The Edge (2024) outshines even its successor with this generous Motorola deal
As we recently shared, Motorola Edge (2025) has already received its first discount, making it a tempting proposition. However, if you want to save more, going for its predecessor may be the better financial decision for you.
Right now, Motorola is selling the Edge (2024) for $200 off, bringing the price down to $349.99. You can also trade in an eligible device to save even more, with Motorola offering a $100 trade-in discount on most phones. Granted, this isn't a new deal. However, this doesn't mean the phone is not an absolute bargain at its current price.
Trade-in
$249 99
$549 99 $300 off (55%)
Motorola has slashed $200 off the price of its mid-range Edge (2024), bringing it down to just $349.99. Want to save even more? Trade in your old phone and get an extra $100 discount. Powered by a Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and 8GB of RAM, this bad boy delivers snappy performance—making it a steal at this price. Don't wait too long—save now! Buy at Motorola Rocking a Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and 8GB of RAM, this bad boy can tackle most tasks without even breaking a sweat. You'll also be able to play demanding games like League of Legends: Wild Rift without any stutters, which is impressive for a phone that could be yours for just $249.99.You'll also enjoy a pleasant viewing experience when streaming YouTube videos, thanks to its beautiful 6.6-inch P-OLED screen with a 2400 x 1080 resolution and HDR support. Additionally, the display features a blazing-fast 144Hz refresh rate and reaches a peak brightness of 1,300 nits, letting you see clearly even on the sunniest summer days. Meanwhile, its 50MP main camera takes pretty decent photos for—again—a phone that could set you back only $250. That said, it lacks a telephoto lens, so zooming in can lead to loss of sharpness and detail.
Nevertheless, the Motorola Edge (2024) is worth every penny, and we encourage you to get one if you want a speedy phone without overspending. So, if it fits the bill for you—don't miss out! Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Can Samsung come on top of Huawei with the Galaxy G Fold tri-fold?
Huawei, baby. – You, outraged at my shenanigans. True that: I really do find the Oppo Find N5 – the virtual successor to the OG masterpiece OnePlus Open (OnePlus and Oppo are joined at the hip, their devices share components more often than not) – to be an amazing piece of technology. People are astonished by its 4.2mm thin (when unfolded) chassis, but I don't care that much about super thin phones. The Oppo Find N5. | Image by PhoneArena Instead, I'm fascinated by the Find N5's extreme toughness and fierce elegance, its potent chipset (inside, there's the top-shelf Snapdragon 8 Elite silicon), its 5,600 mAh battery (hey, that's more than what my non-folding flagship's cell offers) and its overall performance: reliable, premium, incredibly cool. But, at the end of the day, I don't need it. Did you see that? Did you see what I just did? I praised a phone, I explained how thrilled I'm with its specs, I almost said how it's second to none in my heart. And yet, I said: no, thank you, I will not buy you. I'm a stable person who makes the correct financial decision. The ability to refrain yourself from buying things just because you happen to like them very much is great, and I do recommend meditating on it. As I said, because they have what nobody else has: the Huawei Pura X. That's a foldable, but unlike anything else you've seen: Image by PhoneArena See?That's a flip-style phone that opens sideways to a 16:10 aspect ratio, 6.3-inch display. So clever. So you accuse me of not getting the Huawei Pura X right – and you'll be right, up to a point – let me assure you: I'm aware of the Pura X's shortcomings. That's not a standard phone, software-focused speaking. It comes on Huawei's own Harmony Next OS, so it doesn't support Android and iOS apps that people outside of China generally use. The phone itself will probably never be released outside its home country. Why, then, do I see it as a better option for me and my needs compared to the Oppo Find N5, the Galaxy Z Fold 6, or Motorola's cool Razr models? It's because of that 16:10 aspect ratio and the clamshell form factor. Being a flip phone, the Pura X offers me far better pocketability, while providing a large – both tall and wide – inner display.I like large displays: say, you've just come back from an exotic trip and you want to show some pictures and videos to your friends. A regular non-folding phone – even if it's a 6.8-inch beast – just doesn't cut it. Being a slab, candy bar-like device, the non-folding phone comes with a far narrower display and those wonderful photos you've captured just can't be seen that well on such a small a laptop or a tablet is out of the question, as I hate backpacks, bags, purses – I have pockets, thank you very much. Enter the Huawei Pura X.I don't intend on using it as anything more than a cool, large, foldable extra display to watch (and edit – why not?) photos and videos. An extra phone that doesn't take extra space in my pockets. – You, outraged at me once again. Hey, that's your money, remember? Joking aside, book style foldables are a great option as well, but they do take much more space (when folded) than a clamshell one. That's precisely why I won't be getting a book style foldable any time soon. Plus, they're twice (or more) as expensive, so… far, no foldable can come close to the camera power of dedicated camera-centric flagships like the Xiaomi 15 Ultra or the Oppo Find X8 Ultra. And since I value cameras above all in a smartphone, that kind of explains why I'm not getting the Pura X or the Oppo Find N5 (expensive or not) for a daily as great as the Pura X is, I can't deny that Samsung could very well make Huawei sweat in some months time precisely on the foldable a point in the future, many of us will rock tri-foldables like this one: Image by PhoneArena So far, this is the only commercially available tri-fold on the market, the Huawei Mate XT. It's a fascinating device that has its share of shortcomings, but its debut is now written in history. Apple and Samsung are also reportedly developing tri-folds of their own. Recently, I argued that while Samsung's tri-fold seems flawed, at least it's innovation (even if it's a Huawei comeback). Now, it seems that Samsung is on the right track and could very well produce a tri-fold of its own that could enchant many. The latest report hints at such a possibility: Samsung Galaxy tri-foldable's RAM and processor leak Samsung's upcoming Galaxy G Fold is shaping up to be one of the company's most ambitious