Watchdog group exposes red state college administrator explaining 'loophole' around anti-DEI law
The video, obtained by conservative watchdog Accuracy in Media (AIM) and posted online, shows University of South Florida St. Petersburg administrator Heather Klišanin explaining to an undercover investigator how the school had attempted to skirt Florida law banning public funds from promoting DEI by using a "loophole."
"It is a student-funded area, so it changes some things in regards to what we are able to do because student-funded things are not affected by the changes in regulation and law," Klišanin, director of student conduct and ethical development and dean of student ambassadors at USF St. Petersburg, can be seen saying on video, suggesting that the school is using student fees to fund DEI programs.
"I was hoping it would be similar here that they weren't totally getting rid of DEI," the unidentified woman says to Klišanin at another point in the video.
Klišanin responds, "Yeah, and even our students, we just have to make sure, like any of our programming and things like that, is mostly done through student government because if it's student-funded, they can't stop it. But like, our departments can't spend any money on that."
Klišanin went on to explain that she has students who do "outreach and education" on DEI issues, but the department can no longer directly fund those efforts, "but if they partnered with student government and student government paid for it, then we can."
Klišanin described the loophole as "red tape" but said "Yeah" when asked whether the school administrators could still have a "supportive role" in the DEI efforts.
"Loopholes?" the undercover individual asked.
"Yeah," Klišanin responded.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, a university spokesperson said they are complying with the law.
"The University of South Florida follows all state and federal guidance, policies, and laws related to DEI. USF does not operate a DEI office," the spokesperson said.
"As soon as USF was provided the hidden camera video of Heather Klišanin, we began a review of the matter, which is ongoing. Upon initial review of the edited video, it appears that she is referencing Florida law and Florida Board of Governors regulation on DEI that includes an exemption for student-led programs funded by student fees. However, after seeing the video and to ensure USF continues to comply with state and federal laws, USF will require her to complete additional training."
The Florida law does provide a carveout for student-funded activities, but in a press release, AIM suggests that the "loophole" talked about in the video might not be legal either.
"However, this 'loophole' employed by USF is still likely in violation of state law, because not all student fees are paid through private sources," the press release states. "As of fall 2022, over 74% of Florida residents enrolled at USF received a taxpayer-funded scholarship through the Bright Futures program."
"'Federal funds' are those funds provided to the university or direct support organization for a university directly or indirectly by an appropriation by Congress," the Florida regulation states on the university system's website.
"This includes financial aid provided to the university by or on behalf of a student attending the university if that financial aid is provided to the student via a governmental aid or grant program. State and federal funds do not include student fees to support student-led organizations notwithstanding any speech or expressive activity by such organizations which would otherwise violate this section, provided that the student fees must be allocated to student-led organizations pursuant to written policies or regulations of each state university, as applicable."
Later in the video, Klišanin says, "We're not going to stop supporting the students that we've been supporting in that space and right now it's student-funded, so even if a name changes, they won't have to take away the support."
The video also shows AIM President Adam Guillette confronting Klišanin, who denies she has been pushing to skirt the DEI laws.
"You're going to need to talk to Carrie O'Brion," Klišanin says, pointing Guillette to the school's communications director.
Later in the video, Guillette speaks to O'Brion, who seemingly acknowledges that something improper had taken place.
"That's not the policy," O'Brion said when confronted about the idea of switching DEI programs to student-funded efforts or changing the names of certain programs.
"DEI is a poisonous ideology that leads to division, hate and antisemitism," Guillette told Fox News Digital in a statement. "It has no place in our education system, and both Gov. DeSantis and the Trump administration must ensure these programs are rooted out of public universities and K-12 schools."
In a statement to Fox News Digital, DeSantis communications director Bryan Griffin told Fox News Digital, "Circumventing state laws & rules prohibiting DEI in public universities is unacceptable. We are looking into the matter and, to the extent public dollars are being used toward DEI, there will be consequences. 'Additonal training' will not be a sufficient response."
The newly uncovered video comes weeks after Fox News Digital exclusively reported on a Florida professor bragging about how he too had found ways around the state's DEI ban. The professor, Dr. Haywood Brown, former associate vice president of academic affairs at the University of South Florida, resigned shortly after Fox News Digital's reporting.
