
Air Canada to resume operations after cabin crew strike ends
The deal, reached early on Tuesday morning, ends the first strike by the airline's cabin crew in nearly 40 years.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) issued a statement explaining that its mediation with the airline and its low-cost affiliate Air Canada Rouge had arrived at a successful conclusion.
'Unpaid work is over. We have reclaimed our voice and our power,' the union wrote. 'When our rights were taken away, we stood strong, we fought back — and we secured a tentative agreement that our members can vote on.'
The walkout began on Saturday and lasted nearly four days, leading to disruptions in travel for the nearly 130,000 travellers each day who take Air Canada.
The strike also forced the company to withdraw its third-quarter and full-year earnings guidance. In early trading on Tuesday morning, in the wake of the news that the strike had ended, shares of Air Canada rose four percent. But they had lost approximately 14 percent of their value so far this year.
The carrier said it would gradually resume operations, with flights taking off once again by Tuesday evening.
Air Canada warned, however, that a full restoration of its services may require a week or more. Some flights will remain cancelled over the next seven to 10 days while the flight schedules are stabilised.
Customers with cancelled flights can choose between a refund, travel credit or rebooking on another airline.
What was the dispute about?
CUPE represents nearly 10,400 flight attendants employed by Air Canada, and the union had been negotiating for months with the airline to address issues including 'unpaid work, work rules, and poverty-level wages'.
The union pointed out that wages had not kept pace with the cost of inflation and that cabin crew members were not offered 'ground pay': compensation for all the work done before a flight's doors close and after a flight lands.
That includes no pay for getting passengers boarded, assisting travellers with baggage and seating, and conducting safety checks.
CUPE noted last week that 99.7 percent of its members voted in favour of the strike.
In announcing the end of the walkout, CUPE explained that negotiations had stretched from 7pm local time (23:00 GMT) on Monday to 4:23am (08:23 GMT) the next day.
'We are required to advise our membership that we must fully cooperate with resumption of operations,' the union wrote in an announcement on Facebook.
A tense showdown
Until the deal was announced, it was not clear whether the impasse would be quickly resolved. On Monday, Mark Hancock, CUPE's national president, said there was 'no limit' to his commitment to the fight.
'We're going to stay strong. We're going to stay committed to making sure those workers can do the job that they love doing and actually be able to afford a roof over their heads,' Hancock said. 'And if it means folks like me going to jail, then so be it.'
In a rare act of defiance, the union remained on strike even after the Canada Industrial Relations Board, a federal labour board, declared its action unlawful.
On Monday, the board called for the flight attendants to return to work and for the union to submit to arbitration.
But with the flight attendants refusing, a three-way standoff developed between the workers, the company and the government.
The union had asked the government not to intervene, in case it gave the airline the upper hand in negotiations.
In an apparent effort to address that argument, Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu also promised on Monday to place pressure on Air Canada by investigating allegations of unpaid work in the airline sector.
'I've also heard the allegations of unpaid work. It's unacceptable. Nobody should work for free in this country. In fact, we expect to get paid for the work we perform,' Hajdu said in a video on social media.
'That's why I've ordered a probe into the allegation of unpaid work in the airline sector. We will start this probe immediately.'
In recent years, unions in the aerospace, construction, airline and rail sectors have renewed their efforts to push employers for higher pay, improved conditions and better benefits amid a tight labour market.
Travellers express frustration
While Air Canada works towards resuming full service, travellers have expressed frustration with the ongoing flight cancellations.
As of Monday, the analytics firm Cirium estimated that nearly 1,219 domestic flights in Canada and 1,339 international flights had been suspended since Thursday as a result of the strike.
Retiree Klaus Hickman was among those who missed a flight to Toronto earlier in the week. While he rebooked on another airline, he was concerned about returning to Calgary on time for a connecting flight to Germany.
Hickman sympathises with workers demanding better pay but is worried about his own health and travel challenges.
'They want to get more money to survive. And so it is with everybody else,' he said.
