Sinn Féin calls for vacant council houses to be made available within 12 weeks
New figures show that at least one in every four boarded up council home has been empty for longer than 12 months.
Advertisement
The figures released to Sinn Féin's Thomas Gould show that 38 per cent of those vacant longer than 12 months have been empty for more than two years.
Over 750 council homes across the state have been boarded up for over a year. This is shameful.
We must fight back together against FF & FG, demand investment in our communities, and ensure everyone has a safe, secure & affordable place to call home.
pic.twitter.com/oDVgxpECiJ
— Sinn Féin (@sinnfeinireland)
June 6, 2025
There are currently more than 750 council homes across Ireland which have been boarded up for more than a year.
Mr Gould, the party's spokesman on Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Planning, Public Realm and Local Government, said there are thousands of homes that have been boarded up for three to four years, with some homes lying empty for eight years.
Limerick, Wicklow, Tipperary and Louth have council homes boarded up for the longest time periods, while Donegal, Cork City and Limerick have the highest levels of vacant stock.
Advertisement
Mr Gould said the average re-letting times vary across the state.
'Why are local authorities boarding up houses? When a family moves out, (and) if that house is (in) a decent condition, let's put a family straight in. Let's not board it up. Let's put people in there.
'Instead, it's being boarded up, waiting for the Department of Housing to give money in 12 months' time, and then taking another six months for procurement to do it up.
'We want to get every house returned within 12 weeks. We think 12 gives time for local authorities to repair the house and get them out again.
Advertisement
'Local authorities are only getting 11,000 euros for each unit to be turned around, when the average cost last year was 28,000.'
He added: 'This is a scandal when we're in the middle of the worst housing crisis in the history of the state, and what we are trying to do is bring forward solutions.
'This in itself won't solve the housing crisis, but what it would do, is could release thousands of homes that would help to house people who are homeless, but also take people out of the rental market.
'So this will have a domino positive effect from homeless services to social housing to rent.
Advertisement
'(We) want local authorities, rather than waiting for the department to give sanctions, that local authorities would be able to work returning homes all year long, and not just waiting for once or twice a year for the government to give sanctions.'
He called for Fianna Fail and Fine Gael to bring in a 'proper procedure' to address long-term vacant homes.
Mr Gould said boarded-up houses have 'devastating effects' on communities.
'Families are coming out every day and looking at them, they're magnets for anti social-behaviour, the magnets for dumping,' he added.
Advertisement
Ireland
Department of Foreign Affairs spent almost €1.4m o...
Read More
'They just drag down the whole environment of really good communities, and it's about time now the Government stepped up.
'We are bringing forward a solution. We hope the Government will take it on board, because we think it makes sense.'
The Department of Housing has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
9 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Politics watch: Taoiseach defends EU-US trade deal amid criticism
Here, we have a look at the topics likely to dominate political discourse in the week to come. EU-US trade deal The Taoiseach has welcomed a new trade agreement between the US and EU as having 'avoided a damaging trade war'. Advertisement Taoiseach Micheál Martin also said there is 'much to be negotiated' following what he termed a 'framework agreement'. Speaking to the media in Dublin on Monday, Mr Martin said it 'opens up the prospect of more significant strategic collaboration between the US and Europe on quite a number of issues'. 'It also avoids further escalation, or indeed a trade conflict, which would be very, very damaging to the economies of the United States and of the European Union,' he said. 'It's important to say that Europe never sought tariffs, or never sought to impose tariffs, and fundamentally, we are against tariffs: we believe in an open trading economy.' Mr Martin said it is a very different situation than before April 1st. Advertisement 'New realities are in play and so at a broader level, the stability and predictability that this agreement brings is important for businesses, is important for consumers and indeed patients when it comes to the manufacturing and distribution of medicines,' he said. 'In essence, we have avoided a trade conflict here which would have been ruinous, which would have been very damaging to our economy, and to jobs in particular. 'The challenge now for Europe is to work on its own inefficiencies, to reduce barriers within the single market, to press ahead more ambitiously and more proactively on trade diversification and trade deals with other countries that would facilitate that market diversification that is required. 'Meanwhile, there is much to be negotiated in the aftermath of this framework agreement.' Advertisement Asked about mixed reactions to the deal in Europe, Mr Martin said: 'Nobody is welcoming tariffs with open arms. 'I think we've been consistent in saying that we don't agree with tariffs, that we prefer if there weren't tariffs, but we have to deal with realities. 