Opinion: ‘Back to the Future II' — restoring a classical core curriculum to higher education
Though the bill last year was well received by my fellow senators, they felt that the proposed changes required more time and consideration. My bill did not pass committee, though my colleagues strongly encouraged further work on the issue. That process has resulted in this year's SB334.
Much has changed in just a year. For one thing, there has been a major shift in the nation's mood. In November, voters expressed a deep dissatisfaction with the direction of the country, and so, elected an 'agent of change' in the form of President Donald Trump. Part of what drove voters to Trump was a rejection of political correctness and the so-called 'woke' agenda. Caterwauling from the legacy media aside, the majority of Americans support a return to 'common sense' and favor a general change in direction.
Last year, we pointed out that taxpayers have funded a 40-year, left-leaning academic experiment that has left multiple generations of graduates with little or no understanding of the history and intellectual contributions of, for example, ancient Greece and Rome, medieval Europe, the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment. Momentous world developments like the dawning of Christianity, parliamentary democracy and the Industrial Revolution are left unexplored.
Many students graduate with little exposure to the tragedies and lessons of the 20th century, such as the rise and fall of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Students are shielded from the real-world consequences of the Marxism so insidiously infused into today's so-called core curriculum. Pervasive postmodern critical theories have also managed to twist and suppress history and thus rob students of crucial lessons and wisdom of the past.
This alarming deficit of historical perspective is no accident. Neo-Marxist thought has accrued outsized curricular and governing influence on the modern campus, and for the Marxist, historical illiteracy is a feature, not a bug. If you doubt me, let Marx speak for himself. 'In bourgeois society,' he wrote, 'the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past.' (In other words, Marx preferred that we become 'unburdened by what has been.')
SB334 offers the chance for public universities to course correct, restoring a commitment to free thought, free speech and solid citizenship. After decades of leftist dominance on campus, the appetite to revive a classical core liberal arts curriculum that features Western principles of law, liberty and constitutional self-government has grown more acute.
The good news is that this year, far from forcefully imposing a classical curriculum on Utah universities, we are enjoying a willing partnership in reestablishing an appreciation of core Western principles on campus. We are actively working with Utah State University, for one, in developing our first 'Center for Civic Excellence.' We are working to iron out the details of reviving the classical core liberal arts curriculum, and other Utah schools are watching with interest.
To reference some of our working materials with USU, the plan is to replace the existing distribution model of general education. 'Through engagement with foundational primary texts representing 'the best of what has been thought and said,' this general education program will ensure that all graduates, regardless of their major, engage with the big questions, great debates, and enduring ideas that continue to shape our self-understanding, the American experience, and our world.'
The only way to undo the damage done by a directionless core curriculum is to revivify the fundamental philosophical, historical, moral and ethical thinking that forged Western culture and led to our nation's founding. If SB334 passes, graduates will emerge from degree programs with common grounding in the intellectual, artistic, scientific, mathematical and literary traditions that once led us to feel like 'One nation under God.'
We can best serve today's students and prepare them to excel, not with rigid ideologies or narrow skill sets, but by preparing them to think critically, to adapt and grow. Taking the university's core curriculum 'back to the future' through the traditional liberal arts will open students' minds, giving them broad appreciation for the foundational literature, art and philosophy of America's birth and the blossoming of Western culture and thought.
I believe more strongly than ever that, to maintain its relevance, the university must resume its key role in the generational transfer of the intellectual foundations of American and Western civilization. Yes, graduates must be equipped to meet our future workforce needs, but more importantly, they must be prepared to lead our families, communities and our constitutional republic.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
6 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Israel-Hamas war roils Somerville mayoral race
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Alain Jehlen Advertisement Somerville Outrage against Israel makes Jews a target Shira Schoenberg is right but too lenient in her op-ed 'Could Somerville mayoral hopeful Willie Burnley fairly represent Zionist constituents?' Willie Burnley Jr. can't represent Somerville Zionists. He can't represent Jews; and in being bad for Jews, he's bad for Americans. Oct. 7, 2023, gave license to target Jews in ways that, if aimed at other minorities, would spark outrage. Once such actions are normalized against Jews, they become normalized against any group the mob targets. Jew hate was primed to erupt. Advertisement No other minority faces such mob punishment. Not the Chinese for Communist Party terror against Tibetans, Uyghurs, or Hong Kong; Arabs for horrors in Iraq or Syria; or Muslims for jihadist massacres in Africa. Only Jews. In doing so, radicals target all Americans who hold to the proposition that all are created equal and, out of many, one. In siding with them, Burnley and others don't just endanger Jews; they also threaten those principles and Americans who live by them. Steve Spear Brookline Still waiting to hear a certain condemnation from Burnley Shira Schoenberg's otherwise excellent op-ed about Willie Burnley Jr.'s campaign for mayor of Somerville noted that Burnley has been compared with New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. The