50 years after Emergency: India confronts its sterilisation past, potential of demographic future
In the 1970s, before the Emergency was officially imposed, children in some rural areas often ran around unclothed -- until fear gripped families so tightly that even toddlers were dressed, not for modesty, but out of fear of forced sterilisation.
As India marks the 50th anniversary of the Emergency imposed by then prime minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975, memories of mass sterilisation campaigns -- many carried out under coercion -- continue to haunt survivors and influence public health discourse even today.
In 1976 alone, more than eight million sterilisations were conducted across India, most of them vasectomies. Many of these were not voluntary.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Learn The Most Successful Intraday Strategy in Just 2 Hr.
thefutureuniversity
Learn More
Undo
"It was a dark, dark period -- no less than a war. We didn't know what would happen the next day. I remember being so afraid that my family didn't travel outside Delhi until the Emergency ended," 78-year-old Ishrat Jahan, a resident of Okhla, Delhi said.
Amina Hasan, now 83 and living in Aligarh, still shudders at the memory.
Live Events
"We were poor but had dignity. They took that away. In our area, men started hiding in fields and wells when officials came around. We felt hunted," she recalled.
The pressure was relentless and indiscriminate. In 'Unsettling Memories', anthropologist Emma Tarlo documents how civil servants, factory workers and police personnel were often coerced into undergoing vasectomy.
"The officers said you could keep your job only if you got sterilised. I didn't have time to think," a worker told her. "I agreed because I had to save my job and bring up my family."
The stigma attached to male sterilisation was severe that in many communities, it was equated with emasculation. One anti-Emergency slogan scrawled across North India at the time summed up the sentiment: "Nasbandi ke doot, Indira Gandhi ki loot" (Agents of sterilisation, Indira Gandhi's loot).
One of the most violent episodes unfolded at Delhi's Turkman Gate, a historic Muslim locality. In April 1976, when residents resisted demolitions linked to urban "beautification" drives and refused to undergo sterilisation, police opened fire.
Entire families were displaced, homes were razed, but the area remains an enduring symbol of Emergency excesses.
Poonam Muttreja, Executive Director of the Population Foundation of India, said coercive measures during the Emergency "set back reproductive rights for both men and women".
"India's population for a long time was viewed through the narrow lens of fear and scarcity. But today, there's growing recognition that our people are our greatest asset," she said.
"India's strength lies in its youthful population -- its demographic dividend. But being the most populous country also brings enormous responsibility. It's not just about numbers -- it's about investing in every life through education, health and opportunity," she added.
Since the late 1970s, India has shifted from coercive family planning to voluntary participation and awareness. Today, female sterilisation accounts for the majority of procedures, although critics point out that the burden has disproportionately shifted to women.
The past, however, still casts a long shadow. Some states have proposed limiting government benefits to families with only two children.
"Yes, we are seeing troubling signs on both extremes. On one hand, there are calls for coercive population control -- such as punitive two-child policies or conditional welfare schemes," Muttreja said, adding that on the other end there is growing pronatalist rhetoric driven by fear of long-term population decline, with some suggesting incentives for more births.
Both approaches risk instrumentalising women's bodies for demographic goals, she said.
As India seeks to harness its population as a source of economic strength, experts stress the need for caution.
"The way forward lies in ensuring choice, not control," Muttreja said.
"India's fertility rate is already below replacement level. The focus should be on addressing unmet need for contraception, improving healthcare access and empowering women through education and economic opportunity," she added.
Population stabilisation will come not from pressure, but from trust, dignity and protecting reproductive rights, she said.
