Ireland's love affair with fossil fuels is an oil-soaked slippery slope
While the global conversation has increasingly focused on reducing reliance on fossil fuels like oil and gas, government action has been neither sufficient nor urgent enough.
As the world now faces the escalating impacts of this climate crisis — from drought and coastal erosion in Honduras, to storms here in Ireland — Trócaire's latest report examines Ireland's role in supporting the continued growth of this unsustainable industry, which endangers billions of lives around the world.
Launched just last Thursday, our report, 'Fuelling Injustice – Ireland's Fossil Fuel Problem', explains that the emissions from just 25 oil and gas corporations between 1985 and 2018 caused more than $20 trillion in damages, while at the same time amassing profits of $30 trillion.
Such figures starkly highlight the injustice of the situation.
Wealthier nations in the Global North, where emissions are highest, have not taken the lead in reducing their carbon footprints, instead allowing climate-harming corporations to operate primarily without regulation.
This negligence manifests as a human rights crisis across the globe, with marginalised communities—who have contributed the least to climate change—suffering the most. They face extreme weather, loss of lives and livelihoods, displacement, and hunger, pushing them deeper into poverty and amplifying existing inequalities.
Globally, governments continue to enable the expansion of this destructive industry, often at the expense of the world's most vulnerable populations.
Alarmingly, by 2030, governments collectively plan to produce more than double the amount of fossil fuels required to stay within the critical 1.5C warming limit, set by the Paris Agreement.
This completely disregards the scientific consensus, the necessity of phasing out fossil fuels to mitigate further climate impacts, and violates the agreements and obligations to protect and support those who have done the least to cause this crisis, but who are suffering the most.
Ireland's climate impact
It may not surprise many to read that Ireland is falling short of its commitments, but by how much is truly shocking. Current government policies and private sector initiatives are facilitating an increase in the country's fossil fuel demand and infrastructure, (such as plans for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facilities) and the proliferation of data centres.
These plans directly contradict Ireland's climate obligations and risk entangling the country in human rights abuses linked to continued high greenhouse gas emissions and excessive energy demands.
Claims that dependence on more polluting, fossil fuels is a solution to energy security couldn't be further from the truth. In reality, it only exacerbates vulnerability to geopolitical shifts and price shocks.
Right now, Earth is projected to reach a sobering 2.6 – 3.1°C of warming by 2100. However, if the rest of the world had polluted like Ireland, the world would already be at 3.6°C of warming.
Ireland is on a slippery slope to missing our emissions reduction target of 51% by 2030, with just a 23% reduction expected. Even before you consider the impacts of new liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities and the energy use of projected data centres, Ireland's ambition and delivery on climate action falls far short of our fair share.
These shortcomings alone are due to cost the country €26 billion — an alarming sign of a government failing to meet its obligations.
Ireland's role as a global financial hub further complicates the issue. With substantial investments in fossil fuel companies through Irish subsidiaries, Ireland is directly and significantly implicated in the climate crisis.
In June 2024, Irish investment firms held roughly €31.76 billion in fossil fuel assets, 91% of which were tied to companies actively expanding fossil fuel production.
The emissions linked to these investments exceeded Ireland's national emissions by a staggering 20%, underscoring the need for accountability on these activities, which is currently lacking.
The world's climate crisis
The climate crisis is fundamentally a human rights crisis, and there have been increasing calls from human rights treaty bodies for a complete fossil fuel phase-out and stringent regulations against corporations responsible for damage both at home and abroad.
In Malawi where Trócaire works, 56% of those affected by Cyclone Freddy's impacts were children. Following Cyclone Freddy, hundreds of health facilities were disrupted, while displacement camps faced limited access to sanitation and medical care, leading to a surge in the spread of cholera, malaria, malnutrition, covid-19, and other vaccine-treatable diseases.
This is what climate injustice looks like: those who do the least to cause the crisis are paying the highest price. Children, women and the world's most vulnerable are losing everything.
Action
It is time for a decisive shift away from fossil fuels. Ireland can be a key player in this transition by endorsing a global Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, by prohibiting new fossil fuel infrastructure, and swiftly implementing policies that promise a just phase-out of fossil fuels domestically, and urgently reduce emissions.
Every fraction of a degree of warming holds dire consequences, making every tonne of carbon pollution critical. Ireland must urgently align with the global call for action to mitigate against catastrophic climate breakdown. It's time to hold both polluters, states, corporations, and their investors accountable.
To address our complicity in the climate crisis, Trócaire is calling on the Irish Government to implement a Climate Damages Tax on fossil fuels investments, which could generate up to €3.33 billion by 2030 and €20 billion by 2050. This would help partially address the ecological debt incurred from exceeding our fair share of carbon limits.
