This Activist Wants to Stop Female Genital Mutilation
Credit - Zohra Bensemra—Reuters
For Fatou Baldeh, the past year was critical in the fight to end female genital mutilation. A survivor and the founder of the organization Women in Liberation & Leadership (WILL), Baldeh, 41, is a leading activist fighting against the practice in Gambia. Although FGM has been banned in her country since 2015, it still happens: about 75% of women and girls ages 15 to 49 have been cut, according to the United Nations Population Fund. FGM can lead to long-lasting health effects and is internationally recognized as a human-rights violation. Advocates say the law banning the practice is poorly enforced. 'We continue to have those issues where we will have a case, we go to the police and report, and the police would be like, 'This is our culture, this is our tradition.' So they do not see it as a crime,' Baldeh says.
This past year, Gambian parliamentarians considered a bill to overturn the ban. 'This was an attack on women's rights,' Baldeh says. She and WILL worked with other organizations to fight the bill. They connected with survivors, who shared their experiences with parliamentarians, and discussed the issue with religious leaders. They conducted a nationwide study to document the health impacts of FGM and brought that evidence to politicians. And they succeeded: in July 2024, Gambia's parliament rejected the bill.
Baldeh says this past year has opened up the conversation: 'People are talking about it, and that is a positive thing because we cannot end the practice if we don't talk about it.' Baldeh says news of the bill has brought the issue of FGM back 'in the limelight'—not just for Gambia, but for the rest of the world too. 'It's 2025, and little girls are being pinned down and their genitals are being cut in the name of culture and tradition,' she says. 'When this whole issue happened in Gambia, it really made people pay attention.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
5 hours ago
- Fast Company
How understanding how your brain works can make you a better leader
What if the key to being a better manager isn't found in a new productivity hack, a different feedback framework, or a time management app—but in understanding the three-pound organ inside your head that runs the show: your brain? Most leadership advice focuses on what you should do. Neuroscience helps explain why some things work—and why others fail, despite your best intentions. When you manage in ways that are aligned with how the brain naturally operates, you unlock better decision-making, motivation, creativity, and connection. Here are five ways neuroscience can help you manage smarter. 1. Multitasking Is a Myth: Prioritization is Your Brain's Superpower The brain's prefrontal cortex handles focus, planning, and decision-making. But it's also highly energy-demanding and sensitive to overload. When you spring last-minute requests on your team, surprise them with new deadlines, or pile on urgent tasks, you're setting their brains up to fail. Cognitive overload impairs performance. Each unexpected demand consumes energy needed for prioritizing, problem-solving, and creative thinking. When managers protect their people from chaotic, reactive workflows, they preserve their team's brainpower. This also builds psychological safety and trust. Try this: Push back on unnecessary urgency from above. Communicate early and clearly about changes. Create space for people to do their best work, not just keep up. 2. Creativity Needs Space (and Structure) Leaders often say they want innovation, but fail to create the conditions that allow it. The brain's creative engine—particularly the default mode network —thrives when we're relaxed, slightly daydreaming, and free from judgment. Yet most work environments reward hyperproductivity and constant urgency. Creativity requires a balance of exploration and exploitation. Neuroscience tells us that the best ideas often come when we're mentally alert and engaged, but not overwhelmed; often when we are focused, interested, and under just the right amount of pressure. Constant pressure to be 'brilliant now' can actually inhibit insight. Try this: Build 'white space' into your team's calendar. Walking meetings, unscheduled thinking time, or even mindfulness minutes. Counterintuitively, making time for your people to actively rest may be your easiest to implement, but most impactful, innovation strategy. 3. Coaching Unlocks Neuroplasticity (and Performance) If your job is to get the best from your people, you need to stop telling and start coaching. Great managers ask the kinds of questions that rewire their team's thinking. That's not a metaphor; it's neuroscience. Neuroplasticity is the brain's ability to change. When people reflect, reframe, or develop insight, they're literally rewiring their neural pathways. Effective coaching conversations tap into this, activating networks for learning, motivation, and problem-solving. And coaching at the identity level (helping people explore not just what they do but who they are) creates deep, lasting change. Try this: Next time someone brings you a problem, don't solve it. Ask: 'What have you already tried?' or 'What would great look like here?' When you practice this, you're building your colleague's brain. 