KC-10 Extender Tankers Are Up For Auction
The U.S. government is offering for sale 10 of the KC-10 Extender tanker and cargo aircraft, which the Air Force retired the last operational example of in September of 2024. Notably, the aircraft are all being offered without their refueling booms fitted. However, reinstalling these might well be feasible, and even without, there is the option of using a hose-and-drogue system, so the aircraft could be of real interest to one or more of the private aerial refueling companies now operating military-surplus tankers. On the other hand, they could be of interest as spare parts sources for private KC-10s already in operation or to supplement a future acquisition of more of the USAF's mothballed KC-10 fleet.
The 10 KC-10As are now listed on the GSA Auctions website. The specific tail numbers are 86-0036, 87-0120, 83-0077, 87-0122, 79-1713, 79-1949, 86-0034, 83-0081, 87-0124, and 79-0434.
These aircraft are currently all at the boneyard, in the charge of the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona. As you can read about here, the last Air Force KC-10 was flown to the boneyard on September 26, 2024, after a farewell flight over its base and other locations notable in the type's history.
In a statement, an Air Force spokesperson told TWZ that all 10 aircraft are currently in a 'non-flyable status.'
'Eight are missing one engine due to a GSA sale in 2021,' the spokesperson added. 'We put eight engines up for sale and the winning bidder funded the removal of each of the engines.' All of the eight engines that were removed were taken from a wing nacelle, rather than the central/rear fuselage nacelle, although the spokesperson couldn't clarify if all engines were removed from the same side. It's also puzzling why the engines were removed in this way, rather than stripping all the powerplants off the required aircraft.
The KC-10s are being offered 'without boom' since these aircraft were some of the first to be retired, with their booms being removed for use as spares to support the fleet that remained active at the time. As you can read about here, the KC-10 inventory was fairly rapidly reduced over the last couple of years of the type's military career.
'In order to make them flyable, the winning bidder will need to work with Boeing to obtain a fly-away kit to seal up the area where the boom systems was,' the Air Force spokesperson added. A customer might choose to reinstall the boom, if that's possible, which we will address later.
After all, the Air Force acquired the KC-10, which was based on the DC-10-30CF commercial trijet airframe, as a 'heavy tanker' to supplement the KC-135 Stratotanker family. With the three main DC-10 wing fuel tanks supplemented by three large fuel tanks under the cargo floor, the Extender accommodated almost twice as much aviation fuel as the KC-135 — more than 356,000 pounds.
Fuel was primarily offloaded via the boom, but the KC-10 had an integrated hose-and-drogue system, allowing it to refuel U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft, as well as probe-equipped receivers flown by other operators, without any further modifications. We have asked the Air Force if the integrated hose-and-drogue is also still fitted in the aircraft being offered.
Twenty KC-10s additionally received wing-mounted pods, allowing multiple probe-equipped receivers to top up simultaneously. It's not clear if the aircraft listed for sale also have the refueling pods fitted.
While using the KC-10s with underwing refueling pods and centerline basket would likely be possible for any potential customer, it's not clear how practical it would be to reinstall the refueling booms.
Regardless, as noted earlier, there's already a precedent for DC-10-derived tankers working with private aerial refueling companies.
Similar to the KC-10 were the two KDC-10 aircraft that were acquired by the Royal Netherlands Air Force and which are now operated by Omega Air, a pioneer in the commercial aerial refueling segment. The Virginia-based company is one of only two private operators that have tankers equipped with booms. Omega also has a single KDC-10 that was converted from a Douglas DC-10-40 for probe-and-drogue refueling.
While Omega might be interested in boosting its DC-10-based tanker fleet, it's far from the only player in this market segment.
The other company with boom-equipped tankers, Metrea, already operated four KC-135Rs it previously acquired from the Republic of Singapore Air Force, after which it hugely expanded its fleet with the purchase of 14 KC-135 tankers previously flown by the French Air and Space Force. Already on contract with the U.S. Navy, the company has been eyeing major new opportunities with the U.S. military and foreign armed forces. Last month, Metrea announced it had received a contract to provide the Indian Air Force with aerial refueling training, which will involve some of its tankers being based out of Indian Air Force Station Agra in central India.
While Metrea could seek to expand their fleet with the KC-10, like omega has done, augmenting their KC-707s with KDC-10s. The surplus KC-10 might still attract interest from other companies seeking to take a share of this growth market.
On the other hand, these are well-used aircraft — since they were among the earlier examples to be retired, they are probably also more worn-out than more recent additions to the boneyard. Fresher examples of the KC-10 may still come up for auction or become available via the Department of Defense.
The KC-10 first entered U.S. Air Force service back in 1981. The service acquired a total of 60 examples, although one was later lost in an explosion and subsequent fire while undergoing maintenance at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana in 1987.
The Extender fleet was starting to show its age by 2018 when smoke on the flight deck of one of the aircraft forced the crew to evacuate. A separate fault quickly revealed itself in the same incident, when the crew's escape slides failed to activate.
While these kinds of issues are far from uncommon in older aircraft designs, the fact that so many commercially operated DC-10s and MD-11s have now left service means any customer for ex-Air Force KC-10s will find them harder to support. As of early this year, only eight DC-10/MD-11 variants were in service around the world.
For the Air Force, meanwhile, there remains a notable gap in aerial refueling capability since the retirement of the KC-10, a problem that is now compounded by the growing understanding that planning for future contingencies, especially in the Indo-Pacific theater, highlights a need for more fuel on tankers, to enable aircraft to operate over huge geographical distances.
