logo
The sneaky new friendship divide between millennials and Gen Z

The sneaky new friendship divide between millennials and Gen Z

Yahoo08-06-2025
Whether to share your location is a heated topic, especially among millennials and Gen Z.
As a Gen Zer, I share with 18 people, which my older friends may view as excessive.
Gen X is indifferent, seeing both pros and cons, as social connections evolve post-pandemic.
Do you want to share your location with me? Eighteen of my closest friends and family already do.
On a Tuesday evening in early June, I can map a digital town square of that real-life network. One friend is still at the office; two are at Central Park; another is at home hundreds of miles away from me. These are people who share their location with me, not just for directions, but in perpetuity through the Find My Friends app. I think it strengthens our bonds to observe each other's routines and special outings — even when there's no practical need for it.
To others, location sharing is a nightmare. They see it as an extension of the surveillance state, with their college roommate, jealous partner, or overbearing parent acting as Big Brother. The Washington Post proclaimed that it's "making us miserable."
How you feel about your friends and loved ones being able to see where you are at any given time may represent your current lifestage, how friendships evolve, and technology's role in our relationships.
"This is brand new culturally, historically," Anna Goldfarb, the author of "Modern Friendship: How to Nurture Our Most Valued Connections," told me of the confluence of friends and location-sharing technology. "And it makes sense that people are like, 'what does this mean?' This is something we haven't ever had that technology to do before — much less the space and freedom to do it."
While it's impossible to generalize entire generations' attitudes toward anything, I wanted to find out how location sharing shakes out across the age spectrum. So, I spoke to seven people spanning three generations to get a sense of their feelings about sharing their location. Gen Zers were chill about it; so are Gen Xers. But as millennials approach middle age, location sharing highlights how their friendships are growing — or growing apart.
The location sharing debate represents the journey of growing up in a digital age.
As a geriatric Gen Zer, I'm still at a stage in life where the majority of my friends are single or unmarried, and pretty much none of them have kids. We're living similar lifestyles, often out and about, and I don't encounter many issues with my friends knowing my whereabouts at all times.
That mid to late 20s uncoupledness and childlessness aligns with historical trends: On average, each generation gets married and has kids later in life.
For Aiden Lewis, a 26-year-old Ph.D. student in the Boston area, sharing his location with his family is a matter of convenience.
"The positives really far outweigh the negatives," he said, adding that while it's unlikely he'll be in danger, if he is, his parents would know his whereabouts. "But otherwise, the only risk on my part is minor embarrassment that they saw me out late drinking too much."
A 2022 Harris Poll found that Gen Z, born 1997 to 2012, was the most likely generation to say it was convenient to share their location. For folks like Lewis, location sharing is just another digital tool in their belt.
As Goldfarb, on the border between Gen X and the millennials, said, "When I was younger in my 20s, I would've absolutely loved to know where all my friends are at all times."
As I've progressed through my 20s, location sharing has shown me some shifts that are harbingers of what's to come in the next decade: Couples are together more often. My higher-earning friends, or those in more corporate roles, might show up at nice hotels on a work trip or a more upscale vacation. Others might still be on campus for their graduate degrees. And it felt symbolic when I revoked a former college friend's location-viewing privileges — a sort of closure for a specific period in my life.
Millennials, born 1981 to 1996, are in a life stage that's as bifurcated as their views toward location sharing.
Meranda Hall, a 33-year-old in Brooklyn, operates more like a Gen Zer in this realm. She doesn't have any married friends, and she said she never plans to marry. She and her friends have no qualms about sharing their locations.
"All the people that I share mine with, they're super open about it, and no one is ever anywhere particularly interesting for it to be too much of a debate," Hall said.
For her peers of similar ages but a different life stage, like Goldfarb, location sharing might be more fraught. After age 30, Goldfarb said, friendships start falling off a cliff; people move, have kids, take on different jobs, or prioritize relationships relevant to their careers.
