Tribute paid to Professor Khursheed for championing Kashmir cause
He recognised that Professor Khurshid Ahmad's scholarly contributions, with over 70 books authored in Urdu and English and his editorship of esteemed international journals, reflect a lifelong devotion to the advancement of Islamic thought and economic justice. "For over half a century, his life was an embodiment of wisdom, loyalty, eloquence, and steadfastness. His unflinching support for the Kashmir cause and his deep spiritual bond with the late Syed Ali Geelani (RA) will always be remembered with great reverence by the people of Jammu and Kashmir," Bhat added.
In his condolence statement, Altaf Ahmed Bhat described Professor Khurshid Ahmad's demise as an irreplaceable loss to the intellectual, ideological, and freedom-loving circles of the Muslim world.
He hailed him as the true successor of Syed Abul A'la Maududi (RA), a devoted advocate for Kashmir's right to self-determination, and a towering luminary of modern Islamic economics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
31 Arab, Islamic states denounce Netanyahu's ‘Greater Israel' plan
A Palestinian girl surveys the destruction after a strike on the Sheikh Radwan Health Centre in the north of Gaza City. Photo: AFP The foreign ministers of 31 Arab and Islamic countries, along with the secretaries-general of the Arab League, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), have strongly condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's so-called 'Greater Israel' vision. 'These statements represent a grave disregard for, and a blatant and dangerous violation of the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations,' they said in a joint statement. Joint Statement by the Foreign Ministers of 31 Arab and Islamic Countries and the Secretaries-General of the League of Arab States, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the Gulf Cooperation Council The Foreign Ministers of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, the… — State of Palestine - MFA 🇵🇸🇵🇸 (@pmofa) August 15, 2025 'They also constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, to the sovereignty of states, and to regional and international peace and security.' Qatar said it joined 31 Arab and Islamic countries, the Arab League, the OIC and the GCC in condemning Netanyahu's statements. Qatar's Foreign Ministry, in a statement posted on X, said the Israeli PM's comments 'represent a gross disregard and a blatant and dangerous violation of the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations.' 31 Arab, Islamic Countries, Arab League, OIC, GCC Condemn So-called "Greater Israel Vision" 🔗To learn more : — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Qatar (@MofaQatar_EN) August 16, 2025 At least ten Palestinians, including four children, were killed by Israeli strikes early Friday, Al Jazeera reported citing Al-Awda Hospital in Nuseirat reported. The UN Human Rights Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OHCHR) said it has recorded 11 incidents since the beginning of August involving attacks on Palestinians guarding aid convoys or attempting to obtain assistance, resulting in at least 46 deaths. A Palestinian man reacts to the destruction after an Israeli strike on the Sheikh Radwan Health Centre run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in the north of Gaza City on August 6, 2025. Photo: AFP Between May 27 and August 13, OHCHR said at least 1,760 people were killed while trying to obtain aid, including 994 near distribution sites run by the controversial GHF. Palestinians carry a wounded man on a bicycle after Israeli forces attack a crowd gathered to receive aid in northern Gaza. Photo: Anadolu Read: Key Muslim states condemn Israel A woman cries as the bodies of slain Palestinians are brought to al-Shifa Hospital on August 15, 2025. Photo: Anadolu Read more: Pakistan rejects 'Greater Israel' plan Israel's war in Gaza The war, now in its 21st month, has killed more than 61,776 Palestinians and wounded 154,906, according to Gazan health authorities. Most of the victims are reported to be women and children. Last November, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over war crimes and crimes against humanity. Israel is also facing a genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over its conduct in Gaza.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
14th August Independence Day: Evolution of Pakistani national identity
The establishment of Pakistan as an independent state on August 14, 1947 was an event of historical importance. It created a new national identity of PAKISTANI NATION, which did not physically exist before that date. It was the culmination of a long political struggle of the Muslims of British India to protect and advance their civilizational and cultural identity inspired by the principles and teachings of Islam, their political rights and interest in the context of the state system introduced by the British in India. National Identity is one of the many identities that an individual has. These identities could be linguistic, ethnic, religious, political-ideological, regional or family/tribal. All these identities of human beings are not equally important. Further, their importance can vary over time. One identity, i.e., linguistic, may be a basis of political action at one time but it could lose its political relevance if circumstances and conditions. Out of all these human identities, the national identity is given a priority, although other identities