Canada's largest air hub, Pearson International Airport in Toronto, said it would call up extra employees to help as Air Canada restarts its services this week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US Senator Bernie Sanders backs Trump plan for government stake in Intel
United States Senator Bernie Sanders has thrown his support behind US President Donald Trump's plan to convert US grants to chipmakers, including $10.9bn for Intel, into government stakes in the companies. The senator for the state of Vermont announced his support on Wednesday. 'If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,' Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said in a statement to the Reuters news agency. The awards were part of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, which sought to lure chip production away from Asia and boost American domestic semiconductor output with $39bn in subsidies. The acronym CHIPS in the name of the legislation stands for 'Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors'. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is now looking into the government taking equity stakes in embattled Intel and other chipmakers in exchange for the grants as the Trump administration seeks 'equity' in return for 'investments'. Rare bipartisanship The unusual alignment between Sanders and Trump on government ownership stakes in private companies highlights a marked shift by Trump toward policies of state intervention in the economy that are typically associated with the left. Since Trump took office for a second time in January, he agreed to allow AI chip giants Nvidia and AMD to sell AI chips to China in exchange for the US government receiving 15 percent of revenues from the sales. The Pentagon is also set to become the largest shareholder in a small mining company to boost the output of rare earth magnets. And the US government negotiated for itself a 'golden share' with certain veto rights as part of a deal to allow Nippon Steel to buy US Steel. Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, had proposed an amendment to the CHIPS Act that would have forbidden the Commerce Department from granting a CHIPS Act award without the Treasury Department receiving a warrant, equity stake or senior debt instrument issued by the recipient company. 'I am glad the Trump administration is in agreement with the amendment I offered three years ago,' Sanders said. 'Taxpayers should not be providing billions of dollars in corporate welfare to large, profitable corporations like Intel without getting anything in return.' Much of the funding for CHIPS Act award recipients such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung has not been disbursed. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US, which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the US will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Earlier this month, Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump has since backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the US to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story'. This comes as Intel is also in talks with other large investors to receive an equity infusion at a discounted price just days after the chipmaker got a $2bn capital injection from the SoftBank Group, according to CNBC. On Wall Street, investors have not responded well to the government's potential new role. Intel stock is down 7.1 percent from the market open as of 1:30pm in New York (17:30 GMT).


Al Jazeera
18 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
How will Trump's semiconductor tariffs affect the global chip industry?
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 300 percent on semiconductor imports, with exemptions for foreign companies that commit to manufacturing in the US. Trump has cast the proposed tariff as a way to drive investment to the US, but experts say it could also disrupt global supply chains and even penalise companies already making chips in the US. What are the details of Trump's plan? Few details have been released since Trump announced plans for a 100 percent tariff at a White House event on August 7. The US president said exemptions would be given to companies that build research or manufacturing facilities in the US, but tariffs could be applied retroactively if they failed to follow through on their planned investments. 'If, for some reason, you say you're building, and you don't build, then we go back, and we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee,' Trump told reporters. On Friday, Trump told reporters on board Air Force One that more details would be announced soon and that the tariff could be much higher than previously suggested. 'I'll be setting tariffs next week and the week after, on steel and on, I would say chips – chips and semiconductors, we'll be setting sometime next week, week after,' Trump said en route to Alaska to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'I'm going to have a rate that is going to be 200 percent, 300 percent,' he added. Why does Trump want to impose tariffs on chip imports? Trump wants to impose a tariff on chips for several reasons, but the main one is to re-shore investment and manufacturing to the US, said G Dan Hutcheson, the vice chair of Canada's TechInsights. 'The primary goal is to reverse the cost disadvantage of manufacturing in the US and turn it into an advantage. It's mainly focused on companies that are not investing in the US,' Hutcheson told Al Jazeera. 