logo
Shopify: A High-Growth Leader with a Pricey Valuation

Shopify: A High-Growth Leader with a Pricey Valuation

Yahoo03-03-2025

Over the past few quarters, Shopify's stock has been extremely volatile, with prices swinging sharply. Despite these fluctuations, the company has recently posted impressive gains that reinforce its place in a long-term portfolio. Even though inflation worriesfueled by concerns over tariff policies under the Trump administrationhave rattled the markets, Shopify has shown remarkable resilience. Its recovery from the 2022 selloff has been nothing short of extraordinary, with shares rebounding nearly fourfold from their October 2022 lows. After reporting Q4 results, the stock wavered between gains and losses, despite clear signs of accelerating growth. I find the market's tepid reaction to these earnings perplexing, as Shopify has consistently delivered strong performance during tough economic times, suggesting that its growth potential could be even higher once the broader economy picks up.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with SHOP.
SHOP Data by GuruFocus
While the stock trades at a premiumwhich might appeal to aggressive growth investors due to its ability to capture market share in a rapidly expanding industrythe upside appears limited unless it surpasses the already optimistic consensus estimates. Given these ambitious growth expectations and stretched valuation assumptions, I believe the potential returns don't match my risk appetite. For now, I recommend holding your current position and waiting for a market pullback to build a larger stake, while being cautious not to get overly greedy on Shopify at its current high valuation.
Shopify has long been the go-to platform for SMBs, but it's now making a deliberate push into the enterprise spacea move that significantly diversifies its merchant base. This shift is evident in its growing list of high-profile clients, including Reebok, Overstock, and Barnes & Noble. By bringing in larger, high-revenue businesses, Shopify is reducing its reliance on SMBs, which tend to be more vulnerable during economic downturns. What stands out to me is how this strategy strengthens Shopify's position, as enterprise merchants have the scale to weather market uncertainties like tariffs while also contributing to more stable, long-term revenue.
A key part of this expansion is Shopify Plus, its premium offering designed for larger businesses. With features like custom storefronts, advanced analytics, and dedicated account management, Shopify Plus positions itself as a serious competitor to enterprise platforms like Salesforce Commerce Cloud and Adobe Commerce. On top of that, Shopify continues to expand internationally, which is another key growth driver that shouldn't be overlooked. All of this expands Shopify's TAM and improves revenue stability, as enterprise clients typically offer higher lifetime value and longer commitments. I'll break down how this could drive long-term top-line growth in the sections ahead.
From a top-line perspective, Shopify's growth is being fueled by a few key factors. First, there's the continued expansion of Shopify Payments, which has become an increasingly significant revenue driver. In FY24, Shop Pay penetration hit 62% of GMVup 4 percentage points YoYmeaning nearly two-thirds of transactions on Shopify's platform are processed in-house. This allows the company to capture a greater share of merchant sales and strengthen its payments ecosystem.
[Shopify Investor Relations]
Another major contributor is Shopify's international expansion, which has been outpacing its U.S. growth. International revenue grew 33% YoY last quarter, with EMEA GMV jumping 37%. International markets now make up 30% of Shopify's total revenue, a sharp increase from just a few years ago. What I find particularly compelling is that despite this strong growth, Shopify still has plenty of untapped potential in global markets. This provides a strong hedge against U.S. economic uncertainty while also giving the company room to scale further. I expect this momentum to continue, especially with Shopify rolling out merchant-focused tools like its Managed Markets offering, designed to help sellers expand into new regions.Enterprise Shift Boosting GMV GrowthShopify's push into the enterprise space is another major factor in its growth story. The company has been actively attracting large-scale brands, and FY24 results confirmed this shift is paying off. What excites me about this transition is that enterprise clients generate much higher transaction volumes and are far less sensitive to economic slowdowns than SMBs. This is clearly reflected in Shopify's GMV, with B2B GMV surging 140% YoY. Large merchants not only bring stability but also help Shopify capture new consumers, adding to the now 875 million unique online shoppers on its platform. More importantly, these big players have the resources to absorb tariff-related costs, making Shopify's business model more resilient.
Despite facing some headwinds, Shopify has demonstrated impressive operating leverage. Gross profit growth has outpaced operating expenses, which is exactly what I want to see in a company scaling this quickly. In fact, full-year operating expenses dropped to a record low of 38% of revenue, underscoring Shopify's ability to grow revenue faster than costs. That said, there has been some pressure on gross margins, which fell 340bps YoY to 46.1%, partly due to the growing adoption of Shopify Payments. However, the company has offset this by improving operating efficiency, cutting sales, marketing, and R&D expenses as a percentage of revenue. As a result, Shopify's pro forma operating margins jumped to 17%a solid 4-point improvement YoY.
[Shopify Investor Relations]
