Northampton homeless charity has closed, says council
NAASH is the landlord of several supported accommodation properties and the council said "it cannot influence NAASH's eviction decisions". The council acknowledged that some tenants were vulnerable and said each case was being looked at individually so that "tailored support" could be offered.The authority said NAASH's closure followed a "long period of discussion and negotiation related to housing benefit claimed for tenants' support at the properties". NAASH, which has been supporting homeless people since 2000, does not own its housing and mostly rents rooms in houses of multiple occupation (HMOs). The charity has not confirmed its closure to the BBC.
'Acting proactively'
Charlie Hastie, council cabinet member for housing, said: "We are actively engaging with other providers to ensure there is support available to help residents through this difficult time."We recognise the deep anxiety this situation causes for people with complex health and personal challenges."We as a council have already made a commitment to reduce homelessness and its wider impact, and we are acting proactively to address this."The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which administers housing benefit, previously said it could not comment on the case.It said: "We support over a million people through housing benefit every year, which is managed and administered by local authorities."Local authorities decide if a customer is eligible for the benefit, applying DWP rules to ensure the right support is going to the right place."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Don't call married couple 'husband and wife' in case it offends non-binary people, London council tells staff
Council staff have been advised not to describe married couples as 'husband and wife' - over fears it could offend people who do not identify with a gender. Instead, civil servants at the Royal Borough of Greenwich council in southeast London, have been told to use 'spouse' or 'partner'. They have also been asked to avoid saying 'ladies and gentleman' at public meetings and events, or requesting someone provide their 'Christian name', in an effort to be more inclusive. The woke guidelines are provided in a 45-page booklet obtained by The Sun following a freedom of information request. A foreword in the guide states: 'For some of us, communicating in a more inclusive way is about changing deeply embedded habits.' It adds: 'It's OK to make mistakes. Remember that if you are really sorry and apologise, you cannot keep making the same 'mistake'.' A spokesman for the council told The Times: 'Our inclusive language guide is advisory only, and was designed to encourage staff to reflect on the use of language in the workplace and how it might impact their colleagues. 'We are proud to have a very diverse workforce at Royal Borough of Greenwich, and are committed to making sure that everyone working here feels considered and included. The woke guidelines are provided in a 45-page booklet for employees at the London council 'Feedback we have received suggests the advice in the guide has been very well-received across the organisation.' Earlier this month, Merton Council in south London sent a 27-page inclusive language document round to employees encouraging them to change the words they use in the workplace. The guide, also obtained by The Sun, tells workers to stop using the words 'young', 'old' or 'mature' to describe people, in a clampdown on ageism. Terms such as 'mum and dad' and 'mother and father' are also a no-no and should be swapped out for 'caregivers', according to the document. The Labour-run council says it aims to reduce the chances of staff making assumptions about a child's biological parents. The change in terminology is supposed to 'recognise diverse family formation'. In further semantic reforms, employees will be told to use 'person-centred language' instead of gendered terms, including 'man the desk'. The council's equality and diversity team also said: 'Avoid making assumptions about preferred names or nicknames without asking the individual first.' Hannah Doody, chief executive of Merton Council, said however that the guide was more about 'tips and suggestions' rather than 'banning' the use of certain words. She said: 'I want to be really clear: the council has not banned the use of the term "mum and dad". 'The council produced a guide for staff which contains tips and suggestions on how to communicate with understanding and without making assumptions. These are not policies or instructions. 'We regularly review all our guides and policies, and intend to review this guide to ensure it cannot be further misunderstood or misrepresented.' Wokingham Council in Berkshire also came under the spotlight earlier this year after it advised staff not to use the term 'hard-working families' out of fear it could offend the jobless and make them feel 'undeserving'. Wokingham Council in Berkshire issued the advice in its new inclusive language guide. Terms like 'blacklist' and 'whitewash' were among others outlawed as they could be considered 'racist' while staff were warned 'sustained eye contact could be considered aggressive' in some cultures.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Homelessness 'not just men with dogs in doorways', says charity
