logo
Reddit post sparks questions over transparency in NSmen make-up pay adjustment

Reddit post sparks questions over transparency in NSmen make-up pay adjustment

SINGAPORE: A Reddit user has sparked public concern over a lack of transparency surrounding recent changes to the Make-Up Pay (MUP) scheme for Operationally Ready National Servicemen (NSmen).
The user, who had recently completed a two-week In-Camp Training (ICT) in May, noticed a significant discrepancy in his MUP despite a civilian pay increment.
The post on 19 May 2025 raised questions about the communication and fairness of the policy change.
Well-Publicised NSF Pay Hike vs. Silent NSman Adjustment
The user highlighted the stark contrast in how two major policies affecting national servicemen were communicated.
In March 2025, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) publicly announced an increase in the monthly allowance for full-time National Servicemen (NSFs), ranging from S$35 to S$75, set to take effect in July 2025.
The announcement was widely covered by the media.
In contrast, the user pointed out the lack of any official communication regarding a revision to the MUP formula for NSmen, which took effect in February 2025.
He noted that there were no press releases, government announcements, or media reports concerning the change, which he found troubling.
Bonuses Excluded Under New Make-Up Pay Formula
The Reddit user shared his experience of receiving a lower MUP than expected, despite having received a pay increase in his civilian job.
Upon contacting the NS hotline, he was informed that his Additional Wage (AW) was recorded as '$0' under the new MUP formula, as bonuses were excluded.
According to the explanation provided by MINDEF, the exclusion of bonuses was based on the assumption that employers are unlikely to reduce bonuses when employees take short absences due to NS activities.
MINDEF explained that the revised MUP calculation, which took effect in February 2025, adjusts the AW component by removing the two highest AW months, typically bonuses.
The aim was to better estimate income loss for NSmen when attending Operationally Ready National Service (ORNS) activities.
This change was introduced after feedback from employers and NSmen.
'Unjust and Unjustified': Redditor Calls for Reversal
The Reddit user expressed strong dissatisfaction with the policy change, calling it 'unjust and unjustified.'
He argued that the rationale behind the exclusion of bonuses was illogical and unfair.
The user pointed out that someone has to bear the cost of the compensation shortfall—either the reservist employee, who would receive a smaller bonus, or the employer, who would have to pay the same bonus despite fewer work weeks.
The user also criticized the lack of transparency in the implementation of the policy change.
He noted that while the NSF pay increase had been publicly announced months in advance, the MUP revision affecting NSmen had not been disclosed or discussed in public.
What Does This Mean for NSmen?
The Reddit post included a detailed FAQ section to explain the potential consequences of the MUP changes.
The user highlighted that for NSmen whose bonuses form a significant portion of their income, the exclusion of bonuses during reservist training could lead to substantial pay cuts.
For example, missing out on one month's performance bonus could result in a 7% pay cut, and missing two months could lead to a 14% cut.
The FAQ also addressed concerns from those under the Direct scheme, where MUP goes directly to the employer.
The user warned that employers might become less inclined to pay the same bonus to reservist employees if they are absent for two weeks a year, making them less cost-efficient compared to other employees.
In response to the unannounced policy change, the Reddit user encouraged others to express their concerns.
He provided several ways to raise the issue, including filling out the official feedback form on the NS website, calling the NS hotline, emailing MINDEF, or writing to Members of Parliament (MPs) during Meet-the-People sessions.
The user also suggested reaching out to both soial and traditional media outlets to bring more attention to the issue.
He emphasized the importance of accountability for the changes and called for the revision to be reversed and backpaid.
Reddit Users Weigh In on Silent Make-Up Pay Change
Following the Reddit post, several users echoed concerns about the revised Make-Up Pay (MUP) scheme for Operationally Ready National Servicemen (NSmen), calling for a broader public discussion on what they viewed as a significant and troubling policy shift.
They questioned the rationale behind the exclusion of bonuses from the MUP calculation, particularly the assumption by authorities that employers are unlikely to reduce bonuses for employees taking short absences for National Service.
One user highlighted the lack of public communication surrounding the change, describing it as 'extremely poor'.
Another Redditor shared a personal account, stating, 'I completed my ICT recently and noticed the slight drop compared to last year as well—thanks for bringing this up.'
The comment reflected a growing chorus of dissatisfaction over the silent policy adjustment and calls for greater transparency.
Following the Reddit post, The Online Citizen (TOC) sent a formal letter to MINDEF on 20 May, seeking clarification over the recent changes to the MUP scheme for Operationally Ready NSmen.
TOC asked why the change—implemented in February 2025—was not formally announced or communicated to the public, noting that the revised method could significantly affect payouts.
TOC also asked whether the exclusion of bonuses—achieved by removing the two highest Additional Wage (AW) months from the 12-month average—marked a shift in policy.
It questioned the rationale behind no longer including bonuses as part of income loss calculations.
TOC further asked about the basis for MINDEF's claim that bonuses are excluded because employers are 'not likely to reduce these' during short absences for NS.
It requested evidence supporting this assumption and whether there had been any consultation with employers, unions, or employee groups.
TOC also asked how MINDEF assessed the potential long-term impact on employability and equity, warning that the change could lead to unintended consequences such as reduced bonuses, hindered career progression, or added burdens for employers.
TOC raised concerns over the DIRECT scheme, where employers continue paying full salaries and claim reimbursement.
It asked if these employers are now under-compensated and whether they were informed about the change.
TOC has since reviewed past public documentation and noted that the change appears inconsistent with previously published calculation methods.
As of 27 May 2025, MINDEF has not responded to TOC's queries.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Job applicant walks out of interview after being asked, 'Do you support your parents?' and other personal questions
Job applicant walks out of interview after being asked, 'Do you support your parents?' and other personal questions

