YSRCP rejects report on Tirupati stampede, demands CBI inquiry
The Andhra Pradesh cabinet headed by Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Thursday accepted the report submitted by Justice (retired) M Satyanarayana Murthy on the stampede that occurred at Padmavathi Park in Bairagipatteda, Tirupati on January 8, 2025.
Six devotees died and nearly 40 were injured in the stampede in Bairagipatteda near MGM School as hundreds of them jostled for tickets for Vaikunta Dwara Darshanam at Lord Venkateswara Swamy temple in Tirumala Hills.
"The report seems to be predetermined as it has let off all the main persons responsible for the incident, which includes the TTD, revenue (department) and police officials, but has selectively picked two persons and made them scapegoats," said Reddy, addressing a press conference in the temple town.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC Orders Retrial In Anti-Sikh Riot Case
New Delhi: More than 40 years after the 1984 anti-Sikh riots followed Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination, resulting in brutal killings where the accused walked free, Delhi High Court on Monday ordered retrial in one of the cases. In three other acquittals, HC asked the trial court to "reconstruct" the case records as vital documents, including deposition of witnesses and their statements, are missing. The cases relate to the killing of five Sikhs in the Raj Nagar Part I area in Palam Colony and the burning down of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part II, and were lodged at the Delhi Cantt police station. In 2017, HC had reopened these cases after it found that all accused were acquitted by trial courts in 1986, and neither Delhi Police nor CBI appealed. Incidentally, only two of the several accused men are alive. In multiple verdicts, a bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar ordered the retrial of the accused, Ramji Lal Sharma, and the reconstruction of records in three cases against another accused, Balwan Singh Khokhar. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi HC said it is "mindful" that more than 40 years have passed, but underlined that the case "undoubtedly falls within the category of an 'exceptional case' warranting setting aside of the acquittal dated May 28, 1986, and consequent direction for a retrial." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kate Middleton's Daring Outfit Took Prince William's Breath Away Crowdy Fan Undo The court noted that the "truth-finding exercise was given a go-by previously" and directed CBI to probe further "since the alternative would entail turning a Nelson's eye to the needs of the society at large and the rights of victims, including the complainant and her children, to a comprehensive free and fair investigation". HC also flagged how, in Sharma's case, the trial court in 1986 "committed several manifest errors of law" that resulted in a "miscarriage of justice", and a "grave offence of murder and arson with communal overtones" was neither investigated properly nor "tried in right stead". The court said sufficient efforts were not made to involve all natural witnesses in the probe, including victim Harbhajan Singh's children who were present at the time of the incident, and/or any neighbours in whose house Singh's wife and children took shelter after the mob burnt their house down. On the long delay in victims approaching police, HC pointed out that "a bloodbath took place after the assassination and as a result of the violence, widows, children and persons residing in the vicinity ran away for their safety and took shelter elsewhere, which naturally meant they would not have been readily available for investigation". It said the trial court "failed to factor in the precarious situation and communal tensions which existed in the aftermath of the assassination". Dealing with the other three cases reopened in 2017, HC noted that apart from the shoddy investigation, trial judges "hardly took any steps to ensure the presence of crucial witnesses, including persons who had witnessed the incident", leading to missing material evidence. "Valuable lives have been lost in the incidents which form the subject matter of the present cases. Several crucial witnesses, including eyewitnesses to the incident, were not examined on account of insufficient efforts to secure their presence through service of summons at addresses which had been damaged and/or abandoned by such witnesses in the aftermath of the incident," the court observed. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Bar Council Issues Notices To 16 Lawyers in Punjab & Haryana HC Over 'Bench Hunting'
Last Updated: Bench hunting is an unethical practice where litigants or their counsel aim to have a case heard by a particular judge or bench perceived as favourable to secure a desired outcome The privilege committee of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana has issued notices to 16 lawyers over allegations of bench hunting in the high court, considering it a severe threat to the dignity and ethics of the legal profession. Bench hunting, or forum shopping, is an unethical practice where litigants or their counsel aim to have a case heard by a particular judge or bench perceived as favourable to secure a desired outcome. Central to the controversy is the high-profile case of Roop Bansal v State of Haryana, a corruption case involving a Gurugram-based realtor and a former special CBI court judge. Certain advocates allegedly engaged in bench hunting to obtain favourable orders in this matter. The privilege committee has sought responses from several lawyers of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Supreme Court, as well as senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mukul Rohatgi. 'This Committee is of the considered view that it is necessary at this stage to seek responses from Senior Advocates Sh. Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Sh. Mukul Rohatgi, in order to fairly and comprehensively adjudicate the matter at hand," the notice states. Those named in the notice include senior advocates Rakesh Nehra and Puneet Bali, as well as advocates JK Singla, Sidharth Bhardwaj, Aditya Aggarwal, Gagandeep Singh, Anmol Chandan, Baljeet Beniwal, Harsh Sharma, Sauhard Singh, Rupender Singh, Ankit Yadav, Ashim Singla, Aakash Sharma, Bindu, and APS Shergil. All have been directed to appear before the committee on August 16. The notice states that, prima facie, Singla orchestrated the plan but suggests it is 'highly unbelievable" that he acted alone, alleging that the effort was organised with ingenious minds possibly pulling strings behind the scenes. The privilege committee was formed on August 4, 2024, following directions from bar council chairman Rakesh Gupta and is headed by Raj Kumar Chauhan. The committee said documents placed before it allegedly indicate an attempt to manipulate the bench assignment process in the Punjab and Haryana HC. 'The sole objective of placing this matter, suo motu, before the Committee is to uphold the dignity of the legal profession, ensure the maintenance of legal ethics, and discharge the responsibilities entrusted under the law," the notice states. Citing an Indian Express report titled 'Reassigned case: Chief Justice Nagu hints at 'bench shopping', says bar being destroyed', the committee stressed on the seriousness of the issue, noting that there appears to be 'foul play" by advocates representing Roop Bansal, who may have manipulated procedural rules for convenience and gain. 'In India, common people knock on the doors of the court with the help of noble advocates. Here, Roop Bansal tried to break the door of the court with the help of some ingenious-minded advocates. The matters pertaining to M3M and Roop Bansal, pending before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, need to be watched carefully. The Bar Council cannot remain idle as a mere spectator. It is duty-bound to protect the dignity and ethics of the profession. The Committee must trace out the rotten apples from the basket before all get spoiled," the notice states. Describing the incident as 'painful and disturbing", the committee observed that certain advocates had allegedly attempted to manipulate bench allocation in a tactful, systematic, and organised manner. The committee said the court is regarded as the temple of justice and that any attempt to subvert it, whether driven by greed or manipulation, must be addressed with utmost seriousness. Drawing a parallel with the Mahabharata, the committee said: 'We are reminded of the Mahabharata, where the silence of wise men in Duryodhana's court led to the disrobing of Draupadi. This serves as a grim reminder that silence and inaction in the face of injustice enable further injustice." 'Legal ethics are not optional. They are sacred. Upholding the dignity of this noble profession requires moral courage, compassion, and an unwavering commitment to truth," it added. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : punjab and haryana high court view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Cyber fraudsters exploit Sadakat Khan's name in digital arrest scams
Hyderabad: Cyber fraudsters, suspected to be operating from Cambodia, are allegedly using the name of their former associate Sadakat Khan to target victims from Telangana and other states in digital arrest frauds. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In 2025 alone, at least 10 victims from the state reported that the fraudsters, posing as CBI sleuths, extorted crores of rupees by threatening to arrest them in human trafficking cases linked to Khan. On Nov 6, 2024, immigration officials at Indira Gandhi International (IGI) airport in Delhi had intercepted Sadakat Khan, a native of Sultanpur district in Uttar Pradesh, after he arrived from Dubai based on the look out circular (LOC) issued by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau (TGCSB) sleuths. The LOC was issued following a case registered at TGCSB headquarters police station in Hyderabad after a complaint from a woman in Sircilla on April 20, 2024. The complainant alleged that her son, who had completed graduation, was lured by Sadakat Khan and others with a job offer in Cambodia. "Sadakat, through his local associates, had collected 1.4 lakh from the victim on Jan 11, 2024, by offering a computer operator job in Cambodia for $950 monthly salary," a TGCSB investigator. After reaching Cambodia in Jan 2024, the victim was made to work for 16-17 hours per day in a cyber crime factory where over 500 other Indians were also employed. When the victim called his mother and explained his ordeal, she approached TGCSB, and a case was registered. Based on her complaint, Telangana police, through the ministry of external affairs, contacted Cambodian officials, and the victim was rescued. During the interrogation of Sadakat, TGCSB sleuths discovered that he had been working from Dubai as a mediator between India-based job consultants and cyber crime operators in Cambodia. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A few months after his arrest, a new trend has emerged in digital arrest frauds. Fraudsters posing as police and CBI officials began calling victims, threatening to arrest them for alleged links with Sadakat Khan. While most of these cases were reported in Telangana, the use of Sadakat Khan's name in digital arrest cases was also noted in West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh. Almost all the victims were senior citizens, and a victim from Hyderabad lost over 1.1 crore. "We suspect that Cambodia-based gangs, who used to work with Sadakat, have been using his name to dupe victims from Telangana. When offenders posing as cops take his name while executing a digital arrest scam, victims often check it online and see news articles about Sadakat's arrest. Sadakat is currently out on bail in the two human trafficking cases he was accused of," a TGCSB official said.
