logo
Jeffrey Dean Morgan's Lost Shot At Playing Batman In A Flashpoint Movie

Jeffrey Dean Morgan's Lost Shot At Playing Batman In A Flashpoint Movie

When Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice hit theaters in 2016, fans were intrigued—and a bit puzzled—by the casting of Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Lauren Cohan as Thomas and Martha Wayne. These were big-name actors, known for gritty roles in projects like The Walking Dead , yet their screen time was limited to a brief, tragic flashback. Almost immediately, speculation swirled: was this a sneaky setup for a future Flashpoint film, with Morgan stepping into the cowl as a darker, alternate-universe Batman?
Fast forward nearly a decade, and those fan theories have been both validated and dashed. In a recent interview on the Den of Geek YouTube channel, Morgan, alongside Cohan, confirmed that there were plans for him to play Thomas Wayne as Batman in a Flashpoint adaptation. Sadly, the project never materialized, leaving fans to mourn yet another missed opportunity in Zack Snyder's DC Universe. A Tease That Sparked Hope
The Flashpoint storyline, based on the 2011 DC Comics event, flips the Batman mythos on its head. In this alternate timeline, it's Thomas Wayne, not Bruce, who becomes Batman after a tragedy reshapes the Wayne family. Morgan's casting in Batman v Superman seemed like perfect foreshadowing. Fans imagined him as a grizzled, morally complex Batman, a role that would've leaned into his knack for intense, layered characters like Negan in The Walking Dead . Cohan as a twisted Martha Wayne—potentially the Joker in this universe—only fueled the excitement.
But as the DC Extended Universe (DCEU) evolved, those dreams fizzled. The 2023 Flash movie, while loosely inspired by Flashpoint , sidelined Thomas Wayne entirely, opting instead to bring back Michael Keaton as Batman. Many assumed Snyder had simply tossed Morgan and Cohan into Batman v Superman as a favor to old pals, with no bigger plan in mind. More on The Flash. Photo Credit: DC Comics Morgan Confirms the Scrapped Plan
Turns out, the fans were onto something. While promoting The Walking Dead: Dead City , Morgan dropped a bombshell during the Den of Geek interview. He revealed that Snyder had indeed envisioned a Flashpoint film where Thomas and Martha Wayne would play 'a much bigger role.'
'Truthfully, Zack was gonna do more movies,' Morgan said. 'And I think there was a time when Flashpoint Batman would have seen these two characters in a much bigger role. And that was part of the Zack world of all of it, and then I never got a chance to do that, unfortunately.'
The collapse of this project ties directly to Snyder's gradual exit from the DCEU. After creative differences and personal challenges, Snyder stepped away from Justice League , and his broader vision for the DC Universe—including films like Flashpoint —was shelved as Warner Bros. pivoted to new directions. Why It Hurts
For fans, this revelation stings. Morgan as Thomas Wayne's Batman could've been electric—a chance to see a darker, more vengeful take on the Caped Crusader, clashing with Ben Affleck's weathered Bruce Wayne. The Flashpoint comics are beloved for their bold twists, and Morgan's intensity would've been a perfect fit. Pair that with Cohan's potential as a chaotic Martha/Joker, and you've got a recipe for a game-changing superhero movie.
The DCEU's history is littered with what-ifs, from Affleck's unmade Batman solo film to the scrapped Justice League sequels. Morgan's Flashpoint joins that list, a casualty of a franchise that struggled to capitalize on its stellar casting and ambitious ideas. Affleck himself has spoken about his frustrations with the DCEU, particularly the grueling experience of playing Batman, which he detailed in interviews about the physical and creative toll. What's Next for DC?
While Morgan's Batman dream didn't pan out, the DC Universe is far from done. Under James Gunn and Peter Safran's leadership, the rebooted DCU is taking shape, with projects like Superman (2025) and The Brave and the Bold on the horizon. Could Morgan still don the cowl in a future multiverse story? Never say never—DC loves its alternate realities, and fans would lose their minds for it.
For now, you can revisit Snyder's vision with Zack Snyder's Justice League , streaming on HBO Max. And keep an eye on Morgan and Cohan in The Walking Dead: Dead City , where they're still kicking zombie butt.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pacers Starting Five Had Worst Group Outing In Game 5, Must Improve
Pacers Starting Five Had Worst Group Outing In Game 5, Must Improve

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Pacers Starting Five Had Worst Group Outing In Game 5, Must Improve