This tells me that Shopify is scaling in a way that doesn't come at the expense of profitability. Its 84% revenue growth rate speaks for itself, and as operating margins continue to improve, it's becoming clear that Shopify can sustain high growth while still driving long-term profitability. If it stays on this trajectory, I believe sustaining 25%+ annualized revenue growth is more than achievable.
Another major positive has been Shopify's improved capital allocation following its decision to offload its logistics arm in mid-2023. Initially, the company had tried to compete with Amazon in fulfillment, but this effort ended up weighing on profitability. The divestiture streamlined operations, reducing TTM CapEx and giving Shopify much-needed breathing room on the financial side. The impact on FCF has been dramaticShopify posted its first sustained period of positive FCF since 2022, with FCF jumping 76% YoY to $1.60 billion in FY24, representing an 18% FCF margin (up 5 points YoY).
[Shopify Investor Relations]
Before 2020, Shopify's FCF was negligible, and while it briefly spiked in 2021, inflation, higher interest rates, and aggressive logistics investments dragged it into negative territory in 2022. Now, with FCF margins in the high teens and strong revenue growth, the company is positioned to continue expanding profitability. The key question now is just how much further Shopify can push these margins in the coming years.
There's no denying that Shopify isn't cheap. However, when I factor in its accelerating growth, its positioning within the "Rule of 40" framework (with ~30% revenue growth combined with high-teens pro forma operating margins), and its dominant role in e-commerce software, I think its premium valuation is justified. To properly assess its valuation, we need to compare it to relevant peers operating in similar spaces. Shopify competes directly with platforms like Wix and BigCommerce in online store-building, while also pushing further into enterprise SaaS, where it's up against Salesforce's Commerce Cloud. Amazon is also a relevant comparison, given its sheer scale in e-commerce.
[Alpha Spread]
When stacked up against these peers, Shopify's valuation stands out. The stock currently trades at a P/E of 74.1certainly high, but not unreasonable considering its growth trajectory. For context, Wix trades at an even loftier 116.5x earnings, while Amazon (38.7x) and Salesforce (49.9x) command lower multiples.
[Alpha Spread]
On a sales basis, Shopify's P/S ratio of 16.8 is significantly higher than its peer group average of 7.3x. This signals that investors are pricing in Shopify's ability to outpace its competition in revenue growthsomething it has consistently delivered, with revenue climbing nearly 84% YoY. That being said, valuation will inevitably act as a ceiling on Shopify's upside, which is a challenge facing most high-growth stocks. There's no sugarcoating itShopify is expensive relative to its peers. But what makes it compelling is its rapid revenue expansion and improving profitability. If growth slows, its valuation could face pressure, but for now, I'm comfortable staying long and holding out for more upside.
[Shopify Investor Relations]
Looking ahead, the broader market trends also work in Shopify's favor. The e-commerce SaaS market is projected to surge from $9.4B to $29.82B by 2032 at a CAGR of 15.5%, while the payment SaaS market is expected to grow from $18.4B in 2024 to $43B by 2030 at a similar 15.2% CAGR. Shopify's headless commerce solutions have strategically positioned it to capitalize on these expanding markets. Additionally, e-commerce penetration remains lowjust 2% in Shopify's core geographies and 1% globallyleaving plenty of room for further adoption. Given management's focus on expanding TAM over the years, I believe Shopify is well-positioned to sustain profitable growth.
Shopify's merchant solutions segment remains central to its future expansion. The e-commerce industry itself offers massive tailwinds, and Shopify's strong execution so far gives me confidence in its ability to keep capitalizing on them. While the consistent revenue and EPS growth reinforce this bullish case, the stock's current valuation doesn't necessarily scream "buy" right now. Shopify's long-term potential is undeniable, but I'd prefer to wait for a pullback before adding more exposure. At a more reasonable entry point, it would offer a better risk-reward balance while still allowing investors to benefit from the company's future growth trajectory.
Shopify remains one of my favorite long-term holdings due to its immense growth potential and the strong tailwinds propelling its business forward. However, its valuation has reached a level where only aggressive growth or long-term investors should feel comfortable buying in. For those who are more risk-averse, waiting for a pullback might be the smarter move. That said, Shopify has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to grow into its valuation, and while downside risks exist, the company's long-term outlook remains compelling. Even if the stock were to drop 30%, it would still be trading at around 50x earningsmeaning it's unlikely to ever be considered "cheap." Given this, my approach is to start with a small position at current levels and add more on dips. This way, I can participate in Shopify's upside while managing risk effectively. For investors who, like me, believe in Shopify's continued dominance in e-commerce, a gradual accumulation strategy makes sense. While consensus estimates might not fully capture its long-term potential, Shopify has repeatedly outpaced expectations. As long as it continues executing well, I see meaningful upside ahead.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'
Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Musk's father says Elon made a mistake going nuclear on Trump, predicts prez ‘will prevail'