'I understand people criticising, but given the balance and the options here… in my view, I would appreciate the work of the (European) Commission in this regard, and the avoidance of a trade war is preferable, in my view, and that's the key issue.' Businesses have had a mixed reaction to the agreement. Advertisement In a statement, business lobby group Ibec said the deal will still leave a "substantial burden" for some industries. Ibec chief executive Danny McCoy said: "Today's trade agreement between the US and EU brings an end to a significant amount of uncertainty for some businesses. However, a 15 per cent tariff still represents a substantial burden for many industries. Sectors which rely heavily on the US market and operate within small margins, will once again be significantly impacted by an additional 5 per cent tariff, on top of what they have already had to absorb over the past several months and well in excess of the 1 per cent effective tariff which existed before April." Mr McCoy added: "Our message to the Government, as it was with the 10 per cent tariff, is that the most exposed sectors will require support similar to the interventions provided as a response to Brexit. "It is important to note that the details are still emerging and will only be worked out as today's framework is fleshed out. These details will be critically important for Ireland. Pharmaceuticals and Semiconductors which equate to 75 per cent of Ireland-US trade are, we understand, included in the 15 per cent deal. However, there is still a question around the stability of that rate over both the short and long-term in the face of ongoing Section 232 investigations." Advertisement Speaking on RTÉ's News at One, IEA chief executive Simon McKeever: "I think the EU was backed into a very difficult negotiating position because of the lack of investment in defence and security spending over the last number of years. It's totally dependent on the US in that space. "I don't think it's a good deal. I don't think it's a great deal and for Irish businesses, they're now faced with a 15 per cent tariff they weren't faced with before and they'll need to deal with that. "I think that we were negotiating with one if not two hands tied behind our back. I don't think we were in a very strong position because of the defence issue." He called on Tánaiste Simon Harris to get the trade forum together urgently. "Companies are going to need help. We have called for a tariff adjustment fund, which is based on the Brexit adjustment reserve and was brought out in 2021. "Irish companies are going to need time to get to grips with this. I'm calling on Simon Harris to please get the trade forum together tomorrow or on Wednesday, because we need to get back to our members with this." French prime minister François Bayrou called the deal a "dark day" for Europe. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to assert their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission,' Mr Bayrou wrote on X. Michael D Higgins tells EU presidents silence on Gaza would be a 'moral failure' President Michael D Higgins has written to other European presidents to say that silence on Gaza would be a moral failure. He said that while Israel has a right to defend itself, they cannot let the 'horrific' attack on October 7th, 2023, 'provide a licence or cover' for the scale of civilian deaths in Gaza. Mr Higgins wrote the letter to the Arraiolos Group, an informal organisation representing presidents of EU countries which meets once a year. The political forum is named after the Portuguese town where the first meeting took place in 2003. 'I am sure that we all remember with horror the moment when news broke of the horrific atrocities carried out by Hamas as we returned from our meeting of the Arraiolos Group in Porto in October 2023,' he said. 'These atrocities were rightly condemned by all member states. We were not silent and called for the unconditional release of all hostages. 'While Israel has a right to defend itself, we cannot let that horrific event provide a licence or cover for the totally unacceptable loss of life, including from malnutrition and dehydration by infants and mothers that is now being perpetrated in Gaza.' Abroad The EU-US trade deal was announced during US president Donald Trump's visit to Scotland, where he appeared alongside European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. He also appeared with UK prime minister Keir Starmer at a press conference on Monday, where they addressed a range of topics. Mr Trump said the focus in Gaza was getting food to people amid ongoing Israeli blockades of aide that have left the population on the brik of mass starvation. Mr Trump also suggested he will bring forward a deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine.
BreakingNews.ie
12 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Kinvara residents fail in application to challenge decision to accommodate asylum seekers at hotel
Several residents of a Co Galway village have failed in their bid to bring High Court proceedings challenging the Government's decision to house international protection applicants at a local hotel. Kinvara residents Ruth Sexton, Mary Boyce, Chris Hartnett Dalton and Paul Collins had sought the court's permission to challenge the decision in March to place up to 98 people in the Merriman Hotel, which is currently home to about 50 Ukrainian people. Advertisement The Merriman Hotel has accommodated international protection applicants since 2019, but, the residents contended, the Government's decision in March constituted a fresh designation of the building as international protection accommodation. In designating a premise as an accommodation centre, the Minister for Integration is obliged to have regard for public interest, among other considerations, under a statutory instrument provided for in the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018. The residents argued that the Minister was in breach of this obligation in their alleged designation of the building in March. In a judgment, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said the decision in March to accommodate 98 people at the Merriman Hotel was not a fresh designation of the premises, and therefore, the statutory instrument did not apply. The hotel was clearly designated in 2019, when international protection applicants were first accommodated there, the judge said. Advertisement The judge said it was not possible to judicially review the decision complained of by the residents. Ms Justice Bolger said she was not satisfied the residents had presented arguable grounds on which their case would succeed, and denied their application to bring the proceedings. The judge noted that there was no legal obligation on the Minister to consult residents or prepare an assessment of how its decision might impact local businesses, or the availability of a local venue for family events, or the availability of social services where a premises has already been designated as international protection accommodation. The judge said the Government's decision in March is mainly grounded in the State's obligation to provide accommodation to those seeking asylum. Advertisement 'The [residents] accept that the State has a legal obligation to provide accommodation for applicants for international protection but seem to ask the court to prioritise their personal interest in having a hotel in their locality to accommodate tourists and provide a local venue for their family events over the State's attempt to comply with those national, European and international obligations,' the judge said. The case is listed before the judge later this week. The residents – Ms Sexton, of Sexton's Bar, Main Street, Kinvara; Ms Boyce, of Cathercon, Kinvara, Mr Hartnett Dalton, of Northampton, Kinvara; and Mr Collins, of Crushoa, Kinvara – had sought to bring proceedings against the Minister for the Department of Children, Equality, Disability and Integration and the Minister for the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
