logo
Dalai Lama succession dispute: Understanding who he is, how his successor is chosen, and what students need to know about growing tensions

Dalai Lama succession dispute: Understanding who he is, how his successor is chosen, and what students need to know about growing tensions

Time of India12 hours ago
Dalai Lama
The
Dalai Lama
is not only a globally recognised figure of peace and compassion but also the spiritual head of
Tibetan Buddhism
. For many, he symbolises the preservation of Tibetan culture and religious identity in exile.
The current 14th Dalai Lama, based in India since fleeing Tibet in 1959, has long been at the centre of a delicate political and religious balance, especially between India and China.
As the 14th Dalai Lama advances in age, attention has turned to the sensitive question of his successor. This issue is not merely spiritual but heavily political, with China and Tibet's exiled leadership offering starkly different visions.
The Dalai Lama has made it clear that the Chinese government has no role to play in selecting his successor, igniting fresh tension with Beijing.
Who is the Dalai Lama and why does his succession matter?
The Dalai Lama is believed to be the reincarnation of Avalokiteshvara, the Bodhisattva of Compassion. Each Dalai Lama is considered a 'Living Buddha', whose soul is reborn in a new child after his death. The process of identifying the reincarnation involves a range of spiritual signs, visions, and consultations by senior Tibetan monks.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Guararapes (consulte o preço)
Alarmes
Undo
The current Dalai Lama, the 14th in the line, fled to India in 1959 after a failed uprising in Tibet. Since then, he has lived in exile in Dharamshala, where the Tibetan government-in-exile is based.
His influence is not just spiritual but also political, although he stepped down from political responsibilities in 2011, handing over authority to the elected Tibetan leadership. Despite this, Beijing often attributes political motives to his religious activities and has objected to his visits to Indian states like Arunachal Pradesh, which China claims as part of its territory.
In contrast, the Chinese state enforces a more regulated and political process involving the Golden Urn, a system introduced in 1792 by the Qing dynasty. This method requires drawing lots from a gilded urn containing names of potential successors. According to Beijing, this process ensures authenticity and is backed by centuries of tradition and legal authority.
A deeply political process cloaked in religious tradition
While the Dalai Lama has previously stated that his next reincarnation could be born among his followers in India, China insists that any legitimate successor must be born within China and selected through the Golden Urn method.
The Chinese ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, recently reaffirmed that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama and other Tibetan lamas must comply with 'religious rituals and historical conventions as well as Chinese laws and regulations.
'
Beijing has warned that bilateral ties with India could suffer if New Delhi refuses to accept its chosen successor. Although India has long hosted the Tibetan government-in-exile and offers the Dalai Lama asylum, it has refrained from making official statements on the issue.
By contrast, the U.S. has declared that reincarnation is a matter of religious freedom, not state authority, and has threatened to raise the matter at the UN.
Implications for India–China relations
India, home to the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan exile community, has so far remained silent on the issue. Unlike the U.S., which sees the succession as a matter of religious freedom and human rights, India has chosen to stay neutral, likely to avoid diplomatic fallout with China.
However, Beijing has previously warned that ignoring the 'traditional' selection process could strain bilateral ties. A Chinese research delegation in 2019 cautioned Indian journalists that no 'wise leader' would challenge China's role in the process, but suggested India could simply stay neutral without endorsing the Chinese choice.
The succession issue could become another flashpoint in Sino-Indian ties, especially given recent efforts to improve bilateral relations.
Past events, such as the Dalai Lama's visit to Arunachal Pradesh followed by the Doklam standoff, demonstrate how quickly religious matters can escalate into geopolitical disputes.
Why students should care about this issue
For students, the Dalai Lama succession dispute highlights the complex relationship between religion, politics, and international diplomacy. It also offers insight into how historical traditions are sometimes used to assert state power, and how countries like India and China navigate sensitive cultural and geopolitical matters.
Understanding the implications of the Dalai Lama's succession dispute offers students more than just insight into a religious tradition—it provides a valuable lens through which to examine how religion, identity, and political power intersect on the global stage. This issue highlights not only the historical and spiritual significance of the Dalai Lama's role, but also the broader themes of diplomacy, cultural preservation, and the tensions that arise when state authority seeks to influence deeply personal and sacred matters.
For students, following this story is an opportunity to engage critically with international affairs and explore the complex dynamics between faith and governance in today's world.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's father Errol Musk to Donald Trump: ‘Listen to Elon…he's not a fool'
Elon Musk's father Errol Musk to Donald Trump: ‘Listen to Elon…he's not a fool'

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk's father Errol Musk to Donald Trump: ‘Listen to Elon…he's not a fool'

