Apple challenges ‘unreasonable' EU order to open up to rivals
Apple has submitted a legal challenge to an EU order to open up its closed ecosystem to rivals such as Meta and Alphabet's Google, saying the demands are unreasonable and hamper innovation.
The European Commission had in March detailed how
Apple must comply with the Digital Markets Act, which aims to rein in the power of Big Tech.
Apple said the EU's interoperability requirements create 'a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation'.
'These requirements will also hand data-hungry companies sensitive information, which poses massive privacy and security risks to our EU users,' it said in a statement.
'These deeply flawed rules that only target Apple – and no other company – will severely limit our ability to deliver innovative products and features to Europe, leading to an inferior user experience for our European customers.'
Meta, Google, Spotify and Garmin are among companies that have requested access to Apple users' data.
The legal fight will likely take years to play out in court. Until then, Apple will have to comply with the EU order.
The Commission ordered Apple to give rival makers of smartphones, headphones and virtual reality headsets access to its technology and mobile operating system so they can connect with Apple's iPhones and iPad tablets.
It also set out a detailed process and timeline for Apple to respond to interoperability requests from app developers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bruno Fernandes transfer could shape Manchester United's rebuild strategy
Manchester United weigh £100 million Bruno Fernandes offer Rebuilding options and transfer market history Live Events Future outlook for Fernandes and United (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Manchester United are considering a £100 million transfer offer from Saudi Pro League club Al Hilal for midfielder Bruno Fernandes. The decision could significantly impact the club's rebuild under manager Ruben Amorim , with a potential sale opening the door for squad reinforcements ahead of the 2025–26 30, remains Manchester United's most consistent performer. Despite the team's struggles in the 2024–25 campaign, he delivered 19 goals and 18 assists and played a pivotal role in their run to the Europa League final. United lost that final to Tottenham Hotspur and missed out on UEFA Champions League qualification, creating a reported £80 million to £100 million shortfall in read: Al-Hilal confident of £100m Bruno Fernandes capture as Man Utd face financial pressure With Al Hilal's offer potentially covering that gap, United must now evaluate whether retaining Fernandes outweighs the financial and strategic benefits of a major potential sale of Fernandes could mirror past rebuild efforts by other Premier League clubs. Liverpool's sale of Philippe Coutinho to Barcelona in 2018 for £145 million allowed the club to sign Virgil van Dijk and Alisson Becker, leading to immediate improvements and eventual European and domestic contrast, Tottenham Hotspur's 2013 sale of Gareth Bale to Real Madrid yielded £85 million but saw the funds spread across seven signings. Only Christian Eriksen emerged as a long-term contributor, while the rest failed to deliver lasting United's recent transfer record presents challenges. Outside of Fernandes, major signings have largely underperformed. That has cast doubt on whether the club's recruitment staff can successfully reinvest funds if Fernandes is sold. Amorim is reportedly prioritizing the sale of players such as Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho, and Antony, but expected fees are unlikely to match the figure offered for is expected to complete a £25 million move to Chelsea this month, while Rashford and Antony's markets remain read: Top 5 most expensive Manchester United and Spurs players in the squad, and why they matter in Europa League final Fernandes signed a contract extension last August that runs through 2027, giving Manchester United the option to reject all offers. However, should the player express a desire to leave, the club may be forced to proceed with a Hilal's interest comes ahead of the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, adding urgency to negotiations. United will have to determine whether Fernandes is central to their future or if his departure can catalyze a more balanced suggest Amorim requires reinforcements at goalkeeper, right back, central midfield, and attacking midfield. Addressing those needs through one significant sale could provide the resources necessary to elevate the team from mid-table club must now decide whether to follow a model of reinvestment success, as seen at Liverpool, or risk repeating missteps similar to those made by Tottenham.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
As India and Pakistan eye each other, this superpower eyes the whole map
Beijing's close ties with Islamabad give it a level of influence over dealings with Delhi The recent terrorist attack in India's Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which originated in Pakistan and resulted in the death of 26, mostly Hindu, civilians, has triggered another wave of heightened tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad. While public discourse has focused on terrorism and hostilities between the two nuclear-powered nations, a deeper analysis reveals the unmistakable imprint of another key actor - China's strategic calculus in the region. The relationship between Islamabad and New Delhi has evolved significantly in recent decades. Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar travelled to Beijing days after the military standoff with Delhi and met his counterpart Wang Yi. The Chinese Foreign Minister called Pakistan an " iron-clad friend" and " all-weather strategic partner." China is pursuing a strategy that aligns with its regional interests - including economic engagement, defense cooperation, and influence-building. This strategy, logically, includes efforts to slow down India's rise. Pahalgam incident thus cannot be seen an isolated terrorist attack, but as a signal within a larger geostrategic landscape that is shaping Asia's future. Strategic Timing The flareup in South Asia has come at a time of major geopolitical developments. With the mass shift of Western companies like Apple away from China to India, India is poised to become the next big manufacturing hub. As global businesses explore alternatives to rising operational costs and geopolitical uncertainties in China, India is increasingly seen as a competitive option. Additionally, the proposed US tariffs may add pressure to China's manufacturing sector, which is already adapting to evolving global supply chains. For the strongman leader, Xi Jinping, sustaining economic growth and employment remains a top priority. Any escalation involving India could introduce uncertainty that might affect investor sentiment and infrastructure momentum. Regional instability could redirect global attention away from India's growth narrative toward