When the last of the Air Force KC-10s was sent to the boneyard, TWZ pointed out that at least some of these aircraft could potentially still provide useful service in a contractor-operated form. Based on what we know about the 10 aircraft now being offered, flying them as boom-equipped tankers might not be at all straightforward, and all but two of them will need a new engine fitted. Still, the capability the KC-10 provides remains largely unrivaled. At the very least, they could provide valuable spares for existing or future DC-10-based tanker operators.
Any interested parties can start putting bids in for the aircraft on April 15.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Russian attack on Ternopil: infrastructure hit, parts of city left without power and water
Russian forces conducted a strike on the city of Ternopil on the night of 5-6 June. Industrial and infrastructure facilities have been damaged, part of the city has been left without electricity and water supply has been disrupted due to the attack. Source: Ternopil Mayor Serhii Nadal Details: Nadal said the Russians had hit industrial and infrastructure facilities in the city. All the appropriate services are working at the scene and the aftermath of the attack is being dealt with. Quote: "Part of Ternopil is without electricity. Water pressure across the city is reduced due to power outages. There may be no water pressure on upper floors. Restoration work is ongoing." Details: Viacheslav Nehoda, Head of Ternopil Oblast Military Administration, reported that "today the enemy conducted the biggest aerial attack on the oblast". "Many hits were recorded. Firefighting and damage assessment efforts have begun," he wrote. Background: Ternopil was being attacked by Russian drones throughout the night. Several explosions occurred in the city at around 03:20. At 04:20, Ukraine's Air Force reported Russian cruise missiles heading towards Ternopil. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!


Indianapolis Star
3 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
D-Day in photos: See the historic landings
US paratroopers, carrying full equipment, walk in single file to board their transport - a DC-3 Dakota - for the invasion of Normandy on D-Day. Hulton Archive, Getty Images American General Dwight D. Eisenhower, the supreme commander for the 1944 cross-channel invasion of the continental mainland, giving orders to the paratroopers before the landing operations during the Second World War on June 6, 1944. AFP, US National Archives/AFP Via Getty Images US troops in landing craft, during the D-Day landings on June 6, 1944. Keystone, Getty Images US troops prepare to disembark from landing crafts during D-Day, June 6, 1944, after Allied forces stormed the Normandy beaches. D-Day is still one of the world's most gut-wrenching and consequential battles, as the Allied landing in Normandy led to the liberation of France which marked the turning point in the Western theater of World War II. US National Archives/AFP Via Getty Images Bombs are unloaded from a Norwegian merchant ship onto an American amphibious landing craft during the Invasion of Normandy by allied forces on June 6, 1944. Keystone Features, Getty Images US Assault Troops seen landing on Omaha beach during the Invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. Keystone, Getty Images In the distance American Infantrymen are wading towards the beach on the Northern Coast of France during the D-Day Landings of June 6, 1944. Keystone, Getty Images American soldiers on an invasion craft during the D-Day landings on June 6, 1944. PNA Rota, Getty Images American troops helping their injured friends from a dinghy after the landing ship they were on was hit by enemy fire during the Allied invasion of France on D-Day on June 6, 1944. Fox Photos, Getty Images British commandos who landed in Normandy on June 6, 1944, set out to capture a Nazi gun site, which is protected by enemy snipers. Keystone, Getty Images
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump, in show of NATO support, nominates official to key role with alliance
President Donald Trump has nominated Air Force Lt. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich to lead U.S. and NATO forces in Europe, sending a strong signal the administration will continue to play a leadership role in the alliance. Some allies, amid reports theTrump administration was reconsidering the position, worried the president would choose not to prioritize Europe and decline to place an American at the helm of NATO forces. A U.S. officer has filled the role since Gen. Dwight Eisenhower took the job in 1951 and is a symbol of American commitment to the region. Trump nominated Grynkewich, the Joint Staff's director of operations, to become the Supreme Allied Commander for Europe and commander, U.S. European Command. The nomination reinforces support for European allies just two weeks before NATO leaders gather in The Hague, Netherlands for an annual summit, which Trump and other alliance leaders will attend. The current Supreme Allied Commander, Gen. Chris Cavoli, told a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in April that a U.S. decision to walk away from the role would prove a grave mistake. 'Our allies crave our leadership and are stronger with it, and are stronger for us,' he said. The discussions about not filling the role were part of a wider rethinking of the global U.S. footprint, according to a person familiar with the conversations, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss internal matters. But the White House decided to keep a U.S. officer in the seat, the person said. The role is a critical one for European security. The official coordinates NATO military maneuvers and warfighting strategies across the continent, and handles nuclear deterrence. The person also commands American forces during any conflict in Europe. Lawmakers have advocated for keeping an American in the role so that a foreign leader would not oversee U.S. troops in a time of war. Grynkewich, an F-16 and F-22 pilot, has previously served as director of operations for U.S. Central Command, chief of plans for the European Command and the Pentagon's deputy director of global operations. "There was some concern about the U.S. pulling back here but this is a welcome signal that the U.S., even while shifting some priorities, still sees a secure Europe as a key priority,' said a European official. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at NATO headquarters Thursday for a defense ministers meeting, expressed confidence that European countries would continue investing more in their own defense. The administration is pressing allies to commit 5 percent of GDP to the alliance, a number the U.S. has yet to meet. "I'm very encouraged by what we heard," Hegseth said after the meetings. "Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5 percent commitment to NATO."