
The influence of Peter, the conscientious objector, lives on after death
He died a year ago, my brother Peter, the Moll family's mighty totara, and his loss still reverberates.
And yet. "Non omnis obiit" — he is not all dead. His influence lives on among us.
My English lecturer at university, Dr Bertelsen, displayed an arresting poster on her door: "Carry a little conviction this morning!"
Peter did, and thus he became a conscientious objector.
In South Africa military training was compulsory for young white men. Peter completed his "basic training" after school and then sailed off to the University of Cape Town.
Where he began changing. First of all, there were the Soweto riots of June 1976 and then days later at a Christian student conference he had a "Damascus Road experience", noting that the delegates of colour were accommodated, inconveniently, miles away.
Deliberately he widened his circle of friends to include those of other denominations and faiths, indeed, folk of all stripes.
The (White) National Government then in power disrespected the humanity of other races and the army bolstered its position, he realised.
Conscription compelled participation in an "unjust war", and the Lord, Peter told me firmly, was impelling him to oppose it.
There was no precedent for the direction he was taking, and there was certainly virulent opposition, such that his life was made truly unpleasant. He was accused of being a disobedient son and a poor God-follower.
But nothing deterred him, and during this period of decision making he practised, in the words of Ovid, being patient and tough, knowing that one day this pain would be useful to him.
He objected to two army summer camps. Third strike though, he was warned, and you're off to jail.
Peter worked as an actuary for a year after university. The third call-up though was looming, and, steadfastly setting his face towards Jerusalem as it were, on December 4 1979 he found himself at Cape Town Castle, convicted of failing to report and being sentenced to 18 months, to be served at the military prison, Voortrekkerhoogte, in Pretoria.
I visited him there regularly; he was allowed three visitors per month for 15 minutes each. We would sit on formica chairs in the hot, largely shadeless prison yard. Really, the pits.
Mercifully he could receive any number of letters (including monthly missives from Desmond Tutu) but was allowed to write only one per month of 500 words.
Solitary confinement however was the worst privation.
Peter refused to wear army overalls. Into solitary confinement he went for 10 days with no reading matter officially but the Bible and no clothes but his underpants.
A few days after his release he was asked, Now will you comply? No, he said.
In, out, in, out. Altogether he spent 125 days in that cell, all alone.
On visiting days, I sensed his steely resolve but alongside that a curious serenity, calling up the immortal words of Dante Aligheri: "In His will is our peace."
Despite all this Peter later said that objecting was the best thing he ever did, as it helped to ignite the conscientious objection movement in South Africa.
There was the odd moment of joyful clarity. Over Easter 1980 supporters around the country fasted and prayed, and then on Easter Sunday Peter received a telegram from his Economics Professor Francis Wilson recounting the words of Romans 8:38: "Nothing can separate us from the love of God."
Peter hung on to this promise of God's constant companionship and upholding.
In the wake of Peter's stand, and that of our cousin Richard Steele, a movement was spawned, the End Conscription Campaign.
But more importantly hearts were touched and challenged by the message that was, at bottom, as simple and profound as this: Love one another.
This added to the anti-apartheid ferment in South Africa in the 1980s and, I like to think, helped make way for the new, more equitable regime to come.
Our brother Terence in his Encomium said: "In our dark times, Peter is a reminder of how people with moral clarity and courage can make a difference." You can't help swelling with pride and gratitude, can you?
After his death Professor Jim Cochrane was to say that Peter's was in a sense the story of anyone who has to break free of the straitjacket of authority that allows injustice to thrive "in order to find and follow the moral foundations that offer hope for all of humanity".
I'm deeply comforted in my mourning by recollections of Peter's courage. And this thought from Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott: "Is death the last sleep? No, it is the last and final awakening."
Also, recalling Dr Bertelsen's poster, to have had a brother who, God-with-him, carried more than a little conviction not only back then but all his life.