internal and border-related concerns. China's close political, economic and defence ties with Pakistan - an economically vulnerable partner - gives Beijing a certain level of influence on the way Islamabad deals with India. New Delhi was compelled to act militarily, risking escalation and economic fallout. To India's credit, it managed to negotiate a ceasefire after achieving its key objectives of affecting 11 Pakistani air bases and nine terrorist camps and other strategic terrorist infrastructures against the popular sentiment against de-escalation. Economic factor Pakistan has been struggling with near to bankruptcy. Its foreign exchange reserves have fallen to $4.3bn, its lowest levels since February 2014. Despite a $2.4 billion bailout from the IMF - approved on May 9, when Islamabad and New Delhi were firing missiles at each other - the Pakistani economy is still in tatters. China's offer of financial and military aid to Islamabad at such times comes in more than handy. China's support for Pakistan is not circumstantial. It is also institutional and deeply entrenched. Between 2014 to 2024, China sold over $9 billion worth of advanced weaponry to Pakistan, accounting for around 80% of imported weapons, including J-10CE fighter jets, Wing Loong drones, LY-80 air defence systems, and naval assets. The operational use of these systems in the recent conflict, including Pakistani claims of downing Rafales using Chinese PL-15 missiles, has allowed Beijing to showcase its weapons systems in live combat. Beyond India, China's motivation also ties into its long-term strategic objectives in the Persian Gulf. Pakistan provides China access to the Arabian Sea via Gwadar port, a linchpin in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and part of the broader Belt and Road Initiative. This maritime access offers China two significant advantages: a strategic military presence near key Middle Eastern shipping lanes and an alternative route for oil imports in case of a US-China maritime standoff in the South China Sea. Military-Industrial Complex benefits China's defence industry is another big beneficiary of the escalation. Claims by the Pakistan Air Force that Chinese-made jets outmanoeuvred India's French-built Rafales, regardless of their authenticity, have created a nationalist fervour in Chinese social media and boosted investor confidence. Stocks in Chinese defence manufacturers surged as hashtags like "J-10 shot down Indian warplanes" trended online, and praise for the PL-15 missile system flooded Weibo. Indeed, Beijing wants to use this as an inflexion point for its arms export ambitions. With Western suppliers often constrained by political alignments or human rights concerns, China's relatively unrestricted military exports offer an attractive alternative, especially in conflict-prone or authoritarian regimes across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia. A perceived successful battlefield performance strengthens China's pitch as a reliable arms supplier. From shaping regional dynamics to advancing its defense exports and maintaining strategic interests in West Asia, China may perceive certain advantages in the current situation in the region. While the Pahalgam attack was carried out by terrorist actors, it may also reflect broader regional undercurrents in which multiple stakeholders play complex and calculated roles. Through India-Pakistan rivalry, China is executing a proxy strategy that would halt India's rise, safeguard its own economic interests and bolster its defence exports and regional clout. Beijing has much to gain and little to lose from this rivalry - as long as it stays just below the threshold of full-scale war.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Elon Musk once gave Apple 3 days to accept his Rs 55000 crore offer, Tim Cook rejected it, paid heavy price due to...
(File) Elon Musk, the world's richest man is infamous for aggressive business tactics, and one such example was none other than Apple, when Musk reportedly issued a 3-day ultimatum to the tech giant to accept his SpaceX satellite connectivity deal for a whopping $5 billion, days ahead of the iPhone 14 launch. When Elon Musk gave an ultimatum to Tim Cook According to reports, Elon Musk's SpaceX offered satellite connectivity for the iPhone, but Apple would have to pay $5 billion upfront for the service, and $1 billion annually after an 18-month exclusivity period. The egotistic billionaire was convinced that Apple wouldn't dare turn down such a deal, and gave Tim Cook 3 days to decide. Musk also threatened to launch a competing service that would work directly with iPhones if Apple refused his offer. Tim Cook defies Elon Musk However, unfazed by Musk's ultimatum and threats, Apple CEO Tim Cook turned down the offer and chose to partner with a smaller satellite communications provider (satcom), and even though the SpaceX deal would have provided more expansive satellite network for the iPhone, Cook decided otherwise due to various factors. Scorned by the refusal, Elon Musk did exactly what he had threatened to do; the tech billionaire launched Starlink Direct to Cell, a competing satellite service that offered satellite-powered communication for smartphones, including the iPhone running a T-Mobile network. The service was a collaboration between SpaceX and T-Mobile. Musk sues Globalstar in spectrum battle The situation presented a major legal challenge to Apple as iPhones using a T-Mobile network, could connect to Musk's Starlink Direct to Cell services, even though the devices were legally tied to Globalstar. The legal battle escalated after SpaceX challenged Globalstar's rights to an important wireless spectrum, claiming that the latter had failed to fully utilize the allocated spectrum, and was trying to block competitors from entering the market. This directly impacted Apple as the spectrum being challenged was being used for its iPhone satellite connectivity service, which meant that it would have to find an alternative satcom provider, if SpaceX were to win the lawsuit. SpaceX legal challenge triggers internal rift at Apple As per a report by Apple Insider, Musk's legal onslaught created internal rifts within Apple as senior executives, including its software chief Craig Federighi, and Adrian Perica, head of corporate development, expressed concerns over the tech giant's partnership with Globalstar, which reportedly has an outdated and slower network compared to its competitors like SpaceX. Globalstar was planning to expand its satellite network, but only marginal improvements were expected over the next decade. Many Apple executives feared that the company's reliance on Globalstar could draw unwanted regulatory attention, particularly over the issue of whether Apple could be classified as a telecommunications carrier. However, despite these reservations, Apple decided to continue its partnership with Globalstar, and has a $1.7 billion investment with the satcom provider, out of which $1.1 billion is dedicated to developing and launching new satellites.
