logo
Are 1080p monitors still worth buying for gaming? You'd be surprised

Are 1080p monitors still worth buying for gaming? You'd be surprised

Digital Trends3 days ago
These days, many of the best gaming monitors fall in the 1440p to 4K category — but does that make 1080p displays obsolete? Many users and manufacturers alike might want you to believe that, but fortunately, there's still a lot to be said about the humble (or not-so-humble, as expensive options exist) 1080p monitor.
While 1080p monitors have their charms, gamers tend to go for top-shelf hardware instead, which is why their popularity in those circles is slowly waning. Personally, I think there's a lot to love about 1080p, but it's not all sunshine and rainbows. I'll walk you through whether 1080p is still worth buying in 2025, and how to pick the right monitor for your needs.
Why 1080p refuses to die
Check any tech outlet or electronics store, and it's all jaw-dropping 4K OLEDs as far as the eye can see. But, for many gamers and casual users alike, the reality is quite different. 1080p monitors are still far from being buried in the tech graveyard alongside CRTs and VGA cables, and with good reason.
Recommended Videos
For a lot of gamers, 1080p still does exactly what they need it to do, and it does so without setting their bank accounts on fire. You can play just about every game in 1080p and make the most of it, and while many will tell you 1440p looks and feels better, it's not going to make or break your whole setup.
It's true that higher resolutions tend to offer better immersion, and more importantly, more screen real estate. But, speaking as someone who only made the 1080p to 1440p switch in the last couple of years, I didn't suddenly become a better player just by switching my monitor. However, I can't deny that I enjoy the extra pixels.
However, those extra pixels come at a staggering cost: a hit to raw performance. Rendering fewer pixels means your graphics card doesn't have to work as hard, freeing up frames for smoother gameplay. That's why competitive esports pros still swear by 1080p — you're more likely to get those ultra-high refresh rates on a 1080p monitor.
Take this 500Hz Alienware monitor, for example. In our review, we were impressed by how fast it was, and that kind of refresh rate would be infinitely harder to achieve on a 1440p display. And because the technology is so mature, you can get those blistering refresh rates, solid color accuracy, and low input lag for a fraction of the price of a high-refresh 1440p or 4K display.
Scaling up to 1440p or 4K is really taxing on the GPU, so you'll often need one of the best graphics cards to comfortably hit 60 frames per second (fps) and more in every title at 1440p and more. That explains why a whopping 54% of all Steam Hardware Survey participants are still using 1080p, although 1440p is at 20% and rising every month.
Some trade-offs are hard to ignore
It's impossible to fully ignore the benefits of 1440p, though. I currently run a dual-monitor setup consisting of two identical 1440p screens (although I'm considering switching to an ultrawide). The extra screen real estate is nothing to turn your nose up at.
Switching to 1440p gives you roughly 78% more pixels on your screen. This feels great, both when you just look at your desktop and when you play games, and having used 1440p and 4K, scaling back to 1080p feels jarring. However, that's also 78% more pixels that your GPU needs to render, making it work extra hard.
The benefit of 1440p also lies in the fact that you can easily upgrade to a bigger display while keeping the image perfectly sharp. 1080p monitors do just fine at 24 inches or less, but if you want a display that's 27 inches or bigger, you might notice jagged edges or softer text. Textures don't look anywhere near as nice as they do on a higher resolution display.
If you've ever gone from playing a visually rich single-player game on a 4K panel to the same title at 1080p, the downgrade is immediately obvious: less fine detail, more aliasing, and a general sense that the world you're looking at is just a bit blurrier.
There's also the question of future-proofing. You might want to buy a budget GPU right now (and who can blame you, considering the current GPU prices), and for that, a 1080p monitor will do just fine. But if you one day upgrade to a high-end model, all that extra firepower will be slightly wasted on a worse display. Conversely, if your GPU can't handle it, buying a 1440p monitor will just result in lower frame rates and a lot of frustration.
It's certainly a balancing act, but the fact remains that 1440p and 4K have their benefits — but so do 1080p displays.
When 1080p makes perfect sense
While there are some downsides, if you're still using 1080p, don't let the FOMO (fear of missing out) get to you. There are still a lot of situations in which 1080p makes perfect sense.
As things stand now, pretty much every GPU under $300 is made for 1080p gameplay — meaning that a lot of budget-oriented gamers are better off with a 1080p monitor. There are GPUs like the Intel Arc B580 that are cheap but also equipped with plenty of VRAM, giving them more merit at higher resolutions. Even then, you'll enjoy smoother gameplay at 1080p than if you brute-force your GPU to go up to 1440p or 4K.
No one's stopping you from upgrading, of course. A friend of mine uses a 4K 34-inch monitor with an Nvidia GTX 1060 GPU. It works, and he claims he's happy with it even in games like Red Dead Redemption 2, but this is achieved through dialing it back as far as settings go. If you like to play at max settings, you'll need a GPU that can handle higher resolutions and modern AAA gaming.
Then, there are the times when you might have the hardware, but may not actually need a bigger display. Gamers who like esports titles are often better off with a snappy 1080p monitor than with a bigger display. After all, you need your monitor to be fast, and pixel density plays a smaller role in winning matches. At 1080p, even a modest GPU can push 200 fps in games like League of Legends.
And then there's the price-to-performance sweet spot. High-refresh 1080p monitors are significantly cheaper than their 1440p or 4K counterparts, which means you can invest more of your budget into other parts of your setup. You can get a 240Hz 1080p monitor for $150 or less — this AOC model is a good one. Standard 60 to 75Hz displays can be bought for well under $80. 1440p and 4K monitors are cheaper now than ever before, but you'll still spend extra, especially if you want to invest in a good IPS (or OLED) panel.
The bottom line is: Yes, 1080p monitors are still relevant for gamers, and they're still worth buying. If you're a mainstream gamer on a budget and your hardware might struggle with higher resolutions, stick to 1080p. If there's one thing that might force you to upgrade, it's trying out a higher resolution and then going back down. Personally, I know that I'm forever stuck with 1440p or more, because once you try it out, it's hard to go back.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next Decade
5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next Decade

