
NI university leaders unite to call for political agreement on tuition fee rise
University chiefs in Northern Ireland have jointly called on the region's political leaders to back a significant uplift in tuition fees, warning that failure to tackle a funding crisis in the sector will force them to cut places for local students.
In an unprecedented step, the heads of Queen's University, Ulster University and The Open University, Ireland have co-signed a letter to the five largest parties at Stormont to warn the current financial arrangements are 'not sustainable'.
In the letter to the party leaders, seen by the PA news agency, the vice chancellors of Queen's and Ulster University, Professor Sir Ian Greer and Professor Paul Bartholomew, and the director of The Open University Ireland, John D'Arcy, express fears the brain drain of young talent leaving Northern Ireland to study elsewhere will accelerate without 'urgent intervention'.
The university heads outline in stark terms the consequences of continued inaction on the funding issue.
They wrote: 'As leaders within the higher education sector in the region, we are committed to expanding access to the opportunities our institutions provide; but an underfunded higher education sector will inevitably lead to us having to take the difficult decision to reduce the proportion of local students in our institutions.'
The three leaders acknowledge any increase in tuition fees agreed by Stormont should not be seen in 'isolation' and they also express support for a corresponding uplift in the maintenance grant available to students from low-income households.
The letter has been endorsed by the principals of Northern Ireland's two dedicated teacher training colleges – Stranmillis and St Mary's – with Professor Peter Finn from St Mary's and Professor Jonathan Hegarty from Stranmillis sending a similar letter to Stormont Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald, whose department has responsibility for higher education funding.
The move by the university and college heads has also been backed by a range of leading business organisations in the region.
A statement of support has been signed by the heads of the Northern Ireland Chamber of Commerce, the CBI, the Institute of Directors, the Centre for Competitiveness, the Federation of Small Businesses and the Belfast, Londonderry and Causeway chambers of commerce.
Annual tuition fees for students from the island of Ireland studying in Northern Ireland are currently capped at £4,750.
Students from the rest of the UK who study in Northern Ireland pay up to £9,250. That is the same amount paid by Northern Ireland students studying in universities and colleges in England, Scotland and Wales.
The £9,250 cap is increasing to £9,535 at the start of the next academic year in the autumn.
The Northern Ireland university chiefs are not pressing for major structural changes to the current funding model, rather an increase to the fee cap for island of Ireland students to reflect the inflationary pressures of recent years.
Their letter expresses frustration that tuition fee increases in Northern Ireland since 2011 have 'consistently fallen below inflation' while costs have 'risen dramatically'.
Citing an example, the higher education leaders said if 2021 was taken as a new baseline point to apply retrospective inflationary uplifts, the corrected fee cap would be £5,831.
'This level of fee is still well below fees in England and Wales, which will be £9,535 in the next academic year,' said the letter.
'Index-linking the funding level will also protect the shared-investment approach that has served Northern Ireland well and guard against future further erosion of the per-student funding model.'
The funding model in Northern Ireland is different to England and Wales, where institutions are primarily funded through tuition fees. In Northern Ireland, the Stormont Executive provides much more direct funding to further education institutions – a reason why the tuition fees are lower in the region.
Scottish students studying in Scotland pay no tuition fees, with the Scottish Government funding places for local students.
Universities across the UK also raise funds through their own commercial activities and by offering places to international students, who usually pay significantly more than local students.
The sector as a whole has been hit by a sharp decline in the number of overseas students coming to the UK to study – a drop attributed to recent changes to visa rules.
The university leaders stressed any increase to the fee cap should not be accompanied by a decrease in the amount of direct funding from Stormont.
The letter was addressed to Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald, DUP leader Gavin Robinson, Alliance leader Naomi Long, UUP leader Mike Nesbitt and SDLP leader Claire Hanna.
It was also circulated to First Minister Michelle O'Neill, deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly, Economy Minister Ms Archibald and the leader of the official opposition at the Assembly, SDLP MLA Matthew O'Toole.