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 29: Pascal Siakam #43 of the Indiana Pacers drives to the basket against ... More Josh Hart #3 of the New York Knicks during the third quarter in Game Five of the Eastern Conference Finals of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Madison Square Garden on May 29, 2025 in New York City. (Photo by) NEW YORK – With a possible berth in the NBA Finals on the table for the Indiana Pacers on Thursday night, they had an offensive performance that made even the team scratch their heads and wonder what exactly went wrong. The Pacers entered Game 5 with a 3-1 series lead. After a terrific Game 4 in which three key players stepped up for the blue and gold, their confidence was high heading back to New York City. They entered the day 2-0 in Madison Square Garden during the series and could close out the Knicks with one more win in the World's Most Famous Arena. But by the end of the night, those sanguine feelings would be gone. It was the Knicks' night. They were the much better team, and they became the first group in this playoffs to hold Indiana under 100 points in a game. The Pacers walked out of MSG after putting up just 94 points in the 48-minute battle, a bizarre performance given everything at stake. The visitors shot just 40.5% from the field, their lowest figure in the postseason by nearly three percentage points. They had a playoff-high 20 turnovers, too. Indiana's total chances were limited – and they didn't convert the ones they got. 'We obviously didn't play with the level of force that we needed to. We lost the rebound battle, we lost the turnover battle,' Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle explained postgame before even fielding a question. 'We didn't shoot well, they had a lot to do with it, so give them credit.' It was a dreadful performance all around. The Pacers trailed by double-digits from late in the second quarter onward. Any run that cut into the Knicks lead was immediately answered. Indiana is used to being the team that can respond to adversity at any moment in the postseason, but it was New York playing that way in Game 6. Several strategic reasons influenced the Pacers' poor Game 5 – the Knicks were applying more ball pressure and face guarding star ball handler Tyrese Haliburton, for example. The improvements of the Knicks, combined with a substandard night from the Pacers, led to a blowout. Most of the problems Indiana faced stemmed from the worst postseason outing for their starting five. That unit has played 241 minutes in the playoffs, and they've outscored opponents by 71 points. The five-man lineup consists of Haliburton, Andrew Nembhard, Aaron Nesmith, Pascal Siakam, and Myles Turner. They have just as many 2025 postseason outings with a plus-minus above +10 as they do with a figure below zero (six each). There is always confidence in that five-man group when they are together. They entered Game 5 a plus-eight in the Eastern Conference Finals. Yet after three quarters of play in that fifth game, they had combined to score 29 points. Knicks star Jalen Brunson had 30 points by himself. Some players were having an off night. One was injured. A few couldn't find their usual level of impact due to defensive changes from New York. For many reasons, the Pacers starting five was poor in Game 5, and their series lead dropped to 3-2 as a result. 'We weren't great as a group. I thought we lost the margin battle today,' Haliburton said over a half hour after walking off the court with a confident grin, even in defeat. 'We've got to be better as a group. I think our pace has to be better.' Indiana Pacers center Myles Turner (33) passes the ball against the New York Knicks during the ... More second quarter of Game 5 of the NBA basketball Eastern Conference final, Thursday, May 29, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Adam Hunger) It all starts with Haliburton. In Game 4, he had the best night of his NBA career – posting a triple-double to put his team one win away from an NBA Finals berth. Two days later, he took seven shots and finished with just eight points and six assists. Haliburton saw new coverages. Mikal Bridges was face guarding him all over the floor, making it hard for Haliburton to catch the ball on the move. Other offensive release valves had tough nights for the Pacers and couldn't punish that adjustment. It's not unusual for ramped-up pressure to slow the Pacers star, but it shouldn't have been as impactful as it ended up being. 'Rough night for me,' Haliburton stated. 'I've got to be better setting the tone, getting downhill. I feel like I didn't do a great job of that.' Haliburton's personal effectiveness has dropped in the past when he sees this type of coverage. In this instance, it also limited the ability of his teammates. Their star point guard had fewer avenues to get into the paint and distribute, so easy shots were harder to come by. Play finishers were hurting as a result. Nesmith, who started the series on fire and is dealing with an ankle injury suffered in Game 3, made just one of his eight field goal attempts. Turner only took three shots. Nembhard, who can be more than just a finisher but didn't find much space while being defended by OG Anunoby, went 3/8 from the field. Those three all struggled and combined to score 14 points on 19 shot attempts. Nesmith gets more of a pass because of his injury. 'It's not 100%, but it's no excuse. I've got to be better,' he said of his sprained ankle. But he was still terrific in Game 4. Being off from the field in Game 5 and only playing for 15:52 challenged the usually-effective starting five. The Pacers will hope he's better in any future battles. 'It still comes down to the physicality from the jump, just playing with more effort and energy and worrying about us more than them,' Nesmith said matter-of-factly at his locker postgame. Turner wasn't himself either. He took eight or more shots in the first four games of the series but only found room for three in Game 5. His shots usually come from strong ball movement and offensive flow, so that field goal attempt number being so low shows just how disconnected the starting five was Thursday night. Turner's impact has been muted in the last few games and needs to pop. Siakam can get the Pacers going on some nights when their offense is subpar. That's how the blue and gold won Game 2 of this series. But even he had an off night, shooting just 5/13 and missing four attempts from the foul line. 'They were more aggressive from the jump. They brought the fight to us. I just didn't think we brought it enough,' Siakam said. Altogether, it was the starting lineup's worst game this series. They played for under 10 minutes together for the first time this postseason – though Nesmith's injury was a factor in that. It was only the second time in these playoffs that they were outscored by 10+ points while sharing the floor. The bench was good enough for Indiana in Game 5. The starters were not. They shot 33.3% and had 10 turnovers. If the Pacers adjust like they have all season, they'll be fine. The team hasn't lost consecutive games since early March. But after the worst collective performance from their starting five in the postseason, the blue and gold need more from their best players to close out the Knicks.