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next Decade

Key Points Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor are slated to profit from the huge AI computing power buildout. Meta Platforms and Alphabet are using AI to improve advertising. Amazon's cloud computing division is seeing strong AI demand. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › The best investing strategies involve buying great companies and holding them over long periods to let them be, which has yielded impressive returns if you picked the right businesses. Among the top performers over the past decade have been Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META), and Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL). I removed Nvidia from the chart below because it's up over 30,000% in the past decade, which skews the graph, but the other four have also done phenomenally well. The "worst" performer of the remaining four has been Alphabet, with its stock rising nearly five times in value. These five stocks have had a strong run over the past decade, but I still believe they are excellent picks for the next decade, mainly due to the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI). They are at the top of my list right now, and I think buying shares with the mindset of holding for the next decade is a wise investment strategy. Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor are providing AI computing power All five of these stocks are benefiting in various ways from the AI race. Nvidia makes graphics processing units (GPUs), which are currently the most popular computing hardware for running and training AI models. It owns this market, and its dominance has allowed it to become the world's largest company. There's still a huge AI computing demand that hasn't been met, which bodes well for Nvidia's future. Because of this, it remains one of the best stocks to buy and hold over the next decade. Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC for short) is a manufacturer that produces chips for many of the major players in AI, including Nvidia. These companies don't have chip production capabilities, so they farm that work out to TSMC, which has earned its reputation for being the best foundry in the world through continuous innovation and impressive yields. There are few challengers to its supremacy, and this position will help it continue to be a market-crushing stock for the foreseeable future. Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor are seeing huge growth right now because they're providing the computing power necessary for AI. The next three are also benefiting and will likely see even more success over the next decade. More AI applications will rise over the next few years At first glance, Amazon doesn't seem like much of an AI company. However, it has large exposure through its cloud computing wing, Amazon Web Services (AWS), which is the largest cloud computing provider. It's seeing strong demand for increased computing capacity for AI workloads. With this demand expected to rapidly increase over the next decade, this bodes well for AWS, which makes up the majority of Amazon's profits, helping drive the stock to new heights. Meta Platforms is developing its own in-house generative AI model, Llama. It has several uses for it, but the biggest is maintaining its role at the top of the social media world. Meta owns two of the biggest social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram, which generate most of their money through ad revenue. The company has integrated AI tools into its ad services and has already seen an uptick in interaction and conversion rates. This effect will become even greater as generative AI technologies improve, making Meta a strong stock pick for the next decade. Lastly is Alphabet. Many think Alphabet will be displaced by AI because it gets the majority of its revenue through Google Search, which is seen as a target for AI disruption. However, that hasn't happened yet, and Google Search continues to get larger, with revenue rising 12% in the second quarter. Part of its success can be attributed to the rise of its Search Overviews, which are a hybrid between a traditional search engine and generative AI. This feature has become popular and could be enough to keep Google on top in search, allowing it to achieve new heights over the next decade. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy and Hold for the Next Decade was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