Nobody is welcoming tariffs ‘with open arms', says Irish premier
Ireland's premier has said no one is welcoming a baseline tariff of 15% 'with open arms' but the EU-US agreement avoids a 'ruinous' trade war. Taoiseach Micheal Martin also said the deal offered 'overall ceilings' on tariff rates and would mean they are not 'stacked' upon another. Despite suggestions from US President Donald Trump, he said his understanding was that the 15% tariff on pharmaceutical exports also represented 'a ceiling' rate. Speaking to the media at Government Buildings in Dublin on Monday, Mr Martin said the US tariffs are 'not Brexit' and the approach for supporting businesses had to be 'strategic and not a handout'. He said what effect the new trading arrangements would have on October's budget would be decided closer to the time. 'It's important to say that Europe never sought tariffs, or never sought to impose tariffs, and fundamentally, we are against tariffs: we believe in an open trading economy,' he said. 'New realities are in play and so at a broader level, the stability and predictability that this agreement brings is important for businesses, is important for consumers and indeed patients when it comes to the manufacturing and distribution of medicines,' he said. 'In essence, we have avoided a trade conflict here which would have been ruinous, which would have been very damaging to our economy, and to jobs in particular. 'The challenge now for Europe is to work on its own inefficiencies, to reduce barriers within the single market, to press ahead more ambitiously and more proactively on trade diversification and trade deals with other countries that would facilitate that market diversification that is required. 'Meanwhile, there is much to be negotiated in the aftermath of this framework agreement.' The EU is to have 15% tariffs imposed on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US, with no new tariffs on US goods coming into the bloc. There will be 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars (£560 billion) over three years. There is a mixed reaction to the deal across the EU, with French minister Benjamin Haddad calling the deal 'unbalanced' and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban stating that Donald Trump 'ate European Commission President Ursula) von der Leyen for breakfast'. Ireland's junior minister at the Department of Foreign Affairs, Neale Richmond, said the deal was the least worst option. 'We're not exactly celebrating this, it's not a case that this is a good thing but it's probably the least bad option based on what we were facing a couple of days ago, the prospect of a 30% tariff,' he told the BBC. Asked about mixed reactions to the deal from heads of government across Europe, Mr Martin said: 'Nobody is welcoming tariffs with open arms. 'I think we've been consistent in saying that we don't agree with tariffs, that we prefer if there weren't tariffs, but we have to deal with realities. 'I understand people criticising, but given the balance and the options here … in my view, I would appreciate the work of the (European) Commission in this regard, and the avoidance of a trade war is preferable, in my view, and that's the key issue.' He added: 'It's easy to put the chin out in life, but sometimes it's wiser to box more cautiously and to negotiate wisely and to think of the bigger picture, and I think that's what President von der Leyen and Maros Sefcovic have done on this occasion.' Asked about whether the 9.4 billion euro that the government announced last week would be spent in the budget would be cut back, Mr Martin said they would better understand the implications closer to the budget being unveiled in October. 'It's difficult at this early stage to calculate the impact of these tariffs in terms of government revenues, or indeed in terms of the prospects for 2026, so we will do further analysis of that.' He said he did not believe Irish companies would lose access to the US market as a result of the tariff rate. He added: 'This is not Brexit, and I would caution in terms of just creating funds in themselves. 'I think more importantly, we have to take decisions now that would create the opportunity or the landscape for companies to grow and to develop strongly, to become more energy efficient, in terms of research and development supports. 'It has to be a strategic approach, not a handout approach.' Responding, chief executive of business group Ibec Danny McCoy said he believed Europe had 'capitulated' to get a deal, but said if they had negotiated harder 'we could have damaged ourselves a lot more than we anticipated'. He said there would be 'hard cases' and job losses in Ireland under a 15% tariff, and was 'surprised' the government was not open to Brexit or Covid-level supports for businesses. 'It's not going to be a catastrophe, we're more resistant than that, but for some industries, going back to the point around the Brexit-type adjustment fund, you need to be sensitive there will be some areas that actually could find this devastating.' Mr Martin said it was 'vital' that the EU pushes ahead with the expansion of the European single market to reduce barriers in a number of sectors that 'are way beyond the value of the tariffs'. He said it was not clear yet what impact the tariff differential on the island of Ireland would have, as there is a 10% tariff in place in Northern Ireland. 'In terms of the north-south, again, the detail will be important here and its early days yet to be reading too much into that differential, because ours are not stacked, whereas some in the north would be, so these are complex issues that have to be worked out.'