■Jenny Beck is a lawyer and member of Dunedin City Baptist Church.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
13 hours ago
- 1News
Education Minister cut Māori words from future junior books, documents show
Education Minister Erica Stanford has imposed a near total ban on Māori in new additions to a series of books used to teach five-year-olds to read. An Education Ministry report shows Stanford decided in October last year to exclude all Māori words except for characters' names from any new books in the Education Ministry's Ready to Read Phonics Plus (RtRPP) series. The paper showed the decision was driven by concern Māori words were confusing for children learning to read English though evidence of that was mixed. Stanford told RNZ the decision affected only 12 books that would finish the series, after which the series, including 27 books with Māori words, could be reprinted. The ministry's report said: "Under this option, we would not include kupu Māori in all phases of the RtRPP scope and sequence for any future books. The 13 RtRPP books currently in development do not contain any kupu Māori, apart from character names." ADVERTISEMENT It was not clear in the paper whether the books would be reprinted. "As noted above, the RtRPP resources are expected to have a lifespan in schools of approximately 10 years, so it would take several years for the books containing kupu Māori that are currently in circulation to be replaced in practice." The document showed Stanford also instructed the ministry to develop a teaching sequence in the English curriculum to help teachers prepare children to read Māori words from their second year at school. Children reading (file picture). (Source: Stanford told RNZ that would stop teaching children in mainstream classrooms to pronounce and read Māori from being "left to chance". The ministry's document said currently from Year 4, Māori words were included in the curriculum with increasing frequency and complexity. Stanford told RNZ she considered rewriting the 27 books that contained Māori words to retain only the proper nouns in Māori, but later decided against it. ADVERTISEMENT "These are very early readers that teach children to learn to read and there are already 'heart' words in there that children have to memorise in English and if there are some te reo words in there as well, then that's okay and we'll leave them as they are," she said. She described the decision as the middle position between conflicting advice. The minister's October decision included reprinting one of the books, 'At the Marae', as a big book but not as a 'reader' for children to take home — something that angered many teachers and principals in the past week. The document showed Stanford raised the issue after "experts in structured literacy approaches" told her that including two different languages in the books could confuse learners and make it harder for them to master English phonetics. The ministry's paper said evidence about that was mixed but there was a case to consider the amount of Māori words in books for children learning to read. Literacy experts told RNZ this week Māori words were part of everyday New Zealand English and did not present problems for beginning readers because their spelling was regular and their vowel sounds matched some of the English vowels. The document said 26 of the 75 Ready to Read books had up to three Māori words and a 27th, 'At the Marae', had six Māori words. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the legal fight to get a New Zealand woman and her child out of US immigration detention, sliding house prices, and Taylor Swift's big reveal. (Source: 1News) A hand-written note on the document showed the minister wanted te reo Māori introduced when children stopped using "decodable" books like the Ready to Read series, usually at the end of their first year at school or early in their second year. "I want to include in the NZC (English) a section on Te Reo vowel sounds and pronunciation to ready students for reading te reo words in school journals as previously discussed," she wrote. Stanford also noted that: "Interestingly — I asked kura leaders if they would accept English words in te reo Māori decodable books and they no. So it would be consistent to keep one language only in very early Year 1 decodable books, except for names." The ministry's paper said the Ready to Read series was designed to teach the reading of English "and the sound-letter correspondences in English". "Our advice to schools is to teach kupu Māori in RtRPP books as "told" words. The foundational skill of phonic decoding within the resources is based on the English language and students are not expected to decode the kupu Māori," it said. The paper warned the options could result in pushback from schools. ADVERTISEMENT "If we discontinue the use of kupu Māori (apart from character names) in RtRPP books, there may be a negative response and media attention. [REDACTED] In particular, recalling existing books has the potential to generate pushback." The minister wrote in response: "It's only in Year 1 decodable books that teach English and it would align with the approach taken in te reo decodables. Te Reo would be introduced immediately after the use of decodable stops which is typically end of Year 1 early Year 2 where students move on to journals."


NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
New Zealand officials bid for release of Kiwi woman Sarah Shaw, son from US immigration centre
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) was having a meeting about whether Isaac would be released tomorrow, she said. 'As for Sarah, her work visa is still current. She still is able to be within the United States and all of her son's paperwork was current and approved. So there was actually no reason for him to be detained.' A New Zealand woman and her six-year-old son who live in Washington state have been detained by US immigration. Photo / GoFundMe Besancon earlier told the Herald that she's hoping to get an update on Shaw's detention status by tomorrow. Shaw was detained on July 24 crossing the border back into the US after driving her two oldest children, Grace, 11, and Seth, 9, to the airport in Vancouver for a flight to New Zealand. Isaac didn't go on the trip because he wasn't old enough to fly unaccompanied. Besancon told Morning Report that the conditions in the centre, where Shaw and her son are being held together, are 'very similar to a prison'. They are only allowed to roam freely between 8am and 8pm, otherwise being locked in a room with multiple other families, none of whom speak English, she said. Shaw's lawyer, Minda Thorward, told local media she had a temporary immigration document which allowed her to travel and re-enter the US, but there was an 'administrative error' with it. Shaw and her son were being held at the Dilley Immigration Processing Centre in Dilley, Texas. A GoFundMe was set up by Besancon to get Shaw and her son back home to Washington. Family and friends are pleading for the release of a Kiwi mother of three and her 6-year-old son after they were detained by US immigration. Photo / Supplied Besancon told the Herald yesterday that Shaw is 'absolutely terrified.' The children in New Zealand had not heard from their mother since the day she was detained. The children on the way to Canada, excited to see their grandparents. Photo / Supplied Besancon said ICE should have put Shaw and her son in a locator system and filed paperwork establishing a court date, which it did not do for almost three weeks. 'It was about two-and-a-half weeks of basically legal-sanctioned kidnapping, which is a really big deal here in America.' Family and friends are pleading for the release of a Kiwi mother of three and her 6-year-old son after they were detained by US immigration. Photo / Supplied Besancon has been able to speak with Shaw in a controlled capacity because Shaw signed a privacy release between herself, Besancon and her lawyer. A Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson (MFAT) said yesterday that consular officials were aware of reports of a New Zealander and her young son in detention in the United States and were seeking further information. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZ mum 'locked in a cell' hopes 6-year-old son will be released by ICE soon
By Kate Green of RNZ A friend of Sarah Shaw, a New Zealander detained at the US-Canada border, says they're expecting to hear today whether her six-year-old son will be released. Shaw and her son Isaac, who live in Washington state, were detained three weeks ago after dropping her other children off in Vancouver to catch a flight. Victoria Besancon said Shaw was "absolutely terrified" when she and her son were bundled into a giant white van with no markings on it at the Canadian border. "I remember her on the phone being absolutely panicked. She originally thought she was being kidnapped, she didn't even realise she was being detained originally." The conditions she was being held in were "very similar to a prison," Besancon said. "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she's allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that she is locked in a cell with other families." They were among the only English-speakers at the facility. A graduate student working towards her masters degree and working for the state in corrections, Shaw had lived in America for the past three years. Besancon explained that there were two parts to Shaw's visa, known as a "combo card" - first, an I-360 visa (the kind granting immigration status to a widow or, in Shaw's case, a victim of domestic violence), and second, an employment visa, which Shaw was granted when she was employed by the state. Shaw was waiting on both parts of her visa to be renewed, but long wait times on I-360s meant this part was not renewed at the same time as her employment visa - but Shaw did not know that, Besancon said, assuming the visa card she received in the post meant she was fully approved. Besancon said ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officials at the border could have allowed Shaw to return anyway by filing for humanitarian parole, but due to increased detainment quotas and "the atmosphere in America right now", many people were being detained who normally would not have been. Isaac, however, was being held illegally, she said, as he possessed all the right paperwork to re-enter the country. They were expecting a decision today on whether ICE would release him into her care. The Foreign Minister's office has confirmed to RNZ that New Zealand's embassy is working on the case, after only just finding out about it. Winston Peters' office said it was through the media that staff heard about the case and nobody made contact beforehand. Peters' office said the minister was aware of the detention and would let consular officials do their work. Detainment in another state making legal battle difficult Despite Isaac's paperwork, he was still detained along with his mother, which meant they needed to be kept in a family detainment centre - of which there are only three, with the nearest option to Washington state in Texas. "Instead of being detained in her state of record, which is Washington, where her legal attorney would have had a much easier time defending her and requesting information, they took her multiple states away," Besancon said. If Isaac was released, it would hopefully mean Shaw could be transported to a facility in her own state. Retaining legal counsel in both states was expensive, on top of Shaw not being able to work. The GoFundMe page Besanon set up for her friend had topped US$37,000 - that is, nearly NZ$64,000 - by Tuesday evening, leaving her "speechless". "I was hoping to just get her rent covered for a month, I had no idea that this was going to get so much support." As well as donations, they had also been receiving stories from other families who had experienced similar situations. "I know it's really high on Sarah's priority list that when she does get out, to try and find a way to advocate for this."