As the country remembers the Emergency, it also stands at a demographic crossroads - between past trauma and future potential.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Walk your way to a sharper mind: How 40 minutes of walking boosts brain size
An exercise as simple as walking increases the size of your brain. Shocking! Isn't it? Walking, specifically, can significantly increase the volume of the hippocampus, a key part of the brain that is responsible for memory, and improve cognitive ability in older people, says a pioneering study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The research opens the door to a simple, cheap method to stop age-related cognitive decline. During the course of a year, the research followed a cohort of seniors aged between 55 and 80. Participants were split into two groups: the control group undertook stretching and toning exercises, while the other group did regular cardiovascular activity (in this instance, 40 minutes of walking three times per week). MRI scans at the end of the trial showed that the size of the hippocampus in the walking group, which is typically expected to shrink with age, grew by an average of 2%. Why is this finding so significant? An important part of memory creation and recall is the hippocampus. It is also one of the first regions to be affected by Alzheimer's disease. This research discredits the popular opinion that memory loss is a part of the natural ageing process. It proves that throughout elderly life, the brain remains capable of changing and being improved with mild exercise. In addition, walking improves intellectual function as well as brain expansion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Control participants who walked regularly demonstrated superior memory function and increased processing rates. Walking, as the researchers say, increases blood flow to the brain, stimulates growth hormone production, and promotes the growth of new synapses—all supporting a healthier, stronger brain. Brisk walking (and not a leisure walk) is one of the easiest and most effective ways to improve your immune health. Walking is low-impact, accessible, and cost-free, compared to more intense exercise. Neither gym membership nor specialised equipment is required. Walking provides a pathway to enhanced brain health for everyone, including older individuals who may have diminished stamina or mobility. Walking is good for the mind and the body, and more study is needed to establish the optimal intensity and duration of walking for cognitive gain. The next time you slip on your shoes and take a walk, remember that you're investing in your brain as well as getting some fresh air. It may only require 40 minutes a couple of times a week to maintain a young brain, enhance cognitive function, and preserve your memory. It's never too early, or too late, to begin the journey towards mental acuity. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Think you are fearless? Humans will always fear these 2 things no matter what, says science
Despite the modern narrative of humans being fearless or bold by nature, science tells a different story. Humans aren't born with a long list of phobias. In fact, psychologists and neuroscientists agree that we only come into the world hardwired with two basic fears: the fear of falling and the fear of loud noises. These two serve a fundamental purpose—protecting us from harm in our earliest and most vulnerable stages. One of the most cited pieces of evidence is the 'visual cliff' experiment from 1960. In this setup, infants aged 6 to 14 months were placed on a platform with a transparent surface that gave the illusion of a drop. Despite encouragement from trusted caregivers, most babies would not crawl across the glass section. This reaction wasn't something they were taught. It showed a natural fear of falling—something deeply rooted in our instincts. Babies who hadn't yet started crawling didn't show as much concern, suggesting that the development of movement plays a role in reinforcing this inborn fear. Similarly, the fear of loud noises is seen right from birth. Sudden, sharp sounds—like the clanging of metal or a bursting balloon—can cause a newborn to flinch, cry, or display distress. This reaction is called the acoustic startle reflex. According to neuroscientist Seth Norrholm, this reflex is automatic and wired into the brain's primitive survival systems. Loud noises are universally interpreted as signals of potential danger, which is why even a baby with no prior experience of the world reacts to them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Learned Fears Begin with Experience While these two fears are inborn, all other fears—be it spiders, darkness, or public speaking—are acquired through life. These are shaped by culture, upbringing, and personal experience. The famous 'Little Albert' experiment from the early 20th century is often referenced when discussing learned fears. A young child who was originally indifferent to a white rat began fearing it after it was repeatedly paired with loud, startling noises. Over time, the child began to associate the rat alone with fear, demonstrating how easily fear can be conditioned. When it comes to things like fear of snakes or spiders, infants don't start off frightened. Research shows they may notice these creatures more quickly than others, but that's not the same as fear. It's only through learned associations—perhaps stories, parental cues, or traumatic experiences—that children come to fear them. Even something as common as a fear of the dark can be traced back to imagination and storytelling. Toddlers aren't afraid of the absence of light itself—they respond to what they've been told could be lurking in it. If Fear Can Be Learned, It Can Be Unlearned This understanding that most fears are not innate but learned has wide-reaching implications. If a fear can be developed through life, it can also be reduced or even reversed through exposure, therapy, or conscious effort. Many psychologists and therapists use this insight to encourage individuals facing anxiety or phobias. Recognizing that public speaking fear or social rejection anxiety wasn't part of our original design can be empowering. It means the emotional weight of those fears can be lightened with time and effort. As the saying often goes in self-help and mental health circles: we're only born with the fear of falling and loud noises. Everything else, we pick up along the way.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