4. Motivation Lives in the Brain's Reward System Motivation isn't magic, and it's not about free pizza or ping-pong tables. It's about how well leaders understand the brain's reward circuits. Dopamine, the chemical of motivation, spikes when people feel progress, connection, or purpose. In many workplace environments, overuse of rankings, performance comparisons, or conditional bonuses can reduce intrinsic motivation over time. When these tools create pressure or fear of failure, they risk disengagement rather than drive. Try this: Recognize effort, not just outcomes. Connect tasks to meaningful goals. Give your team autonomy in how they reach targets. These all activate the reward networks and sustain engagement over time. 5. A High-Performing Neural Environment Isn't Soft. It's Smart One of the most misunderstood drivers of high performance is psychological safety. This isn't about being nice—it's about creating the neural conditions for people to think clearly, speak up, and take risks. When people feel unsafe (even subtly), the brain activates the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex has to work harder to emotionally regulate. That means less creativity, lower collaboration, and poorer decision-making. Managers who create cultures of trust and fairness help teams stay in a reward state—and unlock their best thinking. Try this: Model curiosity. Fail fast. Admit mistakes. Ask more questions. Your vulnerability is a shortcut to their clarity. Final Thought: Manage Like a Brain-Savvy Human Understanding how the brain works isn't just interesting trivia: It's the blueprint for managing with clarity, creativity, and compassion. By making small shifts in how you focus, coach, motivate, and create safety, you build better brains—your own, and your team's.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts doubt FBI's claim that crop fungus smuggled by Chinese students is a threat
By Heather Schlitz CHICAGO (Reuters) -A biological sample that a Chinese researcher was accused of smuggling into the United States and that prosecutors cast as a "dangerous biological pathogen" is a common type of fungus already widespread in U.S. crop fields that likely poses little risk to food safety, experts said. On Tuesday, U.S. federal prosecutors accused two Chinese researchers of smuggling samples of the fungus Fusarium graminearum into the U.S., describing it as a potential agricultural terrorism weapon. Yunqing Jian, 33, a researcher at the University of Michigan's Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology has been charged in connection with allegations that she helped her boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, 34, smuggle the pathogen into the U.S. However, agriculture experts interviewed by Reuters this week said the fungus has been in the U.S. for more than a century, can be prevented by spraying pesticides, and is only dangerous if ingested regularly and in large quantities. "As a weapon, it would be a pretty ineffective one," said Jessica Rutkoski, a crop sciences professor, wheat breeder and geneticist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Rutkoski and other researchers said extensive testing for the fungus' toxin, widespread use of fungicides and the difficulty of intentionally creating an infection with the pathogen would make it a clumsy weapon. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI declined Reuters' request for comment. Since the 1900s, U.S. farmers have been battling the fungus, which causes Fusarium head blight, usually known as "scab," which often infects wheat, barley and other grains on farms during rainy years. The telltale pink streaks on the grain heads contain a toxic byproduct called vomitoxin, which is tested for and tightly controlled by grain elevators where farmers sell their crops. Constant testing and monitoring means that only negligible amounts of vomitoxin ever make it into the bread, pasta and cookies Americans eat, far below levels that would sicken a human, experts said. "We have a long history of managing epidemics of scab," said Andrew Friskop, professor and plant pathologist at North Dakota State University, noting that farmers have access to many tools to prevent and control the disease. Farmers began regularly spraying their fields with fungicide as early as the 1990s, and researchers have since developed multiple strains of fungus-resistant wheat. Plant experts said that it would be difficult to fully assess the risks posed by the samples without more information on the particular strain. But Rutkoski, whose research involves intentionally contaminating wheat with the fungus, said that she isn't always successful at infecting her test field's wheat with scab. She said the pathogen is difficult to control, and her lab has to strike the right balance of temperature and humidity to create an infection. In federal court in Detroit on Tuesday, Jian was charged with conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the U.S., smuggling goods into the U.S., false statements and visa fraud. Jian did not comment on the charges, and the lawyer who represented her in court was not immediately available for comment. Liu could not be immediately reached for comment. The court scheduled Jian's bail hearing for June 13.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
