logo
Gaza children look ‘very hungry,' US to set up food centres: Trump

Gaza children look ‘very hungry,' US to set up food centres: Trump

Qatar Tribune3 days ago
dpa
Aberdeen, Scotland
US President Donald Trump on Monday described the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip as 'terrible,' and said hungry Palestinian children must be helped.
'We have to get the kids fed,' Trump said during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, adding that the children in Gaza look 'very hungry.' His remarks came a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asserted there is 'no starvation' occurring in Gaza.
'You know, we want to help. It's a terrible situation. The whole thing is terrible,' Trump said, adding that he would bring up the issue with Netanyahu when they next speak.
He announced plans for the US to help establish 'food centres' in Gaza, but did not provide specifics beyond calling it a multinational initiative. 'We're going to set up food centres and we're going to do it in conjunction with some very good people,' he said.
'We've got a lot of money and we're going to spend a little money on some food and other nations are joining us. I know your nation's joining us,' Trump said to Starmer, 'and we have all of the European nations joining us.'
Trump said that the US had provided $60 million in food aid for Gaza in recent weeks. 'We only hope the food goes to the people that need it,' he said.
Asked about Israel's role in ensuring humanitarian aid reaches civilians, Trump responded: 'Israel has a lot of responsibility.'
However, he added that Israel's power to act is 'hampered by the fact' that Hamas and other militant groups continue to hold dozens of hostages in Gaza.
Since March, Israel has permitted only limited aid deliveries into the Gaza Strip.
The resulting shortages of food and water have prompted warnings from UN agencies of 'catastrophic hunger' and imminent famine.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family speaks out after Trump said Jeffrey Epstein ‘stole' Virginia Giuffre
Family speaks out after Trump said Jeffrey Epstein ‘stole' Virginia Giuffre

Al Jazeera

timea minute ago

  • Al Jazeera

Family speaks out after Trump said Jeffrey Epstein ‘stole' Virginia Giuffre

The family of Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused financier Jeffrey Epstein of sex-trafficking and assault, has expressed surprise at recent statements from United States President Donald Trump, alleging that Epstein 'stole' her from his spa. In a statement released late on Wednesday, the family called for more information to be released about the Epstein case. 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' the family's statement said. 'We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this.' Questions about Trump's relationship with Epstein have dogged the president in recent weeks, with critics calling on him to release further documents the US government may have. Trump himself has weighed in on the controversy, most recently while returning from his trip to Scotland this week. A fallout over employee poaching? As he flew on Air Force One, Trump brought up Giuffre, one of Epstein's most high-profile accusers. Giuffre died by suicide in April at her farm in western Australia. Previously, as a teenager, she had worked as a spa attendant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where her father was also employed in maintenance. Trump accused Epstein, a convicted sex offender, of poaching employees like Giuffre. 'People were taken out of the spa, hired by him. In other words, gone,' Trump said. 'When I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people.'' He added that Epstein's actions caused a rupture in their relationship: 'Not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'' His statements sparked a flurry of new media coverage. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has since defended Trump's actions. 'The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,' she said. Upon taking office for a second term, Trump and his officials pledged to release government documents related to high-profile cases, including the assassinations of figures like civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr and US President John F Kennedy. Many of the files in question have been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories. In the case of Epstein, conspiracy theories have swirled about the circumstances of his 2019 jailhouse death and the potential influence he wielded over powerful acquaintances. Figures in Trump's current administration, like Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director Kash Patel and his deputy director Dan Bongino, openly speculated whether Epstein had a 'black book' or 'client list' that he used to coerce government and industry leaders. Attorney General Pam Bondi fuelled those rumours when she appeared on Fox News in February and said such a list was 'sitting on my desk right now'. Family calls for Maxwell to 'rot' Thus far, the Trump administration's document releases have failed to produce major revelations about the Epstein scandal. In July, the FBI and the Department of Justice issued a joint statement also affirming that their review revealed no client list and no evidence that Epstein blackmailed figures of power. That review, however, did little to abate speculation among those who have been following the Epstein conspiracy theories, including members of Trump's 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) base. Reports have since emerged that the Justice Department briefed Trump about his name appearing in the Epstein files, and Democrats have sought to leverage the controversy to dent Trump's popularity. Trump, meanwhile, has called for federal grand jury records to be released, though experts point out that those are unlikely to contain the full scope of evidence in the Epstein case. Justice Department officials also met last week with Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted sex offender and former girlfriend of Epstein who is accused of sex-trafficking and grooming victims on his behalf. Attorney General Bondi has said some Epstein materials cannot be released, as they contain sensitive information about victims. Maxwell, meanwhile, has offered to testify before Congress in exchange for a pardon and has petitioned the Supreme Court to review her case. She is serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison. In Wednesday's message, Giuffre's relatives urged the government not to pardon Maxwell for her crimes. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life,' their statement read.

