
5 Reasons Brora Whisky Is A Top Collector's Pick For 2025
Brora's remarkable resilience in a fluctuating market proves why quality and heritage outperform short-term trends.RetryClaude can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: there has never been a better time for the discerning whisky collector — unless, of course, you had a time machine to whisk yourself back to the 1990s, grab a case of Macallan 1926, and maybe pick up a couple of bottles of Black Bowmore for £90 while you're there.
Science fiction aside, for the savvy collector, 2025 is a treasure trove of opportunities, and Brora sits right at the top of many collectors' lists.
Back in 2003, you could pick up a bottle of the first Brora Special Releases 30 Year Old for £150. Today, that same bottle commands around £1,500 on the secondary market. While some might point out it was worth even more a couple of years ago, I'd argue that whisky, like most investments, isn't about making money every year — it's about the long game.
So, amidst the doom, gloom, and misrepresentation of how "bad" things are, here are my five suggestions for making the most of the whisky market in 2025, with Brora as the perfect example.
Globally in 2018 to 2020 we saw various factors that stimulated interest in alternative investments. In the secondary whisky market those years saw an influx of buyers simply following the crowds. Often they had little understanding of what truly makes a bottle collectable—as highlighted by the pinnacle $21,000 hammer price for a Folio 1 in March 2022, now worth c.$7,100—but it was working, so no one minded. Except the drinkers.
In 2025 the financial situations of many have changed. The un-knowledgeable collectors that were in the whisky market to make quick and easy money have gone. This has left many bemoaning the end of the secondary whisky market. I've argued that cycles are all part of a maturing market. And as the market matures, so too does the need for better education on what defines a genuinely great whisky. By extension, that includes an understanding of what makes a sound investment.
Brora's Special Releases series (released2003-2017) demonstrates the collection-building potential that continues to drive stable investment value despite market volatility.
I have always advocated for education around whisky investment. Sure the odd flip of modern releases while the market is booming was fine, but if you want to build a whisky collection as a long term asset then you need to understand what's generating value with whisky. Then with that knowledge you can master the auction and retail landscapes, buying bottles whose potential you understand and trust. Then you've just got to add time—sorry. But for the education side I can help. Brora is a relatively risk free example to use. But as you'll see in my five points, it's still a sound choice in today's market.
In 1983 the owners of Brora chose to close it. For Diageo (DCL at the time) the rich and complex whisky produced at Brora was surplus to requirements. Over the next 40 years however single malts from the highland distillery trickled into the market through independent bottlers and occasionally official releases as well.
The Brora Distillery, Brora Scotland
Crucially, these releases were largely limited edition special releases, but its closure also meant rarity remained high, while additionally it was still priced as a drinking whisky, which also drove scarcity. Brora slowly evolved into a cult icon in the whisky world, but the change didn't happen in a few months. It wasn't until 2018 Diageo announced they were reopening the iconic distillery, and while Brora had already positioned itself as a potential premium product in the market, this was a key moment for savvy collectors to note.
After delays caused by the global covid-19 pandemic, in 2021 the new Brora distillery reopened to much excitement. Nothing moves quickly in whisky and we have to wait for new bottlings from Brora. However, Diageo retains a stock of mature whisky, which they used to mark the moment with the Brora Triptych. This incredible three bottle collection came in a case the size of a small table. I've seen a couple of these over the years and they really are striking and incredibly well made.
The Brora Triptych showcases Diageo's luxury intent for the revived distillery, a key factor in the Highland malt's strong investment potential.
The decision to launch with that kind of premium presentation is—I would argue—a clear mark of luxury Intent for the reborn brand. Looking for brands to invest in where the parent company is also investing into the brand is a great way to spot potential and take advantage of brand driven growth from that investment—just look at what's happened with Macallan over the last 30 years.
One unifying factor for the success of early whisky collectors was with bottles that were critically acclaimed. It's something that I think has definitely been overlooked in the market over the last decade. But when you look at the rare, vintage, 'unicorn' bottles that stand above their peers in terms of value achieved, it is mostly those whiskies that were deemed the pinnacle of those expressions, with ratings into the mid-90s by industry renowned critics.