and impressive smartphones to date. As a tri-foldable device, it could represent a major leap forward in design and engineering – yeah, it should come months after Huawei's revolutionary Mate XT, but it's still should set the Galaxy G Fold apart is its powerful hardware. Unlike the Galaxy S25 series, which continues to ship with 12 GB of RAM, the G Fold is expected to come with 16 GB of RAM as standard. It's said to run exclusively on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, and this piece of silicon is a beast on its own. Much better than the Kirin chipset in the Mate XT. While the G Fold's innovative design and premium specs (judging from rumors right now) mark it as a standout device, it's not without trade-offs. Battery capacity and charging speeds could remain a weak point, echoing the same limitations seen in Samsung's other foldables. The phone may feature a 4,400 mAh battery – relatively small given its size – and will likely charge slowly compared to other flagship phones. Image by PhoneArena I really hope this 4,400 mAh rumor doesn't hold true, because it would be a shame, so to say. Come on, Samsung, 5,000 mAh is not that hard of a task! The original Mate XT packs a 5,600 mAh cell, albeit with an inferior Kirin chipset that's not as power-efficient as the Snapdragon 8 Elite. But, in the end, the reality is that the majority of people (outside of China) will probably go with the Samsung tri-fold – even if it has a 4,400 mAh. The well-known Galaxy and One UI ecosystem, the unlimited access to the whole plethora of Google services (yeah, the Mate XT doesn't fully support those), and the peace of mind that you're getting a Samsung (some people are actually afraid of getting "exotic" brands"): these are major selling points. The upcoming One UI 8 is designed precisely with foldables in mind – system animations and screen elements should look amazing on all Galaxy almost sees like a clear win for the upcoming Galaxy G Fold (minus the battery). Unless the upcoming Huawei Mate XT 2 turns out to be a beast out of this world. The plot thickens, ladies and gentlemen.
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
The Pixel 10's 'downgraded' camera might actually be genius
Pixel 10 It's not about specs, it's about possibilities Receive the latest editorials Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Pixel 9a Pixel 10 A surprising new strength: macro photography Pixel 10 Recommended Stories Pixel 10 Pixel 10 camera changes – downgrade or smart tradeoff? Smart move — versatility matters more than top-tier sensor Not a fan — downgrading the main sensor is a dealbreaker I'll wait and see how the photos actually look Macro and zoom sound exciting — I'm curious! Doesn't matter — I usually go for the Pro anyway Smart move — versatility matters more than top-tier sensor 0% Not a fan — downgrading the main sensor is a dealbreaker 0% I'll wait and see how the photos actually look 0% Macro and zoom sound exciting — I'm curious! 0% Doesn't matter — I usually go for the Pro anyway 0% Versatility over quality Pixel 10 This shift from Google will only make the Pixel stronger Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer Even a couple of months before its release, the Pixel 10 is already shaping up to be one of the most hotly discussed and potentially controversial phones of Because Google is expected to add a third, zoom camera to its base flagship for the first time ever. At first this sounds amazing, but dig in deeper in the leaks, and you'd find out that the cost of that new camera is lower-grade image sensors for the remaining two fact, the main and ultra-wide cameras are said to be the same ones that the Pixel 9a is using… Not great news considering we are talking about a $300 price difference! That would be even worse if the rumors of a $100 price hike for I'm here to argue that we shouldn't be too quick with our start with the alleged 'downgrades.' Google is moving from the Samsung GNV and Sony IMX858 — both flagship-tier sensors — to the Samsung GN8 and Sony IMX712. These newer components are smaller and less capable in terms of dynamic range and low-light performance. But we've seen what Google can do with limited hardware which uses similar camera components, is a perfect example. Despite its budget-friendly positioning, it scored 134 in our PhoneArena Camera Score, with strong marks in photo quality and impressive zoom results thanks to Google's Super Res Zoom. It wasn't perfect, but it punched far above its Google applies the same computational magic to the(now with a new Tensor G5 chip) it could extract even more from these 'inferior' parts. And that brings us to the most interesting possibility of all: macro to early rumors, themight take a smart, hybrid approach to macro photography — automatically switching between its new telephoto and ultra-wide cameras based on how close you are to the subject. This could dramatically improve detail and accuracy in close-up shots of textures, small objects, or even tiny insects — an area where most smartphones still fall macro isn't a camera feature many people ask for. It's not exactly the best one for candid family photos or capturing memories on a trip. But personally, I've always had a soft spot for it. There's something special about discovering an entire hidden world through your the leaks are accurate, this hybrid system could give thea serious edge in close-up photography — maybe even better than what the iPhone Pro can is where the's new camera layout starts to make more sense. Personally, I've found telephoto cameras far more useful than ultra-wides. A telephoto camera is useful for portraits, framing landscapes so that there are no distractions, and even for figuring out text that's far away. Most ultra-wide cameras, especially on non-Pro phones, suffer from weaker image quality and distortion prioritizing zoom and letting the ultra-wide step in only when needed, Google might be giving users a smarter, more intentional camera setup. That doesn't mean ultra-wide is useless. But it does mean we're getting a phone better suited to real-world shooting scenarios.I like what Google is doing here — there's no need to go for the best and most expensive image sensor if you can offer the user more by keeping things moderate. I see this as Google focusing on making the camera more adaptable and useful for those who don't want to pay the extra buck for a Pro could be looking at the most creatively flexible base Pixel yet. I might not be the sharpest shooter, or the most advanced one — but maybe it will be the one that makes you want to go out and take more photos. And I am willing to bet money that it once again punches above its weight despite the 'downgrades.'