The letter concluded: 'We encourage all-party agreement in considering updating the current funding model by making this hitherto deferred, necessary inflationary adjustment – and by so doing preserve the distinctive philosophy of the Northern Ireland higher education funding model while delivering sustainability for the sector and maintaining opportunities for the students we support.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness
A 'spiteful' boss cut his pregnant employee's work hours after she told him she had morning sickness, and then fired her when her maternity leave was due to start, a tribunal has heard. Sadia Shakil had worked as an accountant and bookkeeper at the property development firm Samsons in Bedford since October 2020, and became pregnant early the following year. But after Ms Shakil phoned her boss Mohammed Saleem on 30 March 2021 to inform him that she was experiencing morning sickness due to her pregnancy, he then proceeded to tell her in an email the following day that he was cutting her working hours. In the email seen by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote: 'Considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for 2 days per week.' The tribunal ruled that this was a 'fundamental' breach of Ms Shakil's employment contract, which caused her to experience 'stress, anxiety and panic' while questioning how she and her husband would be able to afford essential items for their baby now that their main source of income had been unilaterally reduced. During this period, Ms Shakil suffered sleepless nights and panic attacks while being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts', including 'doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable'. After informing her boss that she needed to resign, Ms Shakil managed to secure a second full-time job in May, but she continued to work at Samsons in her spare time in the hope she would be able to resume her full-time role at the firm after her maternity leave. In the months that followed, Mr Saleem ignored multiple emails from Ms Shakil about her upcoming maternity leave, 'which caused her further stress and worry', at a time when she also suffered complications, being admitted to hospital on two occasions. By the end of September, blood tests had revealed a potentially serious condition which Ms Shakil was told put her baby at risk of still birth, resulting in the hospital booking her in to have her baby induced on 17 October. Two days after Ms Shakil's final email on 27 September, informing Mr Saleem that her leave would now commence on 1 October, he finally responded – referring to a letter she had not received 'putting her role at risk of redundancy '. Ms Shakil was dismissed with effect from 1 October 2021, when she began maternity leave, the tribunal noted. After her son was born on 18 October, the family were forced to move back in with Ms Shakil's parents 'due to the financial pressure that [her] loss of employment and lack of maternity pay had created'. Ms Shakil's subsequent claim to the Department for Work and Pensions for maternity allowance was then rejected on the grounds that her employer was responsible for paying it. 'The claimant's early weeks and months with her new baby were marred by the need to devote time to trying to resolve her financial predicament and bringing the employment tribunal proceedings,' the tribunal found. After an initial tribunal in Birmingham in April 2023, Ms Shakil was awarded £5,000 in damages for maternity discrimination and Samsons ordered to pay her for income lost while on reduced hours. In an email sent in June 2023 in which he asked Ms Shakil to provide her bank details so that he could pay her the sum awarded by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote 'I hope that you have a wonderful time utilising the monies gained from me', adding that the loss of money 'will make no difference to me'. A further appeal hearing in March 2025 found that Ms Shakil 'was horrified' by the email – which she described as 'disturbing and 'nasty' – and 'was shocked that Mr Saleem could be so spiteful to her'. Ms Shakil's appeal that the sum awarded to her had been too low was accepted, and the judge ordered Samsons to pay her a total of £31,860. Finding it to be a 'serious case of discrimination', the tribunal found: 'The discrimination took place at a time in the claimant's life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy – the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. There was evidence that the claimant's confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. 'These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of the claimants' ongoing financial struggles.' It added: 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because the claimant is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'


The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
MrQ Casino Bonus: 200 Cash Spins on Fishin' BIGGER Pots of Gold
GET READY to make a splash with MrQ casino bonus! New UK players over 18 years can dive into a four-day spin extravaganza on Fishin' BIGGER Pots of Gold. Just deposit £10 each day with bonus code POTS200 and watch up to 200 thrilling cash spins land in your account. Sounds juicy! Let's show you how. What is MrQ's welcome offer? MrQ Casino brings in something special for new players. Imagine this: every day for four days, you deposit and spend a tenner (£10) and instantly unlock 50 electric cash spins on Fishin' BIGGER Pots of Gold. Each spin is valued at 10p per spin, so you receive £20 as extra rewards. The best part? There are no wagering requirements on free spins and associated winnings. So, you can withdraw them anytime or use them to enjoy more games. However, there's a catch! If you miss a day within the first four days, you may not claim the full 200 free spins. You also have 12 hours after each deposit to wager at least £10 and trigger 50 free spins. Once they land in your account, they must be used within 48 hours. It's vital to note that MrQ Casinos has provided a list of games you shouldn't wager your £10 on, as they make you ineligible for this offer. You can bet on other available games, especially slots, to earn free spins. How to claim MrQ casino offer Visit MrQ's official website and create an account using your email address and a password. Once in your profile, click the ' Claim Offer' button. This takes you to a deposit window. Deposit at least £10 and stake it on Fishin' BIGGER Pots of Gold (or another eligible slot) within 12 hours. Watch 50 cash spins pop into your account instantly. Repeat steps 3 and 4 on days two, three, and four to reel in all 200 spins. What happens next? As soon as you hit that £10 spend each day, your spins will splash into 'My Rewards'. Afterwards, load up Fishin' BIGGER Pots of Gold and spin its reels for free. Remember, your spins vanish after 48 hours, so use them quickly. What about potential wins? They drop straight into your cash balance with no hoops to jump through, ready for withdrawal or more play. If you have leftover spins after the 48-hour expiry window, they'll sail off quietly. Terms and conditions of the MrQ casino bonus offer This casino bonus has its own terms and conditions. Let's review them This offer is available to new UK customers aged 18 years or above. Deposit and spend £10 per day within 12 hours for 50 spins daily (200 total). Spins expire 48 hours after credit; unused spins are removed. No wagering requirement on spin winnings; large wins may undergo security checks. We recommend that you wager responsibly and adhere to any applicable terms and conditions, as failure to do so may result in disqualification from any available offer. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.


Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Every time Nigel Farage has fallen out with his colleagues
Nigel Farage's bust-up with Zia Yusuf is only the latest in a string of extraordinary sackings, resignations and break-ups in his political career. Mr Yusuf, the former Reform UK chairman, quit on Thursday following a disagreement over a Reform MP's call for a burka ban. But Mr Farage has fallen out with multiple senior figures in the party and its predecessors, Ukip and the Brexit Party. Godfrey Bloom Nigel Farage was forced to suspend the Ukip party whip from economist Godfrey Bloom after he described women at a party conference in 2013 as 'sluts'. Mr Bloom also hit journalist Michael Crick over the head with the conference brochure. Mr Farage, furious that one of his conference speeches had been overshadowed, said: 'We can't put up with it. We can't have any one individual, however fun or flamboyant or entertaining or amusing they are, we cannot have any one individual destroying Ukip's national conference and that is what he's done today.' Douglas Carswell Douglas Carswell was Ukip's first MP after defecting from the Conservatives in 2014. He won the Clacton seat twice for the party but soon fell out with Mr Farage, who accused him of trying to block efforts to put him in the House of Lords. The party leader branded Mr Carswell a 'Tory party posh boy' and accused him of trying to 'undermine everything we've stood for for a very long time'. Mr Carswell quit Ukip at the 2017 election to stand as an independent, but he lost to the Conservatives. Suzanne Evans Suzanne Evans was the most senior woman in Ukip but fell out with Mr Farage over his leadership style in 2015. She called for two of the Ukip leader's advisers to resign and praised Patrick O'Flynn, economy spokesman, after he accused Mr Farage of being 'snarling and aggressive'. Ms Evans later went on TV to say Mr Farage was seen as 'very divisive' – a move that saw her sacked and party officials told not to have any further contact with her. Diane James Diane James was elected leader of Ukip in 2016 after Mr Farage quit in the wake of the Brexit referendum victory. But within three weeks, he was back, after senior party figures refused to accept her as leader. The story of Mr Farage's role in Ms James' departure is not fully understood. Ben Habib After leaving Ukip in 2018, Mr Farage set up the Brexit Party, which campaigned for a final ending of ties with the EU, and later Reform UK. Its co-deputy leader was Ben Habib but he was sacked soon after last year's general election. He later quit Reform, saying Mr Farage needed to learn that the party 'should not be controlled by one man'. Asked what impact his departure would have, Mr Farage said: 'None whatsoever.' Rupert Lowe Businessman Rupert Lowe was one of five Reform MPs elected last year – but his ego clashed with that of Mr Farage. After he accused Mr Farage in an interview of acting like a 'messiah', Mr Lowe lost the party whip and was reported to police over allegations he had physically threatened Zia Yusuf, then party chairman. Mr Lowe said at the time: 'I am 67 years old, and I have a 67-year-long unblemished record with the law. These are false allegations, designed to maliciously smear my name and ruin my reputation after I dared to bruise [Nigel] Farage's ego.' A party source told The Telegraph: 'This is what happens when you mess with Nigel.'