All-in-One Hosting & AI Website Builder: Huge 75% Discount Now
All-in-One Hosting & AI Website Builder: Huge 75% Discount Now

Gizmodo

time14 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

All-in-One Hosting & AI Website Builder: Huge 75% Discount Now

Are you afraid of starting a website because you're unsure how much it'll cost? The days of expensive web hosting are long behind us. Hostinger, one of the best hosting services out there, is now 75% off, but with a unique twist: an AI website builder. The unique package is massively discounted, resulting in a bottom-shelf price that nearly everyone can afford. Moreover, Hostinger includes countless freebies and managed WordPress hosting to set you on a path to success. There's a catch: the discount is temporary. If you're in, let us board you on the hype train. See offer at Hostinger Hostinger offers a variety of web hosting plans, but shared and cloud hosting deals are the most eye-catching. Users can start at 75% off for the Premium plan and spend only $2.99 monthly for 48 months. An alternative, which is 71% off, is the Business plan at $3.99 monthly. It's eCommerce-friendly, provides more storage, and includes all of Hostinger's AI site-building features. If you need more power, the Cloud Startup plan at $7.99 is the right pick. With Hostinger's mighty cloud-based servers, you'll get top-tier performance, rock-solid storage, and unlimited bandwidth for all tasks. Each plan includes NVMe storage, free email hosting for a year, and ready-to-go WordPress with a one-click setup. Additionally, Hostinger increases its value with a free domain for a year, which is always welcome. This means the initial cost allows you to start and publish a website within a day. Considering its rich AI-driven tools, building a website from scratch has never been easier or cheaper. What a time to be alive. Artificial Intelligence adds tremendous value to your site-building process. Hostinger's promotion includes ample AI-powered tools, like: The bundle includes eCommerce tools if you opt for the Business plan. Offering 0% transaction fees and over 100 payment vendors, you can make a serious online shop on Hostinger's fast hosting servers. Meanwhile, the provider keeps things fair with a 30-day money-back guarantee. This means you can back out and get a refund if things don't go your way. However, it's hard not to be impressed, especially at the price. As the cherry on top, all plans come with two free months. Hostinger gives you many reasons to be happy, but also feel bad because you're virtually stealing the service at this price. Don't worry, though; this is a legal steal, so get on it while you can. Try Hostinger Risk-Free

I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened
I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened

Digital Trends

time44 minutes ago

  • Digital Trends

I've tested OpenAI's claims about GPT-5 — here's what happened

OpenAI recently launched GPT-5, its latest large language model and a huge update to ChatGPT. While the new update has a lot going for it, claims are one thing, and reality is another. GPT-5 is said to be faster, less prone to hallucination and sycophantic behavior, and able to choose between fast responses and deeper 'thinking' on the fly. How many of OpenAI's claims are actually visible when using the chatbot? Let's find out. Claim #1: ChatGPT is now better at following instructions My main problem with ChatGPT, as well as one of the reasons why I recently unsubscribed, is that it's often pretty bad at following basic instructions. Sure, you can prompt engineer it to oblivion and get your desired results (sometimes), but even semi-elaborate prompts often fail to produce desired results. Recommended Videos OpenAI claims that it improved 'instruction following' with the release of GPT-5. To that, I say: I don't see it yet. Luckily for me, on the very day I sat down to write this article, I had a fitting interaction with ChatGPT that proves my point here. It's not the only one, though, and I have generally noticed that the longer a conversation goes on, the more ChatGPT forgets what was asked of it. In today's example, I tested ChatGPT's ability to fetch simple information and present it in the required format. I asked it for the specs of the RTX 5060 Ti, which is a recent gaming graphics card. Chaos ensued. To make my prompt even more successful, I showed ChatGPT the exact format I wanted to get my information in by sharing specs for a different GPU. They included things like the exact process node and the generation of ray tracing cores and TOPS. Long story short, it was all pretty specific stuff. Initially, the AI told me that the RTX 5060 Ti doesn't exist yet, which I kind of expected to happen based on its knowledge cutoff. I told it to check online. What I got was pretty barebones. ChatGPT omitted at least four things that I asked for, and gave me the wrong information for one of the specs. Next, I asked it to specify a few things. It gave me the exact same list in return while claiming to have fulfilled my request. The same happened on the third attempt. You can see it in the screenshot above where ChatGPT claims to have included the generation of TOPS and TFLOPS in the list — it clearly did not. Finally, semi-frustrated, I pasted a screenshot from the official Nvidia website to show it what I was looking for. It still got a couple of things wrong. My initial prompt was semi-precise. I know better than to speak to an AI like it's a person, so I gave it about 150 words' worth of instructions. It still took me several more messages to get something close to my expected result. Verdict: It could still use some work. Claim #2: ChatGPT is less sycophantic ChatGPT was a major 'yes man' in previous iterations. It often agreed with users when it didn't need to, driving it deeper and deeper into hallucination. For users who aren't familiar with the inner workings of AI, this could be borderline dangerous — or, in fact, actually extremely dangerous. Researchers recently carried out a large-scale test of ChatGPT, posing as young teens. Within minutes of simple interactions, the AI gave those 'teens' advice on self-harm, suicide planning, and drug abuse. This shows that sycophantic behavior is a major problem for ChatGPT, and OpenAI claims to have curbed some of it with the release of GPT-5. I never tested ChatGPT to such extremes, but I've definitely found that it tended to agree with you, no matter what you said. It took subtle cues during conversation and turned them into a given. It also cheered you on at times when it likely shouldn't have done so. To that end, I have to say that ChatGPT has gone through an entire personality change — for better or worse. The responses are now overly dry, unengaging, and not especially encouraging. Many users mourn the change, with some Reddit users claiming they 'lost their only friend overnight.' It's true that the previously ultra-friendly AI is now rather cut-and-dry, and the responses are often short compared to the emoji-infested mini-essays it regularly served up during its GPT-4o stage. Verdict: Definitely less sycophantic. On the other hand, it's also painfully boring. Claim #3: GPT-5 is better at factual accuracy The shocking lack of factual accuracy was another big reason why I chose to stop paying for ChatGPT. On some days, I felt like half the prompts I used produced hallucinations. And it can't all be down to my lack of smart prompting, because I've spent hundreds of hours learning how to prompt AI the right way — I know how to ask the right questions. Over time, I've learned to only ask about things I already had a vague idea about. For the purpose of today's experiment, I asked about GPU specs. Four out of five queries produced some kind of wrong information, even though all of it is readily available online. Then, I tried historical facts. I read a couple of interesting articles about the journey of Hindenburg, an airship from the 1930s that could ferry passengers from Europe to the U.S. in record time (60 hours). I asked about its exact route, the number of passengers it could house, and what led to its ultimate demise. I cross-checked the responses against historical sources. It got one thing wrong on the route, mentioning a stop in Canada when no such thing took place — the airship only flew over Canada. ChatGPT also gave me inaccurate information about the exact cause of the fire that led to its crash, but it wasn't a major inaccuracy. For comparison's sake, I also asked Gemini, and was told that it can't complete that task for me. Well, out of the two, GPT-5 did a better job — but honestly, it shouldn't have any factual inaccuracies in century-old data. Verdict: Not perfect, but also not terrible. Is GPT-5 better than GPT-4o? If you asked me whether I like GPT-5 more than GPT-4o, I'd have had a hard time responding. The closest thing that comes to mind is that I wasn't thrilled with either, but in all fairness, neither are strictly bad. We're still in the midst of the AI revolution. Each new model brings certain upgrades, but we're unlikely to see massive leaps with every new iteration. This time around, it feels like OpenAI chose to tackle some long-overdue problems rather than introducing any single feature that makes the crowds go wild. GPT-5 feels like more of a quality-of-life improvement than anything else, although I haven't tested it for tasks like coding, where it's said to be much better. The three things I tested above were some of the ones that annoyed me the most in previous models. I'd like to say that GPT-5 is much better in that regard, but it isn't — not yet. I will keep testing the chatbot, though, as a recently leaked system prompt tells me that there might have been more personality changes than I initially thought.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store