Federal And State Lawmakers Aim To End Union Misuse Of Taxpayer Funds
U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Representative Ben Cline (R-Va.) reintroduced legislation Monday, April 7, that would bar federal government workers from engaging in the practice of 'official time.' 'Official time,' explains a release put out by Senator Lee's office, 'is paid time off for federal employees to engage in union-related work, bargain unit employees, and engage in activities that advance the cause of a union in lieu of actually working.'
'Official time' didn't exist until 1978, when passage of the Civil Service Reform Act created it. This practice, notes Lee's release, 'allows federal employees to use work hours for union-related activities and to deal with cases before the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).' Senator Lee's release contends that American taxpayers 'should not be obligated to pay federal employees to engage in union activities,' added the release from Lee's office, which references official estimates for the taxpayer cost of official time:
'In 2016, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) reported that federal employees spent 3.6 million hours performing union-related business at a cost of $177.2 million,' Senator Lee's release noted. 'Under the Trump Administration, the amount of hours used on official time fell to 2.6 million hours, at a cost of $134.9 million. Today, however, there is no unified reporting requirement for agencies' whose employees use official time. As a result, 2019 is the last year of available data on the use of official time. Because federal law provides so few guard rails on the use of official time, federal employees are routinely able to abuse the process and to engage in overtly political activities during work hours, or fail to do their job at all.'
Union officials and other proponents of 'official time' for government employees describe it as an important worker protection. Testifying before the U.S. House Oversight subcommittee hearing, Darrell West, vice president at the Brookings Institute, claimed that prohibiting 'official time' for federal workers 'would weaken labor-management relations in the federal government, reduce the ability of government employees to air their concerns with management, and undermine agency performance.'
'Like every other American, it is important that federal employees have the right to express their viewpoints and petition government for a redress of grievances,' West added. What 'official time' proponents present as a vital worker safeguard, critics view as an expensive entitlement unknown to most Americans. While the vast majority of private sector workers are not members of a union, the small share of private sector workers who are unionized (5.9% of all private sector employees according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics) do not have a statutory right to 'official time' privileges like federal employees.
The reintroduction of Senator Lee's bill to end 'official time' follows the Trump administration's decisions to send a memo from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to all federal departments and agencies on February 27, informing them that when it comes to 'official time' they need to 'monitor its use to see that it is used efficiently.' What's more, that OPM memo also ordered departments and agencies to resume submission of annual reports to OPM on 'official time' authorization.
OPM had previously published annual reports on the use of official time until the Biden administration suspended it in 2021. According to estimates from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, there are '700 workers in the federal government who never worked for taxpayers thanks to official time.'
'The Biden administration, which was aggressively pro-union, announced in March 2023 that the number of federal employees in unions had grown by 20% under its watch,' CEI added. 'The amount of official time used almost certainly increased with this growth in the workforce.'
While Senator Lee and Representative Cline make the case for their bill, the No Union Time on the Taxpayer's Dime Act, state lawmakers are also pursuing reforms that seek to end union misuse of taxpayer resources. In Texas, for example, members of the state House and Senate have filed legislation that would prohibit state payroll systems from being used to automatically deduct union dues.
'Banning state subsidiaries from the collection of union dues is long overdue legislation,' said Representative Carl Tepper (R-Lubbock), who filed 'paycheck protection' legislation in the House. Senator Tan Parker (R-Flower Mound) filed the Senate version.
'Our state and local governments should not be in the business of making payroll deductions on behalf of unions; especially when those unions so often advocate against the interests of the public,' Tepper added. 'I look forward to working with Senator Tan Parker to make this bill law.'
'It's time for Texas to stop acting as a debt collector for radical left-wing government unions,' said Freedom Foundation CEO Aaron Withe. 'For too long, taxpayers have been forced to finance the collection of union dues, often without their consent,' Withe added, noting that his organization 'proudly supports this legislation, which will help protect taxpayer dollars and restore the proper role of government.'
The 'paycheck protection' legislation filed by Senator Parker and Representative Tepper isn't the only reform now pending in the Texas Legislature that seeks to end what many view as an improper use of taxpayer dollars. That goal is also the impetus behind Senate Bill 19, legislation that would prohibit taxpayer dollars from being used to pay for contract lobbyists.