"When you get older, you tend to have different perspectives on your friendships," she said. "You don't need your friends to know where you are at all times when you're older, because you probably have children, spouses, in-laws, there's just different relationships that bubble to the surface in my opinion,"
In my informal surveying, which also included several coworkers, millennials were the most likely to have very strong thoughts on location sharing. Some outright hated it, although still shared with one or two friends, and others felt no need for it, unless they were happily coupled and shared with spouses. Some said they found it to be strangely intimate.
Olivia Bethea, 31, said she only shares with four people. She said she's noticed location sharing coming up more in regular conversations, with people offhandedly referencing that they checked where someone else was. She doesn't see herself expanding her location-sharing circle more.
"A lot of people end up sharing where they are anyway on Instagram and stuff, but I'm finding myself to be a little bit more protective over it," she said. "People can make a lot of inferences from your location, and I just don't want to invite those inferences."
Millennials grew up before everyone carried an always-on GPS device at all times. A concern that I heard repeatedly was about surveillance and willingness to constantly reveal where they were, which doesn't seem to bother the always-tracked and always-online Gen Zers.
"Millennials, it wasn't something that we always had. I guess if you're Gen Z, it's kind of always been a thing," Hall said, adding, "I guess it's just something to be skeptical about."
When I spoke to Gen Xers about location sharing, I was met with a proverbial shrug. The forgotten generation, born 1965 to 1980, doesn't seem to be too pressed about location sharing, although they're not eager to adopt the practice either.
Meredith Finn, a Gen Xer in her 50s in Maine, said she thinks she missed the location-sharing bandwagon completely. It would've been more fun in college, on a night when all her friends were out at different bars.
"I remember nights when we'd go from bar to bar looking for some of our friends, and we'd just miss them," she said. "And it just would've been kind of nice to be able to see where everybody was hanging out. Of course, we didn't have anything like that. We didn't even have cellphones when I was in college."
She said that she'd probably be willing to share her location with a few friends. But if anyone came up to her and asked to share her location, "I think I would say, 'Why? Just send me a text and ask me where I am.'"
Leslie Lancaster, a 47-year-old in California, felt similarly — she said she's shared location when she's navigating somewhere difficult to find on a map, or trying to find friends in rural locations. Lancaster said she can see the benefits of it, but also how it could become controlling in the wrong hands.
"For myself, my husband and I, I don't need to know where he's at all the time. So that's why I probably wouldn't share my location with him, unless I were potentially off on a vacation or a trip where I was not with him," she said.
Both Gen Xers said they could see its utility in a time when folks are struggling to connect or feeling more isolated. Lancaster said she could understand the impulse to see where your friends are, even if you're not actively communicating.
"People are so isolated now. I mean, since the pandemic and a lot of work from home, a lot of people are just in their little bubbles," Finn said, adding that it's rarer to pop into your regular coffeeshop and run into five friends. "It doesn't happen the way it used to."
Like many technological advances, your thoughts on location sharing are a reflection of your own situation. It's at a crossroads of issues facing our social lives: The lack of third spaces has put them into our phones, social circles are shrinking, and we've had to use technology to fill the gaps.
I'm sure Gen Alpha, born 2010 to 2024, will come up with something that horrifies and shocks me (they're already back on Snapchat). As I creep toward age 30, I am thinking about the ways the social contours of my life have changed; in speaking with other Gen Z peers, we all realized we had a few friends we'd fallen out of touch with who were still lingering on Find My Friends. Right now, though, it feels mean to pull the cord.
"I predict that this is something that you're going to change your relationship with," Goldfarb told me. She added, "I think that it's more likely that it's going to be a more concentrated friend group that will need to know this about you."
Do you have strong thoughts or feelings about location sharing? Contact this reporter at jkaplan@businessinsider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Lioness Built A Sexual Wellness Brand Selling Women Their Orgasms
How Lioness Built A Sexual Wellness Brand Selling Women Their Orgasms