Here's where you can buy microSD Express cards for the Switch 2
Here's where you can buy microSD Express cards for the Switch 2

The Verge

time24 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Here's where you can buy microSD Express cards for the Switch 2

All microSD cards look pretty much the same, but when it comes to buying the right one for your Nintendo Switch 2, only microSD Express cards will work for storing and playing games. The microSD card you used in your original Switch or Switch Lite will offer limited functionality with Nintendo's new handheld, as it will only let you view screenshots or video clips you captured previously — that's it. That's because Nintendo opted for a significantly faster spec in its new handheld console, which boasts an advertised 4.4x improvement in terms of transfer speeds over the microSD cards you might already have lying around. That improvement is signified by a small, easy-to-miss 'EX' emblem etched onto the front of the card. What's harder to miss is how much more expensive Express cards are, with some costing more than $50 for just 256GB of storage. The Switch 2 supports microSD Express cards up to 2TB in size, although 1TB is the largest capacity widely available (that's an overstatement, as many are sold out currently), with some cards selling for up to $200 a pop. Phew. I suppose it makes sense that they're pricier since they're classified as bonafide PCIe NVMe SSDs by the SD Association. Walmart's Onn label is a beacon of light, as its microSD Express cards are significantly cheaper than the competition, with its 512GB model costing $65.88 when it's in stock. Thankfully, since the Switch 2 has 256GB of built-in storage, you most likely won't need a microSD Express card immediately upon receiving your console. Getting a microSD card was a rite of passage with the original Switch since all versions, aside from the newer OLED edition that launched in 2021, came with just 32GB. If you're in the market for one of these pricier storage expansion cards ahead of the console's launch, we've listed the available options below.

Peter David, Comic Book Writer Who Repopularized the Hulk, Dies at 68
Peter David, Comic Book Writer Who Repopularized the Hulk, Dies at 68

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Peter David, Comic Book Writer Who Repopularized the Hulk, Dies at 68

Peter David, who wrote millions of words of science fiction, fantasy and comic-book adventures, becoming a favorite of fans by making it clear that his enthusiasm for genre fiction matched or exceeded theirs, died on May 24 in Patchogue, N.Y., on Long Island. He was 68. His wife, Kathleen, said that the official cause of his death, in a hospital, had not been determined, but that he had had multiple strokes. Known for his puckish sense of humor and for elaborate plotlines that sometimes spanned decades, Mr. David wrote scripts for the television series 'Babylon 5,' highly opinionated columns for the magazine Comics Buyer's Guide, and dozens of 'Star Trek' novels. But it was with his 11-year run, from 1987 to 1998, on the Marvel title The Incredible Hulk, which began as a collaboration with the rising artist Todd McFarlane, that Mr. David left his imprint on the industry. The green-skinned Hulk, the muscular and rage-filled alter ego of the scientist Bruce Banner, had once been a flagship character for Marvel, even starring in a network TV series from 1978 to 1982. But sales of his comic had declined precipitously after the show ended, and the monosyllabic character was seen as marginal. By emphasizing the Hulk's menace and delving into the traumatic childhood that gave rise to the character's split personality, he helped turn the series from a basement dweller into a hit. Valentine De Landro, an artist who drew a dozen issues of Marvel's X-Factor (an X-Men spinoff title) written by Mr. David in 2008 and 2009, praised him as a generous partner and pointed to the afterlife of his work. 'Story lines that he helped build and concepts for characters that he developed from almost 50 years ago are currently being referenced and leveraged,' Mr. De Landro said in an email. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store