'In 2023, local governments spent as much as $98.6 million to hire contract lobbyists—an increase from $75 million in 2021,' explains James Quintero and John Bonura at the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF). TPPF points out other strong arguments in favor of SB 19, noting that local governments across the state that hire contract lobbyists with taxpayer resources 'oftentimes do so for the purpose of securing higher taxes, more spending, and greater regulatory authority.'
SB 19, introduced by Senator Mayes Middleton (R-Galveston), passed out of the Texas Senate in March and is now awaiting consideration in the Texas House. Though this same proposal has passed out of the Senate in previous sessions only to die in the Texas House, a different fate is expected this year. That's because Middleton's reform has the backing of Speaker Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock).
'This practice involves government lobbying government for more government, and according to a recent poll, eight in ten Texans oppose using tax dollars to hire lobbyists,' Senator Middleton said in a recent interview, adding that before adjourning this session, he and his colleagues in the Texas Legislature 'must once and for all prohibit local governments from using our tax dollars to support higher taxes, more spending, and greater government control in our lives.'
Senator Lee and Senator Middleton are proposing different reforms at different levels of government. Yet both Lee and Middleton are seeking end what they see as not only a misallocation of taxpayer dollars, but the use of taxpayer resources to advocate against taxpayer interests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a few seconds ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Artifacts in US museums explain the outsized role of racism in the nation's history
DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) — Museums across the U.S. are displaying artifacts that represent and reflect landmark events of the Civil Rights era. Visitors to the Henry Ford near Detroit can see the bus Rosa Parks was riding when she refused to give up her seat to a white man in 1955, and a desk where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. planned voting rights marches. 'What we do here is help explain our story, as a community, as a culture, as a society to those who may not have lived through it, who may not remember it or who may have a different memory than what we collectively understand," said Amber Mitchell, curator of Black history at the Henry Ford. Public access to these items at federal sites may be restricted or prohibited under Trump administration rules seeking to bar what the president calls 'divisive" ideology that acknowledges the outsized role racism has played in American history and culture. The artifacts include: — The Clark Doll, a plastic, dark-skinned toy doll used by psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark during the 1940s while studying the impact of segregation on Black children. The doll is on permanent display in the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site in Topeka, Kansas. — Shards of stained glass from windows at the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, are on display at The National Museum of African American History and Culture, part of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. White supremacists bombed the church in 1963, killing four Black girls attending Sunday school. — Parts of a car owned by NAACP activist Vernon Dahmer are on long-term loan to The Mississippi Civil Rights Museum in Jackson, Mississippi. The Ku Klux Klan firebombed and shot at Dahmer's home in 1966. Dahmer, who had recruited Blacks to vote, rescued his family and they escaped in the car, but he died the next day from smoke inhalation. — Fountain pens used by President Lyndon B. Johnson to sign the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act are on display at The National Museum of African American History and Culture. — Executive Orders 9980 and 9981 that desegregated the U.S. military and the federal government are stored in the National Archives, but copies are on display at the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library in Independence, Missouri. Truman issued the orders in 1948 following a beating that left Army Sgt. Isaac Woodard blind. Woodard was heading home to South Carolina in 1946 after serving in WWII when a white police chief pulled him from a Greyhound bus and beat him. Woodward was still wearing his uniform when he was assaulted. An all-white jury acquitted the chief.