Tech mogul Elon Musk's father lamented his son's scorched-earth war of words with President Trump as a 'mistake' and warned that the US leader would ultimately prevail in the nasty spat. Errol Musk, who has had a strained relationship with his billionaire son, explained that Elon had been under tremendous stress and was optimistic the two personality giants could patch things up. 'They've been under a lot of stress for five months. And it gives them a break. You know, they've had to get rid of all the opposition, try and put the country back on track, and do normal things and so forth,' Errol told Russian media, per Izvestia. 'They're very tired and stressed. And so you can expect something like this. It's not unusual,' the elder Musk added. 'Trump will prevail. He's the president. He was elected as the president, so Elon made a mistake, I think. But he's tired. He's stressed.' Elon had slowly begun to split with Trump and Republicans publicly last month over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act due to his concerns about its impact on the deficit. 4 Errol Musk seemed optimistic that President Trump and Elon Musk could reconcile. 4 Elon Musk's time as a special government employee ended last month. AFP via Getty Images It started with some swipes during an interview on CBS's 'Sunday Morning Show.' Then, Musk ramped up his attacks on the marquee GOP megabill, ripping it as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' Finally, last Thursday, Musk went nuclear on Trump. The world's richest man argued that without his help, 'Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' At one point, Musk appeared to back impeachment against Trump and then dropped a 'big bomb,' claiming that the president was in the Epstein files, in a since-deleted post. During the epic public feud, Trump threatened to sever lucrative federal contracts with Musk's companies and the tech baron suggested he'd decommission the Dragon spacecraft, the government's main method of getting into orbit, before reversing course. 4 Elon Musk and President Trump had forged a public alliance to trim government waste and bloat. AP Musk's time as a special government employee wrapped up late last month, and Trump gave him a chummy send-off in the Oval Office. Musk had seemingly also grown incensed after the president withdrew his nomination of Jared Isaacman to helm NASA. 'Elon wants to stick to the principles of not giving in to the Democrats [and] their stupid ideas,' Errol added. 'It's normal, it's just a small thing, [it] will be over tomorrow.' Errol was in Moscow to address the Future Forum 2050, an event to promote Russia's development championed by diehard nationalist Alexander Dugin, who is known as 'Vladimir Putin's philosopher.' Trump has publicly downplayed the breakup with Musk, but warned the billionaire that there will be 'consequences' if he starts dipping into his deep pockets to help Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. Elon has expressed openness to working to patch things up with the president and Vice President JD Vance had been optimistic they could bring the tech baron back into the fold. 'No, I don't have any plans,' Trump replied when asked by reporters if he had plans to reconcile with Musk, adding that he's 'not really interested' in such efforts. 'I'm not thinking about Elon. You know, I just wish him well.' 4 Elon Musk went berserk on President Trump last week as tensions boiled over. The president suggested that Musk had 'lost his mind' and gone 'crazy.' Privately, Trump bashed Musk as a 'big-time drug addict,' according to the Washington Post. Musk denies being addicted to drugs. Errol, who has a frosty relationship with his son, has long been a backer of Trump. The South African engineer had briefly been a politician, serving on the Pretoria City Council as an Independent and then later a member of the Progressive Federal Party, which opposed apartheid.

Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo
Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo

The Hill

time37 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's palace coup leaves NASA in limbo

When President-elect Donald Trump nominated Jared Isaacman to become NASA administrator, it seemed like a brilliant choice. Business entrepreneur, private astronaut, Isaacman was just the man to revamp NASA and make it into a catalyst for taking humanity to the moon, Mars and beyond. Isaacman sailed through the confirmation process in the Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), by a vote of 19 to 9. He was poised to be confirmed by the full Senate when something so bizarre happened that it beggars the imagination. The White House suddenly and with no clear reason why, pulled Isaacman's nomination. After months of a confirmation process, NASA was back to square one for getting a new leader. Ars Technica's Eric Berger offered an explanation as to why. 'One mark against Isaacman is that he had recently donated money to Democrats,' he wrote. 'He also indicated opposition to some of the White House's proposed cuts to NASA's science budget.' But these facts were well known even before Trump nominated Isaacman. Trump himself, before he ran for president as a Republican, donated to Democrats and was close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton. Berger goes on to say that a source told the publication that, 'with Musk's exit, his opponents within the administration sought to punish him by killing Isaacman's nomination.' The idea that Isaacman's nomination is being deep-sixed because of Musk runs contrary to the public praise that the president has given the billionaire rocket and electric car entrepreneur. Trump was uncharacteristically terse in his own social media post. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' he wrote. 'I will soon announce a new nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America First in Space. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' CNN reports that Isaacman's ouster was the result of a palace coup, noting that a source said, 'Musk's exit left room for a faction of people in Trump's inner circle, particularly Sergio Gor, the longtime Trump supporter and director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, to advocate for installing a different nominee.' The motive seems to be discontent about the outsized influence that Musk has had on the White House and a desire to take him down a peg or two. Isaacman was profoundly gracious, stating in part, 'I am incredibly grateful to President Trump @POTUS, the Senate and all those who supported me throughout this journey. The past six months have been enlightening and, honestly, a bit thrilling. I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry.' The idea that a man like Isaacman, well respected by the aerospace community, who was predicted to sail through a confirmation vote in the full Senate, could be taken down by an obscure bureaucrat in White House intrigue, motivated by petty spite, is mind boggling. Even Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who has not been fond of Trump's space policy, was appalled. He posted on his X account that Isaacman 'ran into the kind of politics that is damaging our country.' 'Republicans and Democrats supported him as the right guy at the right time for the top job at NASA, but it wasn't enough.' NASA is in for months more of turmoil and uncertainty as the nomination process gets reset and starts grinding its way through the Senate. The draconian, truncated budget proposal is certainly not helpful, either. Congress, which had been supportive of Trump's space policy, is not likely to be pleased by the president's high-handed shivving of his own nominee. Whoever Trump chooses to replace Isaacman as NASA administrator nominee, no matter how qualified, should face some very direct questioning. Trump's NASA budget proposal should be dead on arrival, which, considering the cuts in science and technology, is not necessarily a bad thing. China must be looking at the spectacle of NASA being mired in political wrangling, a leadership vacuum and budget uncertainty with glee. Beijing has its own space ambitions, with a planned crewed lunar landing by 2030. It's possible that the Chinese will steal a march on NASA, with all the damage that will do to America's standing in the world. It didn't have to be this way. Isaacman could be settling in as NASA administrator, deploying his business acumen and vision to lead the space agency to its greatest achievements. Instead, America's space effort has received a self-inflicted blow from which it will be long in recovering, Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.
American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.