'Exclusions are negotiable for entities that align with his goal of bringing manufacturing back to the US.' More broadly, the tariff is also intended to address the US dependence on imported semiconductors and buttress Washington's position in its ongoing rivalry with China, another chip-making powerhouse. Both issues are bipartisan concerns in the US. The Trump administration earlier this year launched a Section 301 investigation into alleged unfair trade practices in China's semiconductor industry, and a Section 232 investigation into the national security implications of US reliance on chip imports and finished products that use foreign chips. Who will be impacted by the tariff? Foreign tech giants that have already invested in the US, including the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and South Korea's Samsung, would likely not be affected by the tariff. It is less clear how the measure could affect other companies, including chip makers in China, where companies face barriers to US investment from both US and Chinese regulators. Yongwook Ryu, an assistant professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore, said the tariff could be used as leverage by the US as it negotiates the rate of its so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' on China. The US has imposed blanket tariffs of 10-40 percent on most trade partners since August 7, but negotiators are still hammering out a comprehensive trade deal with Beijing. 'My view is that while the reciprocal tariffs are generally aimed more at addressing the US trade deficit problem and re-shoring manufacturing back to the US, product-specific or sectoral tariffs [like semiconductors] are aimed at serving the strategic goal of strengthening US technological hegemony and containing China,' Ryu told Al Jazeera. What is the value of US chip imports each year? The US imported about $40bn in chips in 2024, according to a report by the American Enterprise Institute, citing United Nations trade data. Imports mainly came from Taiwan, Malaysia, Israel, South Korea, Ireland, Vietnam, Costa Rica, Mexico and China, but experts say this data does not capture the full picture of chip flows in and out of the US. Chips can cross borders multiple times as they are manufactured, packaged, or added to finished goods. Chris Miller, the author of Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology, estimates that another $50bn worth of chips entered the US in 2024 via products like smartphones, auto parts and home appliances from countries like China and Vietnam. Miller also estimates that a 'substantial portion' of US chip imports are manufactured in the US before being sent overseas for packaging – a labour-intensive process – and then re-imported. 'Many of the chips imported from key trading partners like Mexico, Malaysia and Costa Rica are likely actually manufactured by US firms like Texas Instruments and Intel, which have manufacturing in the US but often have their test and assembly facilities abroad,' Miller told Al Jazeera. Why is the tariff a concern for the global chip industry? Trump's tariff plans have injected further uncertainty into an industry already grappling with his administration's sweeping efforts to reorder global trade. 'It's unclear whether the US government has the capacity to effectively enforce this and… there's not really any guidance in terms of what these tariffs are actually going to look like,' Nick Marro, the lead analyst for global trade at the Economist Intelligence Unit, told Al Jazeera. The White House has yet to provide details on whether the tariff will apply to chips originally made in the US and chips contained in finished products. If the latter were included in the tariff plans, the fallout would extend to industries like electronics, home appliances, automobiles and auto parts. Miller said that it would be consumers in the US and elsewhere who would be among those most affected by the tariff. 'Initially, it appears that most costs would be paid by companies via lower profit margins, though in the long run, consumers will pay the majority of the cost,' he said.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Canada's annual inflation rate eases to 1.7 percent
Agencies Canada's annual inflation rate eased to 1.7 percent in July from 1.9 percent in the prior month as lower year-on-year gasoline prices kept the consumer price index low, but core measures of inflation stayed sticky, data showed on Tuesday. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast the annual inflation rate at 1.8 percent and the monthly inflation rate at 0.3 percent. The CPI increased by 0.3 percent in July from 0.1 percent in June on a monthly basis, Statistics Canada said. Gasoline prices dropped by 16.1 percent on a yearly basis in July, following a 13.4 percent decline in June. On a monthly basis the price of fuel dropped as geopolitical tensions eased and crude oil producing nations increased output. The elimination of carbon levy on purchase of petrol has helped bring down the cost of the fuel on a yearly basis and is expected to maintain a downward pressure on the CPI basket for another eight months. This has helped the overall consumer price index to clock a rate below the mid-point of the Bank of Canada's 1 percent to 3 percent target range, even as there are signs of rising prices of food. Excluding gasoline, the CPI rose 2.5 percent in July, Statscan said. The main drivers of the increase in costs were rise in food prices and shelter costs, StatsCan said. Food prices, which contributes close to 17 percent to the overall CPI basket, rose by 3.3 percent in July from 2.9 percent in June. Shelter costs, the biggest component of the CPI basket, rose 3 percent in July from 2.9 percent in June, marking the first increase since February last year. This was driven by a smaller decline in cost of natural gas and rise in rents by 5.1 percent. Core measures of inflation, which are closely tracked by the Bank of Canada have remained resilient and hovered around the top of the bank's preferred range of CPI. One of the core measures the CPI-median - or the centermost component of the CPI basket when arranged in an order of increasing prices - was at 3.1 percent in July, from 3 percent in June. The CPI-trim, which excludes the most extreme price changes, was unchanged at 3 percent. The share of the CPI basket which is above 3 percent continues to be elevated at over 37 percent, data showed. Money markets are betting the odds of a rate cut on Sept. 17 at 32 percent after the bank has stayed put at 2.75 percent for its last three rate decision meetings. The Canadian dollar weakened and was trading down 0.11 percent after the inflation data to 1.3817 to the US dollar, or 72.37 US cents. Two-year government bond yields were down 0.3 basis points to 2.735 percent.