CNBC
2 minutes ago
- CNBC
War-weary Syria will be hurt further by Trump's 41% tariff rate — the highest on earth
In May, speaking to a rapt crowd in the Ritz-Carlton Riyadh, U.S. President Donald Trump stunned listeners by announcing he would be ordering the full lifting of U.S. sanctions on Syria, many of which had been in place for decades. "Now, it's their time to shine ... Good luck Syria," Trump said. Less than three months later, the Trump administration hit Syria with the highest tariff rate of any country in the world: 41%. Syria has very little trade with the U.S. because of long-held sanctions, but some trade between the two does exist. In 2023, Syria exported $11.3 million worth of goods to the U.S., according to the Observatory for Economic Complexity, and imported $1.29 million worth of American goods, technically giving the U.S. a trade deficit with the impoverished Middle Eastern country. Trump says the levies his administration imposes — which were based on a widely criticized calculation applied to each country in April using trade deficit figures — are meant to address trade imbalances. He has not commented specifically on the case of Syria. But as it faces the specter of rebuilding its devastated state after 13 years of war under a new government with a very shaky hold on power, the country needs all the help it can get, regional analysts say — not further punishment. "After years of devastating civil war, the country is in urgent need of substantial foreign direct investment to begin the long and difficult process of reconstruction and development," Giorgio Cafiero, CEO of risk consulting firm Gulf State Analytics, told CNBC. "While the recent lifting of many U.S., U.K., and EU sanctions was a welcome development for Damascus' economic ambitions, Washington's imposition of steep tariffs now threatens to restrict any potential for meaningful trade with the United States." Syria had been designated a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. government since 1979. U.S. sanctions were imposed on the country in 2004 and again in 2011, after the regime of then-President Bashar Assad launched a brutal crackdown on anti-government uprisings. In the roughly 14 years since, the country has been devastated by civil war, sectarian violence and brutal terrorist attacks, with the Islamic State taking over parts of the country in 2014 and a subsequent Western-led bombing campaign to eradicate the extremist group. The toppling of the Assad regime during a shock offensive by anti-Assad militia groups in December 2024 stunned the global community and brought about the prospect of a new beginning for the devastated country. Syria's new President Ahmed al-Sharaa — a former al-Qaeda member who describes himself as reformed — currently leads the country's transitional government. Syria remained under myriad international sanctions, but those imposed by the U.S. were the most severe, as they applied to third parties as well, deterring other countries and groups from transacting with the country. Most recently, since Trump's official lifting of sanctions in June, Syria has hosted delegations from several countries including the U.S. and wealthy Gulf states pledging support and investment for reconstruction. At the same time, it's been beset by outbursts of sectarian violence in different parts of the country and volleys of Israeli bombings. More than two-thirds of Syria's electricity grid is non-functional, according to aid organizations, with major cities like Aleppo and Damascus facing blackouts for more than 20 hours a day. In many rural and conflict-ridden areas, there is no power at all. "This isn't an economy that is struggling as much as it's an economy that seems to be almost constantly over the last few months, on the verge of collapse, unless very active steps are taken in order to buttress it and give it a chance to recover," said H.A. Hellyer, a senior fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London. "So any step that deviates from that, I think, is very dangerous." Qatar recently announced a project by which its development fund will purchase gas and provide it to Syria — transported via Azerbaijan and Turkey — to support more than 5 million people, with the expectation of improving daily power supply by as much as 40%. Fahad Al-Sulaiti, the director general of Qatar Fund for Development, described how Damascus will need to lean heavily on aid from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Nations — particularly now that tariffs will harm the possibility of developing beneficial trade ties with the U.S. He also said Qatar was in close contact with the U.S. government to enable support for Syria. "We work very closely with our partners in the United States. That's why from day one ... we work very close with the Treasury Department ... we're taking with them to create a good economic system," Al-Sulaiti told CNBC. Economic observers note that the 41% tariff itself will have little actual impact on Syria's devastated economy, since bilateral trade between the two countries is so negligible. "But the symbolism behind this decision carries far greater weight than the trade figures suggest," Cafiero said. "The fact that Syria was singled out for the highest tariffs — even after the easing of most sanctions — sends a clear and calculated message from the Trump administration: Washington is willing to loosen its economic grip on a post-regime change Syria, but only under conditions defined by the White House." One interpretation, Cafiero suggested, is that the tariffs could be a way to pressure Damascus into normalizing relations with Israel, which has been attacking and occupying parts of Syria. "In this sense," he said, "the economic policy resembles a kind of 'leash,' designed to be adjusted in response to the political behavior of the al-Sharaa government and broader developments on the ground." Security analysts warn that instability in parts of the country could tip it back into outright war and far greater humanitarian crisis if it does not get the support — economic, humanitarian and diplomatic — that it needs. U.S. envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, has expressed his and Washington's full support for Syria and the Al Sharaa government, and recently announced U.S. and Qatari-backed investment initiatives into the country. It is not clear whether he supports his administration's imposition of tariffs on the country; the State Department and White House did not respond to CNBC requests for comment. Ultimately, the tariffs themselves may have limited immediate economic consequences, but "their psychological and diplomatic impact should not be underestimated," Cafiero cautioned. "My read is that they reflect Washington's intent to retain leverage over Syria's future."
