
Cambodian soldier killed in clash with Thai army – DW – 05/28/2025
A Cambodian soldier was killed during clashes with the Thai army along a disputed stretch of border, Cambodia's military said on Wednesday.
"One of our soldiers died during the fight, and there were some injuries, but we don't have detailed figures yet," said Cambodian Royal Army spokesperson Mao Phalla.
Clashes lasted 10 minutes
Phalla confirmed "there were clashes," but said Thai soldiers had attacked Cambodian troops who had been on a routine border patrol in the northern Preah Vihear province, which borders Ubon Ratchathani on the Thai side.
"Our soldier died in the trenches. The Thais came to attack us," he alleged.
Thailand's Royal Army at the same time said the clash took place after Cambodian soldiers began firing first.
The Thai army said in a statement that its soldiers fired back in response to fire from Cambodia's border force.
This, it said, led to an exchange lasting around 10 minutes before the Cambodians requested a ceasefire, according to the Thai army statement.
Thai Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said the situation has been resolved and that both sides did not intend to open fire at each other.
Historical border dispute
The neighbors have had a longstanding dispute over their border — spanning more than 800 kilometres (500 miles) — primarily established during the French occupation of Indochina.
In 2008, bloody military clashes erupted over the site of an ancient Khmer temple in Preah Vihear situated near the border.
The International Court of Justice previously ruled in 1962 that the disputed area belonged to Cambodia.
Edited by: Zac Crellin
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Displaced Cambodians Return Home After Thailand Truce
As Cambodia and Thailand's ceasefire held Tuesday, Lat Laem hared back home -- one of the first evacuees to return to the frontier since deadly cross-border clashes sent more than 300,000 people fleeing. The territorial conflict, which ignited into open combat on Thursday, stems from an obscure cartographical dispute dating back decades, and the truce was sealed after interventions from world leaders including US President Donald Trump. Back in his Cambodian village of Kouk Khpos -- about 10 kilometres (six miles) from the Thai border -- 30-year-old farmer Lat Laem is grateful for his homecoming, and more quotidian concerns. "I feel happy to be back to my newly built home so I can clean the floor," he told AFP, after a two-hour trip trailing his family home on a tractor through shuttered villages and empty streets. Lat Laem said he was working in his rice field when the first blasts broke out, heralding the start of fighting that was waged with artillery, rockets, jets and ground troops. At least 43 people have been killed on both sides in the deadliest clashes in years over a scattering of ancient contested temples on Thailand and Cambodia's 800-kilometre border. The truce came into effect at midnight on Monday, and while Thailand accused Cambodia of violating the pact with skirmishes, peace has generally prevailed. When the strikes started raining down around his home, Lat Laem says he took refuge in his brother's bunker -- built because border residents are accustomed to sporadic strife. He was initially reluctant to abandon his simple white home, so recently constructed that he has yet to hold a house-warming. When the drumbeat of blasts became too much to bear, he fled -- joining around 140,000 others in Cambodia, and 180,000 more in Thailand who were forced to quit their homes. He left with his wife and daughter, his sister-in-law and her children on a tractor-drawn wagon known locally as an "iron cow" -- piled with a few scant belongings including cooking gear and a fan -- and headed to a shelter 50 kilometres away. While they were gone the border was scarred by destruction, as both sides traded fire and allegations about the use of cluster bombs, the targeting of civilian homes and even of hospitals. Evacuated far from his prized property, Lat Laem was consumed by anxiety it would be claimed by the conflict. "I was worried that my house that I spent all that money to build might be damaged -- that would upset me," said Lat Laem. "I could not sleep." But pacing the perimeter of his own patch of land back near the contested frontier he confirms it is free of shrapnel scars -- totally undamaged by the turmoil. "It was not hit, it is intact," he marvelled. "Now I am happy that it is all good." Lat Laem said he was working in his rice field when the first blasts broke out, heralding the start of fighting AFP


Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
French Health Experts Speak Out Against Bee-killing Pesticide
French health experts and patient associations on Tuesday urged authorities to protect the public from a bee-killing pesticide, saying the chemical could also harm children and adults. The legislation to reintroduce in France acetamiprid, a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems but popular with many farmers in Europe, was adopted on July 8, but without a proper debate to bypass gridlock in a divided parliament. The move sparked anger in France, and support for a student-initiated petition against the legislation has snowballed, with university lecturers, left-wing lawmakers and star chefs backing it. The petition had garnered more than 2 million signatures by Tuesday. Health experts and patient associations have now weighed in, saying in an open letter in French daily Le Monde that they cannot back "a law that is dangerous to the health of our fellow citizens". President Emmanuel Macron, who has been under increasing pressure to act, said he is waiting to hear the verdict of the Constitutional Council, which is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the law on August 7. The health experts and patient associations urged the Constitutional Council to reject the legislation, calling on its members to "respond to the democratic demand strongly expressed by French citizens". The signatories included Agnes Linglart, president of the French Paediatric Society, Olivier Coutard, president of the scientific council of France's flagship scientific research centre CNRS and Gerard Socie, president of the scientific council of the National Cancer Institute. The Constitutional Council, the letter said, must protect future generations from the legislation that "without a shadow of reasonable doubt compromises the health of young people, children and the unborn". The letter said the Senate committee preparing the bill heard from agricultural unions and government agencies but not "doctors, toxicologists or epidemiologists". The senators did not consult representatives of the CNRS, health and labour ministries, even though occupational exposure to pesticides is a risk factor for humans, the letter said. Citing the INSERM health and medical research organisation, the letter pointed to evidence of a link between exposure to pesticides and the occurrence of cancers, neurodegenerative, pulmonary and hormone-related disorders. Banned in France since 2018, the chemical remains legal in the European Union.