Forbes

time6 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Lioness Built A Sexual Wellness Brand Selling Women Their Orgasms

Lioness Sextech for Sexual Wellness 'When we started the company, I was still very scared of my body,' Anna Lee, co-founder and CEO of the sexual wellness company, Lioness Health, told me over Zoom. 'I very much was like, 'I'm never doing interviews.' I never wanted to say the word vagina, or anything like that. I just want to build this really cool vibrator.' Eight years later, this former Amazon mechanical design engineer raised in a conservative Korean household is now running a profitable company convincing women to share their most intimate biometric data: their orgasms. She's built a strong TikTok following by turning her own orgasm charts into viral content after a 30-day challenge to, if I may borrow from Seinfeld, not be master of her domain. July 31st marks National Orgasm Day. Yes, it's a thing, widely celebrated across six countries as an offshoot of International Female Orgasm Day, founded in Brazil in 2007. Its purpose is to promote sexual wellness education, reduce stigma around the female orgasm, and raise awareness about the orgasm gap. While 95% of heterosexual men climax during sex, only 65% of heterosexual women do. Thirty-nine percent of women always orgasm when alone versus 6% during partnered encounters. A final statistic shocking to no woman, 60% of women have faked orgasms. Twenty-five percent of men have also, though presumably with less acclaim Lee immediately saw an entrepreneurial opportunity in launching Lioness, a smart vibrator tracking biometric data during orgasms. 'I really thought I could build a better vibrator. How do we have self-driving cars and VR glasses, but our sex toys are literally a motor and battery? It makes no sense there's so little tech innovation in sex toys.' Building a company around female pleasure required navigating an industrial landscape where traditional marketing channels are off the table, manufacturing comes with byzantine triangulation, and mentioning the O-word triggers algorithmic censorship. Despite the big O's physical and mental health benefits, sexual wellness is still one of the most underdeveloped segments in the health economy. The global market for sexual technology products, or sextech, is projected to exceed $48 billion by 2033. Hearing industry standards for testing vibration intensity from the male founder of a sex toy company sparked Lee's quiet revolution. 'He told me the industry standard was to put the vibration on your nose and this is what a clitoris feels like!' Lee was aghast. 'All those times where if a toy doesn't work for you, and you're thinking something's wrong with me, why am I broken, but it's really because none of those toys were ever made with women in mind. They're meant for men to purchase for their significant other when they're trying to spice up their relationship.' If the industry was defining 'normal' without studying women's bodies, leaving women to quietly internalize design failures as personal ones, the only plausible solution was to go directly to the source: women's bodies. Sextech And Sexual Wellness The Lioness vibrator with data visualization app Most sexual wellness companies peddle pleasure. Lioness specializes in data. The company operates within the rapidly expanding sextech market, where technology intersects with taboo to fill gaps legacy science conveniently ignores. 'We wanted to take sex toys and make them not sexy, but very nerdy. Make it something that feels like you're understanding your body better, making you curious about your body. The same way people get obsessed with Fitbits, Oura rings, fitness trackers. Why can't you be equally empowered about sexual wellness?' At Amazon, Lee specialized in force sensors embedded in Kindles and tablets, precisely the technological expertise needed to detect pelvic floor muscle movement. If a touchscreen could register the subtle press of a fingertip, why not the contractions of an orgasm? She reverse-engineered this logic and built a sensor durable enough for intimate use while maintaining clinical accuracy. The Lioness monitors pelvic floor muscle contractions, body temperature, and movement patterns during orgasm, translating arousal into data visualizations via a companion app. Each device is assigned a unique ID connecting to an anonymous data repository, allowing users to track patterns over time. She had the perfect product, but her go-to-market strategy wasn't as easy as she'd hoped. Lioness launched into a market where it couldn't say what it was selling. Basic DTC and GTM playbooks recommend Facebook and Instagram advertising, Google Ads, and mainstream influencer partnerships. But when Lioness launched in 2014, the term sextech didn't exist. Sexual wellness products were categorized alongside pornographic content. Meta rejected advertisements outright; YouTube labeled educational content as adult material; payment processors flagged transactions; and even email marketing campaigns were threatened by spam filters. 'January 1st was probably the first time we were able to truly run ads for Meta,' Lee shared. 'This is the first time we're actually experiencing being able to do the traditional method of paid marketing. Before then, we were doing pretty out there things to get the word out, doing everything but paid marketing.' Those 'out there things' included scientific exhibitionism of the most intimate variety. During the pandemic, Lee launched a TikTok channel where she displayed her own orgasm charts. 'I wasn't even showing the vibrator. I was like, this is what data looks like in terms of my orgasms. If I drink coffee, this is what it looks like.' Her candor earned her 450,000 followers. Lee then escalated her commitment to empirical transparency by self pleasuring daily for 30 consecutive days, documenting the physiological variations, and posting analysis on Reddit's DataIsBeautiful subreddit. The posts went viral. 'There were days that was very stressful, because when you're forced to masturbate for 30 days, it is way more difficult than wanting to masturbate for 30 days,' Lee recalled. 