logo
Daylight Debate: The final year to 'spring forward?'

Daylight Debate: The final year to 'spring forward?'

Yahoo08-03-2025
SPRINGFIELD, MO – This Sunday, we'll partake in our annual ritual of 'springing forward' by moving our clocks ahead by one hour. It'll mark the start of Daylight Saving Time, which results in a time shift that brings an extra hour of sunlight in the evenings. Fans of those later sunsets may want to soak up as much as they can, considering the growing debate over eliminating the annual time change.
Daylight Saving Time (which we equate with the spring, summer, and early fall months) is in effect between the second Sunday of March, and the first Sunday of November. The other portion of the year falls under standard time.
Standard time, with its fewer hours of evening daylight, is the 'real' format of time. Meanwhile, Daylight Saving Time is an artificial shift created to provide more sunlight in the evening hours. In recent years, opponents of the time change have been calling for the return to a standard format year round.
WHY DID WE START CHANGING OUR CLOCKS?
Many people mistakenly believe the practice was started as a way to give farmers more daylight to work in their fields. And while farmers may have benefitted from the extra light, the idea to change the clocks came about as a way to conserve energy. The thought was, having an extra hour of daylight in the early evenings would be one hour less that Americans would be turning on their lights and using electricity.
According to the U.S. Department of Defense, a form of Daylight Saving Time was first used in 1918 during World War 1 when resources were in higher demand. The coal and other fuel saved by not generating electricity across the nation during that hour would, in theory, leave more for factories cranking out materials for the war, and for ships and tanks involved with the defense efforts. A secondary benefit would be Americans having an extra hour of light to work or enjoy recreational activities.
Americans returned to standard time after the first World War, but in 1942 it made a temporary comeback for the same reason, to conserve fuel. During this second era, the time shift was called 'War Time.'
In 1966, Congress passed the Uniform Time Act, which created the daylight saving time cycle, and the twice-yearly clock change schedule we're accustomed to today.
In 1973, during an energy crisis, Congress passed a law making Daylight Saving Time permanent. However, due to unpopularity with the public, that change was repealed and we went back to the two-cycle format.
The concerns related to wartime resources and energy conservation faded away, but Daylight Saving Time remained a way of life thanks to Americans coming to enjoy the later daylight afforded.
WHY IS DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME SO CONTROVERSIAL?
While Daylight Saving Time has now been in effect for nearly 50 years, the debate over its benefits and drawbacks has continued. Many Americans have come to enjoy longer, sunny evenings in the warmer months to enjoy activities outdoors. However, some health advocates say the process isn't good for our bodies.
Many doctors say standard time matches how our bodies are wired. And while many people enjoy the later light in the evenings that comes with Daylight Saving Time, the practice can affect our natural cycles.
Some studies say the risk of heart attacks and strokes, sleep disturbances, and certain mood disorders increase when the clocks change. There is also evidence suggesting that accidents, such as car crashes, increase in the days following time changes.
Aside from the health effects, some Americans say Daylight Saving Time and the accompanying clock change is inconvenient. That's because we lose an hour of sleep on the one night our clocks jump ahead (though we gain an hour on the night in November we set them back). For many years, some Americans complained about having to go through the process of physically changing their clocks. But, those issues have largely become a thing of the past with most of our digital devices updating automatically.
Those in support of Daylight Saving Time point to several benefits, namely having more hours of evening sunlight to get work done or enjoy through recreational activities.
While some health studies point out supposed drawbacks of Daylight Saving Time, there is other evidence suggesting the opposite. For instance, many doctors say the later sunlight, and the ability to take advantage of it for recreation or other outdoor activities, helps improve mood and mental disorders.
There could also be safety benefits to later light. On one hand, some experts say the spring change leads to more car accidents due to people's lack of focus as their bodies adjust. However, there is also data showing the majority of car accidents, overall, take place in the darkness. That leads some people to ask the question, would having an extra hour of darkness each day year-round lead to more crashes?
ATTEMPTS TO DO AWAY WITH THE TIME CHANGE
Many of the perceived drawbacks to the time change have to do with the adjustment period experienced on and around the day the switch takes place. With that, a lot of people are all for keeping a set schedule for all twelve months. But then the debate becomes, do we make Daylight Savings or Daylight Standard the permanent format?
There have been several attempts to make Daylight Saving Time the year-round standard.
In 2021, Florida Senator Marco Rubio introduced the Sunshine Protection Act. That bill failed to gain traction and never made it out of Congress.
Two other versions of the Sunshine Protection Act were introduced in Congress during the 2023-2024 session. But, those failed as well. A similar bill has been introduced for the 2025-2026 session, but it hasn't made any progress.
Then there is President Trump, who is *for making Standard time– earlier nightfall- the permanent way going forward. He posted on Truth Social back in December…
'The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn't!' he wrote. 'Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation.'
Considering the speed at which the President has been fulfilling promises and making changes since he returned to office, many Americans wondered if this would be the last year we spring forward. However, on Thursday, Trump announced he would not seek to change the current schedule.
He stated, 'It's a 50/50 issue, and if something is a 50/50 issue, it's hard to get excited about it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I assume people would like to have more light later, but some people want to have more light earlier because they don't want to take their kids to school in the dark.'
Meanwhile, lawmakers in several states, including Missouri, have introduced bills to keep standard time year round.
So, for now, the great debate over sunlight will continue.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin's failed experiment to lure anti-woke Americans to Russia
Putin's failed experiment to lure anti-woke Americans to Russia

