Scientists in South Africa are making rhino horns radioactive to fight poaching
Under the collaborative project involving the University of the Witwatersrand, nuclear energy officials and conservationists, five rhinos were injected in what the university hopes will be the start of a mass injection of the declining rhino population.
They're calling it the Rhisotope Project.
4 Scientists sedate a rhino before a hole is drilled into its horn and isotopes are inserted at a rhino orphanage in Mokopane, South Africa on July 31, 2025.
AP
Last year, about 20 rhinos at a sanctuary were injected with isotopes in trials that paved the way for Thursday's launch.
The radioactive isotopes even at low levels can be recognized by radiation detectors at airports and borders, leading to the arrest of poachers and traffickers.
Researchers at Witwatersrand's Radiation and Health Physics Unit say that tests conducted in the pilot study confirmed that the radioactive material was not harmful to the rhinos.
'We have demonstrated, beyond scientific doubt, that the process is completely safe for the animal and effective in making the horn detectable through international customs nuclear security systems,' said James Larkin, chief scientific officer at the Rhisotope Project.
'Even a single horn with significantly lower levels of radioactivity than what will be used in practice successfully triggered alarms in radiation detectors,' said Larkin.
The tests also found that horns could be detected inside full 40-foot shipping containers, he said.
4 Scientists drill a hole into a rhino before injecting radioactive isotopes into it.
AP
4 Professor James Larkin injects radioactive isotopes into the horn of a rhino.
AP
4 Rhinos stand together at the rhino orphanage in South Africa on July 31, 2025.
AP
The International Union for Conservation of Nature estimates that the global rhino population stood at around 500,000 at the beginning of the 20th century but has now declined to around 27,000 due to continued demand for rhino horns on the black market.
South Africa has the largest population of rhinos with an estimated 16,000 but the country experiences high levels of poaching with about 500 rhinos killed for their horns every year.
The university has urged private wildlife park owners and national conservation authorities to have their rhinos injected.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rare 'extinct in the wild' Barbary lion cubs born at wildlife park
Four Barbary lion cubs have been born at a zoo in the Czech Republic. Experts say it's a vital contribution for a small surviving population of the rare lion that is extinct in the wild. (AP video by Stanislav Hodina)
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Blue whales mysteriously going silent off California coast —alarming scientists
Sounding the alarm. The sound of the blue whale's singing has decreased off the coast of California, frightening scientists who believe it is an indication of greater ecosystem danger. Scientists tracked the auditory songs of three whale species – blue, fin and humpback – in the North Pacific Ocean in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) over six years. Advertisement 5 A blue whale surfaces in the Pacific Ocean near Dana Point, California. AP The research, using a hydrophone on the ocean floor, analyzed the frequency of the structured sequences of sounds, commonly referred to as song, emitted by the large baleen whales, to define the prevalence in this foraging habitat and its potential use in behavioral ecology research. The study, published in Public Library of Science in February, found a decrease in song detection for both blue and fin whales across two of three interannual changes after 2017. Advertisement Recordings began in 2015, at the peak of a multi-year marine heatwave. The unusual warming began in 2013 when a large, dense pool of hot water, nicknamed The Blob, traveled from the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska down to the waters off the West Coast of the US. At the same time, the CCE food web toxicity was at high levels because of an extreme harmful algal bloom (HAB) that caused the 'most widespread poisoning of marine mammals ever documented, including in whales,' the study read. Waters were recorded to be 4.5 degrees hotter than average, and covered about 2,000 miles of the Pacific Ocean by 2016. Advertisement 5 The sea surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean during 'The Blob' in May 2015. ASA Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center The heatwave created a thriving environment for the bloom, killing off the krill population, and in turn quieting the waters with fewer blue whale songs. 'When you really break it down, it's like trying to sing while you're starving,' John Ryan, a biological oceanographer at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute who coauthored the report, told National Geographic. 'They were spending all their time just trying to find food.' Ryan described it as the 'most widespread poisoning of marine mammals ever documented,' creating hard times for the whales. Advertisement Blue whale songs decreased by 40 percent during the study period. 5 Researchers drain a sample collection of krill caught off the coast of San Francisco, Calif. on Sept. 25, 2019. San Francisco Chronicle via Gett 5 The tail of a blue whale above the water surface in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Dana Point on May 30, 2011. The study suggests blue whales had to forage in a larger area in 2019 because of a low abundance of krill in the tracked area. Blue whales – the world's largest mammal – maintain a strict krill-based diet, but their humpback counterparts forage on a wider range of krill and fish. The Blob did not make an impact on the population of foraging fish — anchovies and sardines — and the study found an increase in auditory detection of humpback whale songs. Interannual change from the smaller whale species increased from 34 percent to 76 percent of days over the six years. 5 A humpback whale swims alongside its calf in the ocean waters. Chris – Advertisement Disturbed by the sound of silence, scientists are trying to understand the long-term damage caused by 'The Blob' and similar anomalies believed to have tripled in occurrence since the 1940s, according to the outlet. 'There are whole ecosystem consequences of these marine heat waves,' study co-author and Monterey Bay Aquarium marine biologist Kelly Benoit-Bird told the outlet. 'If they can't find food, and they can traverse the entire West Coast of North America, that is a really large-scale consequence.' The longer foraging period results in less reproductive effort by the marine species, creating a smaller population of the blue whale. Advertisement 'Where they are, and what they're doing can tell you a lot about the health of the ecosystem,' regon State University ecologist Dawn Barlow told National Geographic. 'The Blob really highlighted how long-term these consequences can be.' 'Science shows that climate change is impacting the oceans,' she said, 'Listening and learning from these places is essential to our future. Now more than ever, it's important to listen.'
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardized, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus," the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost," Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. "It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day." John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard," she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