How Leadership Programs Prepare You For High-Stakes In Healthcare
The most powerful aspect of learning to lead better is that it transcends specific settings. It works in the hospital and the clinic, it works at home, it works with relationships, it works with your pets. Leadership is leadership is leadership. A point I like to make in my writing and keynotes is that leadership can be taught. I don't think it's a matter of talent or luck of the genetic draw. Yes, some people are seen as natural leaders, but that's typically after years of growth and development—and the influence of family, community, church, sports teams, and the like. Which makes me believe leadership is largely learned. The most powerful aspect of learning to lead better is that it transcends specific settings. It works in the hospital and the clinic, it works at home, it works with relationships, it works with your pets. Leadership is leadership is leadership. Most of us have seen examples of this skill transfer. West Point, for example, is designed primarily to teach combat leaders, not surgeons (although many surgeons have graduated from West Point over the centuries). But the high-stakes leadership skills learned in this environment carry across multiple domains. Being subjected to stress and adversity forces you to know yourself better—your strengths and your weaknesses. It also teaches you how to find your calm center amidst an onslaught of stressful stimuli and make good decisions. And it builds resilience. There are a lot of parallels between military and medical school training. The leadership programs you experience in the military often start by 'breaking you down.' By putting you in highly stressful training environments, the trainers look to assess your capabilities. First, can you even make it through the exercise without quitting or getting injured? Second, can you perform in those environments? Can you excel? When you're in a follower role, do you listen well? Are you paying attention well enough to execute the plan? Do you communicate the plan effectively to your teammates? When you're in a leadership role, can you understand all the mission's parameters and demands? Can you come up with a tactical plan to influence and inspire others, even though they're all tired, stressed, and perhaps in heightened fear? Medical school training, which is its own form of leadership program, works similarly, though with a different slant. Cognitive pressure, at a very high level, is exerted. A vast amount of information assails you, such that it seems impossible to process and retain it all. The common metaphor is that it's like drinking through a fire hose. It's extremely stressful because you don't want to fail out. You don't even want to get a B because you know the information you're learning is going to be vital in taking care of future patients. When you graduate from medical school, residency programs take it a step further. A lot of information is still thrown at you, but you're also doing hands-on care of patients and making treatment decisions (with supervision). There's a great deal of pressure. But when you ultimately get to the point where you're independently making decisions and leading in a high-stakes environment, you've gained a resilience that is deep-rooted and visceral. That's why I'm not a huge fan of downplaying the importance of the stress commonly associated with medical training. When you're finished with training, you're going to be taking care of patients. This is an extremely important, dare I say sacred, responsibility and authority. And there is tremendous stress associated with it. Strength and resilience are required, and those traits are not forged through easy, low-pressure instruction. Olympic athletes in training don't avoid stress, hardship, and conflict. They seek it out. Of course, a balance must be struck. We certainly don't want medical students and residents to suffer from psychiatric diagnoses, but it is crucial that they learn how to deal with adversity—patients who die or fail to respond to treatment, onrushes of ill and injured patients, etc.—and are able to get back up, brush themselves off, and take care of the next patient. The best way to learn and internalize this kind of skill is by going through a leadership program that delivers sequentially increasing levels of stress, with watchful management.