continue to exist. It was the Muslim identity or a sense of Muslim Community in British India which transformed into a Muslim national identity and served as the basis for the demand of a separate homeland of Pakistan. This raises three fundamental questions to understand the establishment of Pakistan as an independent nation-state. First, what constituted distinct Muslim identity in British India? Second, how this sense of community turned into the notion of nationhood and it became a symbol of collective Muslim identity and an instrument of political mobilization. Third, what led the Muslims of British India to conclude that their political future could be secure in a separate HOMELAND of Pakistan? The roots of distinct Muslim identity can be traced back to the advent of Islam in India. Its civilizational and cultural roots can be traced to the teachings, principles and history of Islam. It provided a theoretical and ideological foundation to Muslim identity. Other factors that contributed to this identity were the arrival of Muslims in India in three major waves: the Arab Muslim traders who arrived at western coastline of India and settled there; Muslim invasion led by Muhammad bin Qasim; and arrival of Muslims from Central Asia, Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey in the form of voluntary migrations and armed invasions. The Sufis and Saints came to India from these territories and most Sufi traditions can be traced back to Central Asia and Turkey. There is an overlap in art and architecture, food and dress between Indian Muslims and these regions in the north and northwest. The conversions to Islam, especially because of the teachings of the Sufis and Saints, also strengthened the Muslim community. As the migrants from the Arab world and Central Asia, Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey settled down in India, they became part of Indian society. However, despite living with the followers of other religious and cultural traditions, Muslims whose ancestors migrated to India or embraced Islam, maintained their distinct cultural and civilizational identity which distinguished them from other communities. They developed a sense of confidence as a community because of the long years of Muslim rule in India and their contribution to governance, history, art and architecture and cultural patterns of India. The Muslim civilizational and cultural identity began to acquire political relevance in the post-1857 period when the British government embarked on setting up a new state system. The British introduced a new state system based on codified legal and constitutional arrangements, clearly defined role of different government functionaries, the setting up of civil services recruited gradually through open competitive system, establishment of a professional military and a western education system. They also gradually introduced the electoral process for setting up legislative bodies with limited powers. The changed state system created a competition among different communities living in India, especially between the Muslims and the majority Hindu community, for access to the government jobs, elected legislative bodies, and the governance and political management arrangements. Two major political movements in the post-1857 period increased competition between the two major communities. These were the Hindi-Urdu Controversy (1865 onwards) when the Hindu leadership in Banaras initiated a movement for replacement of Urdu with Hindi written in Devanagari script. This movement impacted other areas, building pressures on Muslims. The other development was the revivalist and reformist Hindu religious and cultural movement in the last decade of the 19th Century, although the roots of these movements went back to the earlier period. These movements were often characterized by anti-Muslim attitudes. These changes, within the framework of the new state governance system, increased the prominence of religious and cultural identities in the political sphere and contributed to its use as an instrument of political mobilization. The Muslim elite realized that they could not benefit from the opportunities created by the new state system because Muslims lacked modern education and they faced a disadvantage in the electoral process because of their smaller population. The major concern of the Muslims of British India at the beginning of the 20th Century was how to protect and advance their socio-cultural and civilizational identity, rights and interests. This goal of the Muslim community in British India remained unchanged, but their strategies changed over time in view of their experience of interacting with other communities and British Indian government. The major political strategies of the Muslims in British India included: Acquisition of modern knowledge, learning of English language and avoidance of participation in active politics. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and his colleagues launched a movement for modern western education based in Aligarh. The new educational institutions combined modern western knowledge with Islamic education. The Aligarh educational movement also helped to connect Muslims living in different parts of India, and it advised them not to join the Congress Party which was set up in 1885. By the beginning of the 20th Century, Muslim elite had emerged that was either educated in the Aligarh based educational institutions or educated in England. They were more conscious of the need to protect the identity, rights and interests of the Muslims in British India. In October 1906, a delegation of 35 Muslim led by Sir Agha Khan lll called on the Viceroy in Simla and asked for separate electorate for Muslims to elect their representatives to the elected councils. The British government conceded this demand of SEPARATE ELECTORATE in 1909. December 30, 1906, the Muslim leaders established a political party – All India Muslim League – to articulate Muslims' rights and interests and take them up with the British government. The Muslim League and Muslim leaders demanded constitutional safeguards and guarantees for the protection of their cultural and civilizational identity, rights and interests. The Lucknow Pact (1916) between the Muslim League and the Congress Party accepted constitutional guarantees for Muslim representation in the elected councils, cabinets and government jobs, weightage to religious minorities for representation in elected council. These guarantees were reiterated in Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah's Fourteen Points in his address to the Muslim leaders in 1929. The Muslim League and the Muslim elite demanded a federal system with autonomy for provinces in British India. They hoped that this would enable them to rule Muslim-majority provinces. When the above-mentioned demands did not materialize because of non-cooperative political disposition of the Congress Party, the Muslim leadership concluded that their political future as a distinct socio-cultural and civilizational identity would not be safe in an independent and untied India. They formally demanded a SEPARATE HOMELAND for them in March 1940, although the discussion on this idea started earlier. The change in the political strategy of the Muslims was the product of their political interaction with the majority Hindu community and the British government in India. Though the Congress Party agreed to constitutional guarantees for the Muslims in the Lucknow Pact (1916) it rejected these guarantees in the Nehru Report (1928) which prepared recommendations for the new constitution. Jinnah attempted to seek amendments in the Nehru Report for accommodation of Muslim political concerns, but his efforts did not succeed. He gave a rejoinder to the Nehru Report and outlined Muslim demands in his famous speech in 1929, described as Jinnah's Fourteen Points. The political divergence between the two communities increased in the course of the Roundtable Conferences in London in 1930-32. Though Jinnah and other Muslim League leadership were disappointed by the disposition of the Congress Party, they still hoped that a federal system with constitutional guarantees for the protection and advancement of Muslim identity, rights and interests could be achieved. What alienated the Muslim League leadership from constitutional guarantees and a federal system was their experience under the Congress Provincial Ministries in six provinces (1937-39). The provincial elections under the Government of India Act, 1935 were held in early 1937. The Congress Party formed government alone or in coalition in six provinces out of eleven. These provinces included Bombay, Madras, Central Province, United Province, Bihar and Orissa. Further, in the then NWFP, the Congress supported the KhudaiKhidmatgar government. Muslims had a bitter political experience in the Congress Party ruled six provinces. There were numerous complaints of discrimination against Muslims in recruitment to government jobs and Hindu cultural traditions were enforced in these provinces under the rubric of Indian culture. The school education was inundated with Hindu traditions, imagery and culture in complete disregard to the sensitivities of Muslims and other religious minorities. The Muslim League published three reports that outlined the mistreatment of Muslims and imposition of Hindu historical and cultural norms on them in the Congress-ruled provinces. All this alienated the Muslim elite altogether who believed that the Congress provincial government policies were a sample of how they would be treated under the Congress rule after the exit of the British rulers. When the Congress ministries resigned in October-November 1939, the Muslim League welcomed the development. On December 22, 1939, Muslims observed the 'Day of Deliverance' to celebrate the exit of the Congress party's provincial ministers. It was in 1938 that the Sindh Muslim League convention in Karachi, chaired by Quaid-i-Azam Jinnah, asked the All-India Muslim League to explore a new political option instead of a federal system for India. The speakers in the convention talked of the need of having a separate homeland. The Muslim political elite's political learning from their political interaction with the Congress led them to change their political strategy from federalism to a separate homeland. They learnt from their political experience that they would be overwhelmed politically and culturally by living under the Congress Party rule in an independent India. The Muslim League demand for a separate homeland was based on the argument that the Muslims of British India were a nation with their distinct cultural and civilizational identity shaped by the teachings and principles of Islam, and rights and interests. As a separate nation they needed a separate homeland in the regions where the Muslims constituted a numerical majority. Three sets of major developments shaped the Muslim struggle in the 1940s. First, the demand for a separate homeland was made in the annual session of the Muslim League, held at