‘Stress' can't be an excuse for letting children off exams
The Tories in 1995 sought to reduce the volume of statutory content and change methods of assessment. The Blair government announced another overhaul, particularly at primary level, to allow more time to be spent on the core subjects of English, Mathematics and Science. Further changes were introduced in Sept 2008 and again by Michael Gove in the Coalition in 2013.
Another review is under way. An interim report published this week proposes to reduce pressures on pupils by limiting their exposure to exams. It said that 'intensive, high-stakes' assessments were having an impact on their 'wellbeing'.
Polling found 41 per cent of last year's GCSE cohort found it difficult, while 10 per cent found it 'very difficult', to cope with exam stress.
What has been apparent since the pandemic wrought such havoc with the education of a cohort of children is that their ability to deal with the normal vicissitudes of life has been constrained.
Is it really a good idea to compound this tendency by continually making things easier? The review said that it 'would not fundamentally change the number of subjects that students study or are assessed in at GCSE.'
But the direction of travel is to make life less stressful whereas it should be about giving pupils the necessary resilience to deal with the inevitable knocks that growing up entails. A curriculum fit for the modern world, which is what the Government wants to see, needs to address that above all else.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
24 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Human rights ‘worsened' in UK over the past year, says US
The annual US State Department assessment, which analyses human rights conditions worldwide, flagged what it described as 'serious restrictions' on freedom of expression in the UK. 'The government sometimes took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but prosecution and punishment for such abuses was inconsistent,' the report read. The report specifically said laws limiting speech around abortion clinics, pointing to 'safe access zones' curbed expression, including silent protests and prayer. 'These restrictions on freedom of speech could include prohibitions on efforts to influence others when inside a restricted area, even through prayer or silent protests,' the report read. In the wake of the 2024 Southport attack, the report said government officials 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech'. Criticism over the handling of free speech was also directed at the governments of Germany and France. A UK government spokesperson told the BBC: 'Free speech is vital for democracy around the world, including here in the UK and we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe.' Sentiments echoed those previously made by vice president JD Vance. In February, Mr Vance criticised the UK over a legal case in which a former serviceman who silently prayed outside an abortion clinic was convicted of breaching the safe zone around the centre. In a wider attack on what he suggested is a shift away from democratic values across Europe, Mr Vance claimed the 'basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular' are under threat. He referred to the conviction of Adam Smith-Connor, 51, who had denied doing so but was found guilty last year of failing to comply with a public space protection order at the centre in Bournemouth in November 2022. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Mr Vance said that the US' 'very dear friends the United Kingdom' appeared to have seen a 'backslide in conscience rights'. 'A little over two years ago, the British government charged Adam Smith-Connor, a 51-year-old physiotherapist and an Army veteran, with the heinous crime of standing 50 metres from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes, not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own,' he said. The report also said the Government 'effectively' enforced laws around freedom of association and the rights of workers. The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Young people could soon travel on buses for free
The Transport Select Committee has recommended that the government introduce free bus travel for all under-22s across England. This proposal aims to improve young people's access to work and skills opportunities and encourage long-term public transport use. The committee highlighted England 's inconsistent local youth concessions, contrasting them with national free travel schemes in Scotland and discounted fares in Wales. The report identified public transport as a significant barrier to employment for young people, particularly in areas with limited services. The committee also urged the government to reform local bus service funding and establish a national ambition for minimum public transport connectivity.
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Human rights ‘worsened' in UK over the past year, says US
'The government sometimes took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but prosecution and punishment for such abuses was inconsistent,' the report read. Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomes US vice president JD Vance (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) The report specifically said laws limiting speech around abortion clinics, pointing to 'safe access zones' curbed expression, including silent protests and prayer. 'These restrictions on freedom of speech could include prohibitions on efforts to influence others when inside a restricted area, even through prayer or silent protests,' the report read. In the wake of the 2024 Southport attack, the report said government officials 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech'. Criticism over the handling of free speech was also directed at the governments of Germany and France. A UK government spokesperson told the BBC: 'Free speech is vital for democracy around the world, including here in the UK and we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe.' Sentiments echoed those previously made by vice president JD Vance. In February, Mr Vance criticised the UK over a legal case in which a former serviceman who silently prayed outside an abortion clinic was convicted of breaching the safe zone around the centre. In a wider attack on what he suggested is a shift away from democratic values across Europe, Mr Vance claimed the 'basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular' are under threat. He referred to the conviction of Adam Smith-Connor, 51, who had denied doing so but was found guilty last year of failing to comply with a public space protection order at the centre in Bournemouth in November 2022. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Mr Vance said that the US' 'very dear friends the United Kingdom' appeared to have seen a 'backslide in conscience rights'. 'A little over two years ago, the British government charged Adam Smith-Connor, a 51-year-old physiotherapist and an Army veteran, with the heinous crime of standing 50 metres from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes, not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own,' he said. The report also said the Government 'effectively' enforced laws around freedom of association and the rights of workers. The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
