's rush for oil has come much too late and will trap the country into an industry without a long future. 'It's too late to do oil … the only people who are going to make money from this are Exxon and the oil companies,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider

Three cheers for the US-China trade war ceasefire
Three cheers for the US-China trade war ceasefire

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Three cheers for the US-China trade war ceasefire

Yay! High-level US-China talks in London this week reached a trade-war ceasefire, offering some stability for nervous markets. Days of talks, following on President Donald Trump's call with China's Xi Jinping last Thursday, settled on a framework that leaves a 55% US tariff on Chinese goods and a 10% Chinese levy on American imports. Plus, Beijing will ease restrictions on rare-earth exports while Washington will back off on its developing ban on Chinese students attending American universities. Plenty of issues remain: China's key role in world fentanyl production, for one thing; its long history of intellectual-property theft, currency manipulation and so on. Not to mention the outright espionage that so many of those students are dragged into. And of course in the longer term the United States needs to be less dependent on China for rare earths, pharmaceutical precursors and many other critical needs. The two sides are supposed to reach a comprehensive deal by Aug. 10, but at least the summer should be calm. The chaos of on-again, off-again tariffs had led to turbulence in US markets and had mom-and-pop shops bracing for 'the end'; now they can plan at least a couple of months ahead, with solid reason to hope the worst is over. US businesses can adapt to 55% tariffs on Chinese goods, as long as they've got some certainty that the rate will remain stable. Kudos to Treasury and Commerce Secretaries Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, the top US negotiators in London, for mastering 'the art of the framework'; let's hope Trump and Xi can close a final deal.

US-China trade deal news, Fed rate cut odds: Market Takeaways
US-China trade deal news, Fed rate cut odds: Market Takeaways

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US-China trade deal news, Fed rate cut odds: Market Takeaways

US stocks (^DJI, ^IXIC, ^GSPC) eased off the gas and closed Wednesday's session slightly in the red after May's Consumer Price Index (PPI) indicated inflation to be cooling. Yahoo Finance senior markets reporter Josh Schafer examines the trading day's biggest themes and catalysts for equities, including how markets have been reacting to President Trump's touting of a US-China trade deal and what the fresh inflation data indicates about the Federal Reserve's odds of cutting interest rates. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store