The legendary 97-point Brora Rare Malts score from Serge at Whiskyfun remains a benchmark that drives this Highland distillery's exceptional investment potential.
The quality of vintage Brora is undeniable, there are so many critically acclaimed reviews from vintage expressions that it's impossible to list them all. Arguably the pinnacle however has to be the legendary 97 point for a Brora Rare Malts given by Serge from Whiskyfun. There are other Brora of that age and series that are valuable, but for that particular release (distinguished by the ABV) the value has risen above the others because of the critical acclaim.
Prior to 2003 Brora had been bottled officially by Diago but it was on a small scale as part of the Rare Malts brand. When the Brora Special Releases were introduced in 2003 it was the first time that a single malt had been bottled officially under the Brora brand. At £150 these releases were still expensive for a single malt whisky at the time, but Brora had already begun to position itself as a whisky worthy of a premium price tag thanks to the work of independent bottlers and Diageo's success with the Rare Malts Selection.
The Brora Special Releases continued for 17 editions and their success were arguably part of the reason Diageo chose to reopen the distillery. This run of age statement releases is also a great feature for collectors, as it lends itself to building a themed collection through the series and isn't too expensive by the standards of some Brora.
Despite market fluctuations, Joe Wilson of Whisky Auctioneer identifies Brora Special Releases as "the best avenue for new collectors" in an increasingly premium market.
Joe Wilson, Head Curator & Spirits Specialist at Whisky Auctioneer, explained to me over email: 'While the value of these bottles is now considerably higher, they still represent one of the best avenues for new collectors to enter the market for Brora. Considering the ultra-prestige style of releases currently favoured by Diageo for Brora single malt and the still lengthy wait for its newly produced stock to mature, this is likely to be the case for a long time to come.'
The final point in my list does require a little more commitment. Look at wherever you get your data—and if you don't, then perhaps try Spirits Invest or Whisky Hunter—and look at how bottles are performing compared to the overall market indexes. It can be easy to get caught up in overall market indexes, but while these can be useful as an overview, they are of limited use for making bottle level investments—unless you plan to buy every bottle in the index, of course!
When you look at the index for the performance of the Brora Annual Releases by itself you see a similar shape to overall indexes. However, if you compare it directly against indexes like the MLL Index—and even more starkly with the Folio Index—you will notice that while the peaks weren't quite so high, neither are the troughs.
The Brora Annual Release Index (grey) vs The Mark Littler 999 Index (gold)
So yes, in 2022 the Brora might have looked a bit boring compared to the trajectory of Folio 1, but now we can see that the factors underpinning the value of the Brora give a much more robust basis for buying a long term alternative asset.
While hindsight is always 20:20, the important part is to learn from mistakes, whether yours or the market's, in order to make better decisions in the future. That, of course, is the same as with any investment.
Ultimately, you can understand everything there is to know, read all the guidance out there on what to buy and why, but at some point you have to look at a bottle and how it has done over the last 10…20 + years and decide if that's the right purchase for you. I've used Brora as an example because it ticks all the boxes in my opinion: age statements, quality, heritage, parent company intent and market history, but hopefully the context around the information also gives you a little bit more understanding on how to look at the market and select your own Brora.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 days ago
- Bloomberg
Former Lehman Banker Benoît d'Angelin Won't Waste a Crisis
Hi, it's Pamela Barbaglia in London, where I recently caught up with veteran investment banker Benoît d'Angelin to get his thoughts on the latest market upheaval. Elsewhere, Blackstone has big spending plans in Europe and Diageo is looking at options for its stake in an IPL cricket franchise. Today's top stories


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
How Similar Are Whisky Cask Investment Firms To Scammers Of The Past?
