Back-to-back scams cost man RM450k
KUALA LUMPUR: A scam victim who was desperate to seek legal help got scammed again – this time by a bogus lawyer, says Datuk Seri Michael Chong.
The MCA Public Services and Complaints Department head said it all started when the victim, known as Liau, 55, joined a fake investment platform on April 10.
'He had responded to an advertisement by a so-called investment learning platform which lured him with the promise of investing in a purported China-Hong Kong Initial Public Offering (IPO),' Chong said in a press conference at Wisma MCA here yesterday.
Tempted by the offer, Liau used his Employees Provident Fund and loans from family members to buy the purported shares.
Chong said Liau had been pressured to continue purchasing the so-called shares every time the platform purportedly secured a new IPO, even though he could no longer afford it.
In the end, he lost a total of RM390,000 and lodged a police report at the Wangsa Maju police station.
Desperate, the victim turned to a 'lawyer' for help through a Facebook advertisement.
The lawyer, who claimed to be based in Hong Kong, told the victim that his RM390,000 was detected at a casino in Macau and insisted that the only way to recover the money was to win it back at the online casino.
Trusting the story, the victim handed over more money each time the bogus lawyer demanded it under various pretexts.
'I did not think it would be a scam, as I was too desperate to get back the money I had lost,' Liau said.
In total, he ended up giving the fraudulent lawyer RM61,500.
'I never imagined I would be scammed twice,' he added.
Chong said that this was not the first case involving fake lawyers.
Meanwhile, MCA Publicity Bureau chairman and lawyer Chan Quin Er said that Liau was seeking assistance, and the scammer took advantage of his desperation in his bid to regain his losses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
AI will replace most humans in workplace, but then what?
IS technology more job augmenting or job replacing? This has been a long-standing debate. But recent academic work suggests that technology has been a net destroyer of jobs for decades. Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics could rapidly accelerate this trend, with significant implications for inflation, the size of government and United States-China relations. Over the long arc of history, technological advances have enabled industries to emerge, as workers, released from "older" jobs by machines, have been able to transition into newer ones. Indeed, 60 per cent of workers today are employed in occupations that did not exist in 1940, or 74 per cent if we consider just the professional category, which added the most workers during the past eight decades. However, recent academic research suggests we may have reached an inflection point in the US, whereby technology is now destroying more jobs than it is creating. David Autor, an economist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and winner of the 2005 John Clark Bates Medal, argues that since 1980, the jobs replaced by automation have not been fully offset by new jobs created. This reflects the pace of technological change and the fact that advancements are now increasingly focused on "professional, technical, and managerial occupations", Autor notes, rather than lower-skilled work. He finds that machines that are more powerful than an average human (e.g., a tractor) are typically labour-augmenting and productivity-enhancing, while machines that are also smarter than the average human tend to be labour-substituting. And AI is on pace to be a lot smarter than most humans. While forms of AI have been around since the 1940s, the immense computing power resulting from advances in semiconductor technologies has now allowed machines to attain multidimensional intelligence. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that many workers are going to be replaced by automation in the coming decades, even if the best AI is never as creative or imaginative as the smartest humans. A 2019 OECE report and a 2018 paper by PriceWaterhouseCoopers argue that 15 to 30 per cent of all jobs in developed markets are at risk of being automated. If AI does turn out to be a net job destroyer, what are some of the biggest implications? First, it's likely to be deflationary. High and rising unemployment resulting from ever cheaper and more capable machines should, in theory, lead to structural deflation, as technologies that can rapidly augment the supply of goods and services should reduce demand if they cause massive job losses. Next, the US government will probably get even bigger. In a mass unemployment scenario, the government would likely be compelled to step in to facilitate income and wealth transfers from the owners of robots and tech businesses to the unemployed workers. And which countries will come out on top? The economic winners and losers in the years ahead will likely be determined by who can best create and utilise technology. The US and China, both dominant in cerebral technologies, therefore, appear well positioned to thrive in this environment. Even if the trade war between the US and China is short, the tech war between these two countries could be protracted — and ultimately much more consequential. The tech war, unlike the trade war, is dynamic, meaning it's continually evolving and advancing. My views here are admittedly speculative. But the arguments for why AI and robotics could ultimately be labour-creating are as well. Furthermore, these arguments are often obscured by sloppy references to labour productivity, which is a simple ratio between output and labour input. When calculating this, there is often little explanation of what part of the output should be attributed to the labour input. For example, should subway train drivers account for the value of the entire subway system? Projections based on such questionable assumptions should be viewed cautiously. Finally, it's also true that populations in many developed markets are ageing, so the heavy use of automation could simply offset the shrinkage in the labour force, something we're already seeing in Japan and South Korea. But ageing, like natural evolution in general, is gradual, while computational and technological evolution accelerates at an exponential pace. Because of the convexity in technological advances, it's hard not to bet on technology rather than workers.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Kedah water tariff hike explained by MB as non-burdensome
ALOR SETAR: Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor stated that the water tariff increase effective from August 1 will not burden Kedah residents. He emphasised that the new rate of 81 sen for the first 20 cubic metres of domestic use is significantly lower than tariffs in other states. According to Muhammad Sanusi, this adjustment is crucial for Syarikat Air Darul Aman Sdn Bhd (SADA) to manage the state government's water-related debts. 'This tariff increase is not just happening in Kedah,' he confirmed during the Kedah State Legislative Assembly session. He noted that all ten water supply operators in the country requested and received approval for similar adjustments. Muhammad Sanusi, who also chairs SADA, explained that profitability is essential for the company to settle its water supply debts. SADA's financial records show profits after tax ranging from RM31,000 to RM23.1 million between 2010 and 2018. The company faced a loss of RM36 million in 2019 but returned to profitability with RM149,000 in 2020. Profits grew to RM29.5 million in 2021, followed by RM29.4 million in 2022 and RM25.2 million in 2023. SADA recorded RM41.5 million in profit for 2024 and projects an RM80 million profit for the current year. Executive authority over clean water supply resides with the federal government through the National Water Services Commission (SPAN). This is stipulated under Section 3 of the Water Services Industry Act 2006. 'SPAN issues licenses and controls all business plan operators,' Muhammad Sanusi elaborated. He added that SPAN possesses the executive power to take over operations if debt payments cannot be covered. - Bernama
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Cops probing Johor flag being displayed upside-down
SEGAMAT: Police had received a report on a Facebook account in regards to the Johor flag, being displayed upside down. Segamat OCPD Supt Ahmad Zamry Marinsah said the upside-down state flag was spotted on the top floor of a hotel at the Taman Yayasan commercial area near here. 'Investigation on two of the hotel employees found that one of them had unintentionally hung the flag upside-down," he said in a statement. Supt Ahmad Zamry said the suspect, a foreigner, corrected the position of the flag after being reprimanded by his fellow worker. 'Upon inspection, the foreign worker possesses valid travel documents and work permit," he said. 'We are in the midst of completing the investigation papers and refer it to the Deputy Public Prosecutor," he said. Supt Ahmad Zamry called upon those who have information on crime-related activities to go to any nearest police station in the district or contact the Segamat police hotline at 07-9324222.