Independent Singapore

timea day ago

  • Independent Singapore

Job applicant walks out of interview after being asked, 'Do you support your parents?' and other personal questions

SINGAPORE: A jobseeker was left shocked and unsettled after a virtual interview with a local IT company took a deeply personal and inappropriate turn, prompting her to exit the session midway. On Friday (June 6), she shared her experience on Reddit's Ask Singapore forum, detailing what she described as 'the worst interview' she's ever encountered. According to her post, the interview was conducted online by someone who identified herself as the company's 'business advisor.' 'It started off alright,' the jobseeker recalled. 'Then came personal questions asking me to speak and describe my family. I did talk about family, gave some brief details, and the follow-up questions were, 'Are your parents working? Do you need to support your parents financially?'' The jobseeker, applying for an account manager role, said she questioned the importance of those personal questions. 'I asked the interviewer what the relevance was to the job scope. And she said, 'I need to know my team well before hiring,'' the jobseeker said. 'After asking for the relevance and expressing to her that I was uncomfortable in answering, the next question was still family-related and personal. Told her I wasn't interested in the job and left the call.' At the end of her post, she asked, 'Anyone has similar experiences with such interview questions?' 'You did the right thing! They should not be allowed to ask these types of questions…' In the discussion thread, many Singaporean Redditors criticised the interviewer's conduct, calling it unprofessional and inappropriate. One said, 'Definitely not relevant and probably discriminatory. If it's the hiring manager, I think that's a bit of a red flag. If you have options, you should report it to HR and imply that you would complain to MOM.' Another wrote, 'Lol. These kinds of questions sound like the company sussing out characteristics to discriminate against employees for.' A third added, 'You did the right thing! They should not be allowed to ask these types of questions; there is a difference between small talk and an invasion of privacy. Anyway, chit-chat is also not very professional. People are hiring for a specific job, not to find a mate. In Europe and in Canada, this type of questioning is not permitted.' Others also shared their own experiences, saying they too had been asked personal questions in interviews that had nothing to do with the job. Some recalled being questioned about their relationship status, religion, family background, or financial responsibilities. One wrote, 'Some hiring managers have no brains. Many years ago, I encountered someone who asked about my religion (admin role in the banking industry). I didn't get shortlisted, dodged a bullet.' Another recounted, 'I had mine ask if I have a BF, and if I will get married. I rejected the job offer as I was not comfortable. I had another question if I'm comfortable dressing up as a manager to meet clients for sales. I retorted rudely, 'What has it got to do with the role?' (not a customer-facing role)? and left immediately.' Interviewers should steer clear of sensitive or discriminatory questions According to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), interviewers should ask only job-related questions and avoid topics that could be seen as sensitive or discriminatory. To ensure fairness, employers are encouraged to adopt clear, objective, and relevant selection criteria when shortlisting and evaluating applicants. See also How to Scale Your E-commerce Company From Zero to $100M MOM also advises that job application forms should only collect information necessary to assess a candidate's ability to perform the job. This includes qualifications, skills, knowledge, and work experience. Employers should not request details such as age, gender, race, religion, marital status, pregnancy status, number of children, or disabilities, unless there is a valid and job-related reason to do so. If such information is genuinely required, the purpose must be clearly explained to the applicant. Read also: Wife discovers husband secretly spent S$80k on in-game purchases, plunging family into debt Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