'There's days you're like, 'Oh man, I don't even feel like it.' But you're just doing it because you're keeping your streak up.' While Lee charted her climaxes, her team churned out three to four educational articles a week, positioning Lioness as a sexual wellness thought leader while skirting the 'sex toy' label entirely. Lee spoke on every panel she could find, joined every discussion, and chased every earned media opportunity available. By the time Meta finally sanctioned Lioness advertisements in January 2025, coinciding with broader policy shifts surrounding the 2024 elections, the platform had become virtually pointless. Her organic strategy outpaced paid acquisition. Users acquired through content and word-of-mouth showed higher engagement and stronger lifetime value than any gained from those intrusive paid feed interruptions. Lee initially approached the product with an engineer's logic, but the emotional impact on customers caught her by surprise. Many buyers didn't just see Lioness as a tool. They saw it instead as a form of agency, a way to reclaim knowledge long ignored, outsourced, or medicalized beyond recognition. 'There was a researcher that did a study with the Lioness users on what this data means to them, why people buy the Lioness,' Lee said. 'Most, almost a huge percentage of people were like, 'this data helps me and helps other people learn about their body.' They felt this pursuit. They're pioneers in sexual health, helping contribute to the science of sexual wellness, getting more research out there, helping other women understand their bodies better by also contributing their data to science.' Lioness's Sexual Wellness Lab Lioness users opt in to share anonymously their data to researchers Dr. Dee Hartmann, PT, DPT, spent 27 years running a physical therapy clinic in suburban Chicago, specializing in treating chronic vulvar pain, an anatomical mystery patriarchal medicine dismisses. Since shifting her focus to research and education in 2017, she's become a global speaker, author, and co-founder of both The Pleasure Movement and the Center for Genital Health and Education. 'I've spent my life in women's pelvises,' Hartmann candidly told me over Zoom. 'And I'm very fascinated by what happens from a functional perspective. Physical therapists try to treat the cause of a problem rather than medication which treats the symptoms.' Her preliminary research with Lioness's real-time biometric data showed orgasmic contractions generate statistically greater force than voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions. 'We possess negligible understanding in the medical literature regarding what constitutes a female orgasm,' Hartmann continued. 'Female sexual arousal was determined in laboratories with college students supine on tables with temperature and moisture gauges positioned internally. The clitoris received no consideration whatsoever.' Lioness users, meanwhile, have established an unconventional relationship with the company, anonymously contributing their data while enjoying the well-documented benefits of orgasm (better sleep, lower stress, improved immunity). Those who opt in further can share their device ID with researchers, who can then access physiological data from Lioness's mainframe. For Hartmann, the possibilities are finally catching up to questions she's asked her whole career. She dreams of studying cultural differences in physiological arousal, comparing, for instance, orgasm signatures from women in sexually repressive environments versus those in more liberal societies. And now, for the first time, she has a tool that could make those studies possible. 'My thesis is, I want to know the impact and the functionality of pelvic floor muscles and clitoral stimulation, and how it contributes to arousal and orgasm.' She pointed to one Lioness user showing dramatic variations between a 16-minute midnight session and a five-minute morning quickie. 'The studies we could do with this are just endless!' Hartmann enthused. Over in the Czech Republic, Dr. James Pfaus has also been working with Lioness in his research. Pfaus is a Professor of Neuroscience and Psychology at Charles University Prague and Director of Research Division, Center for Sexual Health and Intervention at the Czech National Institute of Mental Health. 'The Lioness, I think, is truly detecting pelvic floor movements, which is the motor part of your orgasm,' Pfaus enlightened me during our Zoom call. Pfaus has already used the Lioness to develop new theories around women's sexual wellness. His analysis of 52 women across multiple sessions introduced three distinct orgasmic signatures: These signatures now inform broader theories about sexual response, reshaping how female pleasure is understood both in labs and bedrooms. 'It's very hard to get funding to study orgasms,' Pfaus lamented. 'Nobody wants to put money into understanding orgasm or orgasm problems because it's like, well, we have other things to study. There's cancer.' In the interim, Lioness is helping researchers like Hartmann and Pfaus bypass academic bureaucracy to continue their research until funding gatekeepers start realizing the $48 billion potential of this work. Takeaways for CMOs Navigating the Taboo Sexual Wellness Industry Lioness's GTM strategy invariably created very passionate consumers. When traditional digital marketing channels shut the door to Lee's ambitions, she created a window and strategically used her $1.2 million fundraise to launch Lioness. Unable to buy attention with advertising, she earned it instead through thought leadership backed by scientific credibility. Bootstrapping led to disciplined spending and creative problem-solving – such as her sharing very personal data very publicly, winning over Gen Z in the process, and their passion for audacity in sexual wellness education. For CMOs navigating restricted markets or taboo categories, here's how to copy her blueprint: 'As someone that was so scared of her own body growing up, the one way I found comfort in understanding my body was through science,' Lee confessed. 'There's a big mission drive for people purchasing the Lioness beyond just being like, 'Hey, this is a really cool vibrator.' They also feel that really big passion of what we have is to change the mission around sexual health and research.' Lee's arc from anatomy-phobic engineer to orgasm-data sexual wellness influencer is how taboo markets reward orthogonal thinking. In building a vibrator cum research device, she reengineered the narrative around female pleasure and redefined for women the passionate pursuit of luxury as the ability to own both their power and their pleasure.