Additionally, leveraging public finance to compel polluters to pay for their contributions to the crisis could provide critical resources for climate finance commitments and support marginalised communities; a Climate Damages Tax and other measures available to Ireland that would make polluters pay could generate up to €9.7 billion annually.
Failing to act decisively compromises our environment and increasingly stains our moral fabric as a nation responsible for national and global human rights. The time to act is long overdue.
Sinéad Loughran is Climate Justice, Policy, and Advocacy Advisor at Trócaire
Read More
Four billion endured extra month of extreme heat due to climate change – report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Post
4 days ago
- Business Post
What the Papers Say: RTÉ €725 million ‘distorting' bailout; Nvidia gets Trump reprieve; Jaguar boss defends ‘woke' rebrand
10 am - Good morning from the Business Post newsroom. Daniel McConnell here with your Saturday morning round-up of the main stories in Ireland and across the world. RTÉ €725m funding could 'distort' media market, Irish Independent publisher warns Minister Mediahuis, the multinational group that owns the Irish Independent and Sunday Independent newspapers, has warned that the Government's multiyear funding agreement for RTÉ could damage competition, the Irish Times reports. The media company says this is the case because the bailout would help fund enhancements to digital products such as the RTÉ Player and RTÉ News App to the detriment of commercial media companies. The Belgian-Dutch publisher also said it was concerned that the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) could compound the existing imbalance in the relationship between Big Tech and commercial media companies in the State. The issues were raised in a May 7th letter, signed by Mediahuis director of legal and public affairs, Fergus Foody, and sent to Minister for Culture, Arts and Communication Patrick O'Donovan. Failure to provide gas storage puts Ireland at risk of major power outages, EY says Power cuts like those seen in Spain and Portugal could be a danger for Ireland if the Government does not provide for storing natural gas, according to a leading industry figure, the Irish Times is reporting. This State has no natural gas storage, or a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal, despite relying on the fuel to generate close to half of all electricity. The Republic ultimately risks 'interruptions to supply' of this key energy source if it does not deal with this question sooner rather than later, Sean Casey, industrials and energy industry leader at EY said. Natural gas generates 40 per cent of Irish electricity, Casey noted, with the State importing 80 per cent of its natural gas via the UK. Its only home-grown source of the fuel, the Corrib field, is dwindling. HP Enterprise paid $25m dividend to Irish entity in June One of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise's main Irish units paid a dividend of €21.5 million ($25 million) in June to another of the computing giant's companies registered here after restructuring its balance sheet and cancelling part of its share capital in early 2025, the Irish Times reports. Accounts filed by Hewlett-Packard Galway (HPG), the entity behind the S&P 500-listed computing giant's European research and development (R&D) hub in Ballybrit, also reveal that operating profits at the unit surged by almost 700 per cent last year amid an increase in R&D tax credits. HPG, which employed some 374 people in the Republic last year, reported turnover of $68.9 million for the 12 months to the end of October last year, up by just under 4 per cent on the previous year. US licenses Nvidia to export chips to China after CEO meets Trump The US commerce department has started issuing licences to Nvidia to export H20 chips to China following weeks of inaction, after chief executive Jensen Huang met President Donald Trump at the White House, the Financial Times is reporting. A US official told the Financial Times the bureau of industry and security, the arm of the commerce department that oversees export controls, had begun to issue licences for the H20. Nvidia designed the chip for the Chinese market after the Biden administration imposed export controls on more advanced artificial intelligence chips. In April, the Trump administration appeared to take a tougher line by telling Nvidia it could not sell the H20 to China. Trump reversed course after Huang visited the White House and directly lobbied the president. But Nvidia was frustrated that three weeks after the decision, the administration had not started issuing the licences. Huang visited the White House on Wednesday and held another meeting with the president. Two days after the meeting, the commerce department starting issue the licences, according to people familiar with the decision. New Jaguar boss defends 'woke' rebrand after stinging criticism The new boss of Jaguar has defended the company's 'woke' rebrand, days after Donald Trump labelled it a 'total disaster', the Daily Telegraph reports. PB Balaji, who is due to take over as chief executive of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) in November, claimed that the carmaker had seen a positive response to its overhaul. The move has seen it ditch its iconic jumping cat logo, embrace a hot pink aesthetic and debut a car design that has been compared to the Thunderbirds' limousine. He told reporters: 'We have put our plans together, the cars are being revealed, they're getting exciting response from the customers on the ground. Therefore, that's what the strategy is.' It comes days after Trump, the US president, claimed Jaguar had been left in 'absolute turmoil' by its rebrand.