"With the details of Mr. Brown's actions and public commitments to violating state law and academic standards surfacing to our attention, our office has immediately ensured his relationship with our university system has ended," Griffin told Fox News Digital at the time.
"This individual's employment at the University of South Florida is over today, and he is no longer welcome to work in Florida education."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Want to fix the nation's broken higher-ed system? Look to the South
Universities in the American South are becoming models for fixing higher education. After the COVID lockdowns and amid antisemitic violence and the anti-American and DEI-infused agendas that have taken hold over the past two decades, Southern colleges are now displacing the broken universities in the Northeast that were once benchmarks for elite education. The number of Northeastern high-school students going to Southern colleges has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, thanks largely to lower costs and less-ideologically driven campus cultures. College-admissions experts note that the rise in these schools' popularity has allowed them to become more selective, boosting their prestige even further among high-school students. From 2014 to 2024, the last full year for available admissions data, Auburn University's freshman-class acceptance rate decreased from 85% to 46%; Clemson University's dropped from 52% to 38%. The trend line holds even for the South's most selective colleges: Rice University's acceptance rate dipped from 14% to 8%; Emory University's, from 26% to 15%. By contrast, elite Northeastern universities have only been able to maintain their enrollments by taking in more foreign students. Why are young people are flocking to Southern universities? Because, on the whole, they're run better. They take a pragmatic approach to education that's attractive to students who want to learn without the far-left craziness that prevails at so many schools. As an adjunct professor at the University of Kentucky, I'm immersed in a common-sense-oriented culture that's absent at elite Northeastern schools, one that lets administrators run the institution more sensibly based on what works best and not the optics of a vocal minority's radical ideology. This summer, the University of Kentucky swiftly fired a professor who launched an online petition calling for international warfare against Jews. About the same time, Columbia University was agreeing to a $221 million settlement with the Trump administration over its multi-year failures to police protesters who caused millions of dollars in damage and harassed peers in the name of far-left ideology pushed by their professors. The contrast could not be starker. Common-sense governance in higher education inspires leaders to be pragmatic and take action to keep students safe and the campus running normally. Pragmatism translates into rational decision-making and logical solutions across all areas of university life. The Universities of Florida and North Carolina systems, for example, have among the strongest track records of enforcing DEI bans and fortifying campus safety against wanton protesters. These policies transcend collegiate bureaucracies and change campus cultures for the better. At the University of North Carolina, students shut down their peers' anti-American protest by raising the American flag in front of them. At the University of Florida, Jewish students felt reassured after Oct. 7 because then-President Ben Sasse immediately issued a zero-tolerance statement for campus antisemitism. Southern universities' resolve to defy far-left craziness resonates with prospective college students because the results give young people positive visions of what they can experience on campus, achieve as students and accomplish after graduation. When learning devolves into activism, education loses its purpose as a tool for practical future success. Seminar discussions and quad gatherings simply won't translate into good jobs after graduation. Students fleeing the Northeast are reacting to that disconnect between college as a stagnant, unserious experience versus a real vehicle for future success. Southern universities are more disposed to traditional approaches to education, which prioritizes civics education and reinforces the campus as a place for cultivating intellectual and spiritual growth. Public institutions like the University of South Carolina and North Carolina State University have recently invested millions on civic-engagement curriculum. Texas, Florida and Tennessee have also allocated millions to beef up civics and classical education at their state universities. And Southern schools are more willing to welcome students of faith — a draw for some. The 2023 Christian revival at Asbury University in Kentucky was an expression of students' attraction to traditional education. The 16-day prayer celebration numbered 20,000 participants and inspired thousands more at Baylor, Texas A&M and Auburn to hold similar events that year. Students said their search for truth, connection and self-discovery in a society dominated by hyper-politicization motivated them to attend such events. Northeastern colleges thought pursuing radical change through social-justice activism would keep them on top — but that course has only precipitated their decline in reputation and relevance. They could learn much from the South. Zachary Marschall is editor-in-chief of Leadership Institute's Campus Reform and an adjunct assistant professor of arts administration at the University of Kentucky.