Ramp raises $500M to rush AI
Ramp raises $500M to rush AI

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ramp raises $500M to rush AI

This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. AI robots are coming for expense accounts – and fintech startup Ramp has raised $700 million in less than two months to help speed the adoption of automation tools in corporate finances. The expense management software company said in a Wednesday press release that it raised $500 million to fund its artificial intelligence investments, less than six weeks since the company collected $200 million from venture investors. The fresh funding gave Ramp a $22.5 billion valuation. 'So, why are we raising another $500 million? (just 45 days after our last round)?' Ramp's co-founder and CEO, Eric Glyman, wrote Wednesday in a blog post explaining the startup's reasoning on capital. 'Because we're at a unique moment in finance. A new beginning.' The funds will help Ramp 'pick up the pace,' he wrote. 'Once you've seen an agent automatically rebook your hotel if the price drops, the days of back and forth between you, your manager, and travel support feels impossible,' Glyman wrote. The company released its first AI-powered autonomous finance agents in July. The bots are built for 'real-world policy enforcement, fraud detection, and policy improvement,' Ramp said in a prior July 9 blog post. New York-based Ramp – like rivals that include Airbase, BILL and Brex – offers corporate clients tools that handle tasks such as expense management, accounting, travel and procurement along with corporate cards and software to analyze and optimize corporate spending. Ramp has raised $1.9 billion in venture funding since it was established in 2019, according to the release. Investment firm Iconiq Capital led the funding round, along with the firms that invested in June and seven new investors that included Emerson Collective, the investment firm founded by Laurene Powell Jobs, the wife of Apple's late co-founder; GV (Google Ventures); and T. Rowe Price Associates. 'We believe Ramp is leading in agentic AI and setting the standard for what AI-powered finance can look like in the coming years – at a defining inflection point in their journey,' Roy Luo, an Iconiq general partner, said Wednesday in a statement emailed by a Ramp spokesperson. AI agents will assume the 'busywork' of many finance functions in 2026, Glyman wrote, using the example of a traditional approval process for an employee's $5 latte. The manual process requires 14 minutes and $20 of human intervention cost for questions, approvals, audits and coding of the coffee expense. 'Scale that across 2,000 swipes a month and your finance team is trapped in an endless loop of micro-decisions,' he wrote. In 2027, finance AI will begin handling contracts, which traditionally have flowed from one person to another in corporate procurement, from a vendor to the procurement department, then to legal and finance, ending with a purchase order and the company's payment, Glyman predicted. AI agents will start handling these workflows in a parallel process, with procurement schedules reduced from a week or more to minutes, according to Glyman. 'Why can't legal, risk, and procurement copilots review the same request at once?' he wrote. Ramp is 'an exciting addition,' to GV's fintech portfolio, a partner at the investment firm, Elena Sakach, wrote in a LinkedIn post. 'Core finance operations remain stuck in decades-old legacy systems,' Sakach wrote. 'Ramp is changing this by executing on the everyday well. This has fueled their rapid evolution beyond a corporate card into a new-aged financial operations platform.' Recommended Reading Ramp raises $200M Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Apple Mac Mini deal: One of Apple's most powerful computers is also the cheapest
Apple Mac Mini deal: One of Apple's most powerful computers is also the cheapest

