Trump signs bill to cancel $9 billion in foreign aid, public broadcasting funding
The bulk of the spending being clawed back is for foreign assistance programs. About $1.1 billion was destined for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS, though most of that money is distributed to more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations around the country.
The White House had billed the legislation as a test case for Congress and said more such rescission packages would be on the way.
Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. Democrats unanimously rejected the cuts but were powerless to stop them.
The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. Conservatives particularly directed their ire at NPR and PBS. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced grave concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Some stations will have to close, they warned.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are 'not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert.'
On the foreign aid cuts, the White House argued that they would incentivize other nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer.
Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. They also expressed concerns that the cuts would have deadly consequences for many of the world's most impoverished people.
'With these cuts, we will cause death, spread disease and deepen starvation across the planet,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
19 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Drimonis: Hypocrisy takes the stage in Feucht affair
As I watched the debate unfold around Christian singer/MAGA influencer Sean Feucht, whose Canadian tour included last week's stop in Montreal, I found myself growing increasingly tired of the hypocrisy it triggered. On all sides. I don't support Feucht's anti-abortion, anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ2+ beliefs. His Christian nationalism is fundamentally far-right politics wrapped up in religion. Feucht is also a hypocrite. You can't support Trump's inhumane policies when it comes to immigration, say, and be a genuine Christian. The two are incompatible. Feucht's views on abortion and gender identity may be reprehensible to me, but he's allowed to have them. While Canada has laws against hate speech and incitement to violence, freedom of expression is enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, even if such rights are not absolute. Many folks ascribe to similar beliefs here at home, and last I checked, they're not being silenced. I also saw no reason for the Plante administration to refuse him a permit because Feucht's 'show runs counter to the values of inclusion, solidarity and respect that are championed in Montreal.' A lot of things do, including Quebec legislation like Bills 21 and 84. More hypocrisy: people who advocated for the removal of pro-Palestinian protesters or the shutting down of campus protests now feigning selective outrage over some two-bit MAGA preacher not given a permit. Either you defend freedom of expression, or you don't. Conservatives who now claim Christianity is 'under attack' in Canada should also take a seat. No one's persecuting Christians here. It's laughable to even make such a claim. It's not because Feucht is Christian that he's unwelcome by many; it's because of his hateful rhetoric and reported ties to far-right extremist groups like the Proud Boys. Years ago, I argued in favour of allowing Julien Blanc, a misogynist who gave seminars on how to seduce women, into Canada. Many urged the government to ban him. There was nothing I supported about his message. 'Except, I wrote, 'his right to share it.' I bet most of you have never heard of Blanc, just like you had not heard of Feucht and his questionable hairstyle until now. Which brings me to: These people are grifters. They rely on your outrage. They want to play victim, be cancelled, told they can't perform, just so they can con those who hate 'woke' culture into parting with their money. Feucht's fundraiser is already up and running. I recognize we must be careful about what we choose to tolerate in the name of free speech. Hence the paradox of tolerance: If a society tolerates those who are intolerant, it risks enabling and normalizing intolerance. I understand people's visceral reaction to Feucht and their desire to keep him out of Canada. In the context of a predatory Trump administration, why roll out the carpet for a MAGA devotee and Christian supremacist? But those who rejoice when Feucht is denied a permit should also question the unintended consequences of allowing governments to decide what you should think and be exposed to. The free publicity we gave this mediocre performer, singing generic worship lyrics for profit, is maddening. There's a lot of money to be made in evangelical ministries and the merch that comes with it. God's love may be free, but Feucht's limited edition trucker hats sell for a whopping $42 U.S. His performance in a Montreal church had an audience of a few dozen. Remove the far-right Rebel News hacks covering the event and you could have fit everyone comfortably in my one-bedroom condo. But outrage gave him notoriety. And amplified his voice. When governments temporarily shut down superspreader faith-based gatherings during COVID, Feucht feigned religious persecution. As a result, his ministries' revenue jumped from a reported $283,526 to $5.3 million between 2019 and 2020. Playing the victim is lucrative. Don't allow your outrage to be used against you. There are better ways to fight back against hate.
Winnipeg Free Press
19 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Fuel price protests in Angola this week left 22 dead while 1,200 people were arrested
CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — Violence that erupted during protests this week in Angola sparked by the government's decision to raise the price of fuel killed at least 22 people while more than 1,200 have been arrested, the president's office said Wednesday. The office of Angolan President Joao Lourenco released the death toll in a statement and said that 197 people were also injured in the two days of violence that began on Monday and spread from the capital, Luanda, to at least six other provinces in the southern African nation. Authorities have often been accused of clamping down harshly on protests to silence dissent in Angola, an oil-rich nation on Africa's Atlantic coast where the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola party has been in power for 50 years — since independence from Portugal in 1975. Earlier this month, the government said it was removing subsidies on diesel and raising the price by more than 30%. That prompted minibus taxis, a common method of transport for Angolans, to hike their prices by as much as 50%. Lourenco's office said dozens of shops were looted and vehicles were damaged in rioting by people angry at the price of fuel and the rising cost of living. The army was deployed to restore order as the riots 'triggered a climate of widespread insecurity,' the statement said. It did not elaborate on how the people died. Protests against the price hikes in Angola first erupted two weeks ago, when Human Rights Watch accused the police of excessive force against what was a largely peaceful demonstration. Police unnecessarily fired tear gas and rubber bullets and assaulted protesters in those demonstrations, the rights group said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. ___ AP Africa news:
Toronto Star
25 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Sarah Huckabee Sanders tests political waters by headlining GOP event in early-voting South Carolina
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is set to headline the latest iteration of an event previously billed as the largest annual gathering of Republicans in South Carolina, a state traditionally key to picking the GOP's presidential nominees, and one in which she already has deep relationships. Rep. Sheri Biggs of South Carolina's 3rd District told The Associated Press that Sanders would be the featured speaker at her Salute to Liberty, slated to take place Aug. 18 in Anderson. In an interview last week, Biggs said she felt the governor 'represents what the people in the 3rd District believe in, our morals, just down-to-earth hardworking people that love the Lord and want to live in peace with their families and uphold our conservative values.'