New York Post
15 hours ago
- New York Post
It's the Age of Trump — and he's forging a new political era
If you had to sum up President Donald Trump's second term so far in one word, you could do worse than 'epic.' Trump may be on the path to the most consequential presidency since Ronald Reagan's. We don't know how it will end — an unforeseen crisis could upend everything — but the emphasis has been on governing ambition from Day 1. Advertisement Even if Trump's second term ended tomorrow, he would have left a significant mark. Consider his signature issues of trade and immigration. Advertisement For all the talk about how he doesn't have core convictions, Trump has favored tariffs for decades and has instituted a tariff regime that — absent discrediting economic turmoil — is likely to endure. This would have seemed almost unthinkable when Trump descended the elevator in 2015, and a relatively free-trade consensus prevailed in US policy. He's brought border crossings to a historic low, and the United States could experience negative net migration for the first time in 50 years. Advertisement Again, this is a big change, and one that it's hard to imagine anyone besides Donald Trump effecting. He's dealt a blow to DEI programs in the federal government and is making it harder for colleges and universities to pursue race-conscious policies. His election coincided with the beginning of a pullback from DEI in the private sector, one that his administration has encouraged. DEI was the culmination of a half-century campaign by the left for quotas in hiring and admissions and other racialized policies. Trump's counteroffensive could represent an inflection point. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters He's signed a tax and spending bill that makes permanent the tax cuts from his first term, funds a large-scale investment in immigration enforcement and includes a meaningful reform of Medicaid. He bombed the Iranian nuclear program, at the very least setting it back for years. He cajoled commitments for greater defense spending out of NATO countries. Almost any one of these items would be a notable first-six-months accomplishment, but he's done them all, with lots of other activity besides. His environmental and energy officials are rolling back the left's climate agenda. Trump defunded public broadcasting and kneecapped the Department of Education (for now). His administration has taken important steps to protect female sports and to keep minors from being subjected to 'gender-affirming care.' Advertisement He's pushed universities into adopting reforms and probably upended forever the assumption that billions of federal dollars would flow to top universities as a matter of course. His election was both a symbol of, and a catalyst for, the woke tide's receding. Trump has what is, in recent memory, an unprecedented grip on his party and has remade it in his image over the last decade. If a Trump-endorsed GOP nominee wins the general election, he would be the George H.W. Bush to Trump's Reagan. Advertisement In sum, the rise of Trump in 2016 represented a break with what had been the post–Cold War consensus, although it was incompletely realized and seemingly a political fizzle when voters ousted him in the COVID election of 2020. Biden was a partial return to a more conventional politics. Now, with his second term, Trump is more fully effecting a transition to a new era — which alone makes him a highly consequential figure. The usual caveats apply: Again, a catastrophe could scramble all of this, and to say Trump is important is not to endorse everything he's doing, whether big (e.g., the tariffs) or small (e.g., firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner). Advertisement Since he's done so much unilaterally, it's subject to relatively easy reversal if a Democrat is elected in 2028. But there's little doubt we are witnessing something historic. Steve Hayward called his volumes on the Republican giant of the 1980s 'The Age of Reagan' — and Arthur Schlesinger wrote both 'The Age of Jackson' and 'The Age of Roosevelt.' Advertisement The equivalent of Hayward or Schlesinger decades from now will probably be justified in continuing the trope: All indications are that we are living in the Age of Trump. Twitter: @RichLowry
Fox News
20 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump-appointed judge strikes down anti-DEI measures from Education Department
A Trump-appointed judge struck down two actions from the Education Department aimed at rooting out diversity, equity and inclusion programs in American schools, arguing that the federal government cannot push their policies "at the expense of constitutional rights." In her ruling Thursday, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. "The administration is entitled to express its viewpoints and to promulgate policies aligned with those viewpoints," Gallagher wrote, according to Politico. "But it must do so within the procedural bounds Congress has outlined. And it may not do so at the expense of constitutional rights." "The government did not merely remind educators that discrimination is illegal: it initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished," she added. The ruling followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centered on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all "race-based decision-making" or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using "illegal DEI practices." Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that "judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level." In April, a federal judge in New Hampshire already blocked the Trump administration from cutting funding to public schools that maintain diversity programs. U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty said at the time that the effort by Trump's Education Department to block federal funding to public schools that continue to promote DEI programs likely violates the First Amendment, presenting what she described as "textbook viewpoint discrimination."