‘Why is nursing looked down on?' Student in Singapore pushes back against tired stereotypes
‘Why is nursing looked down on?' Student in Singapore pushes back against tired stereotypes

Independent Singapore

time4 days ago

  • Independent Singapore

‘Why is nursing looked down on?' Student in Singapore pushes back against tired stereotypes

SINGAPORE: A nursing student recently took to Reddit to express her frustration over the negative perceptions people have of her chosen career. In her post titled ' Why are nurses so poorly regarded in society despite how hard they work?' , the student shared that whenever she tells someone she is studying nursing in a polytechnic, she often receives a 'judgy look.' Some even go so far as to ask whether nursing was her 'first choice.' 'Yes! It was my first choice,' she wrote in her post. 'With my O-Level score, I could have gone to JC, but I chose not to. I decided to go into nursing.' She went on to discuss the stigma surrounding the nursing profession — particularly how some people assume nursing is a backup option for students with poor grades. This perception, she said, is far from the truth. She pointed out that the cut-off point for nursing in polytechnics is actually among the highest across all courses, yet the field still suffers from a lack of respect. 'Despite all the bio, the diseases, and the hands-on clinical skills we're learning now, people have this idea like, 'Oh, nursing is for people who didn't do well and have nowhere else to go.' Like, what do you mean? All this stuff I'm learning right now is so hard,' she said. She also raised concerns about the pay gap between nurses and doctors, noting that it contributes to the belief that nurses are merely 'helpers' rather than professionals in their own right. 'People think that nurses are just the helpers for doctors because doctors get paid an insane amount of money, while nurses are paid so poorly. I do agree that nurses help doctors, but we aren't just helpers — we do so much more. Even if I could go into medicine, I wouldn't, because I love how much patient interaction nurses have,' she explained. Despite the stigma, the student expressed pride in her choice, describing her nursing journey so far as 'amazing' and deeply fulfilling. 'Nursing is so versatile. There are so many different pathways to pursue after you start working, and every day is something different. The last couple of weeks have been nothing but amazing, and as of now, I don't regret my decision,' she shared. She ended her post by inviting Singaporeans to share their thoughts on the profession. 'I know that there are also some people who are really grateful for nurses. But anyway, this was just a thought, and I would love to hear what other Singaporeans think about nurses!' 'Singaporean society values prestige and money.' Contrary to the judgments she received, many users in the comments shared that they do not look down on the profession and are, in fact, grateful for nurses. 'I don't regard nurses poorly at all,' one user said. 'Just surprised that people are willing to take up such a demanding and unappreciated profession, especially if they are local. Takes a certain strength of character, nothing but respect.' 'I respect nurses and caregivers 100%, especially during COVID,' another chimed in. 'I can't imagine seeing a patient coughing his lungs out, asking for help while professing to be anti-vax.' Others, however, shared their views on why some people might look down on the profession. A user, who claimed to be a doctor, suggested that it often comes down to pay: 'Doctor here. I would say for SG, it's mainly because of the pay, and as you know, in SG society, getting money = having dignity. If a nurse were paid similarly to a doctor, you wouldn't receive such comments. It also didn't help that the population white paper accidentally called nursing a low-skilled job (which they amended after).' Another echoed this sentiment, stating, 'Singaporean society values prestige and money. If a career doesn't lead to tangible money, it's immediately regarded as inferior. Such is, unfortunately, the sad state of things.' See also Rambo:Last Blood politics explained What's behind the stigma against nurses? Back in 2022, Dr Pamela Cipriano, the president of the International Council of Nurses (ICN), spoke out about why nursing tends to be looked down on in many parts of the world. One big reason, she said, is because of gender. Since around 90 per cent of nurses worldwide are women, nursing has historically been seen as less important or skilled. For a long time, jobs that involve caregiving, such as nursing, have been labelled as 'women's work' and therefore not taken seriously. This outdated view has led to the profession being undervalued, both in terms of public perception and in how much nurses are paid. Dr Cipriano added, 'ICN calls for health systems around the world to invest in nursing and evaluate the gendered pay models toward the nursing profession as a historically female profession. Women and other gender minorities need equal pay for equal work within nursing and the health sector.' Read also: 'Why should I pay for a car I won't use?' — Singaporean upset after parents ask him to pay for family car's COE Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

