Trump says US could hit Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'
Trump issued the warning in a social media post on Monday evening after Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News that Tehran cannot give up its nuclear enrichment programme, even though it was damaged in US bombings last month.
"It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously, we cannot give up on enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," Araghchi said.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump referenced Araghchi's comments about the nuclear sites being severely damaged and said: "Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary!"
The US strikes on 22 June hit three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — during Israel's 12-day conflict with Iran.
Days after a US-brokered ceasefire was announced, Trump claimed that Washington's strikes had "completely and fully obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites.
However, Trump's claim was called into question when a subsequent US intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear programme had only been set back a few months.
The White House firmly pushed back on the assessment, calling it "flat-out wrong".
Trump's social media post followed an announcement by Iran on Monday that it would hold renewed talks on Friday with European nations over its nuclear programme.
The meeting in Istanbul will be the first since the Israel-Iran ceasefire was reached late last month, and follows similar discussions in the Turkish city in May.
The talks will bring Iranian officials together with counterparts from the UK, France and Germany — known as the E3 nations — and the European Union's foreign policy chief.
"The topic of the talks is clear, lifting sanctions and issues related to the peaceful nuclear program of Iran," Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said on Monday.
Under a 2015 deal designed to limit Iran's nuclear activities, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Tehran agreed to tough restrictions on its nuclear programme in exchange for an easing of international sanctions.
The deal began to unravel in 2018, when the US pulled out and started to reintroduce certain sanctions.
European nations have recently threatened to trigger the 2015 deal's "snapback" mechanism, which would allow sanctions to be reimposed in the case of non-compliance by Tehran.
Iran has gradually increased its nuclear activities, including enriching uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog.
Tehran denies allegations that it is seeking a nuclear weapon and has long said its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran and E3 nations to resume nuclear talks after Istanbul meeting
Talks between Iran and the UK, France and Germany, known collectively as the E3 countries, concluded in Istanbul on Friday with both sides agreeing to continue discussions aimed at breaking the deadlock over Tehran's nuclear programme. The four-hour meeting, held at the Iranian Consulate, marked the first formal engagement since the 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel in June, which included US airstrikes on nuclear-linked sites. Discussions focused on the possible reimposition of international sanctions lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal, which limited Iran's enrichment activities in exchange for relief from punitive measures. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who led the Iranian delegation alongside Majid Takht-e Ravanchi, described the exchange as "serious, frank and detailed," noting that both sides came with "specific ideas" and had agreed to further consultations. The E3 have warned that without visible progress, sanctions could be restored under the UN's "snapback mechanism", a clause in the 2015 agreement allowing the automatic return of sanctions if Iran breaches the deal's terms. A European diplomat, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the negotiations, said the E3 had offered Tehran a temporary delay in triggering the mechanism, on condition that Tehran re-engage diplomatically, cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and address concerns over its rapidly growing stockpile of highly enriched uranium. "The snapback remains on the table," the diplomat said. Iran, however, insists that its enrichment activities are within its legal rights. Gharibabadi reiterated on social media that Tehran's nuclear efforts must be respected, adding that the talks should not serve as a "platform for hidden agendas such as military action." He also stated that Iran's involvement in the diplomatic process depends on "rebuilding trust," particularly in light of the US withdrawal from the 2015 accord under former President Donald Trump. "Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States," Gharibabadi wrote. In May, the IAEA reported that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% purity had surpassed 400 kilograms, close to weapons-grade level. Since then, Tehran has suspended cooperation with the agency. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, speaking in Singapore on Friday, warned that inspectors must be allowed to return soon. "This is an international obligation of Iran," he said, urging movement "from words to reality." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, speaking to Al Jazeera earlier this week, maintained that the country remains committed to international law and does not intend to pursue nuclear weapons. The talks in Istanbul come amid rising tensions in the region. Last month, Israeli and US military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites prompted retaliatory attacks on Israel and a US base in Qatar.
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
US criticizes French inquiry into social media platform X
US officials issued a harsh condemnation Friday, July 25, of France's criminal investigation into the social network X, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, on suspicion of foreign interference. "As part of a criminal investigation, an activist French prosecutor is requesting information on X's proprietary algorithm and has classified X as an 'organized crime group,'" the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor wrote on their X account. "Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike. The United States will defend the free speech of all Americans against acts of foreign censorship." Paris cybercrime prosecutors called for the police probe July 11 to investigate suspected crimes – including manipulating and extracting data from automated systems "as part of a criminal gang." The social media company last week denied the allegations, calling them "politically motivated." X also said it had refused to comply with the prosecutor's request to access its recommendation algorithm and real-time data. The investigation follows two January complaints that alleged the X algorithm had been used for foreign interference in French politics. One of the complaints came from Eric Bothorel, an MP from President Emmanuel Macron's centrist party, who complained of "reduced diversity of voices and options" and Musk's "personal interventions" in the platform's management since he took it over. X said it "categorically denies" all allegations and that the probe "is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech." Tesla and SpaceX chief Musk has raised hackles with his forays into European politics, including vocal backing for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ahead of February legislative elections. "Democracy is too fragile to let digital platform owners tell us what to think, who to vote for or even who to hate," Bothorel said after the investigation was announced.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
'European citizens under US sanctions are being erased economically and socially within the EU'
In recent months, the US has added several judges and International Criminal Court prosecutors to the list of "Specially Designated Nationals" maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which is responsible for enforcing US international financial sanctions. On July 9, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, joined them on the list. The individuals listed have had their assets frozen in the US, and American nationals and companies are prohibited from doing business with them. Neither criminals nor fugitives, but rather respected professionals in international law who have been sanctioned – not for wrongdoing, but for carrying out their duties, in ways that are clearly displeasing to Washington. This development is not just a diplomatic affront; it is an alarming signal. A small but growing number of European citizens – who are innocent under all legal standards of the European Union (EU) – also appear on the OFAC list. They are not under investigation in their own countries. No court has convicted them. And yet, they and their families have been treated as pariahs. Not only in the US, but – more seriously still – in their own countries, within the EU itself. These individuals have become Europe's living dead: legally alive, but erased economically and socially. They are victims of a kind of "civil death" penalty. Their inclusion on the OFAC list, often for opaque or arbitrary reasons, triggers a cascade of consequences far beyond American borders. It is in Europe that banks close their accounts; that IT companies cut off access to email, software, and cloud services; that delivery companies refuse to drop packages at their door. Families have been ruined. Careers destroyed. However, it is perhaps understandable that people subject to OFAC sanctions should be restricted in their travel to, or trade with, the US. After all, it is the prerogative of the US government to exercise sovereignty on its own territory. It is unacceptable, however, that European citizens – some of them above any suspicion in the eyes of their own authorities – lose everything at home due to excessive caution on the part of European companies. These businesses blindly enforce US sanctions. Two trends explain the phenomenon.