Lahore on March 22, 23 and 24, 1940. Second, the notion of a separate homeland was precisely defined in the next six years (1940-46) and the ambiguities in the March 1940 Pakistan Resolution were clarified. Third, the idea of a separate homeland was initiated by the Muslim League elite. They took this message to the common Muslims in the subsequent years and mobilized them in favor of a separate homeland of Pakistan. The results of the 1946 provincial elections showed that the demand for the establishment of Pakistan had become a popular Muslim demand which enjoyed the support of the Muslim populace. It was the determination of the Muslim League leaders under the leadership of Quaid-i-Azam Jinnah and the widespread support of the Muslim populace in British India that turned the demand for the establishment of Pakistan into a reality. It was on August 14, 1947, that the transfer of power ceremony for Pakistan was held at Karachi. Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last British Viceroy, represented the British government at the ceremony. However, Pakistan began to function as an independent nation-state on August 15, 1947, with the oath of Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah as the first Governor-General of Pakistan at 9AM in Karachi. This was followed by the oath of Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan and his cabinet, which was administered by Governor General Jinnah. To conclude, we can argue that the cultural and civilizational identity of the Muslims in British India acquired salience over their other identities and its political relevance increased to such an extent that its status got elevated to the level of the national identity of Pakistan. The notion of a separate homeland of Pakistan was initially articulated by the Muslim League leadership but it became a political reality when the Muslim populace embraced it and demonstrated their support through the democratic process of the 1946 provincial elections. The author is a Political Analyst who holds the PhD Degree from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. His latest book entitled 'Pakistan: Political and Constitutional Engineering' published in 2024. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Chehlum, Urs of Data conclude under tightened security
The Chehlum of Imam Hussain (RA) and the concluding ceremonies of the Urs of Data Ali Hajveri, widely known as Data Ganj Bakhsh (RA), were observed across Punjab on Friday under extensive security arrangements. Authorities confirmed that all processions, majalis, and Urs gatherings concluded peacefully, with no major incidents reported. This year, the 20th of Safar in the Islamic calendar coincided with both the Chehlum and the third and final day of the Urs celebrations in Lahore. Over 37,000 police officers and personnel were deployed across the province to ensure security at 644 majalis and 392 mourning processions. In Lahore alone, 44 majalis and 14 processions were held, guarded by over 12,000 officers. DIG Operations Lahore Faisal Kamran personally inspected the route of the main Chehlum procession from Haveli Alf Shah in the inner city. Security forces sealed connecting streets, stationed snipers on rooftops, and monitored routes via real-time CCTV provided by the Punjab Safe Cities Authority. Walk-through gates, 6,753 metal detectors, and 926 checkpoints were set up for screening. Women officers were deployed for women and children, while plainclothes personnel monitored crowds. "Maintaining peace and protecting every citizen is our mission," Kamran said, urging public cooperation during sensitive occasions. Punjab Inspector General of Police Dr Usman Anwar praised the "excellent security arrangements" and commended the CCPO Lahore, DIG Operations, and senior officers for their coordination. He noted that law enforcement agencies had been on high alert for several days, implementing measures against one-wheeling, aerial firing, and other violations during both the religious observances and Independence Day celebrations earlier in the week. Police reported 277 arrests and 249 cases during the crackdown, including 162 arrests for one-wheeling and 13 for aerial firing. Provincial Health Minister Khawaja Salman Rafique, who also chairs the Punjab Cabinet Committee on Law and Order, visited the Home Department's central control room to review live monitoring. He was joined by Acting Chief Secretary Punjab Ahmad Raza Sarwar, Home Secretary Dr. Ahmad Javed Qazi, and other senior officials. Rafique reaffirmed the government's commitment to ensuring peace, protecting lives and property, and guaranteeing complete religious freedom. He said authorities had engaged scholars and community leaders from all sects throughout Muharram to promote unity and harmony. The Acting Chief Secretary added that all relevant departments - including police, Rescue 1122, and traffic authorities - remained on high alert until the safe return of mourners and devotees. The Home Secretary said a zero-tolerance policy was being enforced against sectarian hate speech, with the provincial cyber-patrolling cell monitoring and taking action against violators. Special arrangements were made in Lahore for thousands of devotees attending the Urs. Control rooms at provincial and district levels ensured continuous coordination among security and administrative agencies. Officials credited the joint efforts of Punjab Police, the Home Department, district administrations, and religious leaders for the peaceful conclusion of both events.