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Will the Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire hold? – DW – 07/29/2025
Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to an unconditional ceasefire after five days of deadly clashes — but questions remain over whether the truce will hold. A ceasefire agreed on Monday between Thailand and Cambodia was met with cautious optimism after five days of fighting over disputed borders that killed at least 35 soldiers and civilians and displaced around 200,000 people on both sides. The leaders of Thailand and Cambodia shook hands on the "immediate and unconditional" truce on Monday, which took effect at midnight after a mediation meeting in Malaysia — the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), of which both countries are members. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim called the ceasefire deal "a vital first step toward de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security" at a press conference announcing the truce. However, just hours after the ceasefire came into effect, the Thai army reported violations by Cambodian forces in multiple areas — claims that were dismissed by Cambodia's Defense Ministry, which said the truce was holding. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While sporadic small-arms fire may persist, Zachary Abuza, a professor at the National War College in Washington, said the ceasefire may largely hold, as both sides have achieved most of their objectives. "On the Thai side, the military and royalist elites used the conflict adroitly to politically weaken the Thaksins," Abuza said, referring to former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his daughter Paetongtarn. Paetongtarn Shinawatra — the third member of her family to serve as prime minister, after her aunt Yingluck — was recently suspended by Thailand's Constitutional Court pending a probe into a leaked phone call with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen last month, aimed at easing border tensions. During the leaked call, Paetongtarn appeared to criticize an outspoken Thai army commander — considered a red line in a country where the military has significant clout. The Thaksin family has long had a thorny relationship with Thailand's powerful military, which has deposed two Thaksin family administrations since 2006. Abuza pointed out that in Cambodia, the clashes helped further cement the rule of the Hun family, namely former Prime Minister Hun Sen and his eldest son Hun Manet, who succeeded his father in 2023. "Hun Sen and Hun Manet rallied the nation, demonstrated Manet's leadership, and took away an avenue of attack for the largely exiled political opposition," Abuza said. "Continued fighting serves neither side politically." Matthew Wheeler, a senior analyst for the International Crisis Group in Bangkok, said Monday's truce could take hold — as long as both sides "recognize their interests are better served by a ceasefire than further fighting." He said the deal could hit some snags over the details, though, including how exactly to monitor the ceasefire, which has yet to be worked out in full. Malaysia, as ASEAN chair, has offered to coordinate a monitoring team. But Wheeler says neither side is keen to host monitors from other countries. "There was a plan to introduce Indonesian observers under ASEAN auspices after fighting in 2011, but it never happened," he said. Even so, he added, "both militaries have in the past demonstrated a capacity to de-escalate after earlier rounds of fighting." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Until this month's clashes, the Thai-Cambodian border had remained largely peaceful since 2011, when Thai and Cambodian soldiers exchanged fire over a century-old dispute based on territorial claims surrounding the Preah Vihear Temple. "The agreement mentions that Malaysia is ready for a monitoring role, but it does not actually state that Malaysia or any other country will be a monitor," noted Paul Chambers, a visiting fellow at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and regional security analyst. "With no monitoring by a third party, it is difficult for any arranged ceasefire to be adequately enforced." Even so, the analysts say US President Donald Trump deserves some credit for getting Cambodia and Thailand at least this far. Over the weekend, Trump threatened to delay trade talks with both countries over US tariffs unless they agreed to stop fighting, and followed up with phone calls to both their leaders. The United States is the largest export market for both Cambodia and Thailand, which are facing tariff rates of 36% unless they can talk Washington down by Friday. Wheeler says Trump's tariff threats may have especially spurred on Thailand, which had previously turned its back on Malaysia's solo offer to mediate talks with Cambodia. "The current government has struggled to revive Thailand's economy, and its popularity has been sinking, so it needed to give itself every opportunity to avoid the US tariffs," he said. Trump's threats likely factored into both countries' decisions, agreed Harrison Cheng, a director at Control Risks, a Singapore-based consulting firm. "However, they are also likely to have doubts about the extent to which the US would be invested in the border dispute and the implementation of the ceasefire, whereas Malaysia — being in the same geographical region — would be better placed to continue playing a mediating role," he said.