comparison is faulty and unfair. Mamdani Burnley has failed to make any such statements, to my knowledge. In fact, on Aug. 7, I saw him at a 'Somerville for Palestine' rally and press conference in front of City Hall, where I politely asked him, 'How would you characterize what Hamas did on Oct. 7, 2023?' He looked at me and then, instead of answering, simply walked away. Ken Brociner Somerville Divestment would make Somerville more welcoming, not less As a Jewish resident of Massachusetts who has donated to Zohran Mamdani and canvassed for Willie Burnley Jr., I felt misrepresented when I read the phrase 'Both are raising fears among many Jewish, Zionist constituents' in Shira Schoenberg's Aug. 11 op-ed. This narrative implies that Jewish and Zionist are two identities that overlap, which couldn't be further from the truth and dangerously casts the Jewish community as universally supportive of Israel's actions. Advertisement Mamdani, rather than being a bogeyman in the Jewish community, is the leading candidate within it with a To hold that it is antisemitic to say that Somerville should not be investing in companies involved in war crimes is as ridiculous as saying that the divestment movement over South African apartheid in the 1980s promoted hatred against white people. Making Somerville a welcoming place doesn't mean avoiding these questions so as not to offend anyone; it means upholding our values of equality and human rights by divesting from entities involved with human rights violations and Israel's racist policies. Sam Levine Lexington At least the candidate is transparent Somerville mayoral candidate Willie Burnley Jr. has dealt with voters fairly by making his views about Israel clear. Voters can take these views into account. All politicians should be so transparent. Felicia Nimue Ackerman Providence

8 minutes ago
A look at Texas' redistricting walkout and California's response, by the numbers
A walkout by Democratic legislators in Texas has ended and Republicans arranged to push a plan for redrawing the state's congressional districts through the GOP-controlled Legislature and give President Donald Trump a better political landscape. Democrats' boycott of daily sessions kept the House from passing a new map because the state constitution requires 100 of the chamber's 150 members to be present to do business. Democrats hold 62 seats. A national, partisan brawl over redistricting has now started to shift to California, where Democrats are hoping to impose a new map that offsets any advantage Trump and his fellow Republicans might gain in Texas. Here's a breakdown by the numbers. Texas is the nation's second most-populous state and has 38 congressional seats. Republicans hold 25 of them but are hoping to boost that number to 30. Their goal is to make it easier for the GOP to hold on to its slim U.S. House majority in the 2026 midterm elections, so that Democrats have little ability to thwart Trump's agenda and can't initiate investigations of his administration. Democrats hold 43 of 52 congressional seats in California, the nation's most populous state. At Gov. Gavin Newsom's urging, they've drafted a proposal to increase the number to 48. However, the current map was drawn by an independent commission created though a voter-approved ballot initiative in 2008. To avoid legal challenges, Democrats want to put their proposal on the ballot in a special election in November. Redistricting usually happens after the once-a-decade population count by the U.S. Census Bureau and sometimes in response to a court ruling. Changes are required to keep a state's congressional districts equal in population after people move into or out of an area. Trump is pushing for a rare mid-decade redistricting in Texas, and Republicans are also considering it in other states including Missouri, Florida and Indiana. Republicans currently hold 219 seats in the U.S. House, seven more than the 212 held by Democrats. Four of the chamber's 435 seats are vacant, three of them previously held by Democrats. Midterm elections most often go against the president's party. In 2018, during Trump's first term, Democrats had a net gain of 41 seats to capture the House majority. Most House Democrats left Texas on Aug. 3 and stayed outside the state for 15 days. They fled to blue states like Illinois, California and Massachusetts to stay out of the reach of the Texas law enforcement officers trying to bring them back. Many of the same lawmakers also walked out in 2021 for 38 days to protest GOP proposals for new voting restrictions. Once they returned, Republicans passed them into law. The Democrats who bolted for other states and returned now have an around-the-clock escort from Texas Department of Public Safety officers to make sure they return to the Capitol, House Speaker Dustin Burrows' office said. Burrows' office did not provide more details, calling it an ongoing law enforcement operation. Plainclothes officers escorted them from the chamber after Monday's session.

8 minutes ago
Judge issues injunction preventing Trump's FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge has issued an injunction preventing the Trump administration's Federal Trade Commission from investigating Media Matters for America, the liberal media watchdog group that had alleged the spread of hate speech on X since Elon Musk acquired the social media platform. U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled Friday that the FTC's probe of Media Matters, 'purportedly to investigate an advertiser boycott concerning social media platforms,' represents a clear violation of the group's freedom of speech. 'It should alarm all Americans when the government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,' Sooknanan wrote. Even before the FTC got involved, Media Matters has been defending itself against a lawsuit by Musk following the organization's November 2023 story that, following Musk's purchase of the social media site once known as Twitter, antisemitic posts and other offensive content were appearing next to advertisements there. Sooknanan said the injunction halting any FTC probe was merited because Media Matters is likely to succeed on its claim that the FTC is being used to retaliate against it for a critical article on a Trump supporter. 'The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration,' said Angelo Carusone, chairman and president of Media Matters.