A Guernsey charity is challenging people's preconceptions of homelessness, after a rough sleeper's story brought the issue to islanders' Home in Guernsey was set up last year to help people facing homelessness on the Cox, CEO, said: "Historically [charities] would put up a picture of a single gentleman, often with a dog and a sleeping bag on the street."However Ms Cox said she was "aware of families with their children" sofa surfing, as well as people sleeping in their cars, adding "just because when we walk through St. Peter Port we're not stumbling across sleeping bags" it did not mean hidden homelessness was not impacting the island. Ms Cox said 29-year-old Tian, who had slept at the Bathing Pools and in a tent, was "not going to be the only" person sleeping rough and there would "be other people in the future", as long as the island's housing crisis Steve Williams, president of Housing, previously told the BBC he recognised the island had a "hidden homelessness" problem and needed to "do something about it". 'Dignity and respect' Ms Cox said more than 25 new people facing or experiencing homelessness had contacted the charity to ask for help during June said "everyone wants dignity and deserves respect in the place that they want to call home".However, even in the "most welcoming" situation, sofa surfers were "still [in] someone else's house" and it was "their routine you're fitting in to"."It's not a very good situation to be in," she added. Ms Cox said there was some emergency housing on the island, such as St. Julian's House, but it was often said the charity was working with Housing to co-produce a Homelessness Delivery and Implementation Plan, so there was a consistent "pathway" for people to avoid or get out of homelessness."It's not an overnight fix - what we want to see is investment in lots of different areas," she said it was "really great in the short time" the charity had existed, that it had "made waves" and helped create positive steps forward. Spare rooms Ms Cox said she was also keen to encourage people to take advantage of a £10,000 tax break for people renting out spare rooms to said At Home in Guernsey could help by vetting both the lodger and the home owner if they wanted to rent out spare rooms."It just adds a bit of security", she said, "if people are sitting at home with a spare bedroom thinking: 'I would like to rent it out, but what if this goes wrong?'."People with spare rooms could take money or a non-financial exchange, such as company, "a bit of care [or] help with the garden," she said.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Wakefield museum tour guides' pay demands 'unaffordable'
The National Coal Mining Museum has confirmed that 40 members of staff will strike due to ongoing disputes over workers, who are mostly guides leading underground tours at the site in Wakefield, will walk out from Wednesday until 14 September, with further action planned if an agreement is not union, Unison, said museum managers proposed an uplift of 80p an hour or 5% for all workers, whichever would be the greater, but this was an "inferior offer".A spokesperson for the museum said it was "saddened" by its pay offer being rejected by the union, adding the industrial action meant its underground tours would not run during this time. The spokesperson said that during the strike period, "the museum will remain open and continue to share the important history of coal mining with our visitors".It added: "The majority of our workforce of over 100 people are not in Unison and do not support the industrial action. "It is largely made up of the museum guides who deliver our underground tours. Only 28 Unison members out of the 39 who voted in the original ballot, did so in favour of industrial action."After further negotiations and serious consideration, mindful of the wellbeing of our wider workforce and our visitors, the museum proposed an increased offer to all staff of 80p per hour or 5%, whichever is the greater." 'Simply unaffordable' The spokesperson added their offer would have equated to a pay rise of more than 6% for many of its workers, but it was "rejected" by the union, who "refused to share our revised offer with their members to see if they wished to accept it".They went on to say that the museum also relied on external funding and donations and "continues to face considerable financial pressures"."As a charity, our trustees feel this offer is fair and the counter-claim by Unison, which equates to over 8%, for many, is simply unaffordable," the spokesperson said"It would jeopardise people's jobs across the organisation and threaten the long-term sustainability of the museum. That counter-claim was suggested by Unison as part of the negotiation process and was at no point agreed."It is our intention to keep an open dialogue with Unison, with the sincere hope that this offer along with the many additional benefits included will be accepted to benefit our staff as a whole." Unison previously said the pay offer should be 5% or £1 an hour more, whichever is union added that it met with museum managers through the arbitration service Acas on Friday with the hopes that a revised figure could be agreed to put to staff as this would have suspended the Hooley, Unison Yorkshire and Humberside regional organiser, said the offer from the museum showed "how little managers value staff"."If museum managers actually care about their staff, they'll improve the offer. Unison is happy to meet right away to resolve this. That would allow families to enjoy the museum and its facilities throughout the summer holidays. "But until they are willing to do so, staff have no option but to strike." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