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
The Thin Phone Fallacy: Why Apple and Samsung are ignoring the only smartphone rule that matters
Why? As sleek as these devices look, they violate the cardinal rule of smartphone success: "don't give users bad battery life!" Poor battery life is the capital sin of the mobile world. We've seen this movie just a few years ago, with the 2020 iPhone 12 mini. The world loved its compact size, but nobody could live with the constant battery anxiety. Not surprisingly, Apple killed it after just two generations. Remember the not so distant days of 'wall huggers' just scanning every room they go into for a power outlet? Or that one friend who turned their bag in more than just a bag — a mobile charging station, tangled with cables and bulky power banks. Those were NOT happy times. And Apple's idea in 2025? An iPhone 17 Air with a 2,800 mAh battery. Well, the thin phone formula in 2025 might be different than the mini one, but leads to the same dead end: a sleek-looking phone with a battery that dies by... 5pm. The light weight is a nice trick—you might forget the phone is in your pocket. But the moment you start using it, there's still no escaping the reality of the big physical size. A thin phone with a big screen is still a big phone, and it won't win over anyone who misses truly compact devices. A New Path is Possible While Apple and Samsung try super slim phones, OnePlus tries super-battery phones (Image by OnePlus) At the same time, other parts of the industry are proving there's a better way. What if a compact phone could have... incredible battery life? This isn't a fantasy, even if it may sound like one. Brands like OnePlus are showing that you don't have to choose between a manageable size and a massive battery. Take the OnePlus 13s (aka OnePlus 13T), a 6.3-inch phone, same size as the compact iPhone 16 Pro or Pixel 9 Pro. However, thanks to clever engineering and different priorities, OnePlus includes a 5,850 mAh battery inside that phone. And this is not even one of those cutting-edge silicon-carbon batteries, it's just a regular cell (the Chinese-bound 13T model uses silicon-carbon and comes with an even higher 6,200mAh capacity). This is proof that a compact phone can have amazing battery. It is proof that settings different priorities can yield much better results for the end user. So why are Apple and Samsung ignoring this? Is it a genuine design obsession, or are they simply unwilling to build a smaller phone with a great battery because... it might threaten the fat profit margins of their "Pro Max" and 'Ultra' behemoths? I'll just leave this question here for you to ponder. The other weak spot: performance iFixit teardown shows Samsung was desparate to add at least some cooling to this design (Image by iFixit) I usually wouldn't care too much about performance (most flagship phones these days are powerful enough), but a recent iFixit teardown of the Galaxy S25 Edge reveals just how desperate Samsung was in its attempt to introduce at least some cooling to the 5.8 mm thin design of the phone. A CT scan of the S25 Edge reveals how the vapor chamber directs heat to... the cell itself. This is not uncommon, but it results in higher temperatures hitting the battery not just during charging, but also even with just average use. The result is your battery getting exposed to temperatures way above the recommended 30°C, and ultimately, not only worse battery life, but faster battery degradation. Talk about a double whammy. Power users and gamers will also notice this with heavy workloads, but that is not even my first concern here as even the regular user can feel it. An inevitable encounter with reality Whatever the reason, the market is brutally practical. No amount of marketing glamor or launch-day hype can save a phone that dies before dinner. Imagine you're on a once-in-a-lifetime trip, hiking for hours to reach the perfect sunset spot. You take out your phone and… the screen is black. All of that sleek design is totally worthless at that moment. Or even worse, imagine relying on that phone to navigate back home. A super-slim flagship with an inflated price and a mediocre battery isn't just a bad product; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what people want from a device they depend on.
