60-year-old Glasgow man to take on Forth Bridge abseil
He said: "I had intended to do this a few years ago and raise funds for cystic fibrosis as a couple of my nieces have the condition but unfortunately Covid-19 came along and stopped me doing it.
"So I ended up doing a parachute jump after a while instead.
"I looked for an opportunity to do the abseil again and I noticed it on the CHSS website.
"My father, James, passed away with a heart and stroke condition and a few of my friends have had frights with heart attacks recently and so has my mother, Margaret.
"It seemed quite a relevant charity to support".
Read more: Meet the 63-year-old 'Summer Santa' zip sliding along the Clyde for cancer care
The Forth Bridge abseil, organised by CHSS in partnership with Network Rail and Balfour Beatty, is one of Scotland's most well-known fundraising events.
Previous events held in June and October raised a combined total of more than £390,000 for all participating charities.
Speaking about the upcoming abseil, Charles admitted that despite having previous experience he still feels apprehensive about the event.
He said: "I've done a wee bit before but I will still be nervous hanging over the edge.
"I do like doing adventurous things though.
"I was up the top of the Forth Road Bridge for its 60th anniversary so I'm making my way across the bridges.
"It was a cracking experience and I'm looking forward to this one as well."
To support Charle's fundraiser, visit justgiving.com/page/charles-frb.
Read more: Juno the dog set to join Beatson 10k event - here is why
CHSS aims to support 175,000 people across Scotland living with chest, heart, and stroke conditions by 2028.
Stephanie Wilks, community, events and corporate fundraiser at CHSS, said: "We thank Charles for his participation in the 2025 Forth Bridge Abseil and wish him all the best in his fundraising and on the day.
"Every pound raised through fundraising helps CHSS to support the one in five people in Scotland who are living with chest, heart and stroke conditions and Long Covid to live life to the full.
'It helps us to provide advice and support through our free Advice Line service, stroke nurses, online health information, support groups, supported self management courses and much more.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Could RFK Jr's move to pull mRNA vaccine funding be a huge miscalculation?
mRNA vaccines were heralded as a medical marvel that saved lives during the Covid pandemic, but now the US is pulling back from researching them. US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has cancelled 22 projects - worth $500m (£376m) in funding – for tackling infections such as Covid and flu. So does Kennedy - probably the country's most famous vaccine sceptic – have a point, or is he making a monumental miscalculation? Prof Adam Finn, vaccine researcher at the University of Bristol, says "it's a bit of both" but ditching mRNA technology is "stupid" and potentially a "catastrophic error". Let's unpick why. Kennedy says he has reviewed the science on mRNA vaccines, concluding that the "data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu". Instead, he says, he would shift funding to "safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate". So are mRNA vaccines safe? Are they effective? Would other vaccine technologies be better? And another question is where should mRNA vaccines fit into the pantheon of other vaccine technologies - because there are many: Inactivated vaccines use the original virus or bacterium, kill it, and use that to train the immune system - such as the annual flu shot Attenuated vaccines do not kill the infectious agent, but make it weaker so it causes a mild infection - such as the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine Conjugate vaccines use bits of protein or sugar from a bug, so it triggers an immune response without causing an infection - like for types of meningitis mRNA vaccines use a fragment of genetic code that temporarily instructs the body to make parts of a virus, and the immune system reacts to that Each has advantages and disadvantages, but Prof Finn argues we "overhyped" mRNA vaccines during the pandemic to the exclusion of other approaches, and now there is a process of adjusting. "But to swing the pendulum so far that mRNA is useless and has no value and should not be developed or understood better is equally stupid, it did do remarkable things," he says.
Channel 4
10 hours ago
- Channel 4
US Health Secretary cuts $500m in MRNA vaccine development
He rose to prominence on a wave of vaccine-skepticism, now US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has cancelled nearly $500 million worth of funding for the development of MRNA vaccines. The kind that helped end the Covid pandemic and save millions of lives according to scientists.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour to deny six million pensioners Covid jabs this winter
The Government is to deny six million pensioners Covid jabs this winter. The rollout will be restricted to only the most vulnerable groups, and the vaccines will not be offered to NHS and care workers. Only people over the age of 75, those living in care homes and others who are immunosuppressed will be eligible for free vaccines. 'Reckless and short-term' The changes mean about six million pensioners between the age of 65 and 74 will not be offered free jabs. The decision from ministers follows recommendations from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) to restrict jabs to those most vulnerable to serious outcomes from infection. But pharmacists said the decision was 'reckless' and 'short-term' and could lead to increasing numbers of patients needing hospital care this winter. Dr Leyla Hannbeck, chief executive of the Independent Pharmacies Association, said: 'This is hugely concerning, a reckless decision.' She said it was 'madness' for the UK to restrict jabs, with Germany and the United States among countries still recommending the vaccines for all pensioners. 'To deny millions of seniors their Covid jab this year is to take an unacceptable risk with patient health and risks producing a winter crisis the NHS simply won't be able to cope with,' Dr Hannbeck said. A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson said: 'This decision is based on expert advice from the JCVI, which continuously monitor and evaluate emerging scientific evidence on COVID-19 vaccines. 'The autumn 2025 vaccination programme will target people who are at the highest risk of serious illness to protect the most vulnerable. We encourage anyone who is eligible for COVID-19 vaccination to come forward for vaccination this autumn.' The decision means frontline NHS workers and care staff will no longer be offered free jabs. The DHSC said: 'In the current era of high population immunity to COVID-19, additional COVID-19 doses provide very limited, if any, protection against infection and any subsequent onward transmission of infection.' It said that high population immunity meant vaccination was likely to only have a very limited impact on reducing staff sickness absence.