David Cutler educational qualification: How Harvard and MIT paved this economist's way to the front lines of US health reforms
In a world of think-tank resumes and siloed expertise, David Cutler has carved a career that defies academic convention. He's not just one of the most respected health economists in the US—he's a builder of policy, an architect of reform, and, as of 2025, the interim dean of Social Sciences at Harvard University. Cutler stepped into the role in June 2025, following the departure of longtime dean Lawrence Bobo. It's not his first time leading the division—he held the same position from 2003 to 2008—but this time, the stakes are even higher. With AI transforming the workforce, inequality growing deeper, and public trust in institutions at a breaking point, the social sciences need a leader who understands both the data and the urgency. Enter David Cutler. But before he was dean, before the policy papers and the White House briefings, Cutler was just another Harvard student with big questions—and a growing belief that economics could be more than charts and models. It could be a tool for change. An Ivy League start, but not a predictable path Cutler's academic journey began at Harvard College, where he graduated summa cum laude in economics. It was a start that promised prestige—but he didn't chase Wall Street. Instead, he pursued the deeper question: How do you build an economic system that works for people, not just profit? He earned his Ph.D. in economics from MIT in 1991, solidifying his reputation as one of the top young minds in the field. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo But rather than disappearing into academic theory, he doubled down on public impact. From classrooms to cabinet rooms After earning his Ph.D., Cutler returned to Harvard — this time as a professor. Over the years, he took on roles that most academics only dream about. He became the Otto Eckstein Professor of Applied Economics, held joint appointments across Harvard's Economics Department, the Kennedy School, and the School of Public Health, and served as Dean of the Social Sciences Division — not once, but twice, most recently stepping back into the role in 2025 after Lawrence Bobo's departure. Yet for all his campus credentials, Cutler's impact stretches far beyond Cambridge. He was a key advisor in the Clinton administration, shaping national economic strategy, and later served as Senior Health Care Advisor to Barack Obama, helping craft ideas that would shape the Affordable Care Act. Where most economists publish papers, Cutler drafted policy. Where many stayed in theory, he moved into action. Rewriting the system Cutler's influence didn't just come from policy memos — it came from publishing work that made complex problems readable, solvable, and deeply human. His 2004 book Your Money or Your Life was one of the first to frame U.S. health care not just as broken, but fixable — if only we focused on quality instead of cost-cutting. The book was later profiled in a New York Times Magazine feature, The Quality Cure , making Cutler one of the rare economists whose ideas actually reached the public. He followed that up with The Quality Cure in 2014 and, more recently, Survival of the City (co-authored with Edward Glaeser), a deep dive into how cities must adapt to pandemics and inequality in a time of climate change and isolation. But even his most technical work — like his 2003 study on the economics of obesity — has always centered people, not just numbers. He argued that America's weight crisis wasn't a moral failing but a market distortion, where frozen pizza and soda were made cheaper and easier than healthy alternatives. Cutler's classroom is everywhere What sets Cutler apart isn't just the brilliance of his models or the reach of his appointments. It's his ability to teach — to make complicated economic systems understandable, and to make students believe they can change them. Honored as a Harvard College Professor for his excellence in undergraduate teaching, Cutler's legacy includes not just laws and legislation but generations of students who now lead in health, economics, and public policy. He's also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a member of the National Academy of Medicine, and a commissioner on the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission, where he continues to push for smarter, more equitable care. Educated to reform, not just report David Cutler's education wasn't just about credentials — it was a launchpad for reimagining what economics could be. He didn't stop at diagnosing the dysfunction in U.S. health care — he helped design the blueprints for reform. And he did it not by shouting from the sidelines but by writing the playbook from within. At a time when the public is more skeptical than ever of elite institutions, Cutler is a reminder that the right kind of expertise — grounded, public-minded, relentlessly curious — still matters. He didn't just attend Harvard. He built Harvard's next chapter. And now, as he once again leads the university's social sciences division, he's not just looking backward at his own education — he's shaping the future of what education, and economics, can do for society. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