Android Authority

time35 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Apple Mac Mini deal: One of Apple's most powerful computers is also the cheapest

Things have taken an interesting turn in the PC market lately. Usually known for overpriced devices, Apple suddenly started offering some of the best value for the buck. For example, one of Apple's best computers is also its cheapest, especially when on sale. Right now, you can take the Apple Mac Mini M4 home for just $539! Buy the Apple Mac Mini M4 for just $539 ($60 off) This offer is available from Amazon. It's specifically for the model with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. Upgraded models are also discounted, though. We would honestly recommend the Apple Mac Mini M4 at its full $599 price point. At $539, it is quite the steal for what you're getting. As already mentioned, it is one of Apple's best computers, unless you start moving to much higher-tier ones. It's an excellent computer. Of course, this is a desktop PC, so it doesn't quite offer the portability of MacBooks. You'll need a mouse/trackpad, keyboard, and monitor. If you already have those, you're ready to go. Otherwise, you should definitely consider those extra expenses, too. So, what makes it so special? It has the same Apple M4 chip and 16GB of RAM you'll find on the base MacBook Air and Pro models. That said, it will actually perform better than similarly spec'd laptops. This is mainly because it has much better active cooling, and the components aren't as crammed inside. A cooler computer can push higher loads for longer, as overheating can cause throttling. It should be able to handle any app, and many even use it for 4K editing. The new Mac Mini got a really nice design overhaul. It is smaller, measuring 5 x 5 x 2 in. It will easily fit in any space, and it can also live under a TV, so you can also use it with a wireless keyboard and mouse in the living room. It's made of aluminum, following that iconic Apple design many of us love. It will look great anywhere. Surprisingly, it has plenty of ports for its size. The front has two USB-C ports and a 3.5 mm headset jack. The back has two USB-C Thunderbolt ports, an Ethernet port, an HDMI output, and a power connection. All things considered, and given the reasonable price, the Apple Mac Mini M4 is a fabulous little desktop computer. There is one thing people often complain about, though, and it is honestly a bit annoying. The power button is at the bottom, so you have to lift the Mac Mini to press it. The argument is that you would rarely turn it on or off, and would let it go to sleep instead. Still a weird placement for a power button, though. Go catch this deal while you can! We don't know when the price will rise to $599. Extra deals: The M2 and M4 MacBook Airs are also at a great price! Apple MacBook Air 13-Inch (M2, 16GB, 256GB) Apple MacBook Air 13-Inch (M2, 16GB, 256GB) Thin, light, and powerful The MacBook Air with an M2 chip brings the thin and lightweight design you'd expect from an Air, but with all the might of the M2 silicon. See price at Best Buy Save $300.00 If you prefer a laptop form factor, Apple has some amazing deals available right now. The Apple MacBook Air M2 is the cheapest at just $699, which is a $200 discount. Honestly, it is amazingly good for that price. I personally own this model, and it can easily handle all my RAW photo editing and some 4K video processing. It will run any other task like a dream. Now, if you absolutely want the latest and greatest, the Apple MacBook Air M4 comes with the newest chip and the same 16GB of RAM. Both laptops are nearly identical, with the exception that this one comes with the upgraded processor. This one goes for $999, which is also discounted by $200. Follow

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store