Reddit sues AI giant Anthropic over content use
Reddit sues AI giant Anthropic over content use

Straits Times

time4 days ago

  • Straits Times

Reddit sues AI giant Anthropic over content use

Reddit's lawsuit represents the latest front in the growing battle between content providers and AI companies. PHOTO: REUTERS San Francisco - Social media outlet Reddit filed a lawsuit on June 4 against artificial intelligence (AI) company Anthropic, accusing the start-up of illegally scraping millions of user comments to train its Claude chatbot without permission or compensation. The lawsuit in a California state court represents the latest front in the growing battle between content providers and AI companies over the use of data to train increasingly sophisticated language models that power the generative AI revolution. Musicians, book authors, visual artists and news publications have sued the various AI companies that used their data without permission or payment. AI companies generally defend their practices by claiming fair use, arguing that training AI on large datasets fundamentally changes the original content and is necessary for innovation. Though most of these lawsuits are still in early stages, their outcomes could have a profound effect on the shape of the AI industry. Anthropic, valued at US$61.5 billion (S$79 billion) and heavily backed by Amazon, was founded in 2021 by former executives from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT. The company, known for its Claude chatbot and AI models, positions itself as focused on AI safety and responsible development. 'This case is about the two faces of Anthropic: the public face that attempts to ingratiate itself into the consumer's consciousness with claims of righteousness and respect for boundaries and the law, and the private face that ignores any rules that interfere with its attempts to further line its pockets,' the suit said. According to the complaint, Anthropic has been training its models on Reddit content since at least December 2021, with chief executive Dario Amodei co-authoring research papers that specifically identified high-quality content for data training. The lawsuit alleges that despite Anthropic's public claims that it had blocked its bots from accessing Reddit, the company's automated systems continued to harvest Reddit's servers more than 100,000 times in subsequent months. Reddit is seeking monetary damages and a court injunction to force Anthropic to comply with its user agreement terms. The company has requested a jury trial. In an email to AFP, Anthropic said 'We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously.' Reddit has entered into licensing agreements with other AI giants including Google and OpenAI, which allow those companies to use Reddit content under terms that protect user privacy and provide compensation to the platform. Those deals have helped lift Reddit's share price since it went public in 2024. Reddit shares closed up 6.6 per cent on June 4 following news of the lawsuit. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store