The NGO holding Israeli soldiers to account
The NGO holding Israeli soldiers to account

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

The NGO holding Israeli soldiers to account

The NGO holding Israeli soldiers to account NewsFeed The Hind Rajab Foundation is using Israeli soldiers' own social media footage as evidence for war crimes investigations. Al Jazeera's Hind Touissate spoke to its founder to explain how dozens of complaints have been filed in more than 10 countries, targeting Israeli military personnel. Video Duration 01 minutes 30 seconds 01:30 Video Duration 01 minutes 26 seconds 01:26 Video Duration 01 minutes 13 seconds 01:13 Video Duration 00 minutes 47 seconds 00:47 Video Duration 02 minutes 33 seconds 02:33 Video Duration 02 minutes 46 seconds 02:46 Video Duration 00 minutes 44 seconds 00:44

US appeals court hears arguments about legality of Trump tariffs
US appeals court hears arguments about legality of Trump tariffs

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US appeals court hears arguments about legality of Trump tariffs

Oral arguments over United States President Donald Trump's power to impose tariffs have kicked off before a US appeals court after a lower court ruled he had exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping new levies on imported goods. The appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned whether what Trump calls his 'reciprocal' tariffs, announced in April, were justified by the president's claim of emergency powers. A panel of all the court's active judges – eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by Republican presidents – is hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small US businesses and 12 Democratic-led US states. The judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC, pressed government lawyer Brett Shumate to explain how the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, gave Trump the power to impose tariffs. Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs. The judges frequently interrupted Shumate, peppering him with a flurry of challenges to his arguments. 'IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them,' one of the judges said. Shumate said the law allows for 'extraordinary' authority in an emergency, including the ability to stop imports completely. He said IEEPA authorises tariffs because it allows a president to 'regulate' imports in a crisis. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued they are not permissible under IEEPA and the US Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Neal Katyal, a lawyer for the businesses, said the government's argument that the word 'regulate' includes the power to tax would be a vast expansion of presidential power. Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government as customs duties in June quadrupled to about $27bn, a record, and through June have topped $100bn for the current fiscal year, which ends on September 30. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from extended tax cuts in a Trump-supported bill that passed and became law this month. 'Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday. 'To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today.' But economists said the duties threaten to raise prices for US consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted US companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. Dan Rayfield, the attorney general of Oregon, one of the states challenging the levies, said the tariffs are a 'regressive tax' that is making household items more expensive. Since Trump began imposing his wave of tariffs, companies ranging from carmaker Stellantis to American Airlines, temporarily suspended financial guidance for investors, which has since started again but has been revised down. Companies across multiple industries, including Procter and Gamble, the world's largest consumer goods brand, announced this week that it would need to raise prices on a quarter of its goods. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. Pressure outside trade Trump has said the April tariffs, which he placed on most countries, are a response to persistent US trade imbalances and declining US manufacturing power. However, in recent weeks, he's used them to increase pressure on nontrade issues. He hit Brazil with 50 percent tariffs over the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a key Trump ally who is on trial for an alleged coup attempt after he lost the 2022 presidential election. Trump also threatened Canada over its move to recognise a Palestinian state, saying a trade deal will now be 'very hard'. He said tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop fentanyl from crossing US borders. The countries have denied that claim. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that are challenging Trump. It said IEEPA, a law intended to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies, did not authorise tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The appeals court has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the US Supreme Court. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authorities, such as duties on steel and aluminium. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan after smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations while other Trump officials have said negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set a deadline of Friday for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store