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
Big news about a key greenhouse gas rule
Were you dodging tsunamis, spiking heat, flooding, lightning or wildfires this week? If the answer is no, you were luckier than most. But some parts of the country could feel a slight hint of autumn in the air over the weekend. Welcome to Climate Point, your weekly guide to the newsiest stories about climate, energy and the environment. I'm Dinah Voyles Pulver, a national correspondent with USA TODAY. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency this week released its proposal to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding, a declaration that six greenhouses gases weren't good for human health or the planet. If the proposal is approved after a public comment period, it would repeal all greenhouse gas emissions standards for light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles, the agency said. The announcement set off sweeping reaction across the country with some heralding it as a cost savings and reduction in regulations, and others decrying it as a setback to the nation's action on climate change and fossil fuel emission reductions. The finding is the mechanism used by the Obama and Biden Administrations to regulate motor vehicle emissions standards, and it would eliminate those standards. The EPA lauded its effort, saying it would be 'one of the largest deregulatory actions in American history.' Environmental advocates, climate science groups and others criticized the move saying it would endanger public health, as well as the environment. Abigail Dillen, president of Earthjustice, said: 'The Trump administration is pretending that the pollution causing climate change is not hurting us, even as we suffer more devastating climate disasters every year.' She added: 'the EPA is telling us in no uncertain terms that U.S. efforts to address climate change are over.' Meanwhile, if climate change continues unabated, the world along the Colorado River will be unlike anything the people and populations along it have been used to, wrote Brandon Loomis, with the Arizona Republic, in a look at the region's continued water challenges. Colorado State University climate researcher Brad Udall warned that under those conditions the river may provide only 10 million acre-feet of water — a sharp reduction in its already diminished flow. US military to keep providing crucial satellite data Citing concerns about cybersecurity and staffing, the Department of Defense had announced plans to stop distributing a flow of data from a set of microwaves sensors on three of its satellites. But after a vociferous outcry from scientists who study hurricanes in far off places and polar ice, who were concerned about the loss of crucial forecast data, the department changed its plan. Russian rollers A massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake off Russia sent tsunami waves hurtling across the Pacific Ocean prompting alerts along the west coasts of North and South America. The event which appeared to be the sixth strongest in recorded history prompted evacuations in Hawaii and some of the Pacific Islands. Fortunately, the worst concerns didn't materialize and the resulting waves did not cause widespread destruction or devastation, but the event prompted a flurry of fascinating features on tsunami science and surfing. Hawaii is certainly no stranger to the effects of seismic activities around the Pacific, given its location and how tsunamis are created and ripple outward. USA TODAY's Will Carless wrote a first person on the call of the waves for surfers. Watchful eyes on the weather Many parts of the U.S. continued to swelter under record-breaking heat and rain-making storms. And some forecasters see the signals for hurricane season to heat up. USA TODAY's Doyle Rice wrote fascinating features on how sharks could help scientists improve hurricane forecasts and a new world lightning record that's 40 miles longer than the previous record holder. Energy efforts Nantucket is in a showdown with an offshore wind provider, demanding answers to a list of demands. It's a follow up to an incident last year when a turbine blade shattered and littered a nearby beach with bits of its remnants. In New York, officials are taking a fresh look at nuclear energy. Governor Kathy Hochul has asked the state's York Power Authority to build 1 gigawatt of nuclear power plants to meet the demand for energy consuming data centers that promise jobs, writes Thomas Zambito. Critter corner USA TODAY'S Elizabeth Weise intrigued and terrified readers with her tale of mating season for the hairy, baseball-sized tarantulas in the West and Southwest. 'If you're lucky enough, you can sometimes see them in hordes crossing the roads at certain times of the year,' said Dan McCamish, a senior environmental scientist with California State Parks. But if you live somewhere else in the U.S., don't feel left out. Weise advises there are 29 species of tarantulas in a total of 15 states. Read on for more, including more on the Grand Canyon fires that destroyed the historic lodge on the Canyon's North Rim and whether fuel reduction measures were overdue in the national park. Some stories may require a subscription. If someone forwarded you this email and you'd like to receive Climate Point in your inbox once a week, sign up here.