In an article on the blog of whisky retailer Master of Malt, former Diageo executive, archivist and whisky historian Dr. Nick Morgan provides examples of promises made by Scotch whisky cask investment firms to the general public: '15 – 30% capital growth per annum'; 'in four years your matured whisky may double in value'; 'malt whisky investment shows an average profit of 50% at maturity.' They sound awfully similar to ads from Scotch whisky cask investment companies that I've come across too: 'Cask whisky saw 15.86% growth in 2022'; '12% typical annual returns', '36.3% return in 3 years', 'a strong asset with the potential for significant capital appreciation' The difference? Morgan's examples are from the late 1960s and 1970s, when prospective investors not involved with the whisky industry were lured into investing into whisky casks - and fell for schemes where all their money was lost. My examples come from Scotch whisky cask investment ads that have shown up on my social media feed within the last year. All these promises past and present form part a pattern that repeats itself every 25 years and it has a familiar script - a new crop of upstart companies enter the whisky industry and tell prospective whisky investors unfamiliar with the market that putting money into Scotch whisky casks will deliver high profits at low risk. The reality is much different. The majority of investors who put their money into such schemes in the past lost everything or were left with casks not worth nearly the value that they were promised. It happened in the 1970s, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, and it's starting to happen again now. However, thanks to new technology and social media the scale at which the current crop of Scotch whisky cask investment firms operates is truly impressive. Morgan warned me that he believes that the dangers of fraud are larger than ever: 'Compared to the previous two [periods where scams took place] A court case from 1973, SEC v. Haffenden-Rimar International, involved defendants charged with selling unlicensed securities under the guise of whisky investments. Investors were told their money would grow as the whisky aged—but many of the casks either didn't exist or had been misrepresented. The scam resurfaced in the late 1990s and early 2000s with companies like Hamilton Spirit Management and Marshall Wineries. These firms used phone sales and print ads to attract investors, promoting casks at heavily marked-up prices and assuring buyers of strong, reliable returns. These casks were often resold multiple times, and when the companies went under, most investors were left with nothing. The promises made to investors today—steady growth, strong returns, a tangible asset—haven't changed for decades. The pillars of how these scams work - either by overcharging for casks and/or not actually providing proper ownership over a cask - remains the same. Morgan sees clear similarities to today: 'Relentless high-pressure sales techniques, inflated promises in terms of return and security of your investment and vastly inflated prices", he noted, 'this is the same palette of sharp practices that was employed 40 or 50 years ago and 20 or 25 years ago is the same one that's been deployed today, but at a higher technological level.' Indeed, the BBC's groundbreaking investigative show and podcast series about whisky cask investment scams, both titled Hunting the Whisky Bandits, revealed how three different firms, Cask Whisky Ltd, Cask Spirits Global Ltd, and Whisky Scotland, recently collapsed after having done the exact same thing to their clients. It's not about cold calls or a reliance on classified ads in the investment sections of newspapers and magazines anymore (though this is also happening today, through ads and sponsored content placed in mainstream publications). Laurence Cook is a producer who worked and was deeply involved with Hunting The Whisky Bandits. In a webinar interview with a consumer protection website I co-founded, he emphasized how today's scammers use digital tools to broaden their reach and sharpen their approach. 'These are people that can build slick websites, slick social media profiles. They're people that are committed to creating content that is targeted.' This expanded reach is translating into significantly more victims. Cook described the process of finding burned investors when he started investigative work for the series: 'There was an incredible human story in this, which was a lot of people had been exploited by a group of people, a fairly large group of people, working with kind of impunity and that was something worth looking into', he said. "We immediately knew was that the scale of this was massive. And secondly, as soon as the team began reaching out to victims, and we started finding people all over the place and in of infinite variety in terms of backgrounds and amounts that they'd invested, we also just found huge numbers of victims." Though his series and podcast only focuses on three firms, Cook is sure that this is just the tip of the iceberg and there are many others operating in the same way today as well. Over the course of his investigation, Cook and his team discovered that at least a few current operators may have been new to cask whisky investment, but aren't new to scam work. He makes chillingly clear the kinds of people who are often involved in this sector: 'It's fairly obvious, once you start digging