Irish Examiner
06-08-2025
- Irish Examiner
Landmark court opinion shows the power of the youth climate movement
Last month, the world witnessed the power of youth. Years of advocacy led to an Advisory Opinion from the world's highest court that states must take urgent action to prevent harm to the climate system, including by tackling fossil fuels, or face real legal consequences. The campaign to bring climate justice before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) began with law students from the University of the South Pacific and grew to a worldwide movement, World's Youth for Climate Justice. In campaigning for climate change to be brought to the world's highest court, young people called attention to the obligations that states have not to destroy the future of people and the planet, and highlighted the day-to-day reality of frontline communities dealing with the existential threat posed by climate change. Working closely with Global South states, the movement successfully achieved a vote by the UN General Assembly in 2023 (which Ireland supported) to ask the ICJ for its views of what obligations states have under international law to address climate change, and, importantly, what consequences they may face for breaching these obligations. In a decisive victory for the youth movement, the court confirmed what young people have known all along. States' obligations to address climate change are not just confined to their commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement, but encompass a broad range of international law principles, treaties, and norms that must be taken into account to address the urgent threat posed by climate change. In particular, the court set out that states must take climate measures which reflect their "highest possible ambition" in accordance with the best available climate science and other considerations like intergenerational equity. This places the interests of young people—those who will inherit the consequences of today's inaction—at the very core of climate governance. The court's opinion also affirmed the interdependence of environmental protection and human rights, stating that the right to a healthy environment is foundational to the enjoyment of all other rights. This reflects what young climate activists have long insisted: that climate inaction violates fundamental rights, deepens global inequalities, and exposes vulnerable communities to escalating hardship, displacement, and injustice. Fossil fuels Moreover, the court's treatment of the international environmental law principle that states should refrain from acts of transboundary harm to the environment has profound implications for climate action. The court made clear that a state's failure to fulfil its climate-related legal obligations may amount to an "internationally wrongful act," triggering international responsibility and potential consequences for that state. Crucially, it affirmed that inadequate action to curb greenhouse gas emissions, including continued fossil fuel production, consumption, licensing, and subsidies, may all contribute to such violations. This conclusion resonates strongly with the demands of youth activists, who have persistently highlighted that fossil fuel dependence is not just an environmental hazard, but a violation of international law, and that a fair transition is a legal and ethical imperative to prevent further harm to vulnerable communities. As the court itself noted, law is only one part of the response needed to address the climate crisis. The Advisory Opinion is non-binding, but, importantly, we now have clear confirmation of state's obligations to address the (as the court stated) "existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet". These obligations are not just words, they are an expression of the moral, political, and legal imperative to protect the only home we have. The International Court of Justice affirmed that inadequate action to curb greenhouse gas emissions, including continued fossil fuel production, consumption, licensing, and subsidies, may all contribute to violations. File photo They add to the global call to deliver justice for communities harmed by activities which have polluted our air, endangered our health, and destroyed lives across the globe, particularly in the Global South and in vulnerable and marginalised communities. Just as young people drove the effort to clarify states' obligations, young people can now create further change in their communities and hold states accountable to these obligations. States and decision-makers at every level must implement calls for justice from marginalised communities, particularly those in the Global South who achieved this success. This moment must mark a turning point from legal clarification to real, enforceable action. The law is clear. Youth made it clear. Now, action must be too. Beth Doherty is Ireland's Youth Climate Delegate for COP29. Eoin Jackson is Irish Rapporteur for the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law and a PhD candidate in Climate Law at the London School of Economics.
Irish Examiner
28-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
EU's von der Leyen: 15% the 'best we could get'
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen defended the trade deal clinched with United States on Sunday as "the best we could get." A 15% baseline tariff will now apply to all EU exports to the US, with the union agreeing to buy up $750bn worth of US energy and to invest $600bn into the US economy in the years ahead. The deal prevents a massive trade war between the US and the EU. Asked if she considered 15% a good deal for European carmakers, von der Leyen told reporters: "15% is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get." The EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth US Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel over three years. "We still have too much Russian LNG that is coming through the back door," she said. The European Commission has proposed phasing out all Russian gas imports by January 2028. "Today's deal creates certainty in uncertain times, delivers stability and predictability," von der Leyen told reporters before leaving Scotland. Government sources, while welcoming the deal, were cautious and said they would need to see the finer details of the agreement. One senior source said 'nobody was jumping with joy' over the deal due to baseline tariffs, but that it did provide certainty to businesses. Read More Trade war averted as Government cautiously welcomes EU-US deal