Boston Globe

time3 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Putin's failed experiment to lure anti-woke Americans to Russia

'He feels like he's been thrown to the wolves right now,' DeAnna Huffman told her YouTube followers two months ago. Her husband is serving in a foreigners unit with Russian officers. 'He's not getting any training,' DeAnna Huffman said, because her husband doesn't speak Russian. Advertisement 'He's needing money,' she said, adding that he had to give the unit 10,000 rubles ($125) for supplies. The Huffmans have been living in what Russian media Advertisement Another American, Chantelle Hare, explained why her family moved to Russia from Texas in The trickle of American emigres calls to mind the larger migration during the 1930s, when hundreds of Americans traveled to the then-young Soviet Union, either to find work or to escape virulent racism in the United States. While there is no reliable, comprehensive account of how those emigrants fared in the self-styed 'workers' paradise,' Many Americans found work in the USSR's explosive factory boom of the early Advertisement Still others, disenchanted, tried to return to the United States, with mixed results. When I posted a query on a Facebook site for former Moscow diplomats earlier this week, a retired consular officer answered: 'I was in Moscow 1992-94 and saw a half-dozen of these American citizens come into the consular section to reclaim their citizenship. They were an interesting group. One older gentleman I remember had been living in a town in the Urals and still had a Chicago accent, although he struggled with getting English words out.' The Depression-era US-to-USSR emigres inspired few imitators. It seems hard to believe that history won't repeat itself with the Huffmans, the Hares, and their disaffected compatriots. The Russians have a saying, 'Khorosho tam, gde as nye,' meaning: 'Things are great, where we are not.' The grass is always greener, until you are standing on the lawn in question. Alex Beam's column appears regularly in the Globe. Follow him

From the importance of Pride to a lack of ambulance coverage, readers share their thoughts
From the importance of Pride to a lack of ambulance coverage, readers share their thoughts

Boston Globe

time3 days ago

  • Boston Globe

From the importance of Pride to a lack of ambulance coverage, readers share their thoughts