Politico

time42 minutes ago

  • Politico

American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.

Donald Trump has repeatedly slammed Joe Biden's use of an autopen during his presidency, going so far as to center its usage in a broad investigation Trump announced Wednesday into his predecessor. But politicians on both sides of the aisle are deeply familiar with the tool. The autopen — also referred to as the robot pen — replicates an individual's signature using a writing utensil, rather than a scanned and printed version of it. The tool, which resembles a small printer with a long arm that allows users to attach a pen to the center, has a long history of use in American politics. The device was first patented in 1803, according to the Shapell Manuscript Foundation, an independent research organization that collects original manuscripts and historical documents. Iterations of the autopen have been used by presidents as far back as Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that 'I could not, now therefore, live without' the device he used to duplicate letters. 'The Autopen has long been a tool for the world's most influential leaders, allowing them to more effectively apply their time and attention to important issues without compromising the impact of personalized correspondence,' according to The Autopen Co., which sells the machines. U.S. leaders on both sides of the aisle have used the autopen for decades — and have faced criticism for their use of the tool. During Lyndon Johnson's administration, the autopen was featured in The National Enquirer for an article headlined 'One of the Best Kept Secrets in Washington: The Robot That Sits In For The President.' Even Trump himself has said he used autopens, but 'only for very unimportant papers.' 'We may use it, as an example, to send some young person a letter because it's nice,' Trump said in March, according to The Associated Press. 'You know, we get thousands and thousands of letters, letters of support for young people, from people that aren't feeling well, etcetera. But to sign pardons and all of the things that he signed with an autopen is disgraceful.' In 2004, George W. Bush's secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, faced criticism from some veterans for using an autopen to sign condolence letters to families of troops killed in the Iraq War. In 2011, Barack Obama used an autopen to sign a Patriot Act extension — becoming the first known, apparent use of the tool by a president for legislation — and used it subsequently in his administration. The move resulted in Republicans questioning the constitutionality of Obama's decision, though Bush's Office of Legal Counsel, which is part of the Department of Justice, had already concluded the use of autopens was constitutional. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law,' the office's 2005 ruling stated. 'Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' There is no specific law governing a president's use of an autopen. But the ruling from the Department of Justice hasn't stopped Trump from accusing Biden and his team of illegally using the tool, alleging that Biden's team used an autopen to sign documents without Biden's permission or knowledge. Trump has also claimed that Biden's round of pardons — including 'preemptive pardons' of Jan. 6 investigators, his son Hunter Biden and Anthony Fauci — were illegal and are 'void' and 'vacant.' However, most legal scholars are in agreement that pardons cannot be overturned once granted. In 1869, a federal court ruled, 'The law undoubtedly is, that when a pardon is complete, there is no power to revoke it, any more than there is power to revoke any other completed act.' Biden has denied the claims that any decision was ever made or issued in his name without his approval or knowledge. Trump and other Republican accusers have provided no evidence that aides used an autopen without the former president's approval. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency,' Biden told POLITICO in a statement. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false. This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store