on a few of them, that there were links to previous commodity scams, you know, be that wine, gold, art, whatever, and that these were people working in with an MO basically of sell a asset that you you tell the customer is a tangible thing that will go up in value, but it's tangible, but they shouldn't touch it. It's taking storage", he explains. "Fine wine was a kind of common denominator across a lot of the people that we looked at. Or they previously had been involved in property abroad, things that basically you have to take on trust in terms of the scale of customers and the scale of loss.' That model, selling an asset that's technically tangible but somewhat out of reach, works well with whisky. Investors usually don't see the casks they supposedly own. If purchasing through a middleman like a cask investment firm, they don't even necessarily safely own them unless they receive a document called a delivery order, which provides real legal proof of ownership under U.K. law. (Technically, clear contact between warehouse and cask owner fulfills that legal ownership requirement, but a D.O. is the industry standard). So far, these are hardly ever actually provided by most Scotch whisky cask investment firms. For those affected, the damage isn't just financial. As Cook pointed out during our webinar, 'We found people who hadn't told their families the true scale of the loss. We found people who are contemplated taking their own lives. We found people who would talk to us for background conversations, but wouldn't talk on air because of the shame that they felt.' There's a reason similar tactics have been used by Scotch whisky cask investment firms from the past and present - their goal has been the same. It is to develop a kind of product that provides them with a profit - and it's not whisky. That is just the lure. The money-making product are investors unfamiliar with the industry who can be squeezed for their cash, using both legal (but ethically suspect) and sometimes illegal means. These investors can be overcharged for casks, and regularly enticed with new products once they are in the sales database of the firm that brought them in. In today's Scotch whisky cask investment 'ecosystems', they can even sell to each other with the middleman cask investment firm facilitating the sale between its two clients, arbitrarily determining sale price and then taking a slice of the resulting transaction. If whisky was the product these firms were offering, and if they truly believed that a fortune can be made from it, then they should be bottling and selling whisky themselves. However, the truth - as any independent whisky bottler will tell you - is that this is actually incredibly hard work. It requires the nous to run a good business, to understand your consumer and your markets, to understand the true industry price of casks, to have the contacts to find genuinely tasty ones, and plenty more besides. It's easier to set up a whisky cask investment firm marketing overpriced, mediocre casks to the general public. However, to keep this kind of operation going requires aggressive sales tactics, slick marketing, and constantly bringing in new prospective clients. The business models of many of these firms resemble and blend together two different types of venerable scam business models - boiler rooms and pyramid schemes. Little wonder it all feels familiar to Morgan: "What they're doing is absolutely identical. The key difference is social media and technology."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
United Spirits rebuffs talk of Diageo IPL asset review
United Spirits has said reports Diageo is mulling its options for its interest in IPL cricket team Royal Challengers Bengaluru are 'speculative'. Citing unnamed sources, Bloomberg said Diageo, which owns the side through its controlling interest in United Spirits, had held talks with possible advisors. In a brief stock-exchange filing today (10 June), the publicly-listed United Spirits said: 'The company would like to clarify that aforesaid media reports are speculative in nature and it is not pursuing any such discussions'. Last month, Diageo CFO Nik Jhangiani said the drinks giant could make 'substantial changes' to its product portfolio in the form of asset disposals. Speaking to analysts, Jhangiani said Diageo had identified opportunities to offload assets that were different in scope to the deals the Johnnie Walker maker had conducted in recent years. 'Clearly we see through our reviews that we've been doing internally and with the board some opportunities for what I would call substantial changes versus portfolio trimming,' Jhangiani said. 'I can't say any more than that but clearly it's going to be above and beyond the usual smaller brand disposals that you've seen over the last three years.' Diageo has offloaded assets including rum brands Cacique and Pampero and Safari liqueur. The group has also sold assets in Africa, although in October it reportedly called off the sale of its Pimm's gin-based liqueur after failing to secure an agreement with potential buyers. Jhangiani was speaking after Diageo announced plans to save around $500m in costs over the next three years. United Spirits acquired its interest in RCB in 2008. According to Diageo's annual report, the group owns just under 55.9% in United Spirits. "United Spirits rebuffs talk of Diageo IPL asset review" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.