Elon Musk 's father Errol Musk has shared an advice for his son. According to a report by Al-Arabiya English, Errol Musk advised his son Elon to 'stay silent' and concentrate on his businesses, especially Tesla. He acknowledged that politics can be complicated, with 'tempers flare' and 'human behavior is so complicated,' and suggested it's better for Elon to stay focused on what he does best—running his companies. Errol also expressed his surprise over the Tesla and SpaceX CEO's feud with US President Donald Trump . He said: 'As far as President Trump going against Elon, I can't really understand what is going on. It makes no sense to me at all.' Errol also expressed his optimism despite the rising tension between the two. He said: 'Something good will come out of this, I'm pretty sure.' Elon Musk's father supports Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill According to the report, Errol and Elon have different opinions about the Trump administration's One Big Beautiful Bill . While the tech billionaire has been a vocal critique of Trump's bill, Errol, on the other hand, supports it. Talking about the bill, Errol said 'United States needs a lot of rebuilding…they need to spend money'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walmart Photos Which Are Not For Everyone Old Money Style Undo The senior Musk also made a request to President Trump to 'Listen to Elon,' adding that 'He's not a fool'. At last, Musk's father advised both Trump and Elon to 'talk it out.' Trump-Musk feud The feud between Trump and Musk reignited after the tech billionaire criticized Trump's new federal spending bill. So much so that he threatened to create a new political group, calling it the 'America Party,' if the bill is passed by the Senate. Trump responded by questioning Musk's loyalty and criticizing electric vehicle mandates, which he called 'ridiculous.' Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed [sic] me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one,' the president wrote on Truth Social. OnePlus Nord 5 and OnePlus Nord CE 5: Unboxing and first look AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Stop harassment of Bengal workers in your state, CS Pant writes to Odisha
Stop harassment of Bengal workers in your state, CS Pant writes to Odisha

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Stop harassment of Bengal workers in your state, CS Pant writes to Odisha

Kolkata: Indicating a growing frustration with Bengali-speaking migrant workers being illegally detained in Odisha as Bangladeshis, Bengal chief secretary Manoj Pant on Thursday wrote to his Odisha counterpart, Manoj Ahuja, to put an end to this "continuing harassment faced by people from West Bengal" in the neighbouring state. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Samirul Islam, chairman of West Bengal Migrant Workers' Welfare Board and Trinamool's RS MP, threatened to move Calcutta High Court on the issue. "Thousands of people from Odisha live and work peacefully in Bengal. Not once has Bengal govt treated them with even a fraction of the hostility that Odisha is showing now," he said. Pant, in his letter, wrote: "We are receiving disturbing reports of such individuals being detained without due legal process in regions around Paradip and across coastal districts such as Jagatsinghpur, Kendrapara, Bhadrak, Malkangiri, Balasore and Cuttack. What is even more concerning is that even when these persons produce valid identity documents — including Aadhaar cards, ration cards, voter IDs, electricity bills and PDS documents — their claims are being dismissed. In many instances, they are being asked to produce ancestral land records dating back several generations, an unreasonable and unjustifiable demand for migrant workers." Pant also mentioned how, "alarmingly, there have also been instances where, despite verification reports from competent authorities in West Bengal confirming the identity and citizenship of the individuals, there has been no positive action or relief". "I appeal to you to take a humanitarian view of the matter and ensure that these individuals, who are Indian citizens, are not subjected to arbitrary detention or harassment based on linguistic or regional identity," he wrote. "It is deeply distressing to learn that many of them are being targeted solely because they speak Bengali — their mother tongue — and are being unjustly labelled as Bangladeshi infiltrators. This sweeping generalisation is not only unfair and discriminatory, but also deeply hurtful to citizens who have every right to dignity and protection under the law," Pant added. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Islam, who has been vocal on the issue, said: "The Odisha authorities refused to accept any identity document like Aadhaar and EPIC, and demanded verification from Bengal govt. We promptly provided the required details — verified and furnished by none other than DMs and SPs. But even that failed to satisfy them. Next, they asked for the electoral roll where names of these individuals were listed. Once again, the Bengal administration complied and sent the relevant documents. " The MP said: "Our CM Mamata Banerjee believes in diversity and strives to maintain harmony in every sense. So, I sincerely urge the Odisha govt and BJP: do not play with fire. If you ignite the politics of hatred, you may end up being consumed by your own flames."

Court cannot punish B for A's mistake: Counsel on HC order nixing 32k primary teachers' appts
Court cannot punish B for A's mistake: Counsel on HC order nixing 32k primary teachers' appts

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Court cannot punish B for A's mistake: Counsel on HC order nixing 32k primary teachers' appts

Kolkata: Senior counsel Anindya Mitra challenged the 2023 Calcutta High Court order by Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay annulling services of 32,000 primary school teachers and argued that a court of law cannot cancel appointments of people not made parties in a case because that would constitute a violation of the principles of natural justice. Arguing before a division bench of the Calcutta HC on Thursday, Mitra said, "The petitioners who moved the single bench didn't even make such a prayer." The senior counsel restricted his arguments to the 2016 selection of primary teachers that concluded in 2017 and distinguished it from the 2014 Teacher Eligibility Test (TET). Mitra argued that the writ petition was moved five years after the selection process had concluded and pointed out that the petitioners did not make any allegations of illegality. "The basis of the illegality recorded in the judgement was the judge's own, based on irrelevant considerations. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Counsel submitted that the judge in the case made references to allegations of corruption against ministers, MLAs and the former president of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education, describing the selection process as the "biggest scam" in Bengal's education system. "A minister or an MLA or a former president might have been arrested for doing something wrong. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo But for an offence committed by A, you cannot punish B," Mitra said. He submitted that the judge made these observations in relation to the 2014 TET and not the 2016 selection process by the Board. The senior counsel drew the division bench's attention to the part of the single bench judgement stating: "the sense of justice is above the sense of law" and argued that such a conclusion goes against the basic framework of the Constitution and rule of law. The counsel pointed out that the judge, while taking on an investigation on his own, had questioned candidates from only four of 20 districts and made a generalised observation on aptitude tests, when nine among those questioned had said that aptitude tests were held. Mitra cited SC judgements to substantiate that a court cannot generalise issues. He further pointed out from the records that the judge had initially ordered the cancellation of 36,000 teachers. "He made changes to his order, calling it a typographical error. Is this believable?"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store