Townsend This was a very sad story with a truly beautiful ending. I am so sorry for the loss of A.J.'s partner Scott. Grieving for a loved one is hard enough without having to do it in the closet. Thank you to A.J. for sharing this very personal story about how he was able to claim his true self, found love after loss, and is living a happy and fulfilling life. Advertisement Sharon Gorberg Newton Story of Survival Both my parents were Holocaust survivors ( Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Judy Maider Townsend Thanks for the Globe's focus and article on Janet Applefield, whom my wife and I invited twice to New Bedford, as a guest speaker, a number of years ago. She has a passion par excellence speaking about her subject, the Holocaust, and her experience as a hidden child in Poland, and conveys her very important, inspirational message with insight, savvy, and elan. Ms. Applefield is a national treasure and an invaluable asset we are lucky to have with us. Advertisement Mel Yoken New Bedford This is a wonderful article by Shira Stoll. I am a 76-year-old grandfather of a 5-month-old girl and am very concerned about what the future holds for her. I hope enough people can see how the Nazis came to power and be very concerned about what is going on now and join together to stop it by peaceful means. David Strati Allston Many younger Americans are not aware of the history of the Holocaust, and recent polls show that [20 percent of 18- to 29-year old] Americans believe that it is a myth. Now, more than ever, it's important that we hear the dwindling number of survivors tell their stories. I wish that the author had mentioned Applefield's autobiography, Becoming Janet, which goes into details that the article was only able to touch on. Her remarkable story is well worth the read. Gail Stein Newton Applefield appeared as part of the speaker series at Stonehill College and I felt fortunate to be in that audience. I hope she's able to continue to share her story for years to come. Karen Crowe North Easton Applefield must keep her message front and center, otherwise the Holocaust will suffer the same fate as the 1915-1923 Armenian Genocide, which has painfully and sadly earned a reputation as the 'forgotten genocide.' In fact, Adolf Hitler in 1939 leveraged the short-term memory of world powers, who neglected to hold the Turkish Republic responsible for the premeditated mass murder of 1.5 million Armenians, by declaring upon invading Poland, 'Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?' Advertisement Ara Jeknavorian Chelmsford The story about Janet Applefield was a Top 10. To have this lovely, brave lady in our midst retelling her life story to so many various groups — with her daughter's obvious love and support — is a HUGE gift! [We must] listen to the truth that happened within our lifetime and sincerely hope and pray it does not ever reoccur. I am glad the students at Malden Catholic had this opportunity to hear her; I hope it leaves a lasting impression on them. Anne Holloway Abington Good Reads I have never found an issue of Globe Magazine that I have read in its entirety: one article maybe, check the food section, Miss Conduct, Dinner With Cupid. But I must commend you folks on ALL the main articles, from the Holocaust witness, to 'Why Pride Will Always Matter,' to the fishmonger Connections. Shed a few tears. I look forward to more of this journalism. Patricia Caldwell Cambridge Eagle Eye Great story by Chris Sweeney ( Susan Lyons Taunton There was so much lead-up to the Belfast trial in this article that I expected more about the fall-out from the verdict before the piece moved on to a denouement about the feather expert's career afterward. I suppose the writer could have been trying to leave the reader as stopped in her tracks as the participants in the murder trial were when the verdict came down. Advertisement Diana Moses posted on I knew Roxie Laybourne when I worked at the Smithsonian. Wonderful lady. Wonderful friend. She taught volunteers how to take birds that had died from striking into glass buildings in D.C. and prepare them into study skins [for] museum collections. RichE20180 posted on Buried Treasure What a great story ( bh1214 posted on Incredible story. Someone in the article mentions almost being brought to tears — I was brought to tears. The Greatest Generation was born into the Great Depression and came of age in WWII. When I think of what all these men and women went through and the selfless service they provided and compare it to what's happening today, I cry again. Bxof9 posted on This story is both poignant and heartbreaking. To think one would serve our country and have to hide upon return is painful to read, and I appreciate the writer's diligence in highlighting this young Dutch man while also being truthful about normative antisemitism in the US. [Louis] Gertzberg's trauma and military experience may have informed his choice to change his name as well. Seeking safety is no small thing. JM the JP posted on You do not need to be Jewish to be a mensch. Laurent Stemkens is a blessing for all of us. Advertisement user_3985505 posted on Good Eats I did love your Jeanie Goddard Needham As a lifetime Globe reader, it saddens and frustrates me that every time you publish the 'Best of' sections, it is always mainly Boston, Somerville, and areas around downtown Boston. What about South Shore restaurants? Easton, Sharon, Walpole? What about the Metro West area of Framingham, Natick, Needham, etc.? Your readership is much larger than the areas you frequent. Carol Battista North Easton Despite appeals from readers, the furthest the Globe strays from Boston and Cambridge — at least to the west — is Newton. . . . Woe to those of us who enjoy good food and restaurants and do not live in the city. Please, Globe, pay us some attention out here in the suburban boonies! screendog123 posted on CONTACT US: Write to magazine@ or The Boston Globe Magazine/Comments, 1 Exchange Place, Suite 201, Boston, MA 02